Frederick W. Reimherr

The Reliability and Validity of Self- and Investigator Ratings of ADHD in Adults

Objective: Little information is available comparing self- versus investigator ratings of symptoms in adult ADHD. The authors compared the reliability, validity, and utility in a sample of adults with ADHD and also as an index of clinical improvement during treatment of self- and investigator ratings of ADHD symptoms via the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS). Method: We analyzed data from two double-blind, parallel-design studies of 536 adult ADHD patients, randomized to 10-week treatment with atomoxetine or placebo. Outcome variables included ADHD symptom severity (CAARS self- and investigator ratings), psychiatric symptom comorbidity, and functioning. Results: All five CAARS subscales showed good internal consistency at each time point. Similarly, interrater reliability was acceptable for each subscale. Following treatment, CAARS total scores and subscale scores improved significantly from baseline. CAARS subscales also predicted changes in other psychiatric symptoms and functioning. Overall, baseline investigator ratings were stronger predictors of treatment outcome than baseline self-report scores. Conclusions: The CAARS demonstrated good internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, as well as sensitivity to treatment outcome. The finding of greater predictive power of investigator-rated baseline scores merits further investigation. (J. of Att. Dis. 2008; 11(6) 711-719)

A multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and safety of 150 and 300 mg/d sustained-release bupropion tablets versus placebo in depressed outpatients

This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the antidepressant efficacy and safety of bupropion sustained-release (SR) tablets (150 mg QD or 150 mg BID) with placebo in outpatients with moderate-to-severe depression. The study consisted of a 1-week placebo phase followed by 8 weeks of active treatment with bupropion SR 150 mg/d (150 mg QD, n = 121) or 300 mg/d (150 mg BID, n = 120) or placebo (n = 121). Efficacy was measured by changes in scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impressions for Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions for Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) scales. Safety was monitored by regular assessment of vital signs and adverse events as well as by pretreatment and posttreatment physical and clinical laboratory examinations. By day 56, both bupropion SR treatments were more effective in relieving the symptoms of depression than was placebo. Compared with those receiving placebo, patients in the bupropion SR 150- and 300-mg/d groups had significantly reduced symptoms by treatment day 56, as measured on the 17-item HAM-D, CGI-S, and CGI-I scales (P < 0.05). Bupropion SR was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported by bupropion-treated patients; 95% of all reported adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, laboratory test results, or physical findings were observed. A greater mean weight loss was observed at the end of treatment in both the bupropion SR 150-mg (0.5 kg) and bupropion SR 300-mg (1.0 kg) group compared with placebo (0.2 kg). We found that bupropion SR 150 mg administered either once or twice daily was more effective than placebo in treating depression and that once-daily dosing appears to be at least as effective as twice-daily dosing. Should this prove true, depressed patients may be able to benefit from the convenience and improved tolerability associated with once-daily dosing.

Analysis of chromosome 18 DNA markers in multiplex pedigrees with manic depression

Six pedigrees segregating manic-depressive illness (MDI) were analyzed for linkage to 21 highly polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers on chromosome 18. These markers span almost the entire length of the chromosome, and gaps between markers are less than 20 cM. In particular, we analyzed several markers localizing to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 18 which generated lod scores suggestive of linkage in an independent study. Lod score analysis was performed and results were examined by family. One region produced positive lod scores, though at 18q23 and not in the pericentromeric region. We additionally used two nonparametric methods because the true mode of transmission of MDI is unknown; results were again somewhat suggestive for markers in the region of 18q23 but not in the pericentromeric region.

