Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Francis X. Johnson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Francis X. Johnson.


Energy for Sustainable Development | 2006

Bio-energy trade and regional development : the case of bio-ethanol in southern Africa

Francis X. Johnson; Emmanuel Matsika

This paper analyses the prospects for international bio-energy trade within the context of regional integration and sustainable development in the region of southern Africa, focusing on the particular case of bio-ethanol made from sugar cane and sweet sorghum. A number of options are considered for expanded production of and trade in bio-ethanol as a transport fuel for blending with petrol. The implications for alternative development paths and regional cooperation strategies are discussed and compared. Transportation costs appear to be small compared to production costs, although the higher cost of shipment by land implies a need for regional coordination strategies. The availability of suitable feedstocks in the region would have to increase significantly in order to achieve economies of scale. There appear to be valuable opportunities for creating new export markets, although international cooperation will be needed for reducing import tariffs and addressing non-tariff trade barriers as well as promoting technology transfer and capacity-building.


Gcb Bioenergy | 2017

Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action

Keith L. Kline; Siwa Msangi; Virginia H. Dale; Jeremy Woods; Glaucia Mendes Souza; Patricia Osseweijer; Joy S. Clancy; Jorge Hilbert; Francis X. Johnson; Pc McDonnell; Harriet K. Mugera

Understanding the complex interactions among food security, bioenergy sustainability, and resource management requires a focus on specific contextual problems and opportunities. The United Nations’ 2030 Sustainable Development Goals place a high priority on food and energy security; bioenergy plays an important role in achieving both goals. Effective food security programs begin by clearly defining the problem and asking, ‘What can be done to assist people at high risk?’ Simplistic global analyses, headlines, and cartoons that blame biofuels for food insecurity may reflect good intentions but mislead the public and policymakers because they obscure the main drivers of local food insecurity and ignore opportunities for bioenergy to contribute to solutions. Applying sustainability guidelines to bioenergy will help achieve near‐ and long‐term goals to eradicate hunger. Priorities for achieving successful synergies between bioenergy and food security include the following: (1) clarifying communications with clear and consistent terms, (2) recognizing that food and bioenergy need not compete for land and, instead, should be integrated to improve resource management, (3) investing in technology, rural extension, and innovations to build capacity and infrastructure, (4) promoting stable prices that incentivize local production, (5) adopting flex crops that can provide food along with other products and services to society, and (6) engaging stakeholders to identify and assess specific opportunities for biofuels to improve food security. Systematic monitoring and analysis to support adaptive management and continual improvement are essential elements to build synergies and help society equitably meet growing demands for both food and energy.


Archive | 2012

Small-Scale Production of Jatropha in Zambia and its Implications for Rural Development and National Biofuel Policies

Thomson Sinkala; Francis X. Johnson

Concerns about energy security and the need to promote rural development have been key factors in the promotion of biofuels in many developing countries in Africa. At the same time, the low cost of labour and plentiful land in some regions of Africa has motivated many foreign investors to set up biofuels schemes that are aimed at export markets. Small-scale production of biofuels in a Least Developed Country (LDC) such as Zambia offers a potentially more viable alternative, or in some cases a complement, to large-scale schemes. The lower capital investment required and the fact that households and communities can use by-products allows for value-added at the local level. The case of jatropha exhibits a number of benefits if there is a willingness to experiment with various production schemes and develop different products. In this chapter small-scale jatropha production in Zambia is assessed using a case study at Thomro farms. The relation of small-scale schemes to national priorities and policies is reviewed and the future role of jatropha at local and national levels is discussed.


Archive | 2012

Keynote Introduction: Traditional and Improved Use of Biomass for Energy in Africa

Edward Smeets; Francis X. Johnson; Grant Ballard-Tremeer

Traditional biomass energy systems are widely used in Africa, mainly because of the low cost and lack of available alternatives in rural areas. Projections indicate that the (relative) contribution of traditional bioenergy will decrease, but that the total use of traditional biomass energy systems will increase during the coming decades. The efficiencies of wood-fuel (firewood and charcoal) energy systems are usually low and the use of these systems has serious negative consequences, such as indoor air pollution and related health effects, deforestation and the labour intensive and sometimes dangerous process of firewood collection. Improvements in stoves, charcoal production efficiency and switching fuels can increase the efficiency by several tens of percent points and thereby reduce the demand for labour for the collection of firewood and the costs. Other advantages of improved traditional bioenergy systems are reduced greenhouse gas emissions, reduced indoor air pollution and reduced deforestation. Various initiatives have been successful in implementing the use of improved household stoves, although the results suggest that the success of improved traditional biomass systems depends on the local conditions and socio-economic impacts of these systems.


Archive | 2012

Economics of Modern and Traditional Bioenergy in African Households: Consumer Choices for Cook Stoves

Francis X. Johnson; Takeshi Takama

The overwhelming majority of African households use traditional biomass in the form of wood-fuel or charcoal to meet their daily cooking needs. Modern options such as LPG or ethanol can provide considerable benefits for health and environment. The case of ethanol is interesting as a renewable source with lower GHG emissions and also having the potential to be a locally produced resource. The purchase cost of such stoves is considerably higher whilst the fuel costs will generally be lower. Previous research on household adoption of new cook stoves has tended to focus on demographic or socio-economic factors such as education and income in trying to explain consumer choice. Such variables change only slowly and thus generally cannot support rapid introduction of improved stoves. A discrete choice model was developed aimed at focusing more on the characteristics of the cook stoves themselves and the way in which they are used, which are referred to as “product-specific” attributes. The methodology is outlined here followed by a brief summary of the model applications in three countries: Ethiopia, Mozambique and Tanzania. This approach could improve the understanding of the underlying economic issues and thereby contribute to better design of cook stove programmes and help stimulate a market transformation towards cleaner and more efficient cook stoves.


Scientific Data | 2018

Survey of local impacts of biofuel crop production and adoption of ethanol stoves in southern Africa

Alexandros Gasparatos; Graham von Maltitz; Francis X. Johnson; Carla Romeu-Dalmau; Charles Jumbe; Caroline Ochieng; Shakespear Mudombi; Boubacar Siddighi Balde; Davies Luhanga; Paulo Lopes; Anne Nyambane; Marcin Pawel Jarzebski; Katherine J. Willis

The two datasets outlined in this paper contain information related to (a) the local impacts of biofuel feedstock production, and (b) the factors that influence the adoption and/or sustained use of ethanol stoves in southern Africa. The first dataset was generated through extensive household surveys around four operational jatropha and sugarcane production sites in Malawi, Mozambique, and Swaziland. This project aimed to examine the local impacts of the most prominent modes of existing or intended biofuel feedstock production in southern Africa. The resulting dataset contains information about impacts on rural livelihoods, ecosystem services, food security and poverty alleviation. The second dataset is the outcome of research into factors that influence the adoption and sustained use of ethanol stoves. This dataset was collected through a household survey in Maputo city where the only large-scale ethanol stove dissemination programme in Africa has been implemented.


Archive | 2010

Food versus fuel : an informed introduction to biofuels

Frank Rosillo-Calle; Francis X. Johnson


Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews | 2015

Biofuels in Sub-Sahara Africa: drivers, impacts and priority policy areas.

A. Gasparatos; G.P. von Maltitz; Francis X. Johnson; Lisa Lee; Manu V. Mathai; J.A. Puppim de Oliveira; Katherine J. Willis


Environmental innovation and societal transitions | 2014

Pioneer countries in the transition to alternative transport fuels: Comparison of ethanol programmes and policies in Brazil, Malawi and Sweden

Francis X. Johnson; Semida Silveira


Challenges in Sustainability | 2013

Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting

Carrie M. Lee; Chelsea Chandler; Michael Lazarus; Francis X. Johnson

Collaboration


Dive into the Francis X. Johnson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Takeshi Takama

Stockholm Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy Woods

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Semida Silveira

Royal Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith L. Kline

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham von Maltitz

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shakespear Mudombi

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Nyambane

Stockholm Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caroline Ochieng

Stockholm Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge