Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Franklin M. Zaromb is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Franklin M. Zaromb.


Memory & Cognition | 2010

The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes

Franklin M. Zaromb; Henry L. Roediger

In two experiments with categorized lists, we asked whether the testing effect in free recall is related to enhancements in organizational processing. During a first phase in Experiment 1, subjects studied one list over eight consecutive trials, they studied another list six times while taking two interspersed recall tests, and they learned a third list in four alternating study and test trials. On a test 2 days later, recall was directly related to the number of tests and inversely related to the number of study trials. In addition, increased testing enhanced both the number of categories accessed and the number of items recalled from within those categories. One measure of organization also increased with the number of tests. In a second experiment, different groups of subjects studied a list either once or twice before a final criterial test, or they studied the list once and took an initial recall test before the final test. Prior testing again enhanced recall, relative to studying on the final test a day later, and also improved category clustering. The results suggest that the benefit of testing in free recall learning arises because testing creates retrieval schemas that guide recall.


Psychological Science | 2009

Using Popular Films to Enhance Classroom Learning The Good, the Bad, and the Interesting

Andrew C. Butler; Franklin M. Zaromb; Keith B. Lyle; Henry L. Roediger

Popular history films sometimes contain major historical inaccuracies. Two experiments investigated how watching such films influences peoples ability to remember associated texts. Subjects watched film clips and studied texts about various historical topics. Whereas the texts contained only correct information, the film clips contained both correct information (consistent with the text) and misinformation (contradicted by the text). Before watching each clip, subjects received a specific warning, a general warning, or no warning about the misinformation. One week later, they returned for a cued-recall test about the texts. Watching a film clip increased correct recall of consistent information relative to recall of the same information when subjects did not see the clip. However, when the information in the film contradicted the text, subjects often (falsely) recalled misinformation from the film. The specific warning substantially reduced this misinformation effect. Teachers should use popular history films with caution and should warn students about major inaccuracies in the films.


Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 2006

Temporal Associations and Prior-List Intrusions in Free Recall

Franklin M. Zaromb; Marc W. Howard; Emily D. Dolan; Yevgeniy B. Sirotin; Michele Tully; Arthur Wingfield; Michael J. Kahana

When asked to recall the words from a just-presented target list, subjects occasionally recall words that were not on the list. These intrusions either appeared on earlier lists (prior-list intrusions, or PLIs) or had not appeared over the course of the experiment (extra-list intrusions). The authors examined the factors that elicit PLIs in free recall. A reanalysis of earlier studies revealed that PLIs tend to come from semantic associates as well as from recently studied lists, with the rate of PLIs decreasing sharply with list recency. The authors report 3 new experiments in which some items in a given list also appeared on earlier lists. Although repetition enhanced recall of list items, subjects were significantly more likely to make PLIs following the recall of repeated items, suggesting that temporal associations formed in earlier lists can induce recall errors. The authors interpret this finding as evidence for the interacting roles of associative and contextual retrieval processes in recall. Although contextual information helps to focus recall on words in the target list, it does not form an impermeable boundary between current- and prior-list experiences.


Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2012

Cross-Cultural Dimensions of Meaning in the Evaluation of Events in World History?: Perceptions of Historical Calamities and Progress in Cross-Cultural Data From Thirty Societies

James H. Liu; Darío Páez; Katja Hanke; Alberto Rosa; Denis J. Hilton; Chris G. Sibley; Franklin M. Zaromb; Ilya Garber; Chan-Hoong Leong; Gail Moloney; Velichko H. Valchev; Cecilia Gastardo-Conaco; Li-Li Huang; Ai-Hwa Quek; Elza Techio; Ragini Sen; Yvette van Osch; Hamdi Muluk; Wolfgang Wagner; Feixue Wang; Sammyh S. Khan; Laurent Licata; Olivier Klein; János László; Márta Fülöp; Jacky Chau-kiu Cheung; Xiaodong Yue; Samia Ben Youssef; Uichol Kim; Young-Shin Park

The universality versus culture specificity of quantitative evaluations (negative-positive) of 40 events in world history was addressed using World History Survey data collected from 5,800 university students in 30 countries/societies. Multidimensional scaling using generalized procrustean analysis indicated poor fit of data from the 30 countries to an overall mean configuration, indicating lack of universal agreement as to the associational meaning of events in world history. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified one Western and two non-Western country clusters for which adequate multidimensional fit was obtained after item deletions. A two-dimensional solution for the three country clusters was identified, where the primary dimension was historical calamities versus progress and a weak second dimension was modernity versus resistance to modernity. Factor analysis further reduced the item inventory to identify a single concept with structural equivalence across cultures, Historical Calamities, which included man-made and natural, intentional and unintentional, predominantly violent but also nonviolent calamities. Less robust factors were tentatively named as Historical Progress and Historical Resistance to Oppression. Historical Calamities and Historical Progress were at the individual level both significant and independent predictors of willingness to fight for one’s country in a hierarchical linear model that also identified significant country-level variation in these relationships. Consensus around calamity but disagreement as to what constitutes historical progress is discussed in relation to the political culture of nations and lay perceptions of history as catastrophe.


Cambridge University Press | 2009

The role of repeated retrieval in shaping collective memory

Henry L. Roediger; Franklin M. Zaromb; Andrew C. Butler

This book is about culture and memory, about how the society and culture in which people grow up helps to determine their individual memories, collective memories, and identity. We will emphasize how the process of repeated retrieval helps to shape our memories. Before we get to our main story, we need to provide some background. Many different cultures exist within the community of scholars who study memory, from humanistic approaches to a whole variety of scientific approaches to the field (see Roediger, Dudai & Fitzpatrick, 2007). In our chapter we attempt to blend some insights from several approaches to studying memory. In particular, we apply the principles that have emerged from research in experimental cognitive psychology to issues in collective memory in hopes that combining insights from various disciplines may point the way to progress in understanding larger issues in the study of memory. Our chapter has six parts. First, we discuss issues in collective memory – how we conceive the topic – by considering three conceptual oppositions (following Wertsch & Roediger, in press). We then discuss how these issues might play out in learning about history from textbooks. Then, we describe three main mechanisms that we believe play a critical role in shaping collective memory: the act of retrieving information from memory; repeated retrieval of information over long periods of time; and finally the role of feedback in modifying memories. The third, fourth, and fifth sections of the chapter spell out these mechanisms and how they might contribute to the creation of collective memories. The sixth section explores the issue of accuracy in collective memory, and how it is affected by the mechanisms of retrieval and feedback. Finally, we end with some conclusions.


Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology | 2011

Cross-Cultural Dimensions of Meaning in the Evaluation of Events in World History?

James H. Liu; Darío Páez; Katja Hanke; Alberto Rosa; Denis J. Hilton; Chris G. Sibley; Franklin M. Zaromb; Ilya Garber; Chan-Hoong Leong; Gail Moloney; Velichko H. Valchev; Cecilia Gastardo-Conaco; Li-Li Huang; Ai-Hwa Quek; Elza Techio; Ragini Sen; Yvette van Osch; Hamdi Muluk; Wolfgang Wagner; Feixue Wang; Sammyh S. Khan; Laurent Licata; Olivier Klein; János László; Márta Fülöp; Jacky Chau-kiu Cheung; Xiaodong Yue; Samia Ben Youssef; Uichol Kim; Young-Shin Park

The universality versus culture specificity of quantitative evaluations (negative-positive) of 40 events in world history was addressed using World History Survey data collected from 5,800 university students in 30 countries/societies. Multidimensional scaling using generalized procrustean analysis indicated poor fit of data from the 30 countries to an overall mean configuration, indicating lack of universal agreement as to the associational meaning of events in world history. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified one Western and two non-Western country clusters for which adequate multidimensional fit was obtained after item deletions. A two-dimensional solution for the three country clusters was identified, where the primary dimension was historical calamities versus progress and a weak second dimension was modernity versus resistance to modernity. Factor analysis further reduced the item inventory to identify a single concept with structural equivalence across cultures, Historical Calamities, which included man-made and natural, intentional and unintentional, predominantly violent but also nonviolent calamities. Less robust factors were tentatively named as Historical Progress and Historical Resistance to Oppression. Historical Calamities and Historical Progress were at the individual level both significant and independent predictors of willingness to fight for one’s country in a hierarchical linear model that also identified significant country-level variation in these relationships. Consensus around calamity but disagreement as to what constitutes historical progress is discussed in relation to the political culture of nations and lay perceptions of history as catastrophe.


Memory & Cognition | 2009

The effects of “effort after meaning” on recall: Differences in within- and between-subjects designs

Franklin M. Zaromb; Henry L. Roediger

In four experiments, we examined free recall of ambiguous sentences with or without corresponding cues to facilitate comprehension, using Auble and Franks’s (1978) paradigm to examine effort after meaning (Bartlett, 1932). The ambiguous sentences were studied without cues, with cues meaningfully embedded in them, with cues provided shortly before the sentence (precue), or with cues following the sentence after several seconds (delayed cue). When these conditions were manipulated within subjects, the process of cue integration in the pre- and delayed-cue conditions enhanced recall, relative to the no-cue and embedded-cue conditions. Furthermore, in a test condition in which subjects first attempted to recall the cues alone, recall was also best in the delayed-cue condition. The effects described above did not occur when the cue presentation conditions varied between subjects, and on a test of order reconstruction, there was even an advantage for sentences studied in the embedded-cue condition over those studied in the delayed-cue condition. The dissociative effects of experimental design on sentence recall and order reconstruction suggest that effort after meaning might enhance memory for study items at the cost of impairing memory for temporal order information.


American Psychologist | 2006

Benjamin franklin and shock-induced amnesia

Stanley Finger; Franklin M. Zaromb

Shock-induced amnesia received considerable attention after Cerletti popularized electroconvulsive shock therapy in the late 1930s. Yet, often overlooked is the fact that Benjamin Franklin recognized that passing electricity through the head could affect memory for the traumatic event. Franklin described his findings on himself and others in several letters from the mid-1700s, 2 of which were published in his lifetime. What he observed was confirmed in 1783 by physician Jan Ingenhousz, who was one of his correspondents. Although Ingenhousz had lost his memory for his electrical accident and was confused immediately afterward, he felt strangely elated and unusually sharp the next morning. Hence, he called for clinical trials with patients with melancholia who were not responding to more conventional therapies. After Franklin received Ingenhouszs letter, he also called for clinical trials. Neither man, however, tied the possible new cure for melancholia to the memory loss--nor did the operators that began to treat some patients with melancholia successfully with cranial shocks. Only much later would the amnesia be thought to be associated with the cure.


Archive | 2017

A Typology of Memory Terms

Henry L. Roediger; Franklin M. Zaromb; Wenbo Lin

Psychologists have used numerous terms to describe and distinguish among various types of memory. Some of the most popular terms are briefly defined and illustrated according to their usage. These include broad distinctions such as explicit and implicit memory, conscious and unconscious forms of memory, voluntary and involuntary retention, intentional and incidental learning and retrieval, declarative and procedural memory, and retrospective and prospective memory. Additional forms of memory are discussed and organized in terms of their duration, ranging from brief sensory memories and short-term conscious memories to varieties of long-term memory.


Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference | 2008

1.02 – A Typology of Memory Terms

Henry L. Roediger; Franklin M. Zaromb; Michael K. Goode

Psychologists have used numerous terms to describe and distinguish among various types of memory. Some of the most popular terms are briefly defined and illustrated according to their usage. These include broad distinctions such as explicit and implicit memory, conscious and unconscious forms of memory, voluntary and involuntary retention, intentional and incidental learning and retrieval, declarative and procedural memory, and retrospective and prospective memory. Additional forms of memory are discussed and organized in terms of their duration, ranging from brief sensory memories and short-term conscious memories to varieties of long-term memory.

Collaboration


Dive into the Franklin M. Zaromb's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henry L. Roediger

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Kahana

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darío Páez

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elza Techio

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katja Hanke

Jacobs University Bremen

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge