Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Francois Sauer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Francois Sauer.


BMJ | 1995

The death of biomedical journals

Ronald E. LaPorte; Eric Marler; Shunichi Akazawa; Francois Sauer; Carlos Gamboa; Chris Shenton; Caryle Glosser; Anthony Villasenor; Malcolm Maclure

The musky scent of aging paper in our medical libraries still evokes an atmosphere of scholarship. But the cloistered peace of the stacks is increasingly punctured by the faint sounds of the coming revolution: the clicks, beeps, and whirrs of computers linked to the internet. For whom do they toll? Are they the death knell of biomedical journals as we know them? Or are they the pealing spire of the global village summoning health scientists to the electronic commons to share the harvest of knowledge? We are at a watershed in biomedical publishing. For some time the costs of paper journals have been mounting and the budgets of health science libraries contracting, while the number of have nots in poorer countries clamouring for access to medical literature has been growing.1 But now the information technology explosion that revolutionised banking and the airline industry is at the gateway of the biomedical community. As the hard copy journal system has started to decay, there has been an information technology explosion that, some argue, will completely transform the exchange of information in the biomedical community. The current process of biomedical publication expanded in the late 1800s. The approaches towards delivery of information to the scientists have changed little during the 20th century: mailed journals, textbooks, and scientific meetings. Transmitting information through the journal system can be likened to the use of the Addressograph in the 1950s for producing mass mailings, or the vinyl records that we all remember. New technology came in to produce the mailings more effectively and to “deliver” music to the consumers. Within a short period the Addressograph and the record player became virtually extinct. We believe that biomedical journals as we know them will become extinct in the next few years as the result of the development and …


BMJ | 2002

Papyrus to PowerPoint (P 2 P): metamorphosis of scientific communication

Ronald E. LaPorte; Faina Linkov; Tony Villasenor; Francois Sauer; Carlos Gamboa; Mita Lovalekar; Eugene Shubnikov; Akira Sekikawa; Eun Ryoung Sa

Scientific communication is in the process of metamorphosis. Will it change into a dung beetle or into a beautiful butterfly? Here is one possibility that some might argue is as frightening as Kafkas story > “As Gregor Samsa awoke from unsettling dreams one morning, he found himself transformed in his bed into a monstrous bug.” > > Kafka, Metamorphosis In 1995 we questioned the hallowed tenets of paper journals. We wrote a series of articles, beginning with “The death of biomedical journals,” suggesting the death knell for paper journals.1–3 Delamothe echoed our conclusions that “The burgeoning world wide web … makes it inevitable that new systems of disseminating research will replace or at least supplement journals.”4 ![][1] #### Summary points Traditional peer reviewed journals are becoming obsolete We are experiencing a dramatic metamorphosis of the tools of scientific communication The prima lingua of scientific communication is PowerPoint Our search for the optimal information exchange method in science leads to P2P The response was Kafkaesque, reminding us of the quote from Penal Colony “It is an exceptional apparatus” so do not question it. The “journal” apparatus shows that little of the fibre of journals has been scientifically evaluated. Are journals an efficient, scientific, “just in time” process? It is impossible to answer. For 300 years there has been no evidence based evaluation of the journal process. For example, there is virtually no research on the quality of learning from journals, whether IMRD (introduction, methods, results, discussion) optimises learning, or if traditional peer review is the best system. To quote Goldbeck-Wood, “But if peer review is so central to the process by which scientific knowledge become canonised, it is ironic that science has little to say as to whether it works.”5 This applies to all phases of the journal process. Is a metamorphosis in … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1997

The Need for a Global Health Disaster Network

Ingrid Libman; Ronald E. LaPorte; Shunichi Akazawa; Eugene Boostrom; Caryle Glosser; Eric Marler; Ernesto A. Pretto; Francois Sauer; Anthony Villasenor; Frank Young; Genro Ochi

When a disaster occurs, a major difficulty is knowing where to find accurate information, and how to help coordinate efforts to share accurate information in a quick and organized manner. The establishment of a global information network, that is in place before a disaster occurs, could link all the communication efforts for relief. We propose that a Global Health Unit for Disaster and Relief Coordination be set up as part of the Global Health Network, utilizing the Internet as its backbone. This Unit would establish the links for the disaster information mosaic.


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2001

Towards an internet civil defence against bioterrorism

Ronald E. LaPorte; Francois Sauer; Steve Dearwater; Akira Sekikawa; Eun Ryoung Sa; Deborah J. Aaron; Eugene Shubnikov

Approaches towards the public-health prevention of bioterrorism are too little, and too late. New information-based approaches could yield better homeland protection. An internet civil defence is presented where millions of eyes could help to identify suspected cases of bioterrorism, with the internet used to report, confirm, and prevent outbreaks.


The Lancet | 1994

Health and climate change

Menno J. Bouma; H.E. Sondorp; H.J. van der Kaay; Ronald E. LaPorte; Francois Sauer; Eric Marler; Carlos Gamboa; Shunichi Akazawa; Tony Gooch; M. Blumthaler; W. Ambach; Claus Kroegel; Andreas Zedtwitz; Peter Deibert; Dieter Häussinger; Wofgang Gerok


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2002

Bioterrorism and the epidemiology of fear.

Ronald E. LaPorte; Francois Sauer; Rania Saad; Eugene Shubnikov


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 2006

Building just-in-time lectures during the prodrome of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Faina Linkov; Ali Ardalan; Sunita Dodani; Mita Lovalekar; Francois Sauer; Eugene Shubnikov; Ronald E. LaPorte


Archive | 2011

Global Health Google

Ronald E. LaPorte; Faina Linkov; Eugene Shubnikov; Mita Lovalekar; Ayesha Aziz; Francois Sauer; Supercourse Team


United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency | 2002

Internet Civil Defense: Feasibility Study [December 17, 2002]

Ronald E. LaPorte; Nathaniel Mass; Francois Sauer


United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency | 2002

Internet Civil Defense: Financial Plan [December 17, 2002]

Ronald E. LaPorte; Nathaniel Mass; Francois Sauer

Collaboration


Dive into the Francois Sauer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Akira Sekikawa

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eun Ryoung Sa

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Faina Linkov

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mita Lovalekar

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge