Frédérique Van Gijsegem

Unified nomenclature for broadly conserved hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria

Genes of plant-pathogenic bacteria controlling hypersensitive response (HR) elicitation and pathogenesis were designated ‘hrp’ by Lindgren et al. in 1986 (J Bacteriol 168: 512–522). hrp genes have been characterized in several species of the four major genera of Gramnegative plant pathogens, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia (a new proposed genus including Pseudomonas solanacearum) and Xanthomonas. To date, hrp genes have been found mainly in large clusters, and they have been shown to be conserved physically and, in many cases, functionally among different bacteria. Hybridization studies and genetic analyses have revealed the presence of functional hrp genes even in species that are not typically observed to elicit an HR, such as Erwinia chrysanthemi and Erwinia stewartii, suggesting that hrp genes may be common to all Gram-negative plant pathogens, possibly excluding Agrobacterium spp. Current knowledge of hrp genes has been reviewed by Bonas (1994, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 192: 79–98) and by Van Gijsegem et al. (1995, In Pathogenesis and Host–Parasite Specificity in Plant Diseases: Histopathological, Biochemical, Genetic and Molecular Basis. Volume 1. (Kohmoto et al., eds); Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 273–292). The nucleotide sequences of four hrp gene clusters, those of Ralstonia solanacearum (previously P. solanacearum) (Genin et al., 1992, Mol Microbiol 6: 3065–3076; Gough et al., 1992, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 5: 384–389; Gough et al., 1993, Mol Gen Genet 239: 378–392; Van Gijsegem et al., 1995, Mol Microbiol 15: 1095–1114), Erwinia amylovora (Bogdanove et al., 1996, J Bacteriol 178: 1720– 1730; Wei and Beer, 1993, J Bacteriol 175: 7958–7967; Wei and Beer, 1995, J Bacteriol 177: 6201–6210; Wei et al., 1992, Science 257: 85–88; S. V. Beer, unpublished), Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (Huang et al., 1992, J Bacteriol 174: 6878–6885; Huang et al., 1993, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 6: 515–520; Huang et al., 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 733–746; Lidell and Hutcheson, 1994, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 7: 488–497; Preston et al., 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 717–732; Xiao et al., 1994, J Bacteriol 176: 1025–1036), and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Fenselau et al., 1992, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 5: 390–396; Fenselau and Bonas, 1995, Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 8: 845–854; U. Bonas, unpublished), have been largely determined. These clusters each contain more than twenty genes, many of which encode components of a novel proteinsecretion pathway designated ‘type III’. It has been shown directly that various extracellular proteins involved in pathogenesis and defence elicitation by plantpathogenic bacteria utilize this pathway (Arlat et al., 1994, EMBO J 13: 543–553; He et al., 1993, Cell 73: 1255–1266; Wei and Beer, 1993, ibid.), and the pathway is known to function in the export of virulence factors from the animal pathogens Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Yersinia entercolitica, Yersinia pestis, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (for reviews, see Salmond and Reeves, 1993, Trends Biochem Sci 18: 7–12; and Van Gijsegem et al., 1993, Trends Microbiol 1: 175– 180). Nine type III secretion genes are conserved among all four of the plant pathogens listed above and among the animal pathogens. Based on sequence analysis and some experimental evidence, they are believed to encode one outer-membrane protein, one outer-membrane-associated lipoprotein, five inner-membrane proteins, and two cytoplasmic proteins, one of which is a putative ATPase. All of the predicted gene products, except the outer-membrane protein, show significant similarity to components of the flagellar biogenesis complex (for reviews see Blair, 1995, Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 489–522; and Bischoff and Ordal, 1992, Mol Microbiol 6: 23–28). We herein refer to the hrp-encoded type III pathway as the ‘Hrp pathway’. Because hrp genes have been characterized independently in diverse plant-pathogenic bacteria, hrp gene nomenclature differs in different species, and it is not always consistent even within the same organism. Different designations are used for homologous genes, and, even worse, the same designation is used for different genes in different organisms. For example, hrpI of E. amylovora is homologous with hrpC2 of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria and hrpO of R. solanacearum, and the homologue in P. syringae pv. syringae appears in the literature both as hrpI and as hrpJ2. Also, ‘hrpN ’ in R. solanacearum designates a secretion-pathway gene, whereas in E. amylovora, ‘hrpN ’ designates the gene encoding the elicitor harpin. Furthermore, in many bacteria the number of known hrp genes approaches 26. In anticipation of exhausting the alphabet, some authors chose to designate hrp genes with a letter and a number, creating the potential for confusion of distinct genes with alleles of the same gene. For hrp gene researchers, the current nomenclature is at best inconvenient; for other scientists, it is bewildering. Another problem exists: accumulation of knowledge about the structure of hrp loci has outpaced the accumulation of Molecular Microbiology (1996) 20(3), 681–683

