Frauke M. Hellwig
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Frauke M. Hellwig.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience | 2004
Anja Ischebeck; Peter Indefrey; Nobuo Usui; Izuru Nose; Frauke M. Hellwig; Masato Taira
In order to separate the cognitive processes associated with phonological encoding and the use of a visual word form lexicon in reading, it is desirable to compare the processing of words presented in a visually familiar form with words in a visually unfamiliar form. Japanese Kana orthography offers this possibility. Two phonologically equivalent but visually dissimilar syllabaries allow the writing of, for example, foreign loanwords in two ways, only one of which is visually familiar. Familiarly written words, unfamiliarly written words, and pseudowords were presented in both Kana syllabaries (yielding six conditions in total) to participants during an fMRI measurement with a silent articulation task (Experiment 1) and a phonological lexical decision task (Experiment 2) using an event-related design. Consistent over two experimental tasks, the three different stimulus types (familiar, unfamiliar, and pseudoword) were found to activate selectively different brain regions previously associated with phonological encoding and word retrieval or meaning. Compatible with the predictions of the dual-route model for reading, pseudowords and visually unfamiliar words, which have to be read using phonological assembly, caused an increase in brain activity in left inferior frontal regions (BA 44/47), as compared to visually familiar words. Visually familiar and unfamiliar words were found to activate a range of areas associated with lexico-semantic processing more strongly than pseudowords, such as the left and right temporo-parietal region (BA 39/40), a region in the left middle/inferior temporal gyrus (BA 20/21), and the posterior cingulate (BA 31).
Brain and Language | 2004
Peter Indefrey; Frauke M. Hellwig; Hans Herzog; Rüdiger J. Seitz; Peter Hagoort
Following up on an earlier positron emission tomography (PET) experiment (Indefrey et al., 2001), we used a scene description paradigm to investigate whether a posterior inferior frontal region subserving syntactic encoding for speaking is also involved in syntactic parsing during listening. In the language production part of the experiment, subjects described visually presented scenes using either sentences, sequences of noun phrases, or sequences of syntactically unrelated words. In the language comprehension part of the experiment, subjects were auditorily presented with the same kinds of utterances and judged whether they matched the visual scenes. We were able to replicate the previous finding of a region in caudal Brocas area that is sensitive to the complexity of syntactic encoding in language production. In language comprehension, no hemodynamic activation differences due to syntactic complexity were found. Given that correct performance in the judgment task did not require syntactic processing of the auditory stimuli, the results suggest that the degree to which listeners recruit syntactic processing resources in language comprehension may be a function of the syntactic demands of the task or the stimulus material.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition | 2012
Georgina Oliver; Marianne Gullberg; Frauke M. Hellwig; Holger Mitterer; Peter Indefrey
This study investigated the development of second language online auditory processing with ab initio German learners of Dutch. We assessed the influence of different levels of background noise and different levels of semantic and syntactic target word predictability on word-monitoring latencies. There was evidence of syntactic, but not lexical-semantic, transfer from the L1 to the L2 from the onset of L2 learning. An initial stronger adverse effect of noise on syntactic compared to phonological processing disappeared after two weeks of learning Dutch suggesting a change towards more robust syntactic processing. At the same time the L2 learners started to exploit semantic constraints predicting upcoming target words. The use of semantic predictability remained less efficient compared to native speakers until the end of the observation period. The improvement and the persistent problems in semantic processing we found were independent of noise and rather seem to reflect the need for more context information to build up online semantic representations in L2 listening.
NeuroImage | 2000
Peter Indefrey; Colin J. Brown; Frauke M. Hellwig; Hans Herzog; Rüdiger J. Seitz; Peter Hagoort
In reading. the meaning of regular words (“rave”) can in principle be accessed directly via the visual word form, or via phonological recoding (“rave” > lreivl) based on regular spelling-to-sound correspondences (“ave” > /eiv/ as in “pave, shave, slave”). In this study we assessed the neural correlates of these lexical access routes using stimuli that selectively rely on one of the two processes: The meaning of irregular words (“have”) can only be accessed via the visual wordform, the meaning of homophonic pseudowords (“brane” brain) only via phonological recoding. In order to verify access to meaning without an additional contaminating task we simultaneously recorded event-related scalp potentials (ERP) to identify the so-called N400-effect reflecting the semantic relation between words.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2001
Peter Indefrey; Colin M. Brown; Frauke M. Hellwig; Katrin Amunts; Hans Herzog; Rüdiger J. Seitz; Peter Hagoort
Journal of Memory and Language | 1993
U. H. Frauenfelder; R.H. Baayen; Frauke M. Hellwig; R. Schreuder
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 2004
Gabriella Vigliocco; David P. Vinson; Peter Indefrey; Willem J. M. Levelt; Frauke M. Hellwig
Written Language and Literacy | 2004
Susanne R. Borgwaldt; Frauke M. Hellwig; Annette M. B. de Groot
TBA; (2015) | 2015
Peter Indefrey; Frauke M. Hellwig; Douglas J. Davidson; Marianne Gullberg
Archive | 2012
Georgina Oliver; Max Planck; Marianne Gullberg; Frauke M. Hellwig; Holger Mitterer; Peter Indefrey