Frits Mohren
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Frits Mohren.
Remote Sensing | 2016
Mathias Neumann; Adam Moreno; Christopher Thurnher; Volker Mues; Sanna Härkönen; Matteo Mura; Olivier Bouriaud; Mait Lang; Giuseppe Cardellini; Alain Thivolle-Cazat; Karol Bronisz; Ján Merganič; Iciar Alberdi; Rasmus Astrup; Frits Mohren; Maosheng Zhao; Hubert Hasenauer
Net primary production (NPP) is an important ecological metric for studying forest ecosystems and their carbon sequestration, for assessing the potential supply of food or timber and quantifying the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. The global MODIS NPP dataset using the MOD17 algorithm provides valuable information for monitoring NPP at 1-km resolution. Since coarse-resolution global climate data are used, the global dataset may contain uncertainties for Europe. We used a 1-km daily gridded European climate data set with the MOD17 algorithm to create the regional NPP dataset MODIS EURO. For evaluation of this new dataset, we compare MODIS EURO with terrestrial driven NPP from analyzing and harmonizing forest inventory data (NFI) from 196,434 plots in 12 European countries as well as the global MODIS NPP dataset for the years 2000 to 2012. Comparing these three NPP datasets, we found that the global MODIS NPP dataset differs from NFI NPP by 26%, while MODIS EURO only differs by 7%. MODIS EURO also agrees with NFI NPP across scales (from continental, regional to country) and gradients (elevation, location, tree age, dominant species, etc.). The agreement is particularly good for elevation, dominant species or tree height. This suggests that using improved climate data allows the MOD17 algorithm to provide realistic NPP estimates for Europe. Local discrepancies between MODIS EURO and NFI NPP can be related to differences in stand density due to forest management and the national carbon estimation methods. With this study, we provide a consistent, temporally continuous and spatially explicit productivity dataset for the years 2000 to 2012 on a 1-km resolution, which can be used to assess climate change impacts on ecosystems or the potential biomass supply of the European forests for an increasing bio-based economy. MODIS EURO data are made freely available at ftp://palantir.boku.ac.at/Public/MODIS_EURO.
Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Ernst van der Maaten; Andreas Hamann; Marieke van der Maaten-Theunissen; A.R. Bergsma; Geerten M. Hengeveld; Ron van Lammeren; Frits Mohren; Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Renske Terhürne; Frank J. Sterck
Abstract Bioclimate envelope models have been widely used to illustrate the discrepancy between current species distributions and their potential habitat under climate change. However, the realism and correct interpretation of such projections has been the subject of considerable discussion. Here, we investigate whether climate suitability predictions correlate to tree growth, measured in permanent inventory plots and inferred from tree‐ring records. We use the ensemble classifier RandomForest and species occurrence data from ~200,000 inventory plots to build species distribution models for four important European forestry species: Norway spruce, Scots pine, European beech, and pedunculate oak. We then correlate climate‐based habitat suitability with volume measurements from ~50‐year‐old stands, available from ~11,000 inventory plots. Secondly, habitat projections based on annual historical climate are compared with ring width from ~300 tree‐ring chronologies. Our working hypothesis is that habitat suitability projections from species distribution models should to some degree be associated with temporal or spatial variation in these growth records. We find that the habitat projections are uncorrelated with spatial growth records (inventory plot data), but they do predict interannual variation in tree‐ring width, with an average correlation of .22. Correlation coefficients for individual chronologies range from values as high as .82 or as low as −.31. We conclude that tree responses to projected climate change are highly site‐specific and that local suitability of a species for reforestation is difficult to predict. That said, projected increase or decrease in climatic suitability may be interpreted as an average expectation of increased or reduced growth over larger geographic scales.
Environmental Management | 2018
Giuseppe Cardellini; Tatiana Raquel Alves Valada; Claire Cornillier; Estelle Vial; Marian Dragoi; Venceslas Goudiaby; Volker Mues; Bruno Lasserre; Arkadiusz Gruchala; Per Kristian Rørstad; Mathias Neumann; Miroslav Svoboda; Risto Sirgmets; Olli-Pekka Näsärö; Frits Mohren; Wouter Achten; Liesbet Vranken; Bart Muys
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a common methodology to analyze environmental impacts of forestry systems. Although LCA has been widely applied to forestry since the 90s, the LCAs are still often based on generic Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). With the purpose of improving LCA practices in the forestry sector, we developed a European Life Cycle Inventory of Forestry Operations (EFO-LCI) and analyzed the available information to check if within the European forestry sector national differences really exist. We classified the European forests on the basis of “Forest Units” (combinations of tree species and silvicultural practices). For each Forest Unit, we constructed the LCI of their forest management practices on the basis of a questionnaire filled out by national silvicultural experts. We analyzed the data reported to evaluate how they vary over Europe and how they affect LCA results and made freely available the inventory data collected for future use. The study shows important variability in rotation length, type of regeneration, amount and assortments of wood products harvested, and machinery used due to the differences in management practices. The existing variability on these activities sensibly affect LCA results of forestry practices and raw wood production. Although it is practically unfeasible to collect site-specific data for all the LCAs involving forest-based products, the use of less generic LCI data of forestry practice is desirable to improve the reliability of the studies. With the release of EFO-LCI we made a step toward the construction of regionalized LCI for the European forestry sector.
Forest Policy and Economics | 2016
Yonky Indrajaya; Edwin van der Werf; Hans-Peter Weikard; Frits Mohren; Ekko C. van Ierland
We study the potential of tropical multi-age multi-species forests for sequestering carbon in response to financial incentives from REDD+. The use of reduced impact logging techniques (RIL) allows a forest owner to apply for carbon credits whereas the use of conventional logging techniques (CL) does not. This paper is the first to develop a Hartman model with selective cutting in this setting that takes additionality of carbon sequestration explicitly into account. We apply the model using data for Kalimantan, Indonesia. RIL leads to less damages on the residual stand than CL and has lower variable but higher fixed costs. We find that a system of carbon credits through REDD+ has a large potential for carbon storage. Interestingly, awarding carbon credits to carbon stored in end-use wood products does not increase the amount of carbon stored and reduces Land Expectation Value. We also observe that the level of the carbon price at which it becomes optimal not to harvest depends on the interpretation of the steady state model.
Ecological Modelling | 2011
Rupert Seidl; Paulo M. Fernandes; Teresa F. Fonseca; François Gillet; Anna Maria Jönsson; Katarína Merganičová; Sigrid Netherer; Alexander Arpaci; Jean-Daniel Bontemps; Harald Bugmann; José Ramón González-Olabarria; Petra Lasch; Céline Meredieu; Francisco Moreira; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Frits Mohren
Forestry | 2014
Peter Brang; Peter Spathelf; J. Bo Larsen; Jürgen Bauhus; Andrej Boncčìna; Christophe Chauvin; Lars Drössler; Carlos García-Güemes; Caroline Heiri; Gary Kerr; Manfred J. Lexer; Bill Mason; Frits Mohren; Urs Mühlethaler; Susanna Nocentini; Miroslav Svoboda
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Hans Pretzsch; M. del Río; Gerhard Schütze; Ch. Ammer; Peter Annighöfer; Admir Avdagić; Ignacio Barbeito; Kamil Bielak; Gediminas Brazaitis; Lluís Coll; Lars Drössler; Marek Fabrika; David I. Forrester; Viktor Kurylyak; Magnus Löf; Fabio Lombardi; Bratislav Matović; Frits Mohren; Renzo Motta; J. den Ouden; Maciej Pach; Quentin Ponette; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Vít Šrámek; Hubert Sterba; Miroslav Svoboda; Kris Verheyen; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
Global Change Biology | 2012
Jean François Soussana; E. Fereres; Stephen P. Long; Frits Mohren; Rajul Pandya-Lorch; Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio; John R. Porter; Thomas Rosswall; Joachim von Braun
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Mathias Neumann; Adam Moreno; Volker Mues; Sanna Härkönen; Matteo Mura; Olivier Bouriaud; Mait Lang; Wouter Achten; Alain Thivolle-Cazat; Karol Bronisz; Ján Merganič; Mathieu Decuyper; Iciar Alberdi; Rasmus Astrup; Frits Mohren; Hubert Hasenauer
Journal of Ecology | 2017
Miren del Río; Hans Pretzsch; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Evy Ampoorter; Peter Annighöfer; Ignacio Barbeito; Kamil Bielak; Gediminas Brazaitis; Lluís Coll; Lars Drössler; Marek Fabrika; David I. Forrester; Michael Heym; Václav Hurt; Viktor Kurylyak; Magnus Löf; Fabio Lombardi; Ekaterina Madrickiene; Bratislav Matović; Frits Mohren; Renzo Motta; Jan den Ouden; Maciej Pach; Quentin Ponette; Gerhard Schütze; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Vít Šrámek; Hubert Sterba; Dejan Stojanović; Miroslav Svoboda