Francis Y. Yao

Excellent Outcome Following Down-Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation: An Intention-to-Treat Analysis

We previously reported encouraging results of down‐staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to meet conventional T2 criteria (one lesion 2–5 cm or two to three lesions <3 cm) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in 30 patients as a test of concept. In this ongoing prospective study, we analyzed longer‐term outcome data on HCC down‐staging in a larger cohort of 61 patients with tumor stage exceeding T2 criteria who were enrolled between June 2002 and January 2007. Eligibility criteria for down‐staging included: (1) one lesion >5 cm and up to 8 cm; (2) two to three lesions with at least one lesion >3 cm and not exceeding 5 cm, with total tumor diameter up to 8 cm; or (3) four to five lesions with none >3 cm, with total tumor diameter up to 8 cm. A minimum observation period of 3 months after down‐staging was required before OLT. Tumor down‐staging was successful in 43 patients (70.5%). Thirty‐five patients (57.4%) had received OLT, including two who had undergone live‐donor liver transplantation. Treatment failure was observed in 18 patients (29.5%), primarily due to tumor progression. In the explant of 35 patients who underwent OLT, 13 had complete tumor necrosis, 17 met T2 criteria, and five exceeded T2 criteria. The Kaplan‐Meier intention‐to‐treat survival at 1 and 4 years after down‐staging were 87.5% and 69.3%, respectively. The 1‐year and 4‐year posttransplantation survival rates were 96.2% and 92.1%, respectively. No patient had HCC recurrence after a median posttransplantation follow‐up of 25 months. The only factor predicting treatment failure was pretreatment alpha‐fetoprotein >1,000 ng/mL. Conclusion: Successful down‐staging of HCC can be achieved in the majority of carefully selected patients and is associated with excellent posttransplantation outcome. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.)

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Validation of the UCSF‐Expanded Criteria Based on Preoperative Imaging

We previously suggested that in patients with heptocellular carcinoma (HCC), the conventional Milan criteria (T1/T2) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) could be modestly expanded based on pathology (UCSF criteria). The present study was undertaken to prospectively validate the UCSF criteria based on pretransplant imaging. Over a 5‐year period, the UCSF criteria were used as selection guidelines for OLT in 168 patients, including 38 patients exceeding Milan but meeting UCSF criteria (T3A). The 1‐ and 5‐year recurrence‐free probabilities were 95.9% and 90.9%, and the respective survivals without recurrence were 92.1% and 80.7%. Patients with preoperative T1/T2 HCC had 1‐ and 5‐year recurrence‐free probabilities of 95.7% and 90.1%, respectively, versus 96.9% and 93.6%, respectively, for preoperative T3A stage (p = 0.58). Under‐staging was observed in 20% of T2 and 29% of T3A HCC (p = 0.26). When explant tumor exceeded UCSF criteria (15%), the 1‐ and 5‐year recurrence‐free probabilities were 80.4% and 59.5%, versus 98.6% and 96.7%, respectively, for those within UCSF criteria (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, our results validated the ability of the UCSF criteria to discriminate prognosis after OLT and to serve as selection criteria for OLT, with a similar risk of tumor recurrence and under‐staging when compared to the Milan criteria.

Report of a national conference on liver allocation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

A national conference was held to better characterize the long‐term outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to assess whether it is justified to continue the policy of assigning increased priority for candidates with early‐stage HCC on the transplant waiting list in the United States. The objectives of the conference were to address specific HCC issues as they relate to liver allocation, develop a standardized pathology report form for the assessment of the explanted liver, develop more specific imaging criteria for HCC designed to qualify LT candidates for automatic Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points without the need for biopsy, and develop a standardized pretransplant imaging report form for the assessment of patients with liver lesions. At the completion of the meeting, there was agreement that the allocation policy should result in similar risks of removal from the waiting list and similar transplant rates for HCC and non‐HCC candidates. In addition, the allocation policy should select HCC candidates so that there are similar posttransplant outcomes for HCC and non‐HCC recipients. There was a general consensus for the development of a calculated continuous HCC priority score for ranking HCC candidates on the list that would incorporate the calculated MELD score, alpha‐fetoprotein, tumor size, and rate of tumor growth. Only candidates with at least stage T2 tumors would receive additional HCC priority points. Liver Transpl 16:262–278, 2010.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus Recommendations of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting

Hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver in adults and the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide. The incidence of HCC in the United States is rising steadily because of the prevalence of hepatitis C viral infection and other causes of hepatic cirrhosis. The majority of patients have underlying hepatic dysfunction, which complicates patient management and the search for safe and effective therapies. The Clinical Trials Planning Meeting (CTPM) in HCC was convened by the National Cancer Institutes Gastrointestinal Cancer Steering Committee to identify the key knowledge gaps in HCC and define clinical research priorities. The CTPM structured its review according to current evidence-based treatment modalities in HCC and prioritized the recommendations on the basis of the patient populations representing the greatest unmet medical need.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundOrthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the best available option for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although its application is limited by stringent selection criteria, costs, and deceased donor graft shortage, particularly in Asia, where living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has been developed.MethodsThis article reviews the present standards for patient selection represented by size-and-number criteria with particular references to Milan Criteria and novel prediction models based on results achieved in patients exceeding those limits, with consideration of the expanded indication represented by the UCSF Criteria.ResultsThe expected outcomes after deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) or LDLT are favorable if predetermined selection criteria are applied. However, selection bias, difference in waiting time, and ischemia-regeneration injuries of the graft among DDLT vs LDLT may influence long-term results. In the article, the differences between East and West in first-line treatments for HCC (resection vs transplantation), indications, and ethics for the donor, are summarized as well as possible novel predictors of tumor biology (especially DNA mutation and fractional allelic loss, FAI) to be considered for better outcome prediction.ConclusionsLiver transplantation remains the most promising product of modern surgery and represents a cornerstone in the management of patients with HCC.

A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding conventional (T2) criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the feasibility and outcome following loco‐regional therapy intended for tumor downstaging to meet T2 criteria for OLT are unknown. In this first prospective study on downstaging of HCC prior to OLT, the eligibility criteria for enrollment into a downstaging protocol included 1 lesion >5 cm and ≤8 cm, 2 or 3 lesions at least 1 >3 cm but ≤5 cm with total tumor diameter of ≤8 cm, or 4 or 5 nodules all ≤3 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm. Patients were eligible for living‐donor liver transplantation (LDLT) if tumors were downstaged to within proposed University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria. 13 A minimum follow‐up period of 3 months after downstaging was required before cadaveric OLT or LDLT, with imaging studies meeting criteria for successful downstaging. Among the 30 patients enrolled, 21 (70%) met criteria for successful downstaging, including 16 (53%) who had subsequently received OLT (2 with LDLT), and 9 patients (30%) were classified as treatment failures. In the explant of 16 patients who underwent OLT, 7 had complete tumor necrosis, 7 met T2 criteria, but 2 exceeded T2 criteria. No HCC recurrence was observed after a median follow‐up of 16 months after OLT. The Kaplan‐Meier intention‐to‐treat survival was 89.3 and 81.8% at 1 and 2 yr, respectively. In conclusion, successful tumor downstaging can be achieved in the majority of carefully selected patients, but longer follow‐up is needed to further access the risk of HCC recurrence after OLT. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:1505–1514.)

Lamivudine treatment in patients with severely decompensated cirrhosis due to replicating hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS Lamivudine is highly effective in suppressing hepatitis B viral replication and hepatic necroinflammatory activity. The potential for recovery of hepatic decompensation in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection treated with lamivudine has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lamivudine treatment in severely decompensated cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B. METHODS Thirteen consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B infection, Childs-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) score of > or =10 (median score=11) and detectable circulating hepatitis B DNA (range 15 to 9634 pg/ml) were included and treated with lamivudine 150 mg once daily. Hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) was positive in 9 of 13 patients pre-treatment. RESULTS Two patients underwent liver transplantation at 4 and 6 weeks after starting lamivudine treatment. The remaining 11 patients were followed for a mean of 17.5 months without liver transplantation (range 3 to 39 months). Significant improvement of liver function, defined as a decrease in CPT score of > or =3, was observed in 9 of 13 patients (69%). In five patients, CPT score improved to <7 and they were placed on the inactive status (UNOS status 7) for liver transplantation. Hepatitis B DNA remained negative in all except one patient who developed breakthrough viral replication 12 months after starting lamivudine treatment, while maintaining stable liver function. Three of seven HBeAg-positive patients who did not undergo liver transplantation lost HBeAg during follow-up, but none had sustained seroconversion to hepatitis B e antibody. CONCLUSION Lamivudine appears highly effective in reversing severe hepatic decompensation due to replicating hepatitis B infection.