The hrp gene locus of Pseudomonas solanacearum, which controls the production of a type III secretion system, encodes eight proteins related to components of the bacterial flagellar biogenesis complex

Five transcription units of the Pseudomonas solanacearum hrp gene cluster are required for the secretion of the HR‐inducing PopA1 protein. The nucleotide sequences of two of these, units 1 and 3, have been reported. Here, we present the nucleotide sequence of the three other transcription units, units 2, 4 and 7, which are together predicted to code for 15 hrp genes. This brings the total number of Hrp proteins encoded by these five transcription units to 20, including HrpB, the positive regulatory protein, and HpaP, which is apparently not required for plant interactions., Among the 18 other proteins, eight belong to protein families regrouping proteins involved in type III secretion pathways in animal and plant bacterial pathogens and in flagellum biogenesis, while two are related solely to proteins involved in secretion systems. For the various proteins found to be related to P. solanacearum Hrp proteins, those in plant‐pathogenic bacteria include proteins encoded by hrp genes. For Hrp‐related proteins of animal pathogens, those encoded by the spa and mxi genes of Shigella flexneri and of Salmonella typhimurium and by the ysc genes of Yersinia are involved in type III secretion pathways. Proteins involved in flagellum biogenesis, which are related to Hrp proteins of P. solanacearum, include proteins encoded by fli and fli genes of S. typhimurium, Bacillus subtils and Escherichia coli and by mop genes of Erwinia carotovora. P. solanacearum Hrp proteins were also found to be related to proteins of Rhizobium fredii involved in nodulation specificity.

Conservation of secretion pathways for pathogenicity determinants of plant and animal bacteria

Extracellular proteins of plant and animal bacteria are important in virulence. Many of these are secreted through the type I sec-independent and the type II sec-dependent pathways. Recently, a third distinct pathway, involved in secretion of Yops, has been discovered in Yersinia. This pathway has homology with pathways in plant pathogenic bacteria that are putatively involved in the secretion of proteins active on plant cells, such as harpin and possibly some avr gene products

PopF1 and PopF2, Two Proteins Secreted by the Type III Protein Secretion System of Ralstonia solanacearum, Are Translocators Belonging to the HrpF/NopX Family

Ralstonia solanacearum GMI1000 is a gram-negative plant pathogen which contains an hrp gene cluster which codes for a type III protein secretion system (TTSS). We identified two novel Hrp-secreted proteins, called PopF1 and PopF2, which display similarity to one another and to putative TTSS translocators, HrpF and NopX, from Xanthomonas spp. and rhizobia, respectively. They also show similarities with TTSS translocators of the YopB family from animal-pathogenic bacteria. Both popF1 and popF2 belong to the HrpB regulon and are required for the interaction with plants, but PopF1 seems to play a more important role in virulence and hypersensitive response (HR) elicitation than PopF2 under our experimental conditions. PopF1 and PopF2 are not necessary for the secretion of effector proteins, but they are required for the translocation of AvrA avirulence protein into tobacco cells. We conclude that PopF1 and PopF2 are type III translocators belonging to the HrpF/NopX family. The hrpF gene of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris partially restored HR-inducing ability to popF1 popF2 mutants of R. solanacearum, suggesting that translocators of R. solanacearum and Xanthomonas are functionally conserved. Finally, R. solanacearum strain UW551, which does not belong to the same phylotype as GMI1000, also possesses two putative translocator proteins. However, although one of these proteins is clearly related to PopF1 and PopF2, the other seems to be different and related to NopX proteins, thus showing that translocators might be variable in R. solanacearum.

