Frank Tamburrino

Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosed by Coronary Angiography and Breast Arterial Calcifications on Mammography: Meta-Analysis of the Data

BACKGROUND Previous studies evaluating breast arterial calcifications (BAC) as a risk marker for coronary artery disease (CAD) have been limited by sample size and have yielded mixed results. Our objective was to evaluate the association of BAC and CAD. METHODS Data sources included Medline (1970-2010), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register electronic database (1970-2010), and CINAHL (1970-2010). The search strategy included the keywords, breast artery calcification, vascular calcification on mammogram, coronary angiography, and meta-analysis. Eligible studies included female patients who had undergone coronary angiography, the gold standard for diagnosing CAD, and had screening mammograms that revealed the presence or absence of BAC. Information on eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, results, and methodologic quality was extracted by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS A total of 927 patients were enrolled in the five studies. There was a 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1-21-2.09) increased odds of angiographically defined CAD in patients with BAC seen on mammography. CONCLUSIONS The presence of BAC on mammography appears to increase the risk of having obstructive CAD on coronary angiography; thus, BAC may not be a benign finding.

Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes

Background— The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. Methods and Results— Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457 498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2 243 209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4th [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3rd [45–100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2nd quartile [16–44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1st quartile [⩽15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001). Conclusions— Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.

Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Bioprosthetic (BP) valves have been increasingly used for aortic valve replacement over the last decade. Due to their limited durability, patients presenting with failed BP valves are rising. Valve in Valve - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (ViV-TAVI) emerged as an alternative to the gold standard redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (redo-SAVR). However, the utility of ViV-TAVI is poorly understood. METHODS A systematic electronic search of the scientific literature was done in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only studies which compared the safety and efficacy of ViV-TAVI and redo-SAVR head to head in failed BP valves were included. RESULTS Six observational studies were eligible and included 594 patients, of whom 255 underwent ViV- TAVI and 339 underwent redo-SAVR. There was no significant difference between ViV-TAVI and redo- SAVR for procedural, 30 day and 1 year mortality rates. ViV-TAVI was associated with lower risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (OR: 0.43, CI: 0.21-0.89; P = 0.02) and a trend toward increased risk of paravalvular leak (PVL) (OR: 5.45, CI: 0.94-31.58; P = 0.06). There was no significant difference for stroke, major bleeding, vascular complications and postprocedural aortic valvular gradients more than 20 mm-hg. CONCLUSION Our results reiterate the safety and feasibility of ViV-TAVI for failed aortic BP valves in patients deemed to be at high risk for surgery. VIV-TAVI was associated with lower risk of permanent pacemaker implantation with a trend toward increased risk of paravalvular leak.

Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention OutcomesCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background— The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. Methods and Results— Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457 498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2 243 209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4th [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3rd [45–100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2nd quartile [16–44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1st quartile [⩽15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001). Conclusions— Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.

Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention OutcomesCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE: A 5-Year United States Experience (2005–2009)

Background— The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. Methods and Results— Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457 498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2 243 209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4th [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3rd [45–100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2nd quartile [16–44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1st quartile [⩽15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001). Conclusions— Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.