Freeha Arshad

Prothrombin complex concentrate in the reduction of blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation: PROTON-trial

BackgroundIn patients with cirrhosis, the synthesis of coagulation factors can fall short, reflected by a prolonged prothrombin time. Although anticoagulants factors are decreased as well, blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation can still be excessive. Blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation is currently managed by transfusion of red blood cell concentrates, platelet concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, and fibrinogen concentrate. Transfusion of these products may paradoxically result in an increased bleeding tendency due to aggravated portal hypertension. The hemostatic effect of these products may therefore be overshadowed by bleeding complications due to volume overload.In contrast to these transfusion products, prothrombin complex concentrate is a low-volume highly purified concentrate, containing the four vitamin K dependent coagulation factors. Previous studies have suggested that administration of prothrombin complex concentrate is an effective method to normalize a prolonged prothrombin time in patients with liver cirrhosis. We aim to investigate whether the pre-operative administration of prothrombin complex concentrate in patients undergoing liver transplantation for end-stage liver cirrhosis, is a safe and effective method to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.Methods/DesignThis is a double blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized trial.Cirrhotic patients with a prolonged INR (≥1.5) undergoing liver transplantation will be randomized between placebo or prothrombin complex concentrate administration prior to surgery. Demographic, surgical and transfusion data will be recorded. The primary outcome of this study is RBC transfusion requirements.DiscussionPatients with advanced cirrhosis have reduced plasma levels of both pro- and anticoagulant coagulation proteins. Prothrombin complex concentrate is a low-volume plasma product that contains both procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins and transfusion will not affect the volume status prior to the surgical procedure. We hypothesize that administration of prothrombin complex concentrate will result in a reduction of perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Theoretically, the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate may be associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic complications. Therefore, thromboembolic complications are an important secondary endpoint and the occurrence of this type of complication will be closely monitored during the study.Trial registrationThe trial is registered at http://www.trialregister.nl with number NTR3174. This registry is accepted by the ICMJE.

Differential in vitro inhibition of thrombin generation by anticoagulant drugs in plasma from patients with cirrhosis.

Background Treatment and prevention of thrombotic complications is frequently required in patients with cirrhosis. However anticoagulant therapy is often withheld from these patients, because of the perceived bleeding diathesis. As a result of the limited clinical experience, the anticoagulant of choice for the various indications is still not known. Objectives We evaluated the in vitro effect of clinically approved anticoagulant drugs in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. Patients/Methods Thirty patients with cirrhosis and thirty healthy controls were studied. Thrombin generation assays were performed before and after addition of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, to estimate anticoagulant potencies of these drugs. Results Addition of dabigatran led to a much more pronounced reduction in endogenous thrombin potential in patients compared to controls (72.6% reduction in patients vs. 12.8% reduction in controls, P<0.0001). The enhanced effect of dabigatran was proportional to the severity of disease. In contrast, only a slightly increased anticoagulant response to heparin and low molecular weight heparin and even a reduced response to fondaparinux and rivaroxaban was observed in plasma from cirrhotic patients as compared to control plasma. Conclusions The anticoagulant potency of clinically approved drugs differs substantially between patients with cirrhosis and healthy individuals. Whereas dabigatran and, to a lesser extent, heparin and low molecular weight heparin are more potent in plasma from patients with cirrhosis, fondaparinux and rivaroxaban showed a decreased anticoagulant effect. These results may imply that in addition to dose adjustments based on altered pharmacokinetics, drug-specific dose adjustments based on altered anticoagulant potency may be required in patients with cirrhosis.

Hypercoagulability as a contributor to thrombotic complications in the liver transplant recipient

Traditionally, perioperative bleeding complications were a major concern during orthotopic liver transplantation, but a tremendous decline in transfusion requirements has been reported over the last decade. In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness towards perioperative thrombotic complications, including liver vessel thrombosis, and systemic venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Whereas a number of these thrombotic complications were previously categorized as surgical complications, increasing clinical and laboratory evidence suggest a role for the haemostatic system in thrombotic complications occurring during and after transplantation. High levels of the platelet adhesive protein von Willebrand factor with low levels of its regulator ADAMTS13, an increased potential to generate thrombin, and temporary hypofibrinolysis are all indicative of increased haemostatic potential after transplantation. Clinical evidence for a role of the haemostatic system in post‐operative thromboses includes a higher thrombotic risk in patients with various acquired thrombotic risk factors. Although data on efficacy of anticoagulant therapy after liver transplantation are scarce, one study has shown a significant decrease in the risk for late hepatic artery thrombosis by antithrombotic therapy with aspirin. These findings suggest that antihaemostatic therapy in prevention or treatment of thromboembolic complications after liver transplantation may be relevant. Studies on efficacy and safety of these interventions are required as many of the thrombotic complications have a pronounced negative impact on graft and patient survival.