Quality of life assessment in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with atomoxetine

Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has its onset during childhood and is estimated to affect 3% to 7% of school-aged children. Unfortunately, the disorder frequently persists into adult life. The burden of this disorder is considerable and is often characterized by academic (or occupational) impairment and dysfunction within the family and society. Despite the existence of research demonstrating the effects of ADHD on certain aspects of life, the clinical trials of treatments for this disorder have focused primarily on efficacy and safety. Methods: Atomoxetine was approved in the United States in November 2002 for the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults. The present study uses data from a clinical trial of atomoxetine in adult patients with ADHD that incorporated a measure of health-related quality of life (the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey [SF-36]) as part of the overall assessment of the success of this relatively new treatment. The primary outcome measure for ADHD symptoms was the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS) ADHD total symptom score. Results: In agreement with previous studies, adult patients with ADHD treated with atomoxetine at typical doses showed significant amelioration of ADHD symptoms, as measured on the CAARS. At baseline, the measures of overall mental health (one aspect of quality of life) of adult patients with ADHD were below the average level, as measured on the SF-36. Treatment with atomoxetine significantly improved the measures of mental health and ameliorated the ADHD symptoms. In addition, the 2 measures were correlated. Conclusions: These data suggest that pharmacological intervention with atomoxetine not only ameliorates ADHD symptoms in adult patients but also improves their perceived quality of life.

A one year trial of methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD.

Objective: To determine the effects of long-term methylphenidate treatment on symptom severity and social adjustment in adult ADHD. Method: Adults (n = 116) meeting operational diagnostic criteria for ADHD (the “Utah Criteria”) entered a randomized double-blind crossover trial of methylphenidate and placebo. Participants who improved on immediate-release methylphenidate entered a 12-month, open-label trial. Outcomes were assessed using the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS), Clinical Global Impression—Improvement (CGI-I), global assessment of functioning (GAF), and the Weissman Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). Results: In the double-blind trial more patients improved (50% reduction of symptoms) receiving methylphenidate (74%) than placebo (21%, p = .001). During the open-label trial, symptom severity decreased 80% from baseline, and the WSAS decreased >50% in all subscales. The average GAF improved significantly (p < .0001). Conclusion: ADHD adults, who responded to methylphenidate in a short-tem, placebo-controlled trial, responded to long-term treatment with marked improvements in ADHD symptoms and psychosocial functioning.

Safety of abrupt discontinuation of fluoxetine : A randomized, placebo-controlled study

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be associated with new adverse events after abrupt discontinuation. Hypothesizing that the long half-life of fluoxetine would be protective, this study analyzed the effects of abrupt fluoxetine discontinuation during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of depression maintenance treatment. After 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment (20 mg/day), 395 responders were abruptly randomized to placebo (N = 96) or to continued fluoxetine (N = 299). Patients were seen at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 after randomization. Reports of new or worsened adverse events were similar for both groups at each visit after randomization. Patient discontinuations related to adverse events were also similar in both groups. Mild, self-limited lightheadedness or dizziness occurred in a small percentage of patients who discontinued fluoxetine treatment but was of little clinical significance. No cluster of symptoms suggestive of a discontinuation syndrome was observed. Abrupt discontinuation of fluoxetine treatment was well tolerated and did not seem to be associated with significant clinical risk. Fluoxetine may offer a potential safety advantage over shorter-acting agents with respect to treatment interruption and/or discontinuation and may be a better choice for those patients who are likely to miss doses because of travel or forgetfulness.

Cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in adults with attention deficit disorder, residual type

Following the hypothesis that attention deficit disorder in adults (attention deficit disorder, residual type; ADD, RT), as well as in children, is associated with decreased central dopaminergic activity, the authors measured lumbar cerebrospinal fluid monoamine metabolites in a group of adults with ADD, RT and matched control subjects. Patients were then entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of methylphenidate. It was predicted that the patients would have lower levels of homovanillic acid (HVA), the major dopamine metabolite in humans. Patients who had a significant response to methylphenidate showed a trend in this direction. Nonresponding patients had significantly higher levels of HVA than controls.

Narrow-band blue-light treatment of seasonal affective disorder in adults and the influence of additional nonseasonal symptoms

Background: Bright visible‐spectrum light therapy has proven effective in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and recent basic research suggests that blue wavelengths ∼470 nm account for that effectiveness. To more stringently test the importance of these wavelengths, bright red‐light was used for the placebo (control) condition. Methods: Thirty subjects meeting DSM‐IV criteria for SAD were randomized to narrow‐band light‐emitting diode panels emitting blue‐ or red‐light in this 3‐week, parallel, double‐blind trial. Twenty‐five subjects participated in an open‐label blue‐light follow‐up. Subjects were divided in a blinded, post hoc manner into two groups: SAD only and those experiencing depression with seasonal intensification. The outcome was assessed using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale–17 item version (HAMD‐17) and the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale—SAD version. Responders were defined by Clinical Global Impression—Improvement scale. Results: HAMD‐17 scores improved more under the blue‐light condition (51%) than under the red‐light condition (32%) (P=.05). Further, in the blue arm 60% of subjects responded compared with 13% in the red arm (P=.01). During the open‐label phase, subjects from both double‐blind arms improved over baseline. SAD alone patients responded numerically better to treatment than those experiencing depression with seasonal intensification during both treatment periods. Conclusions: Narrow bandwidth blue‐light therapy proved superior to red‐light therapy. Blue‐light therapy produced results similar to both previous 10,000 lux visible‐spectrum light studies and many medication studies. The use of bright red panels supported claims that wavelengths of ∼470 nm account for the documented effectiveness of light therapy. Depression and Anxiety, 2009.

A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Lamotrigine as an Antidepressant Augmentation Agent in Treatment-Refractory Unipolar Depression

BACKGROUND Previous reports have suggested that lamotrigine is effective as an antidepressant augmentation agent in patients with treatment-resistant unipolar depression. This study is the largest double-blind placebo-controlled study conducted to date of lamotrigine in this role. METHOD In this multicenter trial, conducted at 19 sites, patients aged 18-65 years with a DSM-IV/ICD-10 diagnosis of unipolar, nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview) who had failed at least 1 adequate trial of an antidepressant (N = 183) were first treated for 8 weeks with open-label paroxetine or paroxetine controlled-release in dosages up to 50 mg/d or 62.5 mg/d, respectively. Individuals with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score ≥ 15 (n = 96) were then randomized on a double-blind basis to receive either placebo or lamotrigine in dosages titrated upward to a maximum of 400 mg/d for 10 weeks. Sixty-five patients completed the study. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the main secondary outcome measures were the HDRS-17 and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Data were collected from 2003 to 2006. RESULTS Results of the primary efficacy analysis of the randomized patients using the MADRS, HDRS-17, CGI-S, and CGI-I did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between lamotrigine and placebo groups, although some secondary analyses were suggestive of efficacy, particularly in those patients who completed the study (completer analysis) and in more severely ill patients (HDRS-17 ≥ 25). CONCLUSIONS This add-on study of patients with treatment-resistant depression failed to detect a statistically significant difference between lamotrigine and placebo given for 10 weeks. However, post hoc analyses suggest that future studies of lamotrigines efficacy might focus on specific subgroups with depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00901407.

Blood pressure changes during short-term fluoxetine treatment.

Recent reports of sustained hypertension in some patients receiving venlafaxine have rekindled concerns about antidepressant-induced hypertension. This study examined sitting and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and rate of sustained hypertension in 796 depressed patients (mean +/- SD age, 40 +/- 11 years) taking fluoxetine 20 mg daily for up to 12 weeks. A modest reduction in sitting and standing systolic (p < 0.001) and diastolic (p < 0.001) blood pressure measures were observed in the entire patient sample. Patients with pretreatment diastolic blood pressure < 60 mmHg (N = 32) showed a modest increase in mean diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), whereas patients with pretreatment diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mmHg and < or = 95 mmHg (N = 57) had a modest reduction in mean diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Patients with preexisting, stable cardiovascular disease (including hypertension) (N = 35) showed no significant blood pressure change (p = not significant). Of the patients receiving fluoxetine, 1.7% had sustained hypertension for > or = 3 consecutive clinic visits-a rate significantly lower than that previously reported with venlafaxine (4.8%) (chi2 = 13.3, p < 0.001) and similar to that previously seen with placebo (2.1%). In conclusion, these data demonstrate a low rate of sustained hypertension (1.7%) during short-term fluoxetine treatment.