Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where G.B. Gunn is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by G.B. Gunn.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Patterns of Disease Recurrence Following Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Adam S. Garden; Lei Dong; William H. Morrison; Erich M. Stugis; Bonnie S. Glisson; Steven J. Frank; Beth M. Beadle; G.B. Gunn; David L. Schwartz; Merill S. Kies; Randal S. Weber; K. Kian Ang; David I. Rosenthal

PURPOSE To report mature results of a large cohort of patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The database of patients irradiated at The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center was searched for patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer and treated with IMRT between 2000 and 2007. A retrospective review of outcome data was performed. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 776 patients. One hundred fifty-nine patients (21%) were current smokers, 279 (36%) former smokers, and 337 (43%) never smokers. T and N categories and American Joint Committee on Cancer group stages were distributed as follows: T1/x, 288 (37%); T2, 288 (37%); T3, 113 (15%); T4, 87 (11%); N0, 88(12%); N1/x, 140 (18%); N2a, 101 (13%); N2b, 269 (35%); N2c, 122 (16%); and N3, 56 (7%); stage I, 18(2%); stage II, 40(5%); stage III, 150(19%); and stage IV, 568(74%). Seventy-one patients (10%) presented with nodes in level IV. Median follow-up was 54 months. The 5-year overall survival, locoregional control, and overall recurrence-free survival rates were 84%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. Primary site recurrence developed in 7% of patients, and neck recurrence with primary site control in 3%. We could only identify 12 patients (2%) who had locoregional recurrence outside the high-dose target volumes. Poorer survival rates were observed in current smokers, patients with larger primary (T) tumors and lower neck disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with IMRT have excellent disease control. Locoregional recurrence was uncommon, and most often occurred in the high dose volumes. Parotid sparing was accomplished in nearly all patients without compromising tumor coverage.


Radiation Oncology | 2013

Outcomes and patterns of care of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated in the early 21st century

Adam S. Garden; Merrill S. Kies; William H. Morrison; Randal S. Weber; Steven J. Frank; Bonnie S. Glisson; G.B. Gunn; Beth M. Beadle; K. Kian Ang; David I. Rosenthal; Erich M. Sturgis

BackgroundWe performed this study to assess outcomes of patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with modern therapy approaches.MethodsDemographics, treatments and outcomes of patients diagnosed with Stage 3- 4B squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx, between 2000 – 2007 were tabulated and analyzed.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 1046 patients. The 5- year actuarial overall survival, recurrence-free survival and local-regional control rates for the entire cohort were 78%, 77% and 87% respectively. More advanced disease, increasing T-stage and smoking were associated with higher rates of local-regional recurrence and poorer survival.ConclusionsPatients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer have a relatively high survival rate. Patients’ demographics and primary tumor volume were very influential on these favorable outcomes. In particular, patients with small primary tumors did very well even when treatment was not intensified with the addition of chemotherapy.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2014

Prospective randomized double-blind study of atlas-based organ-at-risk autosegmentation-assisted radiation planning in head and neck cancer

Gary V. Walker; Musaddiq J. Awan; Randa Tao; Eugene J. Koay; Nicholas S. Boehling; Jonathan D. Grant; Dean F. Sittig; G.B. Gunn; Adam S. Garden; Jack Phan; William H. Morrison; David I. Rosenthal; Abdallah S.R. Mohamed; Clifton D. Fuller

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) for radiotherapy (RT) planning are manually defined, which is a tedious and inaccurate process. We sought to assess the feasibility, time reduction, and acceptability of an atlas-based autosegmentation (AS) compared to manual segmentation (MS) of OARs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A commercial platform generated 16 OARs. Resident physicians were randomly assigned to modify AS OAR (AS+R) or to draw MS OAR followed by attending physician correction. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between groups compared with attending approved OARs (DSC=1 means perfect overlap). 40 cases were segmented. RESULTS Mean ± SD segmentation time in the AS+R group was 19.7 ± 8.0 min, compared to 28.5 ± 8.0 min in the MS cohort, amounting to a 30.9% time reduction (Wilcoxon p<0.01). For each OAR, AS DSC was statistically different from both AS+R and MS ROIs (all Steel-Dwass p<0.01) except the spinal cord and the mandible, suggesting oversight of AS/MS processes is required; AS+R and MS DSCs were non-different. AS compared to attending approved OAR DSCs varied considerably, with a chiasm mean ± SD DSC of 0.37 ± 0.32 and brainstem of 0.97 ± 0.03. CONCLUSIONS Autosegmentation provides a time savings in head and neck regions of interest generation. However, attending physician approval remains vital.


Cancer | 2014

Management of the lymph node-positive neck in the patient with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

Adam S. Garden; G.B. Gunn; Amy C. Hessel; Beth M. Beadle; Salmaan Ahmed; Adel K. El-Naggar; Clifton D. Fuller; Lauren Averett Byers; Jack Phan; Steven J. Frank; William H. Morrison; Merill S. Kies; David I. Rosenthal; Erich M. Sturgis

The goal of the current study was to assess the rates of recurrence in the neck for patients with lymph node‐positive human papillomavirus‐associated cancer of the oropharynx who were treated with definitive radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy).


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016

Comparison of systemic therapies used concurrently with radiation for the treatment of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

Hsin Hua Nien; Erich M. Sturgis; Merrill S. Kies; Adel K. El-Naggar; William H. Morrison; Beth M. Beadle; Faye M. Johnson; G.B. Gunn; Clifton D. Fuller; Jack Phan; Kathryn A. Gold; Steven J. Frank; Heath D. Skinner; David I. Rosenthal; Adam S. Garden

This was a retrospective study of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated oropharyngeal cancer treated with concurrent systemic therapy and radiation.


Cancer | 2016

Radiation therapy (with or without neck surgery) for phenotypic human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Adam S. Garden; Clifton D. Fuller; David N. Rosenthal; William N. William; G.B. Gunn; Beth M. Beadle; Faye M. Johnson; William H. Morrison; Jack Phan; Steven J. Frank; Merrill S. Kies; Erich M. Sturgis

Favorable outcomes for human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal cancer have led to interest in identifying a subgroup of patients with the lowest risk of disease recurrence after therapy. De‐intensification of therapy for this group may result in survival outcomes that are similar to those associated with current therapy but with less toxicity. To advance this effort, this study analyzed the outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with or without systemic therapy.


Seminars in Radiation Oncology | 2018

Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Pierre Blanchard; G.B. Gunn; Alexander Lin; Robert L. Foote; Nancy Y. Lee; Steven J. Frank

Because of its sharp lateral penumbra and steep distal fall-off, proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages over photon therapy. In head and neck cancer, proton therapy has been used for decades in the treatment of skull-base tumors. In recent years the use of proton therapy has been extended to numerous other disease sites, including nasopharynx, oropharynx, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, periorbital tumors, skin, and salivary gland, or to reirradiation. The aim of this review is to present the physical properties and dosimetric benefit of proton therapy over advanced photon therapy; to summarize the clinical benefit described for each disease site; and to discuss issues of patient selection and cost-effectiveness.


Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2016

Improved setup and positioning accuracy using a three-point customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization system for stereotactic reirradiation of head and neck cancer

He Wang; C. Wang; Samuel Tung; Andrew Wilson Dimmitt; Pei Fong Wong; Mark A. Edson; Adam S. Garden; David I. Rosenthal; Clifton D. Fuller; G.B. Gunn; Vinita Takiar; Xin A. Wang; Dershan Luo; James N. Yang; Jennifer Wong; Jack Phan

The purpose of this study was to investigate the setup and positioning uncertainty of a custom cushion/mask/bite-block (CMB) immobilization system and determine PTV margin for image-guided head and neck stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (HN-SABR). We analyzed 105 treatment sessions among 21 patients treated with HN-SABR for recurrent head and neck cancers using a custom CMB immobilization system. Initial patient setup was performed using the ExacTrac infrared (IR) tracking system and initial setup errors were based on comparison of ExacTrac IR tracking system to corrected online ExacTrac X-rays images registered to treatment plans. Residual setup errors were determined using repeat verification X-ray. The online ExacTrac corrections were compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) before treatment to assess agreement. Intrafractional positioning errors were determined using prebeam X-rays. The systematic and random errors were analyzed. The initial translational setup errors were -0.8±1.3 mm, -0.8±1.6 mm, and 0.3±1.9 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, with a three-dimensional (3D) vector of 2.7±1.4 mm. The initial rotational errors were up to 2.4° if 6D couch is not available. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac X-ray images to within 2 mm and 2.5°. The intrafractional uncertainties were 0.1±0.6 mm, 0.1±0.6 mm, and 0.2±0.5 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, and 0.0∘±0.5°, 0.0∘±0.6°, and -0.1∘±0.4∘ in yaw, roll, and pitch direction, respectively. The translational vector was 0.9±0.6 mm. The calculated PTV margins mPTV(90,95) were within 1.6 mm when using image guidance for online setup correction. The use of image guidance for online setup correction, in combination with our customized CMB device, highly restricted target motion during treatments and provided robust immobilization to ensure minimum dose of 95% to target volume with 2.0 mm PTV margin for HN-SABR. PACS number(s): 87.55.ne.The purpose of this study was to investigate the setup and positioning uncertainty of a custom cushion/mask/bite‐block (CMB) immobilization system and determine PTV margin for image‐guided head and neck stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (HN‐SABR). We analyzed 105 treatment sessions among 21 patients treated with HN‐SABR for recurrent head and neck cancers using a custom CMB immobilization system. Initial patient setup was performed using the ExacTrac infrared (IR) tracking system and initial setup errors were based on comparison of ExacTrac IR tracking system to corrected online ExacTrac X‐rays images registered to treatment plans. Residual setup errors were determined using repeat verification X‐ray. The online ExacTrac corrections were compared to cone‐beam CT (CBCT) before treatment to assess agreement. Intrafractional positioning errors were determined using prebeam X‐rays. The systematic and random errors were analyzed. The initial translational setup errors were −0.8±1.3 mm, −0.8±1.6 mm, and 0.3±1.9 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, with a three‐dimensional (3D) vector of 2.7±1.4 mm. The initial rotational errors were up to 2.4° if 6D couch is not available. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac X‐ray images to within 2 mm and 2.5°. The intrafractional uncertainties were 0.1±0.6 mm, 0.1±0.6 mm, and 0.2±0.5 mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, and 0.0∘±0.5°, 0.0∘±0.6°, and −0.1∘±0.4∘ in yaw, roll, and pitch direction, respectively. The translational vector was 0.9±0.6 mm. The calculated PTV margins mPTV(90,95) were within 1.6 mm when using image guidance for online setup correction. The use of image guidance for online setup correction, in combination with our customized CMB device, highly restricted target motion during treatments and provided robust immobilization to ensure minimum dose of 95% to target volume with 2.0 mm PTV margin for HN‐SABR. PACS number(s): 87.55.ne


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016

Disease control and toxicity outcomes for T4 carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Vinita Takiar; Dominic Ma; Adam S. Garden; Jing Li; David I. Rosenthal; Beth M. Beadle; Steven J. Frank; Clifton D. Fuller; G.B. Gunn; William H. Morrison; Kate A. Hutcheson; Adel K. El-Naggar; Kathryn A. Gold; Michael E. Kupferman; Jack Phan

Treatment of T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is challenging because of the proximity of the tumor to the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to present our evaluation of disease control and toxicity outcomes for patients with T4 NPC treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy.


Hematology-oncology Clinics of North America | 2015

Thyroid Gland Malignancies

Maria E. Cabanillas; Ramona Dadu; Mimi I-Nan Hu; Charles Lu; G.B. Gunn; Elizabeth G. Grubbs; Stephen Y. Lai; Michelle D. Williams

Surgery remains the most important effective treatment for differentiated (DTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Radioactive iodine (RAI) is another important treatment but is reserved only for DTC whose disease captures RAI. Once patients fail primary therapy, observation is often recommended, as most DTC and MTC patients will have indolent disease. However, in a fraction of patients, systemic therapy must be considered. In recent decades 4 systemic therapies have been approved by the United States FDA for DTC and MTC. Sorafenib and lenvatinib are approved for DTC and vandetanib and cabozantinib for MTC. Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare and rapidly progressive form of thyroid cancer with a very high mortality rate. Treatment of ATC remains a challenge. Most patients are not surgical candidates at diagnosis due to advanced disease. External beam radiation and radiosensitizing radiation are the mainstay of therapy at this time. However, exciting new drugs and approaches to therapy are on the horizon but it will take a concerted, worldwide effort to complete clinical trials in order to find effective therapies that will improve the overall survival for this devastating disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the G.B. Gunn's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David I. Rosenthal

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clifton D. Fuller

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam S. Garden

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven J. Frank

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William H. Morrison

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jack Phan

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A.S.R. Mohamed

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beth M. Beadle

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen Y. Lai

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine A. Hutcheson

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge