Frank Trudo

Fixed airflow obstruction in asthma: a descriptive study of patient profiles and effect on treatment responses

Abstract Background: The role of fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) in asthma is unclear. Objective: To assess the relationship between FAO and clinical features of asthma and the effect of FAO on treatment response. Methods: Post hoc descriptive analysis of data stratified by FAO category (screening post-albuterol FEV1/FVC <lower limit of normal [LLN] [FAO+] or ≥LLN [FAO−]) from two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of budesonide/formoterol or the monocomponents in mild−moderate (study I; aged ≥6 years; NCT00651651; placebo run-in) or moderate−severe (study II; ≥12 years; NCT00652002; budesonide run-in) asthma patients. Results: At baseline, FAO+ versus FAO− patients were more likely male and had longer asthma duration and worse pulmonary function. During the treatment period, lung function and asthma control measures with placebo were generally worse in FAO+ versus FAO− patients. Budesonide was effective on most end points in both FAO+ and FAO− patients. In contrast to FAO− patients, FAO+ patients were unresponsive to formoterol monotherapy in both study populations. Consistently greater improvements in most end points (including worsening of asthma as predefined by specific lung function parameters or clinical symptoms) were observed moving from formoterol to budesonide to budesonide/formoterol in both FAO+ and FAO− patients, with generally greater than additive effects on lung function with budesonide/formoterol in FAO+ patients. Conclusions: FAO+ patients tended to be more impaired and at greater risk for an asthma event versus FAO− patients. While FAO+ patients were non-responsive to formoterol monotherapy, they retained responsiveness to budesonide and had the greatest lung function and control responses to budesonide/formoterol that were similar to or greater than responses of FAO− patients.

Validation of an administrative claims-based diagnostic code for pneumonia in a US-based commercially insured COPD population.

Objective To estimate the accuracy of claims-based pneumonia diagnoses in COPD patients using clinical information in medical records as the reference standard. Methods Selecting from a repository containing members’ data from 14 regional United States health plans, this validation study identified pneumonia diagnoses within a group of patients initiating treatment for COPD between March 1, 2009 and March 31, 2012. Patients with ≥1 claim for pneumonia (International Classification of Diseases Version 9-CM code 480.xx–486.xx) were identified during the 12 months following treatment initiation. A subset of 800 patients was randomly selected to abstract medical record data (paper based and electronic) for a target sample of 400 patients, to estimate validity within 5% margin of error. Positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for the claims diagnosis of pneumonia relative to the reference standard, defined as a documented diagnosis in the medical record. Results A total of 388 records were reviewed; 311 included a documented pneumonia diagnosis, indicating 80.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.8% to 84.0%) of claims-identified pneumonia diagnoses were validated by the medical charts. Claims-based diagnoses in inpatient or emergency departments (n=185) had greater PPV versus outpatient settings (n=203), 87.6% (95% CI: 81.9%–92.0%) versus 73.4% (95% CI: 66.8%–79.3%), respectively. Claims-diagnoses verified with paper-based charts had similar PPV as the overall study sample, 80.2% (95% CI: 71.1%–87.5%), and higher PPV than those linked to electronic medical records, 73.3% (95% CI: 65.5%–80.2%). Combined paper-based and electronic records had a higher PPV, 87.6% (95% CI: 80.9%–92.6%). Conclusion Administrative claims data indicating a diagnosis of pneumonia in COPD patients are supported by medical records. The accuracy of a medical record diagnosis of pneumonia remains unknown. With increased use of claims data in medical research, COPD researchers can study pneumonia with confidence that claims data are a valid tool when studying the safety of COPD therapies that could potentially lead to increased pneumonia susceptibility or severity.

Benralizumab efficacy by atopy status and serum immunoglobulin E for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND Patients with severe asthma can have eosinophilic inflammation and/or allergen sensitization. Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic monoclonal antibody indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with severe asthma aged 12 years and older, and with an eosinophilic phenotype. OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy of benralizumab by atopic status and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations. METHODS We analyzed pooled results from the SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase III studies. Patients 12 to 75 years old with severe, uncontrolled asthma on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonists received 30 mg of subcutaneous benralizumab every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks) or placebo every 4 weeks. The analysis stratified patients who did and did not meet similar omalizumab-qualifying criteria of atopy and serum IgE levels 30 to 700 kU/L. Patients also categorized as having high serum IgE (≥150 kU/L) or low serum IgE (<150 kU/L) and as having atopy or no atopy. Efficacy outcomes were for all patients and by blood eosinophil counts and included annual exacerbation rate ratio and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second change at treatment end vs placebo. RESULTS Benralizumab every 8 weeks decreased exacerbations by 46% (95% confidence interval 26-61, P = .0002) and increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second by 0.125 L (95% confidence interval 0.018-0.232, P = .0218) vs placebo for patients with at least 300 eosinophils/μL who met the atopy and IgE criteria. For patients with eosinophilia and high or low IgE, treatment with benralizumab every 8 weeks resulted in 42% and 43% decreases in exacerbation rate (P ≤ .0004) and 0.123- and 0.138-L increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P ≤ .0041) vs placebo, respectively. CONCLUSION Benralizumab treatment decreased exacerbations and improved lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma regardless of serum IgE concentrations and atopy status.

Comparative Effectiveness of Budesonide-Formoterol Combination and Fluticasone-Salmeterol Combination for Asthma Management: A United States Retrospective Database Analysis

BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness of the budesonide-formoterol fumarate dihydrate combination (BFC) and the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol combination (FSC) therapy on asthma exacerbation has not been assessed in real-world settings in the United States. OBJECTIVE To compare exacerbation rates and health care utilization for patients with asthma who initiate BFC versus FSC therapy. METHODS This retrospective cohort comparative effectiveness study queried medical and pharmacy data for patients with asthma from a large managed care data repository that covers major US population centers. The patients were 12 to 64 years old, with ≥12 months of pre- and postindex enrollment and ≥1 pharmacy claim(s) for BFC or FSC initiated during June 1, 2007, and September 30, 2010; the first prescription fill date was defined as the index date. Patients with other respiratory diseases and/or cancer were excluded. Exacerbation was defined as asthma-related hospitalization, emergency department visit, and/or oral corticosteroid prescription fill. Cohorts were matched by using propensity scores. RESULTS A total of 3043 patients per cohort were matched and balanced. During the 12 months following the initiation the BFC cohort had lower adjusted exacerbations per person year versus the FSC cohort (0.85 vs 0.93; RR 0.92, 95% CI [0.85-0.99]), lower oral corticosteroid fill rates, and fewer asthma-related emergency department visits but comparable asthma-related hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Asthma exacerbation was lower for BFC versus FSC initiators due to lower rates of oral corticosteroid use and asthma-related emergency department visits, which indicate better treatment effectiveness of those patients initiated with BFC compared with FSC.

Assessment of Consistency of Fixed Airflow Obstruction Status during Budesonide/Formoterol Treatment and Its Effects on Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Asthma

BACKGROUND The consistency of fixed airflow limitation status during treatment in patients with asthma is unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the consistency of fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) status during treatment and effects on treatment response. METHODS This post hoc analysis from a 12-week study (NCT00652002) assessed patients aged 12 years or more with moderate-to-severe asthma randomized to twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 320/9 μg, BUD pMDI 320 μg, FM 9 μg via dry-powder inhaler, or placebo. FAO status was assessed postbronchodilator at screening and after study drug administration at weeks 2, 6, and 12 via the forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio < lower limit of normal (LLN) (FAO+) or ≥ LLN (FAO-). Patients with persistent FAO- and FAO+ retained their screening FAO status at all visits. Patients with inconsistent FAO changed categories at least once during the study. Assessments included early withdrawal due to predefined worsening asthma events (PAEs), lung function, and symptoms. RESULTS Of 386 patients, 29% had persistent FAO+, 31% inconsistent FAO, and 40% persistent FAO-. PAEs were lowest in the FAO- group overall and with BUD/FM treatment in patients with FAO+ and inconsistent FAO. Baseline demographics and treatment responses of the inconsistent FAO group were most similar to the FAO+ group. The greatest improvements in asthma control days and use of rescue medications were seen with BUD/FM treatment, regardless of FAO status. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one third of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in this study had inconsistent FAO, and their treatment responses were most similar to patients with FAO+. Regardless of FAO status, patients treated with BUD/FM experienced the most improved treatment responses and fewest withdrawals due to PAEs.

A US database study characterizing patients initiating a budesonide–formoterol combination versus tiotropium bromide as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objective To compare clinical and demographic characteristics, resource utilization and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients prior to initiating budesonide–formoterol combination (BFC) or tiotropium-maintenance therapy. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study used claims-based diagnosis to identify COPD patients in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database who initiated BFC or tiotropium therapy between March 1, 2009 and January 31, 2012 (intake period); the index date was defined as the initial prescription fill for either agent. Patients diagnosed with respiratory tract cancer or receiving inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-adrenergic agonists or tiotropium in 12 months prior to index date were excluded. Categorical variables were evaluated with χ2 tests; mean cost differences were evaluated using γ-regression. Results Overall, 6,940 BFC and 10,831 tiotropium patients were identified. The BFC group was younger (mean age 64 versus 67 years), with a greater proportion of females (54% versus 51%). BFC-treated patients had more comorbid respiratory conditions, including asthma (25% versus 13%), but fewer comorbid cardiovascular conditions, including atherosclerosis (7% versus 10%) and myocardial infarction (4% versus 6%). A greater proportion of BFC patients received prior respiratory medication, including oral corticosteroids (46% versus 35%) and short-acting β2-agonists (44% versus 35%). Tiotropium-treated patients had a greater mean number of COPD-related outpatient visits (4.6 versus 4.1). BFC-treated patients had lower total all-cause (

Bronchodilator effect of single-dose formoterol administered by pressurized metered-dose inhaler in children with asthma aged 6 to <12 years receiving budesonide.

17,259 versus

Burden of asthma among patients adherent to ICS/LABA: A real-world study

17,926) and COPD-related (

Health Care Utilization and Costs After Initiating Budesonide/Formoterol Combination or Fluticasone/Salmeterol Combination Among COPD Patients New to ICS/LABA Treatment.

1,718 versus

Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and tiotropium bromide among COPD patients new to these controller treatments.

1,930) health care costs, driven by lower all-cause and COPD-related inpatient expenditures. Conclusion Initiators of BFC or tiotropium showed differences in clinical and demographic characteristics and health care utilization and costs prior to starting COPD maintenance therapy.