Fraser C. Lott
Met Office
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Fraser C. Lott.
Journal of Climate | 2016
Fraser C. Lott; Peter A. Stott
AbstractAlthough it is critical to assess the accuracy of attribution studies, the fraction of attributable risk (FAR) cannot be directly assessed from observations since it involves the probability of an event in a world that did not happen, the “natural” world where there was no human influence on climate. Instead, reliability diagrams (usually used to compare probabilistic forecasts to the observed frequencies of events) have been used to assess climate simulations employed for attribution and by inference to evaluate the attribution study itself. The Brier score summarizes this assessment of a model by the reliability diagram. By constructing a modeling framework where the true FAR is already known, this paper shows that Brier scores are correlated to the accuracy of a climate model ensemble’s calculation of FAR, although only weakly. This weakness exists because the diagram does not account for accuracy of simulations of the natural world. This is better represented by two reliability diagrams from e...
Environmental Research Letters | 2014
Fraser C. Lott; Margaret Gordon; Richard Graham; Adam A. Scaife; Michael Vellinga
This study investigates the reliability of seasonal to multi-decadal climate simulations of the wet seasons of several key African regions. It is found that reliability varies across regions and seasons, and that simulations of precipitation are universally less reliable than simulations of temperature. Similar levels of reliability are found across all the timescales considered for most (but not all) region/season combinations. Reliability for temperatures increases on longer timescales, both due to the differences in the modelling systems for each timescale and, in part, due to the contribution from systematic climate warming. Though the use of reliability is well-established for forecasting, its meaning for attribution is less clear, and further work is underway to further clarify this.
Climate Dynamics | 2018
Laura Wilcox; Pascal Yiou; Mathias Hauser; Fraser C. Lott; Geert Jan van Oldenborgh; Ioana Colfescu; Buwen Dong; Gabi Hegerl; Len Shaffrey; Rowan Sutton
Summer 2012 was very wet in northern Europe, and unusually dry and hot in southern Europe. We use multiple approaches to determine whether anthropogenic forcing made the extreme European summer of 2012 more likely. Using a number of observation- and model-based methods, we find that there was an anthropogenic contribution to the extremes in southern Europe, with a qualitative consensus across all methodologies. There was a consensus across the methodologies that there has been a significant increase in the risk of hot summers in southern Europe with climate change. Most approaches also suggested a slight drying, but none of the results were statistically significant. The unusually wet summer in northern Europe was made more likely by the observed atmospheric circulation pattern in 2012, but no evidence was found for a long-term trend in circulation.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2018
Cheng Qian; Jun Wang; Siyan Dong; Hong Yin; Claire Burke; Andrew Ciavarella; Buwen Dong; Nicolas Freychet; Fraser C. Lott; Simon F. B. Tett
Anthropogenic influences are estimated to have reduced the likelihood of an extreme cold event in midwinter with the intensity equal to or stronger than the record of 2016 in eastern China by about two‐thirds.
Journal of Climate | 2018
Bo Christiansen; Carmen Alvarez-Castro; Nikolaos Christidis; Andrew Ciavarella; Ioana Colfescu; Tim Cowan; Jonathan M. Eden; Mathias Hauser; Nils Hempelmann; Katharina Klehmet; Fraser C. Lott; Cathy Nangini; Geert Jan van Oldenborgh; René Orth; Peter A. Stott; Simon F. B. Tett; Robert Vautard; Laura Wilcox; Pascal Yiou
AbstractAn attribution study has been performed to investigate the degree to which the unusually cold European winter of 2009/10 was modified by anthropogenic climate change. Two different methods have been included for the attribution: one based on large HadGEM3-A ensembles and one based on a statistical surrogate method. Both methods are evaluated by comparing simulated winter temperature means, trends, standard deviations, skewness, return periods, and 5% quantiles with observations. While the surrogate method performs well, HadGEM3-A in general underestimates the trend in winter by a factor of ⅔. It has a mean cold bias dominated by the mountainous regions and also underestimates the cold 5% quantile in many regions of Europe. Both methods show that the probability of experiencing a winter as cold as 2009/10 has been reduced by approximately a factor of 2 because of anthropogenic changes. The method based on HadGEM3-A ensembles gives somewhat larger changes than the surrogate method because of differe...
Geophysical Research Letters | 2013
Fraser C. Lott; Nikolaos Christidis; Peter A. Stott
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
Fraser C. Lott; Peter A. Stott; Dann M Mitchell; Nikos Christidis; N. P. Gillett; Leopold Haimberger; Judith Perlwitz; Peter W. Thorne
Weather and climate extremes | 2015
Omar Bellprat; Fraser C. Lott; Carla Gulizia; Hannah R. Parker; Luana Albertani Pampuch; Izidine Pinto; Andrew Ciavarella; Peter A. Stott
Geophysical Research Letters | 2013
Dann M Mitchell; Peter A. Stott; Lesley J. Gray; Myles R. Allen; Fraser C. Lott; Neal Butchart; Steven C. Hardiman; Scott M. Osprey
Environmental Research Letters | 2018
Chunxiang Li; Qinhua Tian; Rong Yu; Baiquan Zhou; Jiangjiang Xia; Claire Burke; Buwen Dong; Simon F. B. Tett; Nicolas Freychet; Fraser C. Lott; Andrew Ciavarella