Frank C. Dougherty

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) is a new agent that is in development for the treatment of anemia with extended administration intervals in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD), both those on and those not on dialysis. This was an open-label, randomized, multicenter, two-period, crossover study in erythropoiesis-stimulating agentnaïve patients who had CKD and anemia and were receiving peritoneal dialysis. After a 1-wk run-in period, 16 patients were randomly assigned to receive a single administration of intravenous C.E.R.A. 0.4 microg/kg (n = 8) or subcutaneous C.E.R.A. 0.8 microg/kg (n = 8). Six weeks after the first administration of C.E.R.A. (4-wk assessment, 2-wk washout), the route of administration was switched so that all patients received single administrations of both intravenous C.E.R.A. 0.4 microg/kg and subcutaneous C.E.R.A. 0.8 microg/kg. C.E.R.A. had a prolonged and comparable half-life after intravenous (mean 134 h) and subcutaneous (mean 139 h) administration. Reticulocyte counts peaked at a median of 8 d after intravenous and subcutaneous administration with no difference in the time course between administration routes. This resulted in similar mean values for the area under the reticulocyte count-time curve (1191 x 10(9) and 1193 x 10(9).d per L, respectively) and the maximum absolute increase in reticulocyte counts (36 x 10(9) and 41 x 10(9)/L, respectively). C.E.R.A. has a prolonged and comparable half-life after intravenous or subcutaneous injection, suggesting that extended administration intervals may be feasible in patients with CKD.

C.E.R.A. Corrects Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease not on Dialysis: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study examined the efficacy of C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, for correcting anemia in patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and were not on dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III study, 324 adult patients with CKD not on dialysis nor receiving treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or darbepoetin alfa once weekly during an 18-wk correction period and a 10-wk evaluation period. Thereafter, patients receiving C.E.R.A. were randomly assigned to C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or once monthly, and patients receiving darbepoetin alfa could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or once every 2 wk for a 24-wk extension period. Dosage was adjusted to achieve a hemoglobin (Hb) response and to maintain Hb +/-1 g/dl of the response level and 11 to 13 g/dl. Primary end points were Hb response rate during correction and evaluation and change in Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation. RESULTS Hb response rates were 97.5% for C.E.R.A. and 96.3% for darbepoetin alfa. Adjusted mean changes in Hb from baseline to evaluation were 2.15 g/dl (C.E.R.A.) and 2.00 g/dl (darbepoetin alfa). Analysis showed that C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk was as effective as darbepoetin alfa once weekly for correcting anemia. Hb levels remained stable in all groups during the extension period. C.E.R.A. and darbepoetin alfa were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk corrects anemia in ESA-naïve patients who are not on dialysis.

Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial

Background. Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly. Methods. Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable once-weekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11–13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50–53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P < 0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups. Conclusions. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa.

Effect of a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) on stable haemoglobin in patients with CKD on dialysis: once monthly administration*

ABSTRACT Aims: This Phase II study aimed to determine the optimal dose and administration schedule of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) given subcutaneously (SC) in patients receiving dialysis converting directly from SC epoetin therapy 1–3 times/week. An extension phase examined long-term safety and efficacy. Methods: Patients were assigned to one of three C.E.R.A. dose groups determined by multiplying the previous weekly dose of epoetin by one of three ratios (0.4/150, 0.8/150, 1.2/150 for groups A, B and C, respectively). Within each group, patients were randomized to once weekly (QW), once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and once monthly (Q4W) schedules. Dose adjustments were not permitted for the first 6 weeks. The core study period was 19 weeks (21 weeks in the Q4W cohorts). Patients could enter a 12‑month extension period at the same schedule, aiming to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) at 11–12 g/dL. Results: 137 patients entered the core period, and 62 continued into the extension period. A dose-dependent relationship was seen in the primary efficacy variable, change in Hb standardized to a 6 week period ( p < 0.0001), but effect was independent of schedule. Hb levels were maintained throughout the study, with few dose changes. C.E.R.A. was generally well tolerated and the most frequent adverse event was hypotension. Conclusion: The results suggest that SC C.E.R.A. at up to once monthly intervals provides stable maintenance of Hb levels in dialysis patients converting directly from epoetin 1–3 times/week. Achieving tight Hb control with few dose adjustments at extended administration intervals may offer health benefits and improvements in resource management. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00364832.

Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) administered at extended administration intervals corrects anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis: a randomised, multicentre, multiple-dose, phase II study

This dose‐finding, open‐label study examined the potential of subcutaneous Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) to correct anaemia at extended administration intervals in 61 erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent‐naïve patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. After a 4‐week run‐in, patients were randomised to C.E.R.A. 0.15, 0.30 and 0.45 μg/kg/week. Within these dose groups, patients were further randomised to once weekly, once every 2 weeks or once every 3 weeks treatment. Mean changes in haemoglobin (Hb) increased with increasing C.E.R.A. dose during a period of 6 weeks where no dose adjustments were permitted. The effect was independent of administration schedule. Erythropoietic responses were sustained until the end of the study (12 weeks) in all groups. In total, 90% of patients in the 0.30 μg/kg/week group and 79% in the 0.45 μg/kg/week group responded to treatment (Hb increase ≥1.0 g/dl), compared with 72% in the 0.15 μg/kg/week group. Faster median response time was associated with increasing dose (51, 38 and 31 days, respectively) and response was unrelated to administration frequency. C.E.R.A. was generally well tolerated. Our results suggest that 0.60 μg/kg twice monthly would be a suitable starting dose of C.E.R.A. for the initiation of anaemia correction in patients with CKD on dialysis. Phase III studies will confirm the feasibility of using C.E.R.A. at extended administration intervals in patients with CKD and anaemia.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol‐Epoetin Beta Are Unaffected by the Site of Subcutaneous Administration1

C.E.R.A. (methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, differs from traditional erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents in its pharmacokinetic and receptor binding properties. This phase I, randomized, open‐label, single‐center, single‐dose, 3‐way crossover study in 42 healthy volunteers compared the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of C.E.R.A. 3.0 μg/kg after subcutaneous injection into the abdomen, arm, or thigh. The pharmacokinetic profile was similar at all 3 injection sites, with a prolonged apparent elimination half‐life from 160 to 164 hours, area under the concentration–time curve from 4088 to 4323 ngṁh/mL, and clearance/bioavailability from 0.64 to 0.68 mL/h/kg. C.E.R.A. produced a sustained erythropoietic response, and the pharmacodynamic profile (area under the reticulocyte count–time curve and maximum increase in reticulocyte count) was similar for all sites. C.E.R.A. was generally well tolerated, regardless of the administration site. This study suggests that C.E.R.A. has the potential to offer a choice of injection sites in clinical practice. The long half‐life may permit effective anemia management with extended dosing intervals. Phase III clinical studies support the role of C.E.R.A. in managing anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

C.E.R.A. safety profile: a pooled analysis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, is a long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) that is approved for the treatment of renal anemia. This analysis evaluated the safety profile of C.E.R.A. in comparison to that of other ESAs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS Safety parameters were analyzed in a pooled population comprising all patients with CKD on dialysis and not on dialysis from the completed Phase II and Phase III studies in the C.E.R.A. clinical program (Phase II/III population); patients were treated with either C.E.R.A. (n = 1,789) or comparator ESA (n = 948). Differences between treatment groups in safety parameters were identified by either a 2% difference in incidence between groups, or a statistically significant difference between groups (p < or = 0.05 with the Fishers exact test, which was used as a conservative screening tool). To assess changes in safety findings over time, long-term safety data were analyzed from patients who were given the option to enter long-term safety studies upon completing their initial Phase II/III study (safety extension population). RESULTS Compared with the C.E.R.A. group, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the comparator ESA group in the Phase II/III population (C.E.R.A. vs. comparator ESA, 89.5% vs. 91.8%, p = 0.067), and significantly so in the safety extension population (93.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.003). The incidence of serious AEs was significantly higher in the comparator ESA group than in the C.E.R.A. group in both analysis populations (Phase II/III population, 37.8% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.021; safety extension population, 53.3% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.001). However, there was no consistent pattern of clinical events that could explain these differences between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION Analysis of safety events in patients with renal anemia receiving long-term treatment with C.E.R.A. shows a safety profile comparable to that of other ESAs.

C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: The ARCTOS extension study.

C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator is approved for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The ARCTOS (administration of C.E.R.A. in CKD patients to treat anemia with a twice‐monthly schedule) phase 3 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of C.E.R.A. in correcting anemia when administered once every 2 weeks (Q2W) subcutaneously in patients with CKD not on dialysis. We assessed the feasibility and long‐term safety of converting patients who responded to treatment with C.E.R.A. Q2W to C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks (Q4W) during a 24‐week extension period. After the core ARCTOS study period (28 weeks), 296 patients entered the 24‐week extension period. At week 29, patients who responded to C.E.R.A. Q2W during the core period were rerandomized to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W or Q4W. Patients in the comparator arm could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or Q2W. Dosage was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) between 11 and 13 g/dL. Mean Hb levels remained stable in all groups, and were comparable at the end of the extension period (mean [standard deviation], C.E.R.A. Q2W, 11.92 [0.90] g/dL; C.E.R.A. Q4W, 11.70 [0.86] g/dL; darbepoetin alfa, 11.89 [0.98] g/dL). Mean within‐patient standard deviation values for Hb were also comparable in all groups (0.66, 0.62, and 0.65 g/dL for C.E.R.A. Q2W, C.E.R.A. Q4W and darbepoetin alfa, respectively). All treatments were well tolerated. Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q4W is safe and effective in maintaining stable Hb levels in patients with CKD not on dialysis following correction with subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W.

Subcutaneous injection pain with C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, compared with darbepoetin alfa.

ABSTRACT Objective: This study assessed injection site pain following subcutaneous (SC) administration with a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.), compared with darbepoetin alfa in healthy adults. Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-centre, single-blind, three-way crossover study, subjects received one of six treatment sequences (ABC/ACB/BAC/BCA/CBA/CAB) involving SC injection of (A) C.E.R.A. 50 μg, (B) darbepoetin alfa 50 μg, or (C) placebo on days 1, 29, and 57. An initial pilot phase (n = 12) was used to determine the sample size for the confirmatory phase (n = 72), and data were combined for the final analysis (n = 84). Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was pain on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after dosing. Secondary endpoints included VAS at 1 hour after dosing and pain on the six-point verbal rating scale (VRS) immediately and at 1 hour after dosing. Results: C.E.R.A. was associated with significantly less pain immediately after SC injection compared with darbepoetin alfa: least squares mean VAS 21.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.5, 25.5) versus 33.4 (95% CI: 28.4, 38.4) ( p < 0.0001). Incidence of pain on the VRS was lower with C.E.R.A. compared with darbepoetin alfa immediately after dosing ( p < 0.0001). One hour after administration, most subjects had no VRS pain. A study limitation is the small sample size and the findings need to be confirmed in a large trial of chronic kidney disease patients. Conclusions: SC injection with C.E.R.A. is significantly less painful than SC darbepoetin alfa in healthy adults. Treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease with SC injection of C.E.R.A. may provide a lower pain burden compared with darbepoetin alfa.

Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity associated with haemoglobin levels: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background/Aims: Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have raised concerns about potential harm associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in chronic kidney disease patients, especially when haemoglobin (Hb) levels above 13 g/dl were targeted. We report the relationship between Hb levels and outcomes in the methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta RCT programme. Methods: We assessed the association between Hb and a composite end point, as well as its components [all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular events (CVE)], in multiple post hoc analyses of 9 prospective RCTs (3,405 chronic kidney disease patients). Mean Hb levels over time and deviation from target were analysed using a Cox regression model. Time-adjusted average Hb, deviation from target, the last Hb, Hb slope and within-patient Hb variability preceding an event were analysed using a time-dependent Cox model. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Average Hb <10 g/dl, decrease from stable baseline Hb >1 g/dl, last Hb <10 g/dl, Hb decline >1.5 g/dl/4 weeks and increased Hb variability were associated with a higher risk of the composite end point and all-cause mortality. An increased risk for CVE and MI was found with a last Hb <10 g/dl and with a decrease from baseline >1 g/dl in the preceding month. Conclusion: In multiple analyses from a large programme of prospective clinical trials of ESA treatment, risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity risk was consistently higher at Hb <10 g/dl and in patients whose Hb fell below target.