François Roman

Immunogenicity and safety in adults of one dose of influenza A H1N1v 2009 vaccine formulated with and without AS03A-adjuvant: Preliminary report of an observer-blind, randomised trial

Governments and public health officials are preparing vaccination campaigns against the 2009 influenza A H1N1v pandemic strain. We evaluated two inactivated split-virion A/California/7/2009 H1N1v pandemic vaccines formulated with/without AS03(A), an oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant system containing tocopherol. This ongoing observer-blind study randomised 130 healthy adults aged 18-60 years to receive either AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine containing 5.25 microg haemagglutinin (HA) (N=64) or non-adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine containing 21 microg HA (N=66) on Days 0 and 21. We performed a first analysis of reactogenicity and serum haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody responses, 21 days after dose 1. Before vaccination, 12.5% in the AS03(A)-adjuvanted group and 13.1% in the non-adjuvanted group had vaccine-homologous HI titres >or=1:40. Immune responses were robust; HI seroconversion rates were 98.2% and 95.1% and HI seroprotection rates were 98.2% and 98.4%, respectively in the AS03(A) and non-adjuvanted groups. The vaccines were well tolerated with similar adverse event profiles. Solicited injection site and general symptoms were reported more frequently for AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccine but these were transient and mainly mild to moderate in intensity. Based on accepted immunological surrogates, these preliminary data suggest that one dose of either AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine at a reduced HA dose or non-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine at a fourfold higher dose is sufficient to immunise healthy adults. The strong immune response is consistent with prevalent immunological priming but as this and the ability to mount immune response after vaccination may be modulated by age, further investigations in children and in the elderly as well as on the persistence of the immune response are warranted.

Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vector Ebola Vaccine - Preliminary Report.

Background The unprecedented 2014 epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) prompted an international response to accelerate the availability of a preventive vaccine. A replication‐defective recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus type 3–vectored ebolavirus vaccine (cAd3‐EBO), encoding the glycoprotein from Zaire and Sudan species, that offers protection in the nonhuman primate model, was rapidly advanced into phase 1 clinical evaluation. Methods We conducted a phase 1, dose‐escalation, open‐label trial of cAd3‐EBO. Twenty healthy adults, in sequentially enrolled groups of 10 each, received vaccination intramuscularly in doses of 2×1010 particle units or 2×1011 particle units. Primary and secondary end points related to safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the first 8 weeks after vaccination; in addition, longer‐term vaccine durability was assessed at 48 weeks after vaccination. Results In this small study, no safety concerns were identified; however, transient fever developed within 1 day after vaccination in two participants who had received the 2×1011 particle‐unit dose. Glycoprotein‐specific antibodies were induced in all 20 participants; the titers were of greater magnitude in the group that received the 2×1011 particle‐unit dose than in the group that received the 2×1010 particle‐unit dose (geometric mean titer against the Zaire antigen at week 4, 2037 vs. 331; P=0.001). Glycoprotein‐specific T‐cell responses were more frequent among those who received the 2×1011 particle‐unit dose than among those who received the 2×1010 particle‐unit dose, with a CD4 response in 10 of 10 participants versus 3 of 10 participants (P=0.004) and a CD8 response in 7 of 10 participants versus 2 of 10 participants (P=0.07) at week 4. Assessment of the durability of the antibody response showed that titers remained high at week 48, with the highest titers in those who received the 2×1011 particle‐unit dose. Conclusions Reactogenicity and immune responses to cAd3‐EBO vaccine were dose‐dependent. At the 2×1011 particle‐unit dose, glycoprotein Zaire–specific antibody responses were in the range reported to be associated with vaccine‐induced protective immunity in challenge studies involving nonhuman primates, and responses were sustained to week 48. Phase 2 studies and efficacy trials assessing cAd3‐EBO are in progress. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health; VRC 207 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02231866.)

