Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Frank W. Worms is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Frank W. Worms.


Angle Orthodontist | 2009

Extreme Variation in Vertical Facial Growth and Associated Variation in Skeletal and Dental Relations

John R. Isaacson; Robert J. Isaacson; T. Michael Speidel; Frank W. Worms

Abstract No Abstract Available. Presented by Dr. Robert Isaacson as the fourth Wendell L. Wylie Memorial Lecture at the University of California, November 1970.


Angle Orthodontist | 1976

Surgical Orthodontic Treatment Planning: Profile Analysis and Mandibular Surgery

Frank W. Worms; Robert J. Isaacson; Speidel Tm

Abstract No Abstract Available. Read at the January, 1975 meeting of the Midwestern Component of the Angle Society.


Angle Orthodontist | 1980

Posttreatment stability and esthetics of orthognathic surgery.

Frank W. Worms; Speidel Tm; Bevis Rr; Waite De

Several procedures were identified as important adjuncts to successful orthognathic results. Among these were the use of laminagraphic X-rays to monitor condyle displacement, condyle resorption and fibrous union problems. Other aspects involve gnathological errors in splint and positioner design, misdiagnosis because of a lack of soft-tissue analysis, differential treatment planning in deciding if surgery is needed, and understanding surgical effects on proportionality of the nose and lip esthetics.


American Journal of Orthodontics | 1977

Effects of rotational jaw growth on the occlusion and profile.

Robert J. Isaacson; Richard J. Zapfel; Frank W. Worms; Arthur G. Erdman

S tudies using cephalograms employ a method of tracing skeletal structures on a radiograph exposed at one time point, tracing these structures again on a second radiograph exposed at a second time point, superimposing the two tracings on some central reference point, and connecting presumed identical landmarks with a straight line .6p 6 This technique produces a self-fulfilling conclusion that the face and jaws grow downward and forward from beneath the cranium in a linear, translatory fashion. This perspective has influenced orthodontists to expect that the dental occlusion will also be carried in a similar, straight-line, downward and forward manner. Interest in vertical facial growth lead BjSrk,lv * Bjiirk and Palling,s Bjork and Skieller,4 e)degaard,*l-I2 Schudy,13-15 and Isaacson and associatess-lo in recent years to focus more attention on nonlinear jaw growth or jaw rotation. Jaw rotation was not recognized by early workers using cephalograms because of surface remodeling bone changes masking rotational effects as they occurred. This phenomenon of bone remodeling in jaws during normal growth has been carefully documented by BjSrk and Skieller,4 using metallic implants, and Enlow and Hunter,s using histologic techniques. Tooth movement also masked changes in dissimilar jaw growth by compensatory movements at the periodontal regions causing the occlusion to remain apparently in nearly constant relations.4 A recent report focused on a mechanism whereby vertical condylar growth can be converted into changes in anteroposterior jaw relationslo This mechanism explains how vertical condylar growth can, under specific conditions, result in significant anteroposterior dental and profile changes. According to this report, the long-held and widely reported concept of linear downward and forward facial growth is the exception rather than the rule. This report noted that, in order for translatory mandibular growth to occur, vertical


American Journal of Orthodontics | 1977

Tooth-size discrepancy in mandibular prognathism

Thomas P. Sperry; Frank W. Worms; Robert J. Isaacson; T. Michael Speidel

A Bolton analysis of seventy-eight cases of Angle Class III malocclusion, twenty-six cases of Angle Class I malocclusion, and twenty-six cases of Angle Class II malocclusion was recorded. Frequency of excess mandibular tooth structure, magnitude of the excess, over-all ratios, and anterior segment ratios were computed and analyzed. Two clinical cases were presented to show the advantage of tooth-size harmony in mandibular prognathism. Analysis of the data as presented above suggests the following conclusions: 1. The frequency of mandibular tooth-size excess (over-all ratio) in this sample was greater in cases of mandibular prognathism than in Angle Class I and Angle Class II cases. 2. In those cases with mandibular tooth-size excess, there was a suggestion that the magnitude of the excess was greater in cases of mandibular prognathism than in Angle Class I and Angle Class II cases. 3. A tooth-size discrepancy analysis should be included as one part of the diagnostic records for mandibular prognathism.


Angle Orthodontist | 1977

The role of dental compensations in the orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism

Sperry Tp; Speidel Tm; Robert J. Isaacson; Frank W. Worms

Thirty-six patients with orthodontically treated mandibular prognathism were recalled for cephalometric and clinical evaluation. A comparison group of 32 non-Class III patients was similarly examined. Analysis of variables associated with the anterior dentition and documentationtion of labial gingival recession and tooth mobility led to the following conclusions concerning the role of dental compensations in the orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism. 1. Vertical and horizontal dental compensations were quantitated in the dentition of the study group (pretreatment to postretention). 2. Increased labial gingival recession and increased tooth mobility in functional jaw positions were present in anterior maxillary and mandibular teeth of the study group relative to the comparison group. 3. Proper diagnosis and the establishment of realistic treatment objectives by clinician and patient are necessary to avoid undesirable sequelae and/or undesirable facial esthetics in the treatment of mandibular prognathism.


