Frédéric Daems

Analytical methods used to quantify isoflavones in cow’s milk: a review

This paper provides an update and comprehensive review of the analytical methods used for quantifying isoflavones and their metabolites in cow’s milk. Isoflavones are secondary plant metabolites that are similar to 17 β-estradiol in chemical structure. They form one of the most common categories of phytoestrogens. Numerous health benefits have been attributed to isoflavones, but many of these compounds are also considered to be endocrine disruptors, with adverse effects on health. These contradictory trends offer an attractive prospect for future research, and therefore, sensitive and reliable analytical methods are required to clarify various issues about isoflavones. For this review, a structured methodology was used to select 26 relevant articles published between 2005 and 2015 from the Scopus and CAB Abstract databases. The review discusses individual steps of the analytical procedures described in these articles, including sample preparation, instrumental analysis and validation. The most commonly used analytical procedure is sample preparation involving liquid-liquid extraction and an enzymatic hydrolysis step followed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry analysis. Currently, however, there is no standardized procedure for the sample preparation and analysis of isoflavones in milk.

Optimized Quantitative Method for Determining Isoflavones and Equol in Bovine Digestive Fluids and Feces

ABSTRACT Many studies have been conducted on the impact of animal feed on isoflavones and their metabolite concentrations in bovine milk, but few studies have focused on the development and validation of analytical protocols for quantifying these compounds in biological matrices other than milk and plants. The purpose of this study was to develop a method that would enable four isoflavones and equol in cows’ feces and digestive fluids to be quantified simultaneously. The method is based on aglycones released by methanolic ultrasound-assisted extraction, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and high-performance liquid chromatography tandem–mass spectrometry analysis. The sample preparation was optimized using the Box–Behnken design. The selected extraction conditions were 80°C, 10 min, and 50% methanol for digestive fluids and 70°C, 35 min, and 60% methanol for feces. For hydrolysis, the selected conditions were 37°C, 1 h, and a pH of 6 for both matrices. The analytical method showed a good linear regression model ranging from 5 to 125 ng mL−1. Both inter- and intraday accuracy (≤8.5 and ≤12.3%) and precision (≤11.1 and ≤15.2%) were suitable. No matrix effects were found. There was good repeatability and extract stability for at least 4 days of storage at − 20 and 6°C. All recoveries were in the acceptable range of 70–120% for both matrices, except for biochanin A in feces, where the value was approximately 43%. This sensitive and reliable method will be useful for monitoring the passage of isoflavones and equol in the digestive system of ruminants.