A Monovalent Chimpanzee Adenovirus Ebola Vaccine Boosted with MVA

BACKGROUND The West African outbreak of Ebola virus disease that peaked in 2014 has caused more than 11,000 deaths. The development of an effective Ebola vaccine is a priority for control of a future outbreak. METHODS In this phase 1 study, we administered a single dose of the chimpanzee adenovirus 3 (ChAd3) vaccine encoding the surface glycoprotein of Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) to 60 healthy adult volunteers in Oxford, United Kingdom. The vaccine was administered in three dose levels--1×10(10) viral particles, 2.5×10(10) viral particles, and 5×10(10) viral particles--with 20 participants in each group. We then assessed the effect of adding a booster dose of a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) strain, encoding the same Ebola virus glycoprotein, in 30 of the 60 participants and evaluated a reduced prime-boost interval in another 16 participants. We also compared antibody responses to inactivated whole Ebola virus virions and neutralizing antibody activity with those observed in phase 1 studies of a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine expressing a ZEBOV glycoprotein (rVSV-ZEBOV) to determine relative potency and assess durability. RESULTS No safety concerns were identified at any of the dose levels studied. Four weeks after immunization with the ChAd3 vaccine, ZEBOV-specific antibody responses were similar to those induced by rVSV-ZEBOV vaccination, with a geometric mean titer of 752 and 921, respectively. ZEBOV neutralization activity was also similar with the two vaccines (geometric mean titer, 14.9 and 22.2, respectively). Boosting with the MVA vector increased virus-specific antibodies by a factor of 12 (geometric mean titer, 9007) and increased glycoprotein-specific CD8+ T cells by a factor of 5. Significant increases in neutralizing antibodies were seen after boosting in all 30 participants (geometric mean titer, 139; P<0.001). Virus-specific antibody responses in participants primed with ChAd3 remained positive 6 months after vaccination (geometric mean titer, 758) but were significantly higher in those who had received the MVA booster (geometric mean titer, 1750; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The ChAd3 vaccine boosted with MVA elicited B-cell and T-cell immune responses to ZEBOV that were superior to those induced by the ChAd3 vaccine alone. (Funded by the Wellcome Trust and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02240875.).

Priming with AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine improves the kinetics, magnitude and durability of the immune response after a heterologous booster vaccination: An open non-randomised extension of a double-blind randomised primary study

An influenza vaccine with cross-immunogenic potential could play a key role in pandemic mitigation by promoting a rapid immune response to infection and/or subsequent vaccination with strains drifted from the primary vaccine strain. Here we assess the role of AS03(A) (an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing tocopherol) in this prime-boost concept using H5N1 as a model shift influenza antigen. In this open, non-randomised study (NCT00506350; an extension of an earlier randomised study) we assessed immunogenicity in nine groups of 35-50 volunteers aged 19-61 years following administration of AS03(A)-adjuvanted split-virion H5N1 vaccine containing 3.75mug of haemagglutinin (HA) from the A/Indonesia/5/2005(IBCDC-RG2) clade 2.1 strain. A single booster dose of vaccine was administered to four groups primed 14 months previously with different HA levels of AS03(A)-adjuvanted clade 1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 H5N1 vaccine. Two booster doses (given 21 days apart) were administered to four groups primed 14 months previously with different HA levels of non-adjuvanted A/Vietnam/1194/2004 H5N1 vaccine and also to a control group of un-primed subjects. In individuals primed 14 months earlier with AS03(A)-adjuvanted A/Vietnam/1194/2004 vaccines, a single booster dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted A/Indonesia/5/2005 induced rapid immune responses (licensure criteria met in 7-14 days) comparable to that observed in the un-primed control group following two doses of adjuvanted vaccine. In contrast, individuals primed with non-adjuvanted formulations exhibited minimal immune responses which, even after two doses, were unexpectedly much lower than that observed in un-primed subjects. AS03(A) enhances the initial priming effect of pandemic influenza vaccination enabling a rapid humoral response to single dose boosting with a heterologous strain at 14 months. In contrast, priming without adjuvant appears to inhibit the response to subsequent vaccination with a heterologous strain. These findings should guide the development of vaccines to combat the present influenza A/H1N1 pandemic.

Use of ChAd3-EBO-Z Ebola virus vaccine in Malian and US adults, and boosting of Malian adults with MVA-BN-Filo: a phase 1, single-blind, randomised trial, a phase 1b, open-label and double-blind, dose-escalation trial, and a nested, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Summary Background The 2014 west African Zaire Ebola virus epidemic prompted worldwide partners to accelerate clinical development of replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus 3 vector vaccine expressing Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein (ChAd3-EBO-Z). We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ChAd3-EBO-Z in Malian and US adults, and assess the effect of boosting of Malians with modified vaccinia Ankara expressing Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein and other filovirus antigens (MVA-BN-Filo). Methods In the phase 1, single-blind, randomised trial of ChAd3-EBO-Z in the USA, we recruited adults aged 18–65 years from the University of Maryland medical community and the Baltimore community. In the phase 1b, open-label and double-blind, dose-escalation trial of ChAd3-EBO-Z in Mali, we recruited adults 18–50 years of age from six hospitals and health centres in Bamako (Mali), some of whom were also eligible for a nested, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MVA-BN-Filo. For randomised segments of the Malian trial and for the US trial, we randomly allocated participants (1:1; block size of six [Malian] or four [US]; ARB produced computer-generated randomisation lists; clinical staff did randomisation) to different single doses of intramuscular immunisation with ChAd3-EBO-Z: Malians received 1 × 1010 viral particle units (pu), 2·5 × 1010 pu, 5 × 1010 pu, or 1 × 1011 pu; US participants received 1 × 1010 pu or 1 × 1011 pu. We randomly allocated Malians in the nested trial (1:1) to receive a single dose of 2 × 108 plaque-forming units of MVA-BN-Filo or saline placebo. In the double-blind segments of the Malian trial, investigators, clinical staff, participants, and immunology laboratory staff were masked, but the study pharmacist (MK), vaccine administrator, and study statistician (ARB) were unmasked. In the US trial, investigators were not masked, but participants were. Analyses were per protocol. The primary outcome was safety, measured with occurrence of adverse events for 7 days after vaccination. Both trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02231866 (US) and NCT02267109 (Malian). Findings Between Oct 8, 2014, and Feb 16, 2015, we randomly allocated 91 participants in Mali (ten [11%] to 1 × 1010 pu, 35 [38%] to 2·5 × 1010 pu, 35 [38%] to 5 × 1010 pu, and 11 [12%] to 1 × 1011 pu) and 20 in the USA (ten [50%] to 1 × 1010 pu and ten [50%] to 1 × 1011 pu), and boosted 52 Malians with MVA-BN-Filo (27 [52%]) or saline (25 [48%]). We identified no safety concerns with either vaccine: seven (8%) of 91 participants in Mali (five [5%] received 5 × 1010 and two [2%] received 1 × 1011 pu) and four (20%) of 20 in the USA (all received 1 × 1011 pu) given ChAd3-EBO-Z had fever lasting for less than 24 h, and 15 (56%) of 27 Malians boosted with MVA-BN-Filo had injection-site pain or tenderness. Interpretation 1 × 1011 pu single-dose ChAd3-EBO-Z could suffice for phase 3 efficacy trials of ring-vaccination containment needing short-term, high-level protection to interrupt transmission. MVA-BN-Filo boosting, although a complex regimen, could confer long-lived protection if needed (eg, for health-care workers). Funding Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council UK, Department for International Development UK, National Cancer Institute, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Federal Funds from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

AS03A-Adjuvanted Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Vaccine for Adults up to 85 Years of Age

BACKGROUND Vaccination of high-risk groups was started shortly after the emergence of the influenza A (H1N1)2009 pandemic virus. METHODS Healthy adults were enrolled into 2 age strata: 18-60 years and 160 years, and received monovalent influenza vaccine containing 3.75 microg of A/California/2009 (H1N1) hemagglutinin antigen, adjuvanted with AS03A. Hemagglutination inhibition assay-based antibody titers against H1N1 vaccine were assessed after 1 vaccine dose(primary endpoint), after which subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive no further vaccination or a second dose.Immunogenicity endpoints were European licensure criteria for influenza vaccines. Exploratory analyses assessed the effect of previous seasonal influenza vaccination on responses to the H1N1 vaccine. RESULTS Licensure criteria for immunogenicity were fulfilled after 1 dose of H1N1 vaccine (N=240). For subjects 18-60 years of age, previous vaccination against seasonal influenza within the preceding 2 seasons resulted in significantly lower geometric mean titers (adjusted for baseline antibody titer) after 1 or 2 doses of H1N1 vaccine (P <.001 and P=.003, respectively). Transient mild or moderate injection-site pain was reported by 87.5%and 65.0% of subjects 18-60 years of age and >60 years of age, respectively, after the first dose, and in 63% of subjects overall after the second dose. CONCLUSIONS A single dose of 3.75 microg hemagglutinin antigen, AS03A-adjuvanted H1N1 2009 vaccine was immunogenic and well tolerated in adults. In exploratory analyses (of subjects 18-60 years of age), postvaccination antibody titers were lower in subjects who had previously received seasonal influenza vaccination, compared with those who had not. This phenomenon warrants further investigation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT00968526.