American Journal of Orthodontics | 1978

Mechanics, growth, and Class II corrections

Bruce Willard Hultgren; Robert J. Isaacson; Arthur G. Erdman; Frank W. Worms

Growth of the orofacial region is quantitatively described by locating the center of mandibular rotation relative to the cranial base. The center of mandibular rotation is positioned by the ratio of vertical facial growth (AFH/PFH) and the direction of condylar growth. Appliance therapy is associated with changes in the means of both of these parameters. These changes reduce or stop favorable anterior mandibular rotation and redirect the mean condylar growth vector more posteriorly. When appliance therapy is stopped, these parameters return toward their resting values. The mean direction of the condylar growth vector became even more anteriorly directed after treatment than the pretreatment mean value. These data support the hypothesis that orthodontic appliances significantly alter the facial growth pattern and when they are stopped, the growth pattern tends to rebound to or beyond the pretreatment values.


American Journal of Orthodontics | 1976

Measurement of tooth movement

Robert J. Isaacson; Frank W. Worms; T. Michael Speidel

1. Tooth movement relative to the alveolar bone can be precisely described only by superimposing on fixed points in the bone. Implants are the best known way today. Over short-term studies laminagraphy and the use of bony trabeculations are also useful. Remodeling occurs extensively on bony surfaces, making them too labile for use as stable landmarks. To project small amounts of tooth movement based on the use of such methods is so questionable as to represent little better than a guess or a clinical impression. 2. Growth can be separated into vertical and anteroposterior vectors with respect to the dentition. Since the occlusion is the concern, orientation of vertical and anteroposterior vectors to the occlusal plane is a reasonable baseline. The vertical and anteroposterior dental changes may not show a linear relationship in the anterior and posterior parts of the mouth when jaw rotations are occurring. 3. Growth can be disproportionate in either the vertical and/or the anteroposteroir plane of space. If the vertical increments of the anterior face differ from the vertical increments at the posterior face, mandibular rotations occur. This growth is accompanied by dental compensations that tend to mask the rotation. Therefore, open bite and deep bite are frequently skeletal growth problems. 4. Disproportional forward growth of the maxilla or mandible in an anteroposterior direction can lead to Class II or III relations. The growth that leads to Class II or Class III is accompanied by dental migrations that tend to mask this disproportionate growth. Orthodontic treatment of growth disproportionalities usually represents attempts to make the teeth further compensate. If surgical options are elected, the dental compensations should be removed prior to surgery in order to achieve a full surgical correction. 5. The teeth tend to move and grow in the opposite direction of the growth disproportionality. The teeth tend to mask the disproportionality. Thus, in an open bite, the incisors tend to move vertically further than in deep bites. Vertical imbalances may be more difficult to mask. Backward rotation of the mandible requires more vertical movement at the incisor than at the molar just to maintain vertical incisor relationships.


Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology | 1985

The sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible

Myer S. Leonard; Paul Ziman; Richard R. Bevis; Gerald Cavanaugh; Michael T. Speidel; Frank W. Worms

Modifications of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible have essentially reduced the major drawbacks of the procedure, such as condyle displacement, short-term skeletal relapse, and protracted maxillomandibular fixation and mental nerve dysesthesia. These techniques have proved effective over a period of 4 years in fifty-seven patients treated.


Angle Orthodontist | 2009

Soft tissue changes associated with mandibular subapical osteotomy

Speidel Tm; Marine Km; Frank W. Worms

Sophisticated treatment planning for those individuals with severe dental and facial disproportions requires accurate prediction of posttreatment results. Preand posttreatment cephalometric X-rays for a group of twelve patients treated by a combined orthodontic-oral surgical approach were evaluated. The surgery was of either the standard mandibular subapical osteotomy or Kole type of procedure. Surgical repositioning of the anterior mandibular alveolus resulted in various changes in hard tissue and soft tissue profile. In summary, these changes were: 1. Decreased lower facial height. 2. More relaxed lip posture as revealed by an increased superior vermilion lip length and decreased inferior vermilion lip length. 3. Stomion moved inferior and posterior relative to the lower facial plane. 4. Superior labial sulcus became less concave. 5. Inferior labial sulcus became more concave. 6. Superior vermilion and inferior vermilion moved posterior relative to the lower facial plane. 7. Chin radius and lip-chin-throat angle decreased. 8. Overbite and overjet increased while Wits analysis decreased. 9. Facial contour angle was unchanged. Changes were similar for both standard subapical and Kole groups with the main difference being a greater reduction in facial height with the Kole group.

Collaboration


Dive into the Frank W. Worms's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge