Fritz C. Eilber

Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: a randomized prospective trial.

To determine the role of chemotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with osteosarcoma, a randomized prospective trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was begun in 1981. Fifty-nine patients with nonmetastatic classic intramedullary osteosarcoma were randomized; 32 received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of high-dose methotrexate, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and BCD (bleomycin, cytoxan, actinomycin D), and 27 patients received no adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 2 years, there was a statistically significant improvement in both disease-free and overall survival in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, there was no difference in the less than 20% disease-free or overall survival of patients treated in the 1970s who did not receive chemotherapy, as compared with the concurrent nontreatment controls. Therefore, with identical staging procedures, uniform surgical management, and standard pathologic evaluation, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy definitely improves disease-free and overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma.

Treatment-Induced Pathologic Necrosis: A Predictor of Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas

PURPOSE To determine whether treatment-induced pathologic necrosis correlates with local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four hundred ninety-six patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas received protocol neoadjuvant therapy. All patients underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy and had pathologic assessment of tumor necrosis in the resected specimens. RESULTS The 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates for patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly lower (6% and 11%, respectively) than the local recurrence rates for patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (17% and 23%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survival rates for the patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly higher (80% and 71%, respectively) than the survival rates for the patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (62% and 55%, respectively). Patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis were 2.51 times more likely to develop a local recurrence and 1.86 times more likely to die of their disease as compared with patients with > or = 95% pathologic necrosis. The percentage of patients who achieved > or /= 95% pathologic necrosis increased to 48% with the addition of ifosfamide as compared with 13% of the patients in all the other protocols combined. CONCLUSION Treatment-induced pathologic necrosis is an independent predictor of both local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. A complete pathologic response (> or = 95% pathologic necrosis) correlated with a significantly lower rate of local recurrence and improved overall survival.

High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Factors Predictive of Local Recurrence and its Effect on Morbidity and Mortality

ObjectiveTo identify patient characteristics associated with the development of local recurrence and the effect of local recurrence on subsequent morbidity and mortality in patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Summary Background DataNumerous studies on extremity soft tissue sarcomas have consistently shown that presentation with locally recurrent disease is associated with the development of subsequent local recurrences and that large tumor size and high histologic grade are significant factors associated with decreased survival. However, the effect of local recurrence on patient survival remains unclear. MethodsFrom 1975 to 1997, 753 patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas were treated at UCLA. Treatment outcomes and patient characteristics were analyzed to identify factors associated with both local recurrence and survival. ResultsPatients with locally recurrent disease were at a significantly increased risk of developing a subsequent local recurrence. Local recurrence was a morbid event requiring amputation in 38% of the cases. The development of a local recurrence was the most significant factor associated with decreased survival. Once a patient developed a local recurrence, he or she was about three times more likely to die of disease compared to similar patients who had not developed a local recurrence. ConclusionsLocal recurrence in patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas is associated with the development of subsequent local recurrences, a morbid event decreasing functional outcomes and the most significant factor associated with decreased survival. Although 85% to 90% of patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas are treatable with a limb salvage approach, patients who develop a local recurrence need aggressive treatment and should be considered for trials of adjuvant systemic therapy.

Diagnosis and management of synovial sarcoma.

Synovial sarcoma accounts about 9% of soft tissue sarcomas, most commonly develops in the extremity of young adults, is considered high grade and contains a characteristic translocation (X;18;p11;q11). While surgery and radiation therapy have achieved excellent local control, distant metastasis remains the principal problem limiting survival. Although ifosfamide based chemotherapy has been associated with an improved survival in patients with synovial sarcoma, the search for less toxic and more targeted systemic therapies is ongoing. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008;97:314–320.

Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Survival in Adult Patients With Primary Extremity Synovial Sarcoma

Purpose:To determine if ifosfamide-based chemotherapy (IF) offers a survival benefit to adult patients with primary extremity synovial sarcoma. Patients and Methods:Prospectively collected patient data from 2 institutions was used to identify all adult patients (≥16 years) with ≥5 cm, deep, primary, extremity, synovial sarcoma that underwent surgical treatment of cure from 1990 to 2002. A total of 101 patients were identified and the median follow-up for survivors was 58 months. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific survival (DSS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results:Sixty-eight (67%) patients were treated with IF and 33 (33%) patients received no chemotherapy (NoC) for the primary tumor. The characteristics of the IF-treated patients [median tumor size = 7.2 cm; monophasic n = 46 (68%)] were similar to NoC patients [median tumor size = 7 cm; monophasic n = 23 (70%)]. The 4-year DSS of the IF-treated patients was 88% compared with 67% for the NoC patients (P = 0.01). Smaller size (HR = 0.3 per 5-cm decrease, P < 0.0001) and treatment with IF (HR = 0.3 compared with NoC, P = 0.007) were independently associated with an improved DSS. Treatment with IF was independently associated with an improved DRFS (HR = 0.4, P = 0.03) but not associated with an improved LRFS (P = 0.39). Conclusion:Ifosfamide-based chemotherapy was associated with an improved DSS in adult patients with high-risk, primary, extremity, synovial sarcoma and should be considered in the treatment of such patients.

Outcome Prediction in Primary Resected Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Histology-Specific Overall Survival and Disease-Free Survival Nomograms Built on Major Sarcoma Center Data Sets

PURPOSE Integration of numerous prognostic variables not included in the conventional staging of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) is essential in providing effective treatment. The purpose of this study was to build a specific nomogram for predicting postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary RPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data registered in three institutional prospective sarcoma databases were used. We included patients with primary localized RPS resected between 1999 and 2009. Univariate (Kaplan and Meier plots) and multivariate (Cox model) analyses were carried out. The a priori chosen prognostic covariates were age, tumor size, grade, histologic subtype, multifocality, quality of surgery, and radiation therapy. External validation was performed by applying the nomograms to the patients of an external cohort. The models discriminative ability was estimated by means of the bootstrap-corrected Harrell C statistic. RESULTS In all, 523 patients were identified at the three institutions (developing set). At a median follow-up of 45 months (interquartile range, 22 to 72 months), 171 deaths were recorded. Five- and 7-year OS rates were 56.8% (95% CI, 51.4% to 62.6%) and 46.7% (95% CI, 39.9% to 54.6%. Two hundred twenty-one patients had disease recurrence. Five- and 7-year DFS rates were 39.4% (95% CI, 34.5% to 45.0%) and 35.7% (95% CI, 30.3% to 42.1%). The validation set consisted of 135 patients who were identified at the fourth institution for external validation. The bootstrap-corrected Harrell C statistics for OS and DFS were 0.74 and 0.71 in the developing set and 0.68 and 0.69 in the validating set. CONCLUSION These nomograms accurately predict OS and DFS. They should be used for patient counseling in clinical practice and stratification in clinical trials.

Reduction of Glucose Metabolic Activity Is More Accurate than Change in Size at Predicting Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Purpose: Change in tumor size as classified by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors poorly correlates with histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) allows for a more accurate evaluation of histopathologic response. Experimental Design: From January 2005 to January 2007, 42 patients with resectable biopsy-proven high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma underwent a FDG-PET/computed tomography scan before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Relative changes in tumor FDG uptake and size from the baseline to the follow-up scan were calculated, and their accuracy for assessment of histopathologic response was compared by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Histopathologic response was defined as ≥95% tumor necrosis. Results: In histopathologic responders (n = 8; 19%), reduction in tumor FDG uptake was significantly greater than in nonresponders (P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were found for tumor size (P = 0.24). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for metabolic changes was 0.93, but only 0.60 for size changes (P = 0.004). Using a 60% decrease in tumor FDG uptake as a threshold resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71% for assessment of histopathologic response, whereas Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors showed a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion: Quantitative FDG-PET was significantly more accurate than size-based criteria at assessing histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. FDG-PET should be considered as a modality to monitor treatment response in patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma.

FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after the Initial Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Purpose: In patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), the early assessment of treatment responses is important. Using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), we determined whether changes in tumor FDG uptake predict histopathologic treatment responses in high-grade STS after the initial cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Experimental Design: From February 2006 to March 2008, 50 patients with resectable high-grade STS scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent tumor resection were enrolled prospectively. FDG-PET/CT before (baseline), after the first cycle (early follow-up), and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (late follow-up) was done. Tumor FDG uptake and changes were measured by standardized uptake values. Histopathologic examination of the resected specimen provided an assessment of treatment response. Patients with ≥95% pathologic necrosis were classified as treatment responders. FDG-PET/CT results were compared with histopathologic findings. Results: At early follow-up, FDG uptake decreased significantly more in 8 (16%) responders than in the 42 (84%) nonresponders (−55% versus −23%; P = 0.002). All responders and 14 of 42 nonresponders had a ≥35% reduction in standardized uptake value between baseline and early follow-up. Using a ≥35% reduction in FDG uptake as early metabolic response threshold resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for histopathologic response of 100% and 67%, respectively. Applying a higher threshold at late follow-up improved specificity but not sensitivity. CT had no value at response prediction. Conclusion: A 35% reduction in tumor FDG uptake at early follow-up is a sensitive predictor of histopathologic tumor response. Early treatment decisions such as discontinuation of chemotherapy in nonresponding patients could be based on FDG-PET criteria.

Quantitative F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography accurately characterizes peripheral nerve sheath tumors as malignant or benign

Correct pretreatment classification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of patients with peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether F18‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) can differentiate malignant (MPNST) from benign PNSTs.

The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with high-grade primary extremity liposarcoma.

Objective:To determine if chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma. Summary Background Data:The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma is controversial and its effect on individual histologic subtypes is not defined. Patient and Methods:Two prospectively collected sarcoma databases were used to identify all patients with >5 cm, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma that underwent surgical treatment of cure from 1975 to 2003 (n = 245). Clinical, pathologic and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific survival (DSS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results:Sixty-three (26%) patients were treated with ifosfamide based chemotherapy (IF), 83 (34%) with doxorubicin based chemotherapy (DOX) and 99 (40%) received no chemotherapy (NoC). To assess the impact of DOX, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1975 to 1990 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the DOX treated patients was 64% (53%–74%) compared with 56% (51%–79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.28). To assess the impact of IF, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1990 to 2003 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the IF treated patients was 92% (84%–100%) compared with 65% (51%–79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.0003). Independent prognostic factors for improved DSS were smaller size (HR = 0.7, P = 0.01), myxoid/round cell histologic subtype (HR = 0.3, P = 0.03) and treatment with IF (HR = 0.3, P = 0.01). The five-year DRFS of the IF treated patients was 81% (70%–92%) compared with 63% (50%–76%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.02). The 5 year LRFS of the IF treated patients was 86% (76%–96%) compared with 87% (77%–97%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.99). Conclusions:In patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma; DOX is not associated with improved DSS and IF is associated with an improved DSS. Treatment with IF should be considered in patients with high-risk primary extremity liposarcoma.