Infusion of DDAVP does not improve primary hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis

Cirrhosis frequently affects multiple components of hemostasis. Reversal of the coagulopathy of these patients is frequently required in case of bleeding episodes, or as prophylaxis before invasive procedures. Although 1‐deamino‐8‐D‐arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) is widely used as a pro‐hemostatic agent in patients with cirrhosis, it is unclear whether DDAVP truly enhances hemostasis in these patients. Here we investigated the hemostatic effects of a single bolus of DDAVP in patients with cirrhosis.

Decreased tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)-dependent anticoagulant capacity in patients with cirrhosis who have decreased protein S but normal TFPI plasma levels

Protein S acts as a cofactor for tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) in the down regulation of thrombin generation, and acquired and congenital protein S deficiencies are associated with a concomitant TFPI deficiency. In contrast, in patients with liver diseases, decreased protein S, but normal or increased levels of TFPI have been reported. We compared TFPI and protein S plasma levels between 26 patients with cirrhosis and 20 healthy controls and found that TFPI levels were comparable between patients (111 ± 38%) and controls (108 ± 27%), despite reduced protein S levels (74 ± 23% in patients vs. 98 ± 10% in controls). Subsequently, we quantified the activity of the TFPI‐protein S system by measuring thrombin generation in the absence and presence of neutralizing antibodies to protein S or TFPI. Ratios of peak thrombin generation in the absence and presence of these antibodies were calculated. Both the protein S and the TFPI ratios were increased in patients with cirrhosis compared to controls. Protein S ratios were (0·62 [0·08–0·93] in patients vs. 0·32 [0·20–0·54] in controls; TFPI ratios were 0·50 [0·05–0·90] in patients vs. 0·18 [0·11–0·49] in controls). Thus, although the acquired protein S deficiency in patients with cirrhosis is not associated with decreased TFPI levels, the TFPI/protein S anticoagulant system is functionally impaired.

Abnormal hemostatic function one year after orthotopic liver transplantation can be fully attributed to endothelial cell activation.

Background: The long-term risk of thrombotic and vascular complications is elevated in liver transplant recipients compared to the general population. Patients with cirrhosis are in a hypercoagulable status during and directly after orthotopic liver transplantation, but it is unclear whether this hypercoagulability persists over time. Aim: We aimed to investigate the hemostatic status of liver transplant recipients one year after transplantation. Methods: We prospectively collected blood samples of 15 patients with a functioning graft one year after orthotopic liver transplantation and compared the hemostatic status of these patients with that of 30 healthy individuals. Results: Patients one year after liver transplantation had significantly elevated plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Thrombin generation, as assessed by the endogenous thrombin potential, was decreased in patients, which was associated with increased plasma levels of the natural anticoagulants antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Plasma fibrinolytic potential was significantly decreased in patients and correlated inversely with levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Conclusion: One year after liver transplantation, liver graft recipients have a dysregulated hemostatic system characterised by elevation of plasma levels of endothelial-derived proteins. Increased levels of von Willebrand factor and decreased fibrinolytic potential may (in part) be responsible for the increased risk for vascular disease seen in liver transplant recipients.

Physiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Blood Loss During Liver Transplantation

Historically, bleeding was one of the major challenges during liver transplantation. The first patient receiving a liver transplant in 1963 exsanguinated during the procedure [1], and massive perioperative blood loss remained a major clinical challenge until 1980s. Most, if not all, liver transplant procedures required transfusion of blood products in those days, and transfusion requirements could exceed 100 units of red blood cell concentrates (RBCs), whereas mean transfusion requirements were around 20–40 units of blood products (RBC, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, cryoprecipitate) [2, 3]. Blood products were, and still are, costly and accounted for a significant part of the total costs of liver transplantation [4]. In the last 15–20 years, massive blood loss during liver transplantation has become rare, and a significant proportion of patients can nowadays be transplanted without any requirement for blood transfusion [5]. Improvements in surgical technique and anesthesiological management have contributed to this major reduction in blood loss, but in addition a better understanding of the nature of the abnormalities in the hemostatic system has led to a more rational approach to the prevention of bleeding. Nevertheless, severe and uncontrollable bleeding still occurs occasionally and has to be treated appropriately.