Francis M Charbonnier

Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment.

The purposes of this study were two. First, we wanted to evaluate in patients a technique for automated adjustment of selected energy for defibrillation or cardioversion based on transthoracic impedance. Second, we wanted to define the relationship of peak current and shock success in various arrhythmias. Applying a previously validated method of predicting transthoracic impedance in advance of any shock, we modified defibrillators to automatically double the operator-selected energy if the predicted impedance exceeded 70 omega. Success rates of shocks given for ventricular and atrial arrhythmias from these modified energy-adjusting defibrillators were compared with success rates for shocks given from standard defibrillators. We prospectively collected data on 347 patients who received a total of 1009 shocks. Low-energy (100 J) shocks given to high-impedance (greater than or equal to 70 omega) patients had a poor success rate; in such high-impedance patients significant improvement in shock success rate was achieved by the energy-adjusting defibrillators. For example, when 100 J shocks were selected for high-impedance patients in ventricular fibrillation the energy-adjusting defibrillators achieved a shock success rate of 75%, whereas standard defibrillators achieved a shock success rate of only 36% (p less than .01). Similar improvements were seen for ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Thus, automated energy adjustment based on transthoracic impedance is a beneficial approach to defibrillation and cardioversion. For ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter there was a clear relationship between peak current and shock success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.

In defibrillation, current flow depends on the energy selected and the transthoracic impedance. If transthoracic impedance is high, current flow may be inadequate to defibrillate. We developed a method by which high transthoracic impedance is automatically compensated for by an increase in operator-selected energy when impedance is high. Transthoracic impedance was predicted in advance of the first shock by passing a low-level current between the defibrillator electrodes during the defibrillator charge cycle; a microprocessor monitored current flow and determined impedance. In 28 mongrel dogs we manipulated transthoracic impedance by placing glycerin-soaked gauze pads between the paddle electrodes and the chest. If the predicted impedance exceeded a preset value, the delivered energy was automatically increased by 40% or 100%. Using this impedance-based energy adjustment technique, we found significant improvements in current flow and success rate of shocks when energy was automatically increased to compensate for high transthoracic impedance. The use of transthoracic impedance as a basis for energy adjustment appears a promising technique to minimize the hazards of high electrical energy; it allows low-energy shocks in most patients while avoiding inappropriate low energies in patients with high impedance. Clinical trials are justified.

Defibrillator Electrode-Chest Wall Coupling Agents: Influence on Transthoracic Impedance and Shock Success

The purpose of this study was to determine if the difference in transthoracic impedance produced by different coupling agents affects the success of shocks for defibrillation. Three different coupling agents, Harco pads (Hewlett-Packard), Littman pads (3M) and Redux paste (Hewlett-Packard), were assessed in 10 anesthetized dogs in which ventricular fibrillation was induced by electrical stimulation of the right ventricle. Defibrillation was attempted 15 seconds later, using 50, 100 and 150 joules (selected energy). Actual delivered energy, current, impedance and the percent of the shocks that achieved defibrillation were determined for the three coupling agents. Redux paste gave significantly lower impedance and higher current than the two disposable performed coupling pads tested. Despite this, there were no significant differences in shock success among the three coupling agents. Thus, in this experimental model, over a three-fold energy range, disposable coupling pads were as effective as electrode paste for defibrillation despite the slightly higher impedance of the disposable pads.