Francis P. Arena

Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine

BACKGROUND In a phase 1-2 trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical activity was noted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We conducted a phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of the combination versus gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with a Karnofsky performance-status score of 70 or more (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance status) to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg per square meter) weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles). Patients received the study treatment until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall response rate. RESULTS A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (431 patients) or gemcitabine (430). The median overall survival was 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group as compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). The survival rate was 35% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group versus 22% in the gemcitabine group at 1 year, and 9% versus 4% at 2 years. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, as compared with 3.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001); the response rate according to independent review was 23% versus 7% in the two groups (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (38% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group vs. 27% in the gemcitabine group), fatigue (17% vs. 7%), and neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3% versus 1% of the patients in the two groups. In the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, neuropathy of grade 3 or higher improved to grade 1 or lower in a median of 29 days. CONCLUSIONS In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, but rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00844649.).

Everolimus for women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Disease progression in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab might be associated with activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR intracellular signalling pathway. We aimed to assess whether the addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to trastuzumab might restore sensitivity to trastuzumab. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited women with HER2-positive, trastuzumab-resistant, advanced breast carcinoma who had previously received taxane therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a central patient screening and randomisation system to daily everolimus (5 mg/day) plus weekly trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) or to placebo plus trastuzumab plus vinorelbine, in 3-week cycles, stratified by previous lapatinib use. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by local assessment in the intention-to-treat population. We report the final analysis for PFS; overall survival follow-up is still in progress. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007942. FINDINGS Between Oct 26, 2009, and May 23, 2012, 569 patients were randomly assigned to everolimus (n=284) or placebo (n=285). Median follow-up at the time of analysis was 20.2 months (IQR 15.0-27.1). Median PFS was 7.00 months (95% CI 6.74-8.18) with everolimus and 5.78 months (5.49-6.90) with placebo (hazard ratio 0.78 [95% CI 0.65-0.95]; p=0.0067). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (204 [73%] of 280 patients in the everolimus group vs 175 [62%] of 282 patients in the placebo group), leucopenia (106 [38%] vs 82 [29%]), anaemia (53 [19%] vs 17 [6%]), febrile neutropenia (44 [16%] vs ten [4%]), stomatitis (37 [13%] vs four [1%]), and fatigue (34 [12%] vs 11 [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 117 (42%) patients in the everolimus group and 55 (20%) in the placebo group; two on-treatment deaths due to adverse events occurred in each group. INTERPRETATION The addition of everolimus to trastuzumab plus vinorelbine significantly prolongs PFS in patients with trastuzumab-resistant and taxane-pretreated, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer. The clinical benefit should be considered in the context of the adverse event profile in this population.

EMERGE: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Glembatumumab Vedotin in Advanced Glycoprotein NMB–Expressing Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB), a negative prognostic marker, is overexpressed in multiple tumor types. Glembatumumab vedotin is a gpNMB-specific monoclonal antibody conjugated to the potent cytotoxin monomethyl auristatin E. This phase II study investigated the activity of glembatumumab vedotin in advanced breast cancer by gpNMB expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 124) with refractory breast cancer that expressed gpNMB in ≥ 5% of epithelial or stromal cells by central immunohistochemistry were stratified by gpNMB expression (tumor, low stromal intensity, high stromal intensity) and were randomly assigned 2:1 to glembatumumab vedotin (n = 83) or investigators choice (IC) chemotherapy (n = 41). The study was powered to detect overall objective response rate (ORR) in the glembatumumab vedotin arm between 10% (null) and 22.5% (alternative hypothesis) with preplanned investigation of activity by gpNMB distribution and/or intensity (Stratum 1 to Stratum 3). RESULTS Glembatumumab vedotin was well tolerated as compared with IC chemotherapy (less hematologic toxicity; more rash, pruritus, neuropathy, and alopecia). ORR was 6% (five of 83) for glembatumumab vedotin versus 7% (three of 41) for IC, without significant intertreatment differences for predefined strata. Secondary end point revealed ORR of 12% (10 of 83) versus 12% (five of 41) overall, and 30% (seven of 23) versus 9% (one of 11) for gpNMB overexpression (≥ 25% of tumor cells). Unplanned analysis showed ORR of 18% (five of 28) versus 0% (0 of 11) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 40% (four of 10) versus 0% (zero of six) in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. CONCLUSION Glembatumumab vedotin is well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Although the primary end point in advanced gpNMB-expressing breast cancer was not met for all enrolled patients (median tumor gpNMB expression, 5%), activity may be enhanced in patients with gpNMB-overexpressing tumors and/or TNBC. A pivotal phase II trial (METRIC [Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer]) is underway.

Effect of visceral metastases on the efficacy and safety of everolimus in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analysis from the BOLERO-2 study

BACKGROUND Everolimus (EVE; an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR]) enhances treatment options for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2(-)) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who progress on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This is especially true for patients with visceral disease, which is associated with poor prognosis. The BOLERO-2 (Breast cancer trial of OraLEveROlimus-2) trial showed that combination treatment with EVE and exemestane (EXE) versus placebo (PBO)+EXE prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) by both investigator (7.8 versus 3.2 months, respectively) and independent (11.0 versus 4.1 months, respectively) central assessment in postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) ABC recurring/progressing during/after NSAI therapy. The BOLERO-2 trial included a substantial proportion of patients with visceral metastases (56%). METHODS Prespecified exploratory subgroup analysis conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVE+EXE versus PBO+EXE in a prospectively defined subgroup of patients with visceral metastases. FINDINGS At a median follow-up of 18 months, EVE+EXE significantly prolonged median PFS compared with PBO+EXE both in patients with visceral metastases (N=406; 6.8 versus 2.8 months) and in those without visceral metastases (N=318; 9.9 versus 4.2 months). Improvements in PFS with EVE+EXE versus PBO+EXE were also observed in patients with visceral metastases regardless of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). Patients with visceral metastases and ECOG PS 0 had a median PFS of 6.8 months with EVE+EXE versus 2.8 months with PBO+EXE. Among patients with visceral metastases and ECOG PS ≥1, EVE+EXE treatment more than tripled median PFS compared with PBO+EXE (6.8 versus 1.5 months). INTERPRETATION Adding EVE to EXE markedly extended PFS by ≥4 months among patients with HR(+) HER2(-) ABC regardless of the presence of visceral metastases.

Everolimus for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: Updated results of the BOLERO-2 phase III trial.

99 Background: Current treatment options for postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) who relapse or progress on a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) are limited. The BOLERO-2 trial supports the activity of everolimus (EVE; an oral mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitor) added to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane (EXE) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient population. Long-term PFS and survival data are awaited. METHODS BOLERO-2 is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, international trial comparing EVE (10 mg once daily) + EXE (25 mg once daily) vs. placebo (PBO) + EXE in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen-receptor-positive BC progressing or recurring after NSAIs (letrozole or anastrozole). Patients were randomized (2:1) to EVE + EXE or PBO + EXE. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator assessment. Main secondary endpoints included centrally assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, bone turnover, and overall response rate. RESULTS Baseline disease characteristics including tumor burden and prior cancer therapy were well balanced between treatment arms (N = 724). Median PFS was doubled and response rates were consistently improved with EVE + EXE (n = 485) vs PBO + EXE (n = 239) in interim analyses. Median PFS by local assessment was ~3 mo with PBO + EXE vs 6.9 mo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P < .0001) and 7.4 mo (HR, 0.44; P < .0001) with EVE + EXE at 7.5 mo and 12.5 mo follow-up, respectively. Fewer deaths were reported with EVE + EXE (17.2%) vs PBO + EXE (22.7%) at 12.5 mo follow-up. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports for mTOR inhibitors. PFS data including 528 events (protocol-specified final analysis), and updated OS and safety data will be presented. CONCLUSIONS Adding EVE to EXE markedly prolonged PFS in patients with NSAI-refractory advanced estrogen-receptor-positive BC. There were fewer deaths among patients receiving EVE, and further follow-up will evaluate the effect of EVE on OS.

CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks as a predictor of overall survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Any CA19-9 decline at week 8 and radiologic response by week 8 each predicted longer OS in both treatment arms. In the nab-P + Gem arm, the higher proportion of patients with week 8 CA19-9 decrease [82% (206/252); median OS 13.2 months] than a RECIST-defined response [16% (40/252); median OS 13.7 months] suggests that CA19-9 decline is a predictor of OS applicable to a larger population.

Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase III trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

In a phase III pancreatic cancer study, tumor response by positron emission tomography (PET) (exploratory end point) predicted treatment efficacy, including longer overall survival. nab-Paclitaxel/gemcitabine had a significantly higher rate of metabolic response versus gemcitabine. Overall, 5× more patients had a metabolic response by PET compared with RECIST. PET may be a more sensitive measure of response than radiographic modalities.

Abstract P4-13-12: Everolimus plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine for trastuzumab-resistant, taxane-pretreated, HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-3

Background PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation due to PTEN loss may lead to trastuzumab (TRAS) resistance. mTOR inhibition has been shown to restore TRAS sensitivity in PTEN-deficient tumors. This provided the rationale for the BOLERO-3 trial which evaluated the combination of everolimus (EVE), an mTOR inhibitor, plus TRAS and a taxane in HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). The addition of EVE to TRAS plus vinorelbine (VNB) led to a statistically significant prolongation of 1.2 months in median progression free survival (PFS) vs TRAS plus VNB in patients with TRAS-resistant and taxane-pretreated, HER2+ ABC (7.0 months vs 5.78 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; p=0.0067). The final overall survival (OS) analysis from this study is presented here. Materials and methods BOLERO-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Women with HER2+ ABC progressing on prior TRAS and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to receive either daily EVE (5 mg) or PBO plus weekly TRAS (2 mg/kg) and VNB (25 mg/m 2 ), in 3-week cycles, stratified by previous lapatinib use. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator assessment. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. Results Overall, 569 patients were enrolled; 284 patients received EVE and 285 patients received PBO. As of April 1, 2015, after a median follow-up of 44.7 months, 388 deaths had occurred, 191 (67.3%) in the EVE arm and 197 (69.1%) in the PBO arm. The median OS in the EVE arm vs PBO arm was 23.5 months vs 24.1 months (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17; p = 0.3392). In the HR+ subgroup, the median OS with EVE was 23.5 months (vs 25.5 months with PBO; HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.35); in the HR subgroup, the median OS with EVE was 22.9 months (vs 23.1 months with PBO; HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.17). AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 81 (28.9%) vs 46 (16.3%) patients in the EVE vs PBO arms. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 122 (43.6%) vs 58 (20.6%) patients in the EVE vs PBO arms. Overall, 14 on-treatment deaths were observed, 7 (2.5%) in the EVE arm and 7 (2.5%) in the PBO arm; on-treatment deaths due to AEs were balanced between treatment arms (0.7% in each treatment arm). Types of post-progression therapies were balanced across both treatment arms. Conclusions In BOLERO-3, EVE showed a statistically significant prolongation of PFS. OS was similar in both treatment arms. The safety profile of EVE was comparable to that observed previously with EVE in breast cancer. (Funded by Novartis; BOLERO-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01007942.) Citation Format: Isaacs C, O9Regan R, Xu B, Masuda N, Arena F, Yap Y-S, Papai Z, Lang I, Armstrong A, Lerzo G, White M, Shen K, Zhang Y, Jappe A, Pacaud LB, Taran T, Ozguroglu M. Everolimus plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine for trastuzumab-resistant, taxane-pretreated, HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-3. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-12.

A randomized, open-label, safety and exploratory efficacy study of Kanglaite Injection (KLTi) plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Background: This study was designed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of KLTi plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: In a randomized, open-label study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized 2:1 to receive KLTi plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Three sequential cohorts were tested at 30 g/day, 50 g/day, and 30 g/day. Gemcitabine was administered at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. KLTi was administered on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19 of each 28 day cycle. Patients received study treatment until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the ITT population. Safety evaluation was based on patients who received any study treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00733850. Results: Eighty-five patients were randomized including 41 (28:13) in Cohort 1, 18 (12:6) in Cohort 2, and 26 (17:9) in Cohort 3. Due to a different dose and/or shift in patient populations in Cohort 2 and 3, efficacy data for the 30 gm dose are presented in this manuscript for Cohort 1 alone, and for the combination of Cohort 1+3. The 30 gm KLTi + gemcitabine group had a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent radiology review in the ITT population, with a median of 112 days, versus 58 days in the gemcitabine group (HR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.92), p = 0.0240. The incidence rates of TEAEs, CTCAE Grade 3 or higher TEAEs, and SAEs were similar between the two arms. There were no deaths related to KLTi + gemcitabine treatment. Conclusion: Kanglaite Injection (30 g/day) plus a standard regimen of gemcitabine demonstrated encouraging clinical evidence of anti-neoplastic activity and a well-tolerated safety profile.

Interactions Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease Drugs and Chemotherapy

Opinion statementAs new and effective novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) become available, patients are living longer with advancing age and are at increased risk for malignancy. The management of IBD and malignancy involves multiple combinations of chemotherapy agents and IBD drugs, with the potential for interactions between these therapies. Interactions may either potentiate the effectiveness of drug class or exacerbate their common side effects. In this review article, we present a guide on studied interactions between IBD therapies and chemotherapy agents, specifically those of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and melanoma. The pharmacology and pharmocokinetics of each IBD drug will be discussed. Then, the IBD drug and chemotherapy interactions are summarized in table format. This guide will provide a quick reference to guide clinicians with this challenging management of two disease processes.