François Gauer

Daily Rhythms of Melatonin Binding Sites in the Rat Pars tuberalis and Suprachiasmatic Nuclei; Evidence for a Regulation of Melatonin Receptors by Melatonin Itself

Using quantitative autoradiography, the density of melatonin binding sites has been measured in the rat pars tuberalis (PT) and suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) every 4 h throughout a 24-hour period in animals kept in a light regime of 12L/12D (with lights on at 07.00 h). Slices of PT and SCN were incubated in the presence of 180 and 172 pM, respectively, of 2-125I-melatonin. In both structures investigated, specific 2-125I-melatonin binding sites showed similar rhythms throughout the 24-hour period with a maximum at 16.00 h (PT: 46.9 +/- 2.8 fmol/mg protein, n = 5 and SCN: 5.12 +/- 0.30 fmol/mg protein, n = 5) and a minimum at 4.00 h (PT: 28.5 +/- 4.5 fmol/mg protein, n = 5 and SCN: 3.07 +/- 0.39 fmol/mg protein, n = 5). Similar experiments performed on PT of animals kept in constant light (LL) for 3 days revealed a lack of variations of melatonin binding site density, all the values being significantly higher than those of the respective 12L/12D group (concentration of 2-125I-melatonin used: 180 pM). All these preliminary results were confirmed by saturation studies performed at 16.00 and 4.00 h using quantitative autoradiography and in 12L/12D animals, using radioreceptor binding assays on isolated PT membranes. In 12L/12D animals, the maximum number of melatonin binding sites (Bmax) of both SCN and PT was significantly higher at 16.00 h than at 4.00 h. In all these cases, however, the dissociation constant (Kd) failed to show any significant daily variation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Melatonin receptor density is regulated in rat pars tuberalis and suprachiasmatic nuclei by melatonin itself

The pineal hormone melatonin interacts with the neuroendocrine system via high affinity binding sites. The density of these receptors is increased after 72 h constant light or pinealectomy in both rat pars tuberalis and suprachiasmatic nuclei. The present results show that, in rat PT and SCN, this increase can be inversed by a single melatonin injection (50 micrograms s.c. in 0.1 ml NaCl, 4 h before sacrifice). At the time of sacrifice, plasma melatonin concentrations of injected animals were no longer significantly different when compared to control values. Thus, this observed effect is not a result of a receptor occupation, but demonstrates a direct regulation of melatonin receptors by melatonin itself.

CONTRARY TO OTHER NON-PHOTIC CUES, ACUTE MELATONIN INJECTION DOES NOT INDUCE IMMEDIATE CHANGES OF CLOCK GENE mRNA EXPRESSION IN THE RAT SUPRACHIASMATIC NUCLEI

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain the main clock of the mammalian circadian system. The endogenous oscillation machinery involves interactive positive and negative transcriptional and posttranslational feedback loops involving the clock genes Per1, Per2, Per3, Clock, Bmal1, Cry1 and Cry2. The SCN endogenous oscillation is entrained to 24 h by the light/dark cycle. Light induced regulation of Per1 and Per2 mRNA expression have been suggested to take part in the clock resetting. However, other factors have chronobiotic and synchronizing effects on SCN activity. Especially, the nocturnal pineal gland hormone, melatonin, which is involved in the regulation of both circadian and seasonal rhythms, is known to feedback on the SCN. Melatonin applied on SCN slices immediately phase-shifts their neuronal electrical activity, while daily injections of melatonin to free running rodents resynchronize their locomotor activity to 24 h. To determine whether melatonin feedback control on SCN activity implicates transcriptional regulation of the clock genes, we monitored the expression pattern of Per 1, 2, 3, Bmal1, Cry1 and AVP mRNAs after a single melatonin injection at the end of the subjective day. Results showed that melatonin injection affected none of the mRNA expression pattern during the first circadian night. Per1, Per3, Bmal1 and AVP expression patterns were, however, significantly but differentially affected, during the second subjective night after the melatonin injection. The present results strongly suggest that the immediate phase shifting effect of melatonin on the SCN molecular loop implicates rather post-translational than transcriptional mechanisms.

Daily variations in melatonin receptor density of rat pars tuberalis and suprachiasmatic nuclei are distinctly regulated

Suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) and pars tuberalis (PT) are two structures in the rat exhibiting high affinity receptors for melatonin. Melatonin receptor density in these two structures was previously shown to be inversely related to endogenous ligand concentration, thus elevated at daytime. We now demonstrate that, in the PT, these daily variations are directly induced by the circadian rhythm of plasma melatonin concentration. Variations persist in constant darkness and can only be blocked by pinealectomy. Thus, autoregulation loop of melatonin receptors determines the circadian rhythm in PT melatonin receptor density. However, this process of desensitization does not determine the daily variations in SCN melatonin receptor density. Indeed, in the SCN, the light/dark cycle is the regulatory factor: melatonin receptor density was shown to be specifically reduced during the night even in pinealectomized animals, while one h light was shown to reverse this nocturnal decrease in the SCN. Moreover, this darkness-induced down-regulation of SCN melatonin receptors has a masking effect on the earlier shown ligand-dependent desensitization process in this structure. This explain why, in constant darkness, SCN melatonin receptor density did not show any variation throughout the 24 h subjective day and night, although the circadian rhythm of melatonin persisted. These results thus clearly show that although daily rhythms in the density of melatonin receptors are identical in the PT and in the SCN, their regulation is totally different in each of these two structures.

MT1 melatonin receptor mRNA expression exhibits a circadian variation in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the daily regulation of both MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptor subtype mRNA expression in the rat SCN in order to clarify their role in the daily variation of SCN melatonin receptors. Existing MT1 and MT2 partial clones were extended by PCR to 982 and 522 bp, respectively. However, while the MT1 clone allowed us to set up a highly sensitive in situ hybridization (ISH) method, we could not detect MT2 expression within the SCN. Therefore, our results suggest that only MT1 mRNA can be correlated with 2-iodo-melatonin binding sites in the rat SCN. Investigation of MT1 mRNA expression throughout the 24 h light/dark cycle or in constant darkness clearly showed that in the two conditions, mRNA expression showed a robust rhythm with two peaks, one after the day/night and one after the night/day transitions in LD, and at the beginning of the subjective night and day in DD, respectively. Furthermore, these variations were not linked to the daily changes in melatonin receptor density. Thus, the transcriptional regulation of MT1 receptors does not appear to play a role in the daily regulation of melatonin binding sites availability.

Endogenous melatonin provides an effective circadian message to both the suprachiasmatic nuclei and the pars tuberalis of the rat

Abstract:  The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) distribute the circadian neural message to the pineal gland which transforms it into a humoral circadian message, the nocturnal melatonin synthesis, which in turn modulates tissues expressing melatonin receptors such as the SCN or the pars tuberalis (PT). Nuclear orphan receptors (NOR), including rorβ and rev‐erbα, have been presented as functional links between the positive and negative loops of the molecular clock. Recent findings suggest that these NOR could be the initial targets of melatonin’s chronobiotic message within the SCN. We investigated the role of these NOR in the physiological effect of endogenous melatonin on these tissues. We monitored rorβ and rev‐erbα mRNA expression levels by quantitative in situ hybridization after pinealectomy. Pinealectomy had no effect on NOR circadian expression rhythms in the SCN in 8‐day pinealectomized (PX) animals. However in animals PX for 3 months, significant desynchronization between per1 and per2 transcription patterns appeared. These results suggest that endogenous melatonin could sustain the circadian rhythmicity and the phase relationship between the molecular partners of the SCN circadian system on a long‐term basis. On the other hand, pinealectomy decreased the level and abolished the rhythmicity of NOR mRNA expression in the PT. These effects were partially prevented by daily melatonin administration in the drinking water. These results show that NOR can be regulated by the melatonin circadian rhythm in the PT and could be the link between the physiological action of melatonin and the core of the molecular circadian clock in this tissue.

Melatonin affects nuclear orphan receptors mrna in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei

The pineal hormone melatonin nocturnal synthesis feeds back on the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the central circadian clock. Indeed, daily melatonin injections in free-running rats resynchronize their locomotor activity to 24 h. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this chronobiotic effect of the hormone are poorly understood. The endogenous circadian machinery involves positive and negative transcriptional feedback loops implicating different genes (particularly period (Per) 1-3, Clock, Bmal1, cryptochrome (Cry) 1-2). While CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer activates the rhythmic transcription of per and cry genes, the PER and CRY proteins inhibit the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex. In previous studies, we observed that the immediate resetting effect of a melatonin injection at the end of the subjective day on the SCN circadian activity did not directly involve the above-mentioned clock genes. Recently, nuclear orphan receptors (NORs) have been presented as functional links between the regulatory loops of the molecular clock. These NORs bind to a retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor response element (RORE) domain and activate (RORalpha) or repress (REV-ERBalpha) bmal1 expression. In this study, we investigated whether melatonin exerts its chronobiotic effects through transcriptional regulation of these transcription factors. We monitored roralpha, rorbeta and rev-erbalpha messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels by quantitative in situ hybridization, up to 36 h following a melatonin injection at circadian time (CT) 11.5. Results clearly showed that, while roralpha was not affected by melatonin, the hormone partially prevented the decrease of the rorbeta mRNA expression observed in control animals during the first hours following the injection. The major result is that the rev-erbalpha mRNA expression rhythm was 1.3+/-0.8-h phase-advanced in melatonin-treated animals during the first subjective night following the melatonin administration. Moreover, the bmal1 mRNA expression was 1.9+/-0.9-h phase-shifted in the second subjective night following the melatonin injection. These results clearly suggest that the NOR genes could be the link between the chronobiotic action of melatonin and the core of the molecular circadian clock.

The Circadian Clock, Light/Dark Cycle and Melatonin Are Differentially Involved in the Expression of Daily and Photoperiodic Variations in mt1 Melatonin Receptors in the Siberian and Syrian Hamsters

Mechanisms underlying the daily and photoperiodic variations in mt1 melatonin receptors were investigated in the pars tuberalis (PT) and suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of Siberian and Syrian hamsters. Whatever its daily profile, melatonin receptor density was strongly increased in both structures and species after constant light exposure or pinealectomy, and decreased after a single melatonin injection, indicating melatonin involvement in the daily regulation of the receptor protein. This was confirmed by a strong inverse correlation between melatonin binding capacity and plasma melatonin concentration. In contrast, regulation of mt1 mRNA appeared more complex. The circadian clock, the light/dark cycle and melatonin are all implicated in mt1 gene daily fluctuations, but the extent of their involvement depends upon the structure and the species studied. The photoperiodic decrease in melatonin receptor density observed in short photoperiod (PT of the two hamster species and Syrian hamster SCN) seems to be the consequence of a long-term mt1 gene repression induced by the lengthening of the melatonin peak. Altogether, these results show that during daily variations, mt1 melatonin receptor mRNA and protein are differentially regulated, while at the photoperiodic level, the mt1 protein status depends on mRNA transcription.

Melatonin regulates the mRNA expression of the mt(1) melatonin receptor in the rat Pars tuberalis.

The pars tuberalis (PT) of the pituitary is a major neuroendocrine target site for melatonin as it contains a large number of high-affinity melatonin receptors. We have previously shown that melatonin autoregulates the density of its own receptors in the PT. However, whether melatonin regulation includes mRNA expression in vivo is unclear. In the present study we have used quantitative in situ hybridization to (1) follow the daily profile of mt1 mRNA expression in the rat PT and (2) investigate whether mt1 mRNA expression could be regulated in vivo by melatonin. We found clear diurnal variations of mt1 mRNA expression that persist in constant darkness. We also showed, on pinealectomized animals, that the rhythmic pineal melatonin secretion is necessary for the expression of these daily variations. In a second step, we studied the effect of an acute suppression of endogenous melatonin synthesis on mt1 melatonin receptors by applying a 1-hour light pulse during the night. We found that light induced a dramatic increase in mt1 mRNA which was totally prevented by a melatonin injection showing that the acute effect of melatonin on the receptor mRNA is strongly inhibitory. A light pulse applied to animals with a chronic absence of melatonin was ineffective showing that light only affects melatonin receptors via the light-induced plasma melatonin suppression. Altogether our results show that melatonin regulates mt1 melatonin receptor mRNA expression. However, this regulation seems to be complex: acute changes in plasma melatonin concentration regulate negatively the gene transcription, even if the daily endogenous nocturnal melatonin peak seems a prerequisite for variations in its receptor expression.

Pinealectomy and constant illumination increase the density of melatonin binding sites in the pars tuberalis of rodents

We report here the effects of pinealectomy and light exposure on the melatonin receptor density in the pars tuberalis of the rat and the European hamster using quantitative autoradiography. Scatchard analysis revealed that 24 and 72 h of constant light exposure (LL) before sacrifice did not modify the Kd value of melatonin for its receptors in rats and European hamsters (about 70 pM). In contrast, the Bmax value was significantly increased in both species when the animals were kept in constant illumination for 72 h before sacrifice (50%-70% compared with the controls). A similar increase was also observed in rats pinealectomized 3 days before sacrifice and then kept in either constant illumination or in 12L/12D. Pinealectomy or constant light exposure are known to result in a clear decrease in the concentration of circulating melatonin. We demonstrate here that they also result in an increase in the density of melatonin receptors. This could suggest a direct effect of melatonin on its own receptors.