František Máliš
Forest Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by František Máliš.
BioScience | 2017
Kris Verheyen; Pieter De Frenne; Lander Baeten; Donald M. Waller; Radim Hédl; Michael P. Perring; Haben Blondeel; Jörg Brunet; Markéta Chudomelová; Guillaume Decocq; Emiel De Lombaerde; Leen Depauw; Thomas Dirnböck; Tomasz Durak; Ove Eriksson; Frank S. Gilliam; Thilo Heinken; Steffi Heinrichs; Martin Hermy; Bogdan Jaroszewicz; Michael A Jenkins; Sarah E Johnson; Keith Kirby; Martin Kopecký; Dries Landuyt; Jonathan Lenoir; Daijiang Li; Martin Macek; Sybryn L. Maes; František Máliš
More and more ecologists have started to resurvey communities sampled in earlier decades to determine long-term shifts in community composition and infer the likely drivers of the ecological changes observed. However, to assess the relative importance of and interactions among multiple drivers, joint analyses of resurvey data from many regions spanning large environmental gradients are needed. In this article, we illustrate how combining resurvey data from multiple regions can increase the likelihood of driver orthogonality within the design and show that repeatedly surveying across multiple regions provides higher representativeness and comprehensiveness, allowing us to answer more completely a broader range of questions. We provide general guidelines to aid the implementation of multiregion resurvey databases. In so doing, we aim to encourage resurvey database development across other community types and biomes to advance global environmental change research.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2012
František Máliš; Karol Ujházy; Anna Vodálová; Ivan Barka; Vladimir Caboun; Zuzana Sitková
Planting of spruce on the sites of natural beech forests is very common across Europe. Its effect on ground vegetation is assumed to be strong on poorly buffered soils. We investigate associated patterns of herb layer composition and diversity on crystalline and carbonate parent rock in the Western Carpathians. We analysed a series of vegetation plots with respect to the partial relationship of spruce cover with vascular understorey species (ordination), to the affinity of plant species to sample groups with different cover of spruce and to plant diversity and species turnover within these groups. In our data set spruce and beech were the most important tree species with the closest association with understorey composition and their covers explained similar proportions of herb layer variability. Species composition was significantly different under spruce canopies, but species richness was not lower (crystalline region) or even higher (carbonate region), and overall diversity of vascular plants was only slightly affected. Most species negatively or positively associated with spruce differed between bedrock types, but those with the same positive relationship are diagnostic for natural spruce forests (Vaccinio-Piceetea). The species turnover between beech- and spruce-dominated stands was much higher on crystalline bedrock. The higher amounts of light and acid litter in spruce stands, limited growth of spruce on dolomite bedrock and the competitive pressure of beech seem to be the most important drivers of the herb layer changes.
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2018
Kris Verheyen; Martin Bažány; Ewa Chećko; Markéta Chudomelová; Déborah Closset-Kopp; Patryk Czortek; Guillaume Decocq; Pieter De Frenne; Luc De Keersmaeker; Cecilia Enríquez García; Martina Fabšičová; John-Arvid Grytnes; Lucia Hederová; Radim Hédl; Thilo Heinken; Fride Høistad Schei; Soma Horváth; Bogdan Jaroszewicz; Edyta Jermakowicz; Tereza Klinerová; Jens Kolk; Martin Kopecký; Iwona Kuras; Jonathan Lenoir; Martin Macek; František Máliš; Tone Martinessen; Tobias Naaf; László F. Papp; Ágnes Papp-Szakály
Aim: Revisits of non-permanent, relocatable plots first surveyed several decades ago offer a direct way to observe vegetation change and form a unique and increasingly used source of information for global change research. Despite the important insights that can be obtained from resurveying these quasi-permanent vegetation plots, their use is prone to both observer and relocation errors. Studying the combined effects of both error types is important since they will play out together in practice and it is yet unknown to what extent observed vegetation changes are influenced by these errors. Methods: We designed a study that mimicked all steps in a resurvey study and that allowed determination of the magnitude of observer errors only vs the joint observer and relocation errors. Communities of vascular plants growing in the understorey of temperate forests were selected as study system. Ten regions in Europe were covered to explore generality across contexts and 50 observers were involved, which deliberately differed in their experience in making vegetation records. Results: The mean geographic distance between plots in the observer+relocation error data set was 24m. The mean relative difference in species richness in the observer error and the observer+relocation data set was 15% and 21%, respectively. The mean pseudo-turnover between the five records at a quasi-permanent plot location was on average 0.21 and 0.35 for the observer error and observer+relocation error data sets, respectively. More detailed analyses of the compositional variation showed that the nestedness and turnover components were of equal importance in the observer data set, whereas turnover was much more important than nestedness in the observer+relocation data set. Interestingly, the differences between the observer and the observer+relocation data sets largely disappeared when looking at temporal change: both the changes in species richness and species composition over time were very similar in these data sets. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that observer and relocation errors are non-negligible when resurveying quasi-permanent plots. A careful interpretation of the results of resurvey studies is warranted, especially when changes are assessed based on a low number of plots. We conclude by listing measures that should be taken to maximally increase the precision and the strength of the inferences drawn from vegetation resurveys.