Xylem Colonization by an HrcV¯ Mutant of Ralstonia solanacearum Is a Key Factor for the Efficient Biological Control of Tomato Bacterial Wilt

Microscopic studies of the colonization of the vascular tissues of tomato by an HrcV¯ (formerly HrpO¯) mutant strain of Ralstonia solanacearum were carried out after either root inoculation of the mutant strain alone or delayed challenge inoculation by a pathogenic strain. The use of two different marker genes, lacZ and uidA, introduced into either mutant or wild-type strains, respectively, permitted histological observation for the presence of both strains simultaneously. In roots, both strains could be found together in infected root tips and in lateral root emergence sites (lateral root cracks), but these bacterial strains subsequently invaded separate xylem vessels in the root system. At the hypocotyl level, a novel staining procedure, in conjunction with bacterial isolation and counting, showed three vascular colonization patterns: exclusive colonization by each of the competitors or simultaneous presence of each strain in separate xylem vessels. The relative frequencies of these patterns depended up...

Genetic dissection of the Ralstonia solanacearum hrp gene cluster reveals that the HrpV and HrpX proteins are required for Hrp pilus assembly

In both plant and mammalian Gram‐negative pathogenic bacteria, type III secretion systems (TTSSs) play a crucial role in interactions with the host. All these systems share conserved proteins (called Hrc in plant pathogens), but each bacterium also produces a variable number of additional type III proteins either unique or with counterparts only in a limited number of related systems. In order to investigate the role of the different proteins encoded by the hrp gene cluster of the phytopathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum, non‐polar mutants in all hrp genes (except for hrcQ) were analysed for their interactions with plants, their ability to secrete the PopA protein and their production of the Hrp pilus. In addition to Hrc proteins and the HrpY major component of the Hrp pilus, four additional Hrp proteins are indispensable for type III secretion and for interactions with plants. We also provide evidence that hrpV and hrpX mutants can still target the HrpY pilin outside the bacterial cell but are impaired in the production of Hrp pili, indicating that HrpV and HrpX proteins are involved in the assembly of this appendage.

Induction of Lateral Root Structure Formation on Petunia Roots: A Novel Effect of GMI1000 Ralstonia solanacearum Infection Impaired in Hrp Mutants

Ralstonia solanacearum is a soilborne plant pathogen that invades its host via roots. As in many gram-negative bacterial plant pathogens, the R. solanacearum Hrp type III secretion system is essential for interactions of the bacterium with plants; however, the related mechanisms involved in disease expression are largely unknown. In this work, we examined the effects of infection by R. solanacearum GMI1000 and Hrp mutants on the root system of petunia plants. Both the wild-type and mutant strains disturbed the petunia root architecture development by inhibiting lateral root elongation and provoking swelling of the root tips. In addition, GMI100 but not the Hrp mutants induced the formation of new root lateral structures (RLS). This ability is shared by other, but not all, R. solanacearum strains tested. Like lateral roots, these new structures arise from divisions of pericycle founder cells which, nevertheless, exhibit an abnormal morphology. These RLS are efficient colonization sites allowing extensive bacterial multiplication. However, they are not required for the bacterial vascular invasion that leads to the systemic spread of the bacterium through the whole plant, indicating that, instead, they might play a role in the rhizosphere-related stages of the R. solanacearum life cycle.

Analysis of the LacI family regulators of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937, involvement in the bacterial phytopathogenicity.

Analysis of the regulators of the LacI family was performed in order to identify those potentially involved in pathogenicity of Erwinia chrysanthemi (Dickeya dadantii). Among the 18 members of the LacI family, the function of 11 members is either known or predicted and only 7 members have, as yet, no proposed function. Inactivation of these seven genes, called lfaR, lfbR, lfcR, lfdR, lfeR, lffR, and lfgR, demonstrated that four of them are important for plant infection. The lfaR and lfcR mutants showed a reduced virulence on chicory, Saintpaulia sp., and Arabidopsis. The lfeR mutant showed a reduced virulence on Arabidopsis. The lfdR mutant was more efficient than the wild-type strain in initiating maceration on Saintpaulia sp. The genetic environment of each regulator was examined to detect adjacent genes potentially involved in a common function. Construction of transcriptional fusions in these neighboring genes demonstrated that five regulators, LfaR, LfcR, LfeR, LffR, and LfgR, act as repressors of adjacent genes. Analysis of these fusions also indicated that the genes controlled by LfaR, LfcR, LfgR, and LffR are expressed during plant infection. Moreover, addition of crude plant extracts to culture medium demonstrated that the expression of the LfaR- and LfgR-controlled genes is specifically induced by plant components.

In planta regulation of phytopathogenic bacteria virulence genes: relevance of plant-derived signals

Interactions between plants and pathogens are complex dynamic and multistep processes involving invasion of the host, avoidance or overcome of plant defence responses and multiplication of the pathogen, eventually culminating with expression of disease symptoms. In all these steps communication at different levels is important either between the pathogen and its host or between the members of the pathogen community. It is therefore not surprising that the genes involved in plant-pathogen interactions are under the control of complex regulatory circuits responding to numerous stimuli. The discovery by Stachel et al. (1985) that the Agrobacterium vir genes, normally expressed at a very low level, are specifically induced by cocultivation of the bacterium with plant cell suspensions and the further identification of plant-derived inducing signals, was the first demonstration of the importance of the direct signalling role of the plant in the initiation of the infection. Subsequently, the role of signals coming from the host in the regulation of genes involved in plant-bacteria interactions was investigated. In gram-negative plant pathogenic bacteria, several factors playing a role in their interactions with plants have been identified. These include the production of toxins or hormones interfering with the normal plant metabolism or development, the secretion of enzymes or signal proteins interacting with plants, polysaccharide production, and the expression of efficient iron acquisition systems. In all bacterial pathosystems studied, the production of these virulence factors is very finely tuned by complex regulatory circuits and several recent overviews on the role of these factors and their regulation in plant-pathogenic bacteria interactions are available (Daniels et al., 1988; Gross, 1991; Zambryski, 1992; Winans, 1992; Leigh and Coplin, 1992; Dow and Daniels, 1994; Barras et al., 1994; Fuqua et al., 1994; Expert et al., 1996; Schell, 1996). The goal of this review is to analyse the data relevant to the possible importance of plant signals in the regulation of the production of the different virulence factors so far characterised. The approaches which were investigated to directly identify genes which would be specifically induced in planta in a search for additional important genes in plant-bacteria interactions will then be discussed.

Genes governing the secretion of factors involved in host-bacteria interactions are conserved among animal and plant pathogenic bacteria

The hrp gene cluster of several phytopathogenic bacteria is needed for the expression of virulence on host plants and for the elicitation of a hypersensitive response, associated with resistance on non-host plants. In Pseudomonas solanacearum, the hrp gene cluster has been sequenced and was shown to contain 19 putative ORFs. Seven of the proteins predicted from these ORFs have characteristics of membrane proteins. For eight of the Hrp proteins, homologies with proteins involved in the secretion of virulence determinants in the mammalian pathogens Yersinia and Shigella have been found. These proteins include five of the putative membrane proteins, a protein sharing homologies with several ATPases and the HrpB protein which was proven to be a positive regulator of the hrp gene cluster expression. These results prompted us to analyze whether the hrp gene cluster was involved in the secretion of factors able to induce a hypersensitive-like reaction in non-host plants. Such a factor has been found in the supernatant of P. solanacearum grown in conditions which allow the expression of the hrp genes. This factor is heat-resistant and proteinase K sensitive indicating that it might be a protein. Analysis of several hrp mutants indicates that the hrp gene cluster could indeed be involved in the secretion of this active factor and that the synthesis of this factor is regulated by the hrpB gene.