Frank Hooper
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Frank Hooper.
Journal of Digital Imaging | 1998
Bruce I. Reiner; Eliot L. Siegel; Frank Hooper; Zenon Protopapas
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of filmless imaging on the frequency with which physicians access radiology images and to assess clinician perception of image accessibility using a hospital-wide Picture Archival and Communication System (PACS). Quantitative data were collected at the Baltimore VA Medical Center (BVAMC), prior to and after conversion to filmless imaging, to determine the frequency with which clinicians access radiology images. Survey data were also collected to assess physician preferences of image accessibility, time management, and overall patient care when comparing filmless and film-based modes of operation. In general, there was a significant increase in the average number of radiology images reviewed by clinicians throughout the hospital. However, the one area in the hospital where this trend was not observed was in the intensive care unit (ICU), where the frequency of image access was similar between film and filmless operations. Ninety-eight percent of clinicians surveyed reported improved accessibility of images in a filmless environment resulting in improved time management. The mean clinician estimate of time saved due to the use of PACS was 44 minutes. The study documented a combination of clinician perception of improved accessibility and substantial time savings with the use of a hospital-wide PACS, which was supported by objective measurements. The increased frequency of image review by clinicians and rapid image access should provide a further impetus to radiologists to decrease report turnaround time to provide “added value” for patient care.
Health Physics | 1999
Melissa A. McDiarmid; Frank Hooper; Katherine Squibb; Kathleen McPhaul
The utility of spot urine collections for uranium bioassay determinations was examined in a small cohort of depleted uranium exposed Gulf War veterans. Some members of the group are excreting elevated concentrations of urinary uranium resulting from the metabolism of retained metal fragments, the residua of several friendly fire incidents. Uranium determinations were performed on both 24-h timed collections and spot urine samples using kinetic phosphorescence analyzer (KPA) methodology. Results ranged from non-detectable to 30.7 mcg g(-1) creatinine in a 24-h collection. A creatinine-standardized spot sample and a 24-h uncorrected sample both correlated highly (R2=0.99) with a creatinine corrected 24-h collection, presumed to be the best estimate of the urinary uranium measure. This relationship was upheld when the population was stratified by uranium concentration into a high uranium group (> or = 0.05 mcg U/g creatinine) but for the lower uranium group (< 0.05 mcg U/g creatinine) more variability and a lower correlation was seen. The uncorrected spot sample, unadjusted for volume, concentration or creatinine had the lowest correlation with the 24-h creatinine adjusted result, especially at lower urinary uranium concentrations. This raises questions regarding the representativeness of such a sample in bioassay programs.
Annals of Epidemiology | 1996
Jay Magaziner; Sheryl Itkin Zimmerman; Pearl S. German; Kris Kuhn; Conrad May; Frank Hooper; Donna S. Cox; J. Richard Hebel; Steven J. Kittner; Lynda C. Burton; Paul S. Fishman; Bruce Kaup; Joana Rosario; Mary Cody
A new method for ascertaining dementia in epidemiologic research and the results of a study to evaluate it are described. The method relies on an expert panel of clinicians reviewing clinically relevant information collected by lay evaluators to arrive at a diagnosis based on DSM-III-R criteria. The approach was developed to study dementia in a statewide sample of over 2400 new admissions to 59 nursing homes in Maryland. Expert panel ascertainment of dementia was compared to that obtained by direct clinical evaluation for 100 nursing home residents. Agreement between the panel and direct assessment was 76% (kappa = 0.59) using a three-category classification of dementia, no dementia, and indeterminate. This ascertainment strategy provides an alternative to methods currently in use and is particularly well-suited for populations with a high prevalence, in those dispersed over large geographic areas, and when timely, cost-effective evaluations are required.
Controlled Clinical Trials | 2003
Steven E. Feldon; Roberta Scherer; Frank Hooper; Shalom E. Kelman; Robert S. Baker; Robert Granadier; Gregory S. Kosmorsky; Stuart R. Seiff; Kay Dickersin
The purpose of this article is to report the methods and results of the surgical quality assurance program associated with the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT). A surgical quality assurance committee developed and implemented a quality assurance program for a randomized clinical trial requiring surgical intervention. A surgical technique questionnaire was administered at two times during the study course, and maintenance of surgeon certification required submission and approval of a masked videotape of an optic nerve sheath decompression surgery by each study surgeon. Surgical quality was assessed through completion of surgical report forms and standardized, masked review of operative notes. Rates of compliance and intra- and interreviewer agreement were assessed for each aspect of the program. Twenty-five of 32 surgeons (81%) successfully completed and maintained certification. Item agreement varied from 21-92% among reviewers of satisfactory videotapes and 22-89% on unsatisfactory videotapes. Intrarater agreement for videotape acceptability was 11 of 13 (85%), and for specific surgical steps, 147 of 182 (81%). Operative notes were submitted for 123 of 125 (98%) patients receiving surgery. Interrater agreement on individual items ranged from 73-100%. Classification of individual items was identical on first and second review for 1285 of 1344 (95.6%) items. Overall agreement for individual reviewers was 93.8-97.8%. We conclude that use of a small peer review committee, which developed and oversaw a quality assurance program, allowed for consistent certification and monitoring of surgical performance. This in turn increased the credibility of the IONDT results, which demonstrated no difference in outcome between operated and unoperated groups of patients.
Medical Imaging 1997: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues | 1997
Bruce I. Reiner; Eliot L. Siegel; Frank Hooper; Zenon Protopapas; Stephen M. Pomerantz
Given todays competitive economic environment, maximization ofproductivity is essential to decrease operational costs and maximize patient throughput. A large scale PACS offers the potential to achieve lower operating costs, increased efficiency, and improved quality of care. A Picture Archival and Communications System (PACS) permits direct display of digital images. Such a system may reduce the need for time consuming processing associated with conventional film based systems
Military Medicine | 2002
Melissa A. McDiarmid; Frank Hooper; Katherine Squibb; Kathleen McPhaul; Susan M. Engelhardt; Richard Kane; Raymond DiPino; Michael Kabat
Medical Imaging 2005 - PACS and Imaging Informatics | 2005
Eliot L. Siegel; Bruce I. Reiner; Khan M. Siddiqui; Amy Musk; Susan Wood; Xiaolan Zeng; Nabile M. Safdar; Paul Nagy; Frank Hooper; Ryan Moffitt; Steve Severance
Controlled Clinical Trials | 1994
Frank Hooper; Judy Urban; Steven E. Feldon; Shalom E. Kelman; Robert S. Baker; Gregory S. Kosmorsky; Robert Granadier; Stuart R. Seiff