Safety and immunogenicity of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored Ebola vaccine in healthy adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 1/2a study

BACKGROUND The ongoing Ebola outbreak led to accelerated efforts to test vaccine candidates. On the basis of a request by WHO, we aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the monovalent, recombinant, chimpanzee adenovirus type-3 vector-based Ebola Zaire vaccine (ChAd3-EBO-Z). METHODS We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 1/2a trial at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. Participants (aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned (2:2:1), via two computer-generated randomisation lists for individuals potentially deployed in endemic areas and those not deployed, to receive a single intramuscular dose of high-dose vaccine (5 × 10(10) viral particles), low-dose vaccine (2·5 × 10(10) viral particles), or placebo. Deployed participants were allocated to only the vaccine groups. Group allocation was concealed from non-deployed participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. The safety evaluation was not masked for potentially deployed participants, who were therefore not included in the safety analysis for comparison between the vaccine doses and placebo, but were pooled with the non-deployed group to compare immunogenicity. The main objectives were safety and immunogenicity of ChAd3-EBO-Z. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02289027. FINDINGS Between Oct 24, 2014, and June 22, 2015, we randomly assigned 120 participants, of whom 18 (15%) were potentially deployed and 102 (85%) were non-deployed, to receive high-dose vaccine (n=49), low-dose vaccine (n=51), or placebo (n=20). Participants were followed up for 6 months. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. We recorded local adverse events in 30 (75%) of 40 participants in the high-dose group, 33 (79%) of 42 participants in the low-dose group, and five (25%) of 20 participants in the placebo group. Fatigue or malaise was the most common systemic adverse event, reported in 25 (62%) participants in the high-dose group, 25 (60%) participants in the low-dose group, and five (25%) participants in the placebo group, followed by headache, reported in 23 (57%), 25 (60%), and three (15%) participants, respectively. Fever occurred 24 h after injection in 12 (30%) participants in the high-dose group and 11 (26%) participants in the low-dose group versus one (5%) participant in the placebo group. Geometric mean concentrations of IgG antibodies against Ebola glycoprotein peaked on day 28 at 51 μg/mL (95% CI 41·1-63·3) in the high-dose group, 44·9 μg/mL (25·8-56·3) in the low-dose group, and 5·2 μg/mL (3·5-7·6) in the placebo group, with respective response rates of 96% (95% CI 85·7-99·5), 96% (86·5-99·5), and 5% (0·1-24·9). Geometric mean concentrations decreased by day 180 to 25·5 μg/mL (95% CI 20·6-31·5) in the high-dose group, 22·1 μg/mL (19·3-28·6) in the low-dose group, and 3·2 μg/mL (2·4-4·9) in the placebo group. 28 (57%) participants given high-dose vaccine and 31 (61%) participants given low-dose vaccine developed glycoprotein-specific CD4 cell responses, and 33 (67%) and 35 (69%), respectively, developed CD8 responses. INTERPRETATION ChAd3-EBO-Z was safe and well tolerated, although mild to moderate systemic adverse events were common. A single dose was immunogenic in almost all vaccine recipients. Antibody responses were still significantly present at 6 months. There was no significant difference between doses for safety and immunogenicity outcomes. This acceptable safety profile provides a reliable basis to proceed with phase 2 and phase 3 efficacy trials in Africa. FUNDING Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), through the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme.

Uncommon mutations at residue positions critical for enfuvirtide (T-20) resistance in enfuvirtide-naive patients infected with subtype B and non-B HIV-1 strains.

Enfuvirtide (T-20) is the lead compound of the new class of antiretroviral drugs called fusion inhibitors. T-20 resistance-associated mutations located in the heptad repeat 1 (HR-1) domain of gp41 have been described in vitro and in clinical trials. In this study, the authors investigated the primary genotypic T-20 resistance in subtype B and non-B HIV-1 strains from patients at the beginning of their follow-up in the Luxembourg HIV Cohort as well as the emergence of primary resistance to T-20 in patients who had long-term infection with subtype B HIV-1 strains. HR-1 fragments including the gp41 amino acid 36-45, T-20-sensitive region were screened for amino acid variation. No classic T-20 resistance-associated mutations were identified in subtype B or non-B isolates. However, several uncommon mutations were found at residues 37, 39, and 42 for subtype B isolates and at residue 42 for a subtype non-B isolate. The results indicate that primary genotypic T-20 resistance seems to be rare in HIV-1, regardless of subtype or prior antiretroviral therapy (excluding fusion inhibitors). However, episodic variation within HR-1 can occur and needs further phenotypic evaluation in accurate fusion inhibitor resistance assays.

Effect on Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses of the AS03 Adjuvant System in an A/H1N1/2009 Influenza Virus Vaccine Administered to Adults during Two Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT The influence of AS03A, a tocopherol oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system, on humoral and cell-mediated responses to A/California/7/2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccine was investigated. In two observer-blind studies, a total of 261 healthy adults aged 18 to 60 years were randomized to receive either AS03A-adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine containing 3.75 μg hemagglutinin (HA) or nonadjuvanted H1N1 vaccine containing 15 or 3.75 μg HA on days 0 and 21. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody and T-cell responses were analyzed up to day 42. A first dose of AS03A-adjuvanted vaccine (3.75 μg HA) or nonadjuvanted vaccine (15 μg HA) induced HI responses of similar magnitudes that exceeded licensure criteria (e.g., 94 to 100% with titers of ≥40). A lower response following 3.75 μg HA without adjuvant was observed (73% with titers of ≥40). Following a second dose, geometric mean HI titers at day 42 were higher for AS03A-adjuvanted vaccine (636 and 637) relative to nonadjuvanted vaccine (341 for 15 μg HA and 150 for 3.75 μg HA). Over the 42-day period, the increase in frequency of A/H1N1/2009-specific CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in the adjuvanted group than in the nonadjuvanted group. There was no evidence of correlation between baseline CD4+ T-cell frequencies and day 21 HI antibody titers, while there was some correlation (R = 0.35) between day 21 CD4+ T-cell frequencies and day 42 HI titers. AS03A adjuvant enhanced the humoral and CD4+ T-cell-mediated responses to A/H1N1/2009 vaccine. Baseline A/H1N1/2009-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies did not predict post-dose 1 antibody responses, but there was some correlation between post-dose 1 CD4+ T-cell frequencies and post-dose 2 antibody responses.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Monovalent 2009 Influenza A/H1N1v Vaccine Adjuvanted With AS03A or Unadjuvanted in HIV-Infected Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients have decreased immune response to vaccines. Few data are available about pandemic flu vaccination in this population. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, patient-blinded, randomized trial in a cohort of HIV-infected adults. Patients received 2 injections 21 days apart of a AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 3.75 μg hemagglutinin (HA) or a nonadjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 15 μg HA to assess hemagglutination inhibition (HI) response and safety. RESULTS A total of 309 patients were randomized, and 306 were vaccinated. After the first vaccine dose, HI titers ≥1:40 were observed in 93.4% of the patients in the adjuvanted group (A group) (n = 155) and in 75.5% in the nonadjuvanted group (B group) (n = 151) (P < .001); seroconversion rates were 88.8% and 71.2%, and factor increases in geometric mean titers (GMT) of 21.9 and 15.1, respectively. After 2 injections, 98.6% of patients of the A group and 92.1% of the B group demonstrated HI titers ≥1:40 (P = .018); seroconversion rates were 96.5% and 87.1%, respectively, and factor increases in GMT were 45.5 and 21.2, respectively. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; no impact on CD4+ cell count or viral load has been detected. CONCLUSIONS In HIV-1-infected adults, the AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine yielded a higher immune response than did the nonadjuvanted one, with no impact on HIV infection.