Frederick M. Pfeffer

Dual responsive chemosensors for anions: the combination of fluorescent PET (Photoinduced Electron Transfer) and colorimetric chemosensors in a single molecule

The design and synthesis of two novel fluorescent PET anion sensors is described, based on the principle of ‘fluorophore-spacer-(anion)receptor’. The sensors 1 and 2 employ simple diaromatic thioureas as anion receptors, and the fluorophore is a naphthalimide moiety that absorbs in the visible part of the spectrum and emits in the green. Upon recognition of anions such as F− and AcO− in DMSO, the fluorescence emission of 1 and 2 was ‘switched off’, with no significant changes in the UV–vis spectra. This recognition shows a 1:1 binding between the receptor and the anions. In the case of F−, further additions of the anion, gave rise to large changes in the UV–vis spectra, where the λmax at 455 nm was shifted to 550 nm. These changes are thought to be due to the deprotonation of the 4-amino moiety of the naphthalimide fluorophore. This was in fact found to be the case, using simple naphthalimide derivatives such as 6. Sensors 1 and 2 can thus display dual sensing action; where at low concentrations, the fluorescence emission is quenched, and at higher concentrations the absorption spectra are modulated.

Fluorescent photoinduced electron transfer (PET) sensors for anions; from design to potential application.

This mini review highlights the synthesis and photophysical evaluation of anion sensors, for nonaqueous solutions, that have been developed in our laboratories over the last few years. We have focused our research mainly on developing fluorescent photoinduced electron transfer (PET) sensors based on the fluorophore-spacer-anion receptor principle using several anthracene (emitting in the blue) and 1,8-naphthalimide (emitting in the green) fluorophores, with the aim of targeting biologically and industrially relevant anions such as acetates, phosphate and amino acids, as well as halides such as fluoride. The receptors and the fluorophore are separated by a short methyl or ethyl spacer, where the charge neutral anion receptors are either aliphatic or aromatic urea (or thiourea) moieties. For these, the anion recognition is through hydrogen bonding, yielding anion:receptor complexes. Such bonding gives rise to enhanced reduction potential in the receptor moieties which causes enhancement in the rate of PET quenching of the fluorophore excited state from the anion:receptor moiety. This design can be further elaborated on by incorporating either two fluorophores, or urea/thiourea receptors into the sensor structures, using anthracene as a fluorophore. For the latter design, the sensors were designed to achieve sensing of bis-anions, such as di-carboxylates or pyrophosphate, where the anion bridged the anthracene moiety. In the case of the naphthalimide based mono-receptor based PET sensors, it was discovered that in DMSO the sensors were also susceptible to deprotonation by anions such as F− at high concentrations. This led to substantial changes in the absorption spectra of these sensors, where the solution changed colour from yellow/green to deep blue, which was clearly visible to the naked eye. Hence, some of the examples presented can act as dual fluorescent-colorimetric sensors for anions. Further investigations into this phenomenon led to the development of simple colorimetric sensors for fluorides, which upon exposure to air, were shown to fix carbon dioxide as bicarbonate.

Simultaneous control of spectroscopic and electrochemical properties in functionalised electrochemiluminescent tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complexes

Using a combination of electrochemical, spectroscopic and computational techniques, we have explored the fundamental properties of a series of ruthenium diimine complexes designed for coupling with other molecules or surfaces for electrochemiluminescence (ECL) sensing applications. With appropriate choice of ligand functionality, it is possible to manipulate emission wavelengths while keeping the redox ability of the complex relatively constant. DFT calculations show that in the case of electron withdrawing substituents such as ester or amide, the excited state is located on the substituted bipyridine ligand whereas in the case of alkyl functionality it is localised on a bipyridine. The factors that dictate annihilation ECL efficiency are interrelated. For example, the same factors that determine ΔG for the annihilation reaction (i.e. the relative energies of the HOMO and LUMO) have a corresponding effect on the energy of the excited state product. As a result, most of the complexes populate the excited state with an efficiency (Φ(ex)) of close to 80% despite the relatively wide range of emission maxima. The quantum yield of emission (Φ(p)) and the possibility of competing side reactions are found to be the main determinants of ECL intensity.

New and improved ‘LEGO’ BLOCK protocols for the direct synthesis of hydrophilic ribbon molecules with acid, ester or peptide functionality

Abstract Hydrophilic ribbon molecules are produced directly from the reaction of cyclobutene epoxide BLOCKs with norbornene dipolarophiles or indirectly by chemical modification of substituents in preformed lipophilic ribbon molecules. The formation of di- and tetra-acid chloride epoxides holds the key to the formation of ester, acid and amide BLOCKs which are active in 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with norbornene dipolarophiles, thereby delivering a wide range of substituents into the ribbon molecules and opening up combinatorial opportunities at each step.

Domino Heck-Aza-Michael Reactions: Efficient Access to 1-Substituted Tetrahydro-β-carbolines

A simple and efficient palladium-catalyzed domino reaction for the synthesis of a series of C1-substituted tetrahydro-beta-carbolines is described. This domino process involves a Heck reaction at the indole 2-position of a halogenated tryptamine precursor, followed by intramolecular aza-Michael addition.

Determining binding constants from 1H NMR titration data using global and local methods: a case study using [n]polynorbornane-based anion hosts

From data generated using 1H NMR titrations, different methodologies to calculate binding constants are compared. The ‘local’ analysis method that uses only a single isotherm (only one H-bond donor) is compared against the ‘global’ method (that includes many or all H-bond donors). The results indicate that for simple systems both methods are suitable, however, the global approach consistently provides a K a value with uncertainties up to 30% smaller. For more complex binding, the global analysis method gives much more robust results than the local methods. This study also highlights the need to explore several different modes when data do not fit well to a simple 1:1 complexation model and illustrates the need for better methods to estimate uncertainties in supramolecular binding experiments.

Size matters—strong binding of the terephthalate dianion by thiourea functionalised fused [n]polynorbornane hosts

Remarkably strong binding of the new [5]polynorbornane based host to the terephthalate dianion is based on size complementarity of the preorganised binding cleft with the rigid dicarboxylate guest.

Conformationally preorganised hosts for anions using norbornane and fused [n]polynorbornane frameworks

Norbornane and fused [n]polynorbornane frameworks are readily synthesised, can be tailored to a variety of predictable geometries and can be functionalised regiospecifically. As such, these highly preorganised scaffolds offer the supramolecular chemist an excellent starting point when designing hosts for specific guests. This feature article will highlight the evolution of our research from relatively simple norbornane based anion receptors to more sophisticated tetrathioureido functionalised fused [n]polynorbornane hosts.

A general approach to N-heterocyclic scaffolds using domino Heck-aza-Michael reactions.

Palladium-catalyzed domino Heck-aza-Michael reactions for the synthesis of a series of C1-substituted tetrahydro-β-carbolines, tetrahydroisoquinolines and isoindolines are described. The domino process involves the initial intermolecular Heck reaction of an aryl bromide with an electron deficient alkene, followed by an intramolecular aza-Michael reaction to form the new N-heterocycle in high yield.

Comparison of homoleptic and heteroleptic 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ruthenium complexes as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence reagents in aqueous solution

We have conducted a comprehensive comparative study of Ru(bipy)(3)(2+), Ru(bipy)(2)(phen)(2+), Ru(bipy)(phen)(2)(2+), and Ru(phen)(3)(2+) as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence (ECL) reagents, to address several previous conflicting observations and gain a greater insight into their potential for chemical analysis. Clear trends were observed in many of their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties, but the relative chemiluminescence or ECL intensity with a range of analytes/co-reactants is complicated by the contribution of numerous (sometimes opposing) factors. Significantly, the reversibility of cyclic voltammetric responses for the complexes decreased as the number of phenanthroline ligands was increased, due to the lower stability of their ruthenium(III) form in the aqueous solvent. This trend was also evident over a longer timescale when the ruthenium(III) form was spectrophotometrically monitored after chemical oxidation of the ruthenium(II) complexes. In general, the greater stability of Ru(bipy)(3)(3+) resulted in lower blank signals, although this effect was less pronounced with ECL, where the reagent is oxidised in the presence of the co-reactants. Nevertheless, this shows the need to compare signal-to-blank ratios or detection limits, rather than the more common comparisons of overall signal intensity for different ruthenium complexes. Furthermore, our results support previous observations that, compared to Ru(bipy)(3)(2+), Ru(phen)(3)(2+) provides greater ECL and chemiluminescence intensities with oxalate, which in some circumstances translates to superior detection limits, but they do not support the subsequent generalised notion that Ru(phen)(3)(2+) is a more sensitive reagent than Ru(bipy)(3)(2+) for all analytes.