Central European Forestry Journal | 2017
Bohdan Konôpka; Jozef Pajtík; František Máliš; Vladimír Šebeň; Miriam Maľová
Abstract The paper focused on the estimation of aboveground biomass and its carbon stock in the vegetation cover on the territory of the High Tatras twelve years after a large-scale wind disturbance. Besides biomass quantification of main plant groups (i.e. trees and ground vegetation) we considered plant components with special regard to carbon rotation rate. The measurements were performed on two transects each containing 25 plots sized 4 × 4 m. Height and stem diameter of all trees on the plots were measured and used for biomass estimation. To quantify the biomass of ground vegetation, six subplots sized 20 × 20 cm were systematically placed on each plot and the aboveground biomass was harvested. The plant material was subjected to chemical analyses to quantify its carbon concentration. The study showed that while the wind disturbance caused dramatic decrease of carbon stock, young post-disturbance stands with abundant ground vegetation, represented large carbon flux via litter fall. Twelve years after the wind disturbance, the trees contributed to carbon stock more than the ground vegetation. However, the opposite situation was recorded for the carbon flux to litter that was related to the dominance of annual plants in the above-ground biomass of ground vegetation. The carbon stock in the biomass of young trees and ground vegetation represented about 8,000 kg per ha. The young stands manifested a dynamic growth, specifically the aboveground biomass increased annually by one third. The results confirmed different carbon regimes in the former old (pre-disturbance) and sparse young (post-disturbance) stands.
Global Change Biology | 2015
Markus Bernhardt-Römermann; Lander Baeten; Dylan Craven; Pieter De Frenne; Radim Hédl; Jonathan Lenoir; Didier Bert; Jörg Brunet; Markéta Chudomelová; Guillaume Decocq; Hartmut Dierschke; Thomas Dirnböck; Inken Dörfler; Thilo Heinken; Martin Hermy; P.W.F.M. Hommel; Bogdan Jaroszewicz; Andrzej Keczyński; Daniel L. Kelly; K. J. Kirby; Martin Kopecký; Martin Macek; František Máliš; Michael Mirtl; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Tobias Naaf; Miles Newman; George Peterken; Petr Petřík; Wolfgang Schmidt
Global Change Biology | 2016
František Máliš; Martin Kopecký; Petr Petřík; Jozef Vladovič; Ján Merganič; Tomáš Vida
Climate Research | 2017
Pavel Cudlín; Matija Klopcic; Roberto Tognetti; František Máliš; Concepción L. Alados; Peter Bebi; Karsten Grunewald; Vlatko Andonowski; Nicola La Porta; Svetlana Bratanova-Doncheva; Eli Kachaunova; Magda Edwards-Jonášová; Josep M. Ninot; Andreas Rigling; Annika Hofgaard; Tomáš Hlásny; Petr Skalák; Frans Emil Wielgolaski
Preslia | 2016
Mariana Ujházyová; Karol Ujházy; Milan Chytrý; Wolfgang Willner; Marek Čiliak; František Máliš; Michal Slezák
European Journal of Forest Research | 2013
Michal Bošeľa; František Máliš; Ladislav Kulla; Vladimír Šebeň; Gaby Deckmyn
Journal of forest science | 2018
František Máliš; Jozef Vladovič; V. Čaboun; A. Vodálová