Frank Grieger

Treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease with rotigotine transdermal system: age-relationship to safety and tolerability.

Although dopamine agonists (DAs) are sometimes perceived as poorly tolerated by the elderly, there is little clinical evidence to support these concerns. Safety and tolerability of rotigotine have been demonstrated in four 6-month randomized placebo-controlled studies: two in early Parkinsons disease (PD) and two in advanced PD. A post hoc analysis of data from these pivotal trials was carried out to compare the adverse event (AE) profiles of younger and older patient populations. Data from early and advanced PD trials were separately pooled and evaluated using two age cut-offs (<65 vs. ≥ 65 years; <75 vs. ≥ 75 years). For most AEs, no age-related differences in incidence were observed. In the early PD pool, nausea (38% vs. 30%) and headache (15% vs. 9%) were more frequent in younger (<65 years) compared with older (≥ 65 years) patients using the 65-year age cut-off. Using the 75-year cut-off, nausea (36% vs. 21%) was more frequent in younger patients (<75 years) and dizziness (15% vs. 28%) was more frequent in older patients (≥ 75 years). In the advanced PD pool, nausea was more frequent in younger patients using the 65-year age cut-off (24% vs. 19%) and falls were more frequent in older patients using the 75-year age cut-off (8% vs. 13%). In this relatively healthy population which included only few patients aged 75 years or older, rotigotine was generally well tolerated regardless of age. Data from more representative PD populations are required to fully assess potential risks of DA therapy in elderly patients.

Impulse control disorder related behaviours during long-term rotigotine treatment: a post hoc analysis

Dopamine agonists in Parkinsons disease (PD) are associated with impulse control disorders (ICDs) and other compulsive behaviours (together called ICD behaviours). The frequency of ICD behaviours reported as adverse events (AEs) in long‐term studies of rotigotine transdermal patch in PD was evaluated.

Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease

BackgroundA recent trial involving predominantly Caucasian subjects with Parkinson Disease (PD) showed switching overnight from an oral dopaminergic agonist to the rotigotine patch was well tolerated without loss of efficacy. However, no such data have been generated for Korean patients.MethodsThis open-label multicenter trial investigated PD patients whose symptoms were not satisfactorily controlled by ropinirole, at a total daily dose of 3 mg to 12 mg, taken as monotherapy or as an adjunct to levodopa. Switching treatment from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine was carried out overnight, with a dosage ratio of 1.5:1. After a 28-day treatment period, the safety and tolerability of switching was evaluated. Due to the exploratory nature of this trial, the effects of rotigotine on motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD were analyzed in a descriptive manner.ResultsOf the 116 subjects who received at least one treatment, 99 (85%) completed the 28-day trial period. Dose adjustments were required for 11 subjects who completed the treatment period. A total of 76 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 45 subjects. No subject experienced a serious AE. Thirteen subjects discontinued rotigotine prematurely due to AEs. Efficacy results suggested improvements in both motor and nonmotor symptoms and quality of life after switching. Fifty-two subjects (46%) agreed that they preferred using the patch over oral medications, while 31 (28%) disagreed.ConclusionsSwitching treatment overnight from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch, using a dosage ratio of 1.5:1, was well tolerated in Korean patients with no loss of efficacy.Trial registrationThis trial is registered with the ClincalTrails.gov Registry (NCT00593606).

Relation of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale with the Clinical Global Impression severity scale, the restless legs syndrome 6-item questionnaire, and the restless legs syndrome-quality of life questionnaire

BACKGROUND The SP790 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00136045) showed benefits of rotigotine over placebo in improving symptom severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS), also known as Willis-Ekbom disease, on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impression item 1 (CGI-1), RLS 6-item questionnaire (RLS-6), and the RLS-quality of life questionnaire (RLS-QoL) in patients with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS. To provide clinical context for the IRLS and to guide the choice of assessment scales for RLS studies, our post hoc analysis of SP790 data evaluated associations between the IRLS and the CGI-1, IRLS and RLS-6, and the IRLS and RLS-QoL. METHODS Scale associations were analyzed at baseline and at the end of maintenance (EoM) using data from the safety set (rotigotine and placebo groups combined [n=458]). Changes from baseline to EoM in IRLS score vs comparator scale scores also were analyzed. RESULTS There was a trend towards increasing IRLS severity category with increasing CGI-1, RLS-6, and RLS-QoL score. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients showed correlations between IRLS and comparator scale scores at baseline and EoM as well as correlations for change from baseline to EoM. CONCLUSION Correlations between the IRLS and comparator scales were substantial. These data indicate that the IRLS is clinically meaningful. The IRLS and CGI-1 are generally sufficient to evaluate the overall severity and impact of RLS symptoms in clinical trials.

Rotigotine's effect on PLM-associated blood pressure elevations in restless legs syndrome: An RCT

Objective: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, interventional trial was conducted to investigate the effects of rotigotine patch on periodic limb movement (PLM)–associated nocturnal systolic blood pressure (SBP) elevations. Methods: Patients with moderate to severe restless legs syndrome (RLS) were randomized to rotigotine (optimal dose [1–3 mg/24 h]) or placebo. Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) assessments were performed during polysomnography at baseline and at the end of 4-week maintenance. Primary outcome was change in number of PLM-associated SBP elevations (defined as slope of linear regression ≥2.5 mm Hg/beat-to-beat interval over 5 consecutive heartbeats [≥10 mm Hg]). Additional outcomes were total SBP elevations, PLM-associated and total diastolic BP (DBP) elevations, periodic limb movements index (PLMI), and PLM in sleep arousal index (PLMSAI). Results: Of 81 randomized patients, 66 (37 rotigotine, 29 placebo) were included in efficacy assessments. PLM-associated SBP elevations were significantly reduced with rotigotine vs placebo (least squares mean treatment difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] −160.34 [−213.23 to −107.45]; p < 0.0001). Rotigotine-treated patients also had greater reduction vs placebo in total SBP elevations (−161.13 [−264.47 to −57.79]; p = 0.0028), PLM-associated elevations (−88.45 [−126.12 to −50.78]; p < 0.0001), and total DBP elevations (−93.81 [−168.45 to −19.16]; p = 0.0146), PLMI (−32.77 [−44.73 to −20.80]; p < 0.0001), and PLMSAI (−7.10 [−11.93 to −2.26]; p = 0.0047). Adverse events included nausea (rotigotine 23%; placebo 8%), headache (18% each), nasopharyngitis (18%; 8%), and fatigue (13%; 15%). Conclusions: Further investigation is required to determine whether reductions in nocturnal BP elevations observed with rotigotine might modify cardiovascular risk. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with moderate to severe RLS, rotigotine at optimal dose (1–3 mg/24 h) reduced PLM-associated nocturnal SBP elevations.

Significant association between systolic and diastolic blood pressure elevations and periodic limb movements in patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE A new and unique methodology was developed to evaluate the association between periodic limb movements (PLMs) and nocturnal blood pressure (BP) excursions in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS All data were collected at baseline of the ENCORE (Effects of Neupro on Cardiovascular Observations in Patients with Restless Legs Syndrome) study, a placebo-controlled polysomnographic study of rotigotine in patients with idiopathic RLS. Continuous beat-by-beat BP and heart rate assessments were performed during a full night of polysomnography. All BP elevations occurring with and without PLMs were systematically identified and analyzed. RESULTS Patients (n = 89) had a mean total of 508.9 ± 405.7 PLMs, 788.4 ± 261.9 systolic BP elevations, and 349.7 ± 242.9 diastolic BP elevations during the night. Higher time-adjusted frequencies of systolic BP elevations [mean difference (95% confidence interval, CI): 543.0 (487.2, I); p <0.0001] and diastolic BP elevations (205.8 (169.3, I); p <0.0001) were observed with PLMs than without PLMs. A peak in the frequency of PLM onset coincided with BP elevation onset. CONCLUSION Our methodology allowed the first evaluation of the total number of nocturnal PLM-associated BP elevations occurring in patients with RLS. Our data clearly indicate an interdependence between BP elevations and PLMs, and they have clinical relevance as BP variability is a potential cardiovascular risk factor.

Effectiveness and tolerability of rotigotine transdermal patch for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in a routine clinical practice setting in Germany

OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess effectiveness and tolerability of rotigotine in patients with moderate to severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) under daily practice conditions in Germany. METHODS In this 3-month noninterventional study, effectiveness was assessed using RLS-6 (primary variables were symptom severity when falling asleep [item 2] and during the night [item 3]). Data were collected at baseline and at the end of treatment. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Six hundred and eighty-four patients were treated with rotigotine and 418 (61%) completed the study. The full analysis set (FAS) comprised 564 patients (106 de novo; 458 pretreated [454 had complete rotigotine dosing data]). Mean rotigotine dose of longest duration was 2.4±1.4 mg/24 h. Rotigotine improved all RLS-6 items (mean change from baseline [item 2], -2.4±3.6; [item 3], -2.7±3.4), with the most pronounced improvement observed in daytime symptoms while at rest (item 4, -2.9±3.2). AEs were typical of dopaminergic treatment and transdermal administration. De novo patients generally started rotigotine on 1 mg/24 h (85% [90/106]) and pretreated patients on 1 (50% [227/454]) or 2 mg/24 h (40% [183/454]). Most patients who were pretreated with levodopa (57%), pramipexole (84%), or ropinirole (78%) monotherapy discontinued these medications on initiation of rotigotine. CONCLUSIONS Rotigotine was effective and well-tolerated when used in routine clinical practice.

Caregivers' and physicians' attitudes to rotigotine transdermal patch versus oral Parkinson's disease medication: an observational study.

Abstract Objective: To provide real-world data on caregiver and physician perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of rotigotine transdermal patch (Neupro) versus oral Parkinson’s Disease (PD) medication. Methods: Cross-sectional, non-interventional study in routine clinical practice in Germany (NCT01330290). Patients had PD with documented need for care, and had received rotigotine transdermal patch as add-on to oral PD treatment for ≥1 month. Caregivers/nurses and physicians assessed rotigotine transdermal patch versus oral PD medications using questionnaires. Specific questions regarding the possible benefits of transdermal application were asked and comprised questions on: swallowing dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, monitoring therapy, once daily application, application independently from meals, application to sleeping patients, caregiving efforts (caregivers only) and clinical aspects (physicians only). Each question was assessed on a 5 point scale ranging from -2 (major disadvantage) to 2 (major advantage) compared with oral treatment. Primary outcomes were mean total scores of all questions for caregivers/nurses and physicians who provided responses for ≥4 questions. As there are no validated tools to assess physician/caregiver preference in the PD setting, there is no reference against which the current findings can be compared; this study serves to pilot the questionnaires. Results: Questionnaire responses from 128 caregivers/nurses and 41 physicians were documented for 147 patients. One hundred (68%) patients had a caregiving family member; 40 (27%) were cared for by a nurse. Mean PD duration was 8.2 (SD 6.3) years; 136 (93%) patients were taking levodopa. Mean total score of caregivers’/nurses’ questionnaires was 1.32 (SD 0.67) and of physicians’ questionnaires was 1.46 (0.32) indicating a perceived advantage of rotigotine transdermal patch over oral PD therapy. Mean scores for individual questions were in the range 1.03–1.54 for caregivers/nurses and 1.15–1.87 for physicians. When given a choice about rationale to prescribe, physicians cited pharmaceutical form (patch) in 139 (95%) cases and active agent (rotigotine) in 89 (61%) cases. Conclusion: Caregivers/nurses and physicians perceived advantages with rotigotine transdermal patch compared to an oral PD medication as add-on therapy in patients with PD; advantages were observed in aspects of medical treatment as well as in everyday situations of caregiving of PD patients.

Alprostadil infusion in patients with dry age related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background: Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness among elderly individuals in industrialized countries. New drugs and advanced concepts for the treatment of dry AMD (dAMD) are needed. A new approach is the application of intravenous infusions of prostaglandin E1. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of intravenous alprostadil infusion in patients with dAMD. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, multi-center study. Patients were treated with intravenous infusion of either 60 µg alprostadil or placebo over 3 weeks. Main efficacy outcomes were mean differences in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline assessed in early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) lines immediately, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Results: In the full analysis set (FAS) a mean difference of 0.89 ± 0.537 ETDRS lines according to analysis of variance-covariance (ANCOVA) resulted in the alprostadil group (n = 16) and a mean difference of -0.05 ± 0.578 in the placebo group (n = 17) 3 months after end of treatment. Thus, effectiveness of alprostadil infusion was numerically superior to placebo treatment by a mean of 0.94 lines after 3 months (1.51 lines after 6 months). These findings were more pronounced in the per protocol set (PPS). Safety results were in line with the good safety profile of alprostadil. Conclusion: A numerical treatment effect in favor of alprostadil was visible, which lasted until the end of follow up. These results provide further evidence that alprostadil probably has a therapeutic effect in the treatment of dAMD and justify further clinical studies.

Effects of rotigotine on daytime symptoms in patients with primary restless legs syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Abstract Objective: This 12 week double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01569464) was conducted to evaluate the effects of rotigotine transdermal patch on daytime symptoms in patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS). Methods: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe RLS were randomized to rotigotine (optimal dose: 1–3 mg/24 h) or placebo. A modified four-assessment version (4:00 pm, 6:00 pm, 8:00 pm, and 10:00 pm) of the Multiple Suggested Immobilization Test (m-SIT) was performed at baseline and end of 4 week maintenance (EoM). Primary study outcomes were change from baseline to EoM in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) and in average of means for the m-SIT Discomfort Scale (m-SIT-DS) (combined average of mean values from each of the individual assessments). Secondary outcomes included average of means of Periodic Limb Movement during Wakefulness Index (PLMWI; PLM/hour) for the combination of m-SIT. Results: A total of 150 patients were randomized and 137 (rotigotine: 92/101 [91.1%]; placebo: 45/49 [91.8%]) completed maintenance. All 150 randomized patients were assessed for efficacy. At EoM, mean change in IRLS was −14.9 ± 9.3 with rotigotine vs. −12.7 ± 7.6 with placebo (ANCOVA, LS mean treatment difference [95% CI]: −0.27 [−2.96, 2.42]; p = 0.8451). Changes in average of means of m-SIT-DS values of each individual SIT were comparable with rotigotine (−2.68 ± 2.31) vs. placebo (−2.62 ± 2.61) (ANCOVA, LS mean treatment difference [95% CI]: 0.07 [−0.61, 0.75]; p = 0.8336) and comparable reductions in PLMWI were observed in both treatment groups (8.34 [−8.50, 25.17]; p = 0.3290). Rotigotine was generally well tolerated. Application site reactions (rotigotine: 20 patients [19.8%]; placebo: 4 [8.2%]) and nausea (16 [15.8%]; 3 [6.1%]) were the most common AEs. Conclusions: Rotigotine was beneficial in improving overall RLS symptom severity (assessed by IRLS) and RLS symptom severity at various times of the day (m-SIT-DS); however, superiority to placebo was not established.