Franco Ciulli

Coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND Preoperative renal insufficiency is a predictor of acute renal failure in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump coronary artery bypass operations have been shown to reduce renal dysfunction in patients with normal renal function, but the effect of this technique in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency is unknown. METHODS From June 1996 to December 1999, data of 3,250 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively entered into the Patient Analysis & Tracking Systems (PATS, Dendrite Clinical Systems, London, UK). Two hundred and fifty-three patients with preoperative serum creatinine more than 150 micromol/L were identified (202 patients on-pump, 51 patients off-pump), and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Serum creatinine and urea, in-hospital mortality, and morbidity were compared between groups. The association of perioperative factors with acute renal failure was investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Preoperative characteristics were similar between the groups. Mean number of grafts was 2.9 +/- 0.8 and 2.3 +/- 0.8 in the on-pump and off-pump groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparison between groups showed a significantly higher incidence of stroke, inotropic requirement, blood loss, and transfusion of red packed cell and platelets in the on-pump group (all p < 0.05). Postoperative serum creatinine and urea were higher in the on-pump group with a significant difference at 12 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified cardiopulmonary bypass, serum creatinine level 60 hours postoperatively, inotropic requirement, need for intraaortic balloon pump, transfusion of red packed cell, and hours of ventilation as predictors of postoperative acute renal failure. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that off-pump coronary artery bypass operations reduce in-hospital morbidity and the likelihood of acute renal failure in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome

OBJECTIVES To determine whether patients with critical left main stem (LMS) coronary artery disease can undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery safely and successfully. METHODS From May 1996 to March 2000 data for patients with critical (> or =50%) LMS stenosis who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCAB) or without (OPCAB) were collected prospectively using the Patient Analysis & Tracking System. A reusable pressure stabilizer, intra-coronary shunts and a single posterior pericardial stitch exposure technique were used in all OPCAB cases. Non-randomized, retrospective data analysis included demographic and preoperative risk factors, operative details, clinical outcome and early follow-up. RESULTS During the study period 387 patients with LMS stenosis underwent surgery (OPCAB n=75, CCAB n=312). Groups were similar in terms of preoperative and intraoperative variables although CCAB patients received significantly more grafts per patient (3.1+/-0.73 vs. 2.6+/-0.76, P< or =0.001). Mortality was similar in both groups (OPCAB 1.3% vs. CCAB 2.6%). OPCAB patients when compared to CCAB patients had a lower requirement for postoperative inotropes (12.0% vs. 38.1%, P=0.0001), temporary postoperative pacing (2.7% vs. 10.1%, P=0.02), and blood product transfusion (6.7% vs. 31.4%, P<0.0001), a lower incidence of postoperative chest infection (0% vs. 6.7%, P=0.02) and a slightly reduced postoperative length of stay (7.9+/-5.46 vs. 8.3+/-5.11 days, P=0.01). At 24 months follow-up, CCAB and OPCAB actuarial survival was 94.1+/-1.7% and 97.7+/-2.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS OPCAB surgery is safe and effective in patients with critical LMS disease.

Predictors of survival in octogenarians after mitral valve surgery for degenerative disease: The Mitral Surgery in Octogenarians study

Objectives: An increasing number of octogenarians are referred to undergo mitral valve surgery for degenerative disease, and percutaneous approaches are being increasingly used in this subgroup of patients. We sought to determine the survival and its predictors after Mitral Valve Surgery in Octogenarians (MiSO) in a multicenter UK study of high‐volume specialized centers. Methods: Pooled data from 3 centers were collected retrospectively. To identify the predictors of short‐term composite outcome of 30 days mortality, acute kidney injury, and cerebrovascular accident, a multivariable logistic regression model was developed. Multiple Cox regression analysis was performed for late mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for long‐term survival in various subsets of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was done to determine the predictive power of the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. Results: A total of 247 patients were included in the study. The median follow‐up was 2.9 years (minimum 0, maximum 14 years). A total of 150 patients (60.7%) underwent mitral valve repair, and 97 patients (39.3%) underwent mitral valve replacement. Apart from redo cardiac surgery (mitral valve repair 6 [4%] vs mitral valve replacement 11 [11.3%], P = .04) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (mitral valve repair 79 [52.6%] vs mitral valve replacement 34 [35.1%], P < .01), there was no significant difference in terms of any other preoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. Patient operative risk, as estimated by logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, was lower in the mitral valve repair group (10.2 ± 11.8 vs 13.7 ± 15.2 in mitral valve replacement; P = .07). No difference was found between groups for duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp times. The 30‐day mortality for the whole cohort was 13.8% (mitral valve repair 4.7% vs mitral valve replacement 18.6%; P < .01). No differences were found in terms of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (2% vs 3.1%; P = .9), acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (6.7% vs 13.4%; P = .12), and superficial or deep sternal wound infection (10% vs 16.5%, P = .17; 2% vs 3.1%, P = .67, respectively). The final multiple regression model for short‐term composite outcome included previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio [OR], 4.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37‐17.46; P = .02), intra‐aortic balloon pump use (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.67‐15.79; P < .01), and mitral valve replacement (OR, 7.7; 95% CI, 4.04‐14.9; P < .01). Overall survival for the entire cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years was 82.4%, 63.7%, and 45.5% (mitral valve repair vs mitral valve replacement: 89.9% vs 70.7% at 1 year, 69.6% vs 54% at 5 years, and 51.8% vs 35.5% at 10 years; P = .0005). Cox proportional hazard model results showed mitral valve replacement (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22‐2.89; P < .01) and intra‐aortic balloon pump use (hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.26‐5.13; P < .01) to be independent predictor factors affecting long‐term survival. Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation did not perform well in predicting early mortality (area under the curve, 0.57%). Conclusions: In octogenarians, mitral valve repair for degenerative disease is associated with good survival and remains the gold standard, whereas mitral valve replacement is still associated with significant mortality. Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was unable to predict early mortality in our cohort of patients. Larger international multicenter registries are required to optimize the decision‐making process in such a high‐risk subgroup.

Fibroelastomas of the left ventricular outflow tract

Primary cardiac tumours are uncommon and most of them are benign myxomas. Only one-tenth of the tumours are fibroelastomas of the cardiac valves. We report two cases with a longstanding history of valvular heart disease where a diagnosis of fibroelastoma of the left ventricular outflow tract was confirmed by histology.

Evolution of OPCAB Surgery in a Single Institution

Abstract Off‐pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting is becoming popular worldwide. The development of exposure and stabilization techniques have made this surgery a simple, safe, and routine procedure. The evolution of OPCAB surgery at our institution is presented and discussed.(J Card Surg 2002;17:514‐519)

Propensity-matched analysis of outcomes after mitral valve surgery between trainees and consultants (institutional report)

OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine whether early outcomes and long-term survival after mitral valve surgery performed by trainee residents are equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy when compared with consultant surgeons. METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2015, a total of 1742 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery were identified. Of these, 1622 operations were performed by consultants (Group I) and 120 operations were performed by trainees (Group II). A propensity score-matched analysis has been used to minimize selection bias. Early postoperative outcomes were defined as in-hospital mortality, cerebrovascular accident, postoperative requirement of renal replacement therapy, reoperation for bleeding and postoperative length of hospital stay. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using late survival data after discharge. RESULTS Before matching, the 2 groups differed significantly in terms of gender and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but these differences were solved after matching. Also, Group I included significantly more patients with mitral regurgitation (83% vs 62%; P < 0.01), but after matching, this difference was corrected (62% vs 59%; P = 0.71). Consultant group was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality (6% vs 2%; P = 0.04) in the unmatched population. Moreover, in the unmatched cohort, this group had longer cross-clamp time compared with the trainees group (91 ± 38 vs 89 ± 26 min; P = 0.47) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (132 ± 58 vs 121 ± 33 min; P = 0.27); these differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative dialysis, cerebrovascular accident, reoperation for bleeding and length of hospital stay. Even after matching, no significant differences were found in terms of perioperative complications. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 1, 5 and 10 years were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Mitral valve surgery can be safely performed by trainees and provides similar short- and long-term results compared with consultant surgeons.