The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

No prior studies have shown that pre‐operative loco‐regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves survival following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We performed subgroup analyses according to pathologic HCC stage among 168 patients who underwent OLT to test the hypothesis that pre‐operative loco‐regional therapy confers a survival advantage in a subgroup at intermediate risk for HCC recurrence. Patients with pathologic T3 HCC meeting the proposed UCSF expanded criteria (single lesion not exceeding 6.5 cm or two to three lesions none > 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter within 8 cm) had a similar 5‐year recurrence‐free survival as patients with pathologic T2 HCC (88.5% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.56). In the subgroup with pathologic T2 or T3 HCC, the 5‐year recurrence‐free survival was 93.8% for the 85 patients who received pre‐operative loco‐regional therapy, versus 80.6% for the other 41 patients without treatment (p = 0.049). The treatment benefit, according to 5‐year recurrence‐free survival, appeared greater for pathologic T3 (85.9% vs. 51.4%; p = 0.05) than T2 HCC (96.4% versus 87.1%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, although the lack of a randomized controlled design precludes drawing firm conclusions, our results suggest that pre‐operative loco‐regional therapy may confer a survival benefit after OLT in the subgroup with pathologic T2 and T3 HCC.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Beyond the Milan Criteria

Liver transplantation represents a cornerstone in the management of early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Expansion beyond the Milan criteria for liver transplantation (1 lesion ≤ 5 cm, or 2 to 3 lesions each ≤ 3 cm) remains controversial. This review covers several key areas: (1) Recent developments and published data on expanded criteria for deceased donor and live‐donor liver transplantation, with emphasis on criteria that have been applied to preoperative imaging. (2) Independent testing of expanded criteria, where published data are largely limited to the proposed University of California, San Francisco criteria (1 lesion ≤ 6.5 cm, 2–3 lesions each ≤ 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm). (3) Response to loco‐regional therapy and tumor downstaging. (4) The fundamental questions and answers in resolving the controversy over expanded criteria. The key issue pertains to whether acceptable outcome can be achieved on a broader scale beyond single center experience, which appears to support modest expansion beyond the Milan criteria. The foundation of the debate over expanded criteria may rest upon what the transplant community would consider to be the acceptable threshold for patient survival using expanded criteria, without causing significant harm to other transplant candidates without HCC.

Downstaging of hepatocellular cancer before liver transplant: long-term outcome compared to tumors within Milan criteria.

We report on the long‐term intention‐to‐treat (ITT) outcome of 118 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing downstaging to within Milan/United Network for Organ Sharing T2 criteria before liver transplantation (LT) since 2002 and compare the results with 488 patients listed for LT with HCC meeting T2 criteria at listing in the same period. The downstaging subgroups include 1 lesion >5 and ≤8 cm (n = 43), 2 or 3 lesions at least one >3 and ≤5 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm (n = 61), or 4‐5 lesions each ≤3 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm (n = 14). In the downstaging group, 64 patients (54.2%) had received LT and 5 (7.5%) developed HCC recurrence. Two of the five patients with HCC recurrence had 4‐5 tumors at presentation. The 1‐ and 2‐year cumulative probabilities for dropout (competing risk) were 24.1% and 34.2% in the downstaging group versus 20.3% and 25.6% in the T2 group (P = 0.04). Kaplan‐Meiers 5‐year post‐transplant survival and recurrence‐free probabilities were 77.8% and 90.8%, respectively, in the downstaging group versus 81% and 88%, respectively, in the T2 group (P = 0.69 and P = 0.66, respectively). The 5‐year ITT survival was 56.1% in the downstaging group versus 63.3% in the T2 group (P = 0.29). Factors predicting dropout in the downstaging group included pretreatment alpha‐fetoprotein ≥1,000 ng/mL (multivariate hazard ratio [HR]: 2.42; P = 0.02) and Childs B versus Childs A cirrhosis (multivariate HR: 2.19; P = 0.04). Conclusion: Successful downstaging of HCC to within T2 criteria was associated with a low rate of HCC recurrence and excellent post‐transplant survival, comparable to those meeting T2 criteria without downstaging. Owing to the small number of patients with 4‐5 tumors, further investigations are needed to confirm the efficacy of downstaging in this subgroup. (Hepatology 2015;61:1968–1977)