G. Bussy

Epigenetic Modification of the FMR1 Gene in Fragile X Syndrome Is Associated with Differential Response to the mGluR5 Antagonist AFQ056

An antagonist for the metabotropic glutamate receptor may improve symptoms in patients with fragile X syndrome whose FMR1 promoters are fully methylated. A Methylation Marker for Fragile X Syndrome Through the practice of meditation, students of Eastern philosophies are taught to turn down the noise to find the silence within. But for patients suffering from fragile X syndrome, it is the silence within that turns up the noise. In this disorder, a defect in the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) silences its expression, which gives rise to myriad molecular changes, most notably a turning up of signaling through the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5. This noisy signaling pathway contributes to the cognitive deficits and differences that first become apparent in patients during childhood, and currently these symptoms are treatable only with supportive behavioral measures. But in mice and fruit flies that carry the same genetic defects as patients and also show enhanced glutamate receptor signaling and behavioral problems, administration of an mGluR5 antagonist improves the symptoms. Jacquemont et al. have now treated a group of 30 fragile X patients with such an antagonist. Not all subjects showed improvement, but an analysis of those who did revealed that the promoter of the FMR1 gene in drug-responsive patients is fully methylated, a sign that gene expression is completely silenced. This molecular aberration might serve as a signature that defines fragile X patients who could benefit from treatment with mGluR5 antagonists. In individuals with fragile X syndrome, the FMR1 gene can contain as many as several thousand extra repeats of the triplet base pairs CGG, a distortion that is accompanied by extra methylation at the gene’s promoter and thus impaired transcription. Because the number of triplet repeats differs widely from person to person—and even from generation to generation—there is a broad variation among patients in the structure of the gene and its methylation pattern. So when the authors tested the effects of a newly described mGluR5 inhibitor on fragile X patients, they assayed the methylation status of the FMR1 promoter, as well as running a large battery of behavioral tests designed to detect stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity, and inappropriate speech. In this clinical trial, the mGluR5 antagonist had no effect on the behaviors measured by these primary tests, but administration of the drug did correlate with differences observed in a secondary collection of tests, when the drug-treated patient group was compared with subjects who were given a placebo treatment. In a subsequent exploratory analysis, the authors found that each member of the subgroup of patients who harbored fully methylated FMR1 promoters showed improvement by the primary behavioral measures, exhibiting a boost in performance 19 or 20 days after treatment was started. The patient group with partially methylated promoters showed no such changes. This correlation between response to treatment and methylation status of the FMR1 promoter provides the basis for a larger study, appropriately designed to test whether methylation can serve as a predictor of a positive antagonist response in a population of patients with fragile X syndrome. It also offers hope that inhibition of the metabotropic glutamate system—believed to underlie many of the characteristic behaviors associated with fragile X—may be accomplished routinely, at least in patients in which the silence within lies in the FMR1 promoter. Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an X-linked condition associated with intellectual disability and behavioral problems. It is caused by expansion of a CGG repeat in the 5′ untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. This mutation is associated with hypermethylation at the FMR1 promoter and resultant transcriptional silencing. FMR1 silencing has many consequences, including up-regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5)–mediated signaling. mGluR5 receptor antagonists have shown promise in preclinical FXS models and in one small open-label study of FXS. We examined whether a receptor subtype–selective inhibitor of mGluR5, AFQ056, improves the behavioral symptoms of FXS in a randomized, double-blind, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study of 30 male FXS patients aged 18 to 35 years. We detected no significant effects of treatment on the primary outcome measure, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist–Community Edition (ABC-C) score, at day 19 or 20 of treatment. In an exploratory analysis, however, seven patients with full FMR1 promoter methylation and no detectable FMR1 messenger RNA improved, as measured with the ABC-C, significantly more after AFQ056 treatment than with placebo (P < 0.001). We detected no response in 18 patients with partial promoter methylation. Twenty-four patients experienced an adverse event, which was mostly mild to moderately severe fatigue or headache. If confirmed in larger and longer-term studies, these results suggest that blockade of the mGluR5 receptor in patients with full methylation at the FMR1 promoter may show improvement in the behavioral attributes of FXS.

High frequency of creatine deficiency syndromes in patients with unexplained mental retardation

Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes (CCDSs) are inborn errors of metabolism that include two autosomal recessive creatine biosynthesis defects (arginine–glycine amidinotransferase [AGAT; OMIM 602360] and guanidinoacetate methyl transferase [GAMT; OMIM 601240] deficiency) and an X-linked creatine transporter defect (OMIM 300036).1 The clinical phenotype is variable, associating nonspecific mental retardation, epilepsy, extrapyramidal movement disorders, and autistic behavior. The frequency of CCDS is unknown and probably underestimated. We report a high frequency of CCDS in mentally retarded children, mostly boys with an X-linked creatine transporter deficiency. Over a period of18 months, children referred to the Department of Pediatric Neurology with unexplained mild to severe mental retardation, normal karyotype, and absence of fragile X syndrome were prospectively screened for CCDS. Children were from diverse ethnic backgrounds. Children with polymalformative syndromes were excluded. Creatinine metabolism was evaluated using creatine/creatinine and guanidinoacetate (GAA)/creatinine ratios on a spot urine.2 Diagnosis was further confirmed using brain proton MR spectroscopy (H-MRS) and …

The Renpenning syndrome spectrum: new clinical insights supported by 13 new PQBP1-mutated males.

D Germanaud, M Rossi, G Bussy, D Gérard, L Hertz‐Pannier, P Blanchet, H Dollfus, F Giuliano, V Bennouna‐Greene, P Sarda, S Sigaudy, A Curie, MC Vincent, R Touraine, V des Portes. The Renpenning syndrome spectrum: new clinical insights supported by 13 new PQBP1‐mutated males.

Implicit procedural learning in fragile X and Down syndrome.

BACKGROUND Procedural learning refers to rule-based motor skill learning and storage. It involves the cerebellum, striatum and motor areas of the frontal lobe network. Fragile X syndrome, which has been linked with anatomical abnormalities within the striatum, may result in implicit procedural learning deficit. METHODS To address this issue, a serial reaction time (RT) task including six blocks of trials was performed by 14 individuals with fragile X syndrome, 12 individuals with Down syndrome and 12 mental age-matched control subjects. The first (B1) and fifth (B5) blocks were random whereas the others (B2, B3, B4 and B6) consisted of a repeated 10-step sequence. Results were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS For patients with fragile X syndrome, the RT was highly suggestive of preserved implicit learning as a significant difference was observed between blocks B5 and B6 (P = 0.009). However, the difference of RT between B4 and B5 did not reach significance, possibly due to a subgroup of individuals who did not learn. In contrast, in the Down syndrome group, RT decreased significantly between B4 and B5 (W = 2; P = 0.003) but not between the last ordered block (B6) and the last random block (B5), suggesting a weakness in procedural learning which was sensitive to the interfering random block. CONCLUSION implicit learning is variable in genetic syndromes and therefore relatively independent of general intellectual capacities. The results are discussed together with previous reports.

Clinical and neurocognitive characterization of a family with a novel MED12 gene frameshift mutation

FG syndrome, Lujan syndrome, and Ohdo syndrome, the Maat–Kievit–Brunner type, have been described as distinct syndromes with overlapping non‐specific features and different missense mutations of the MED12 gene have been reported in all of them. We report a family including 10 males and 1 female affected with profound non‐specific intellectual disability (ID) which was linked to a 30‐cM region extending from Xp11.21 (ALAS2) to Xq22.3 (COL4A5). Parallel sequencing of all X‐chromosome exons identified a frameshift mutation (c.5898dupC) of MED12. Mutated mRNA was not affected by non‐sense mediated RNA decay and induced an additional abnormal isoform due to activation of cryptic splice‐sites in exon 41. Dysmorphic features common to most affected males were long narrow face, high forehead, flat malar area, high nasal bridge, and short philtrum. Language was absent or very limited. Most patients had a friendly personality. Cognitive impairment, varying from borderline to profound ID was similarly observed in seven heterozygous females. There was no correlation between cognitive function and X‐chromosome inactivation profiles in blood cells. The severe degree of ID in male patients, as well as variable cognitive impairment in heterozygous females suggests that the duplication observed in the present family may have a more severe effect on MED12 function than missense mutations. In a cognitively impaired male from this family, who also presented with tall stature and dysmorphism and did not have the MED12 mutation, a 600‐kb duplication at 17p13.3 including the YWHAE gene, was found in a mosaic state.

Variability of the aging process in dementia-free adults with Down syndrome.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the typical aging process in adults with Down syndrome, focusing on its variability. The sample comprised 120 adults with Down syndrome who were free of dementia. Ages ranged from 20 to 69 years. Each participant was assessed on cognitive functioning and social adaptation, and was checked for the presence of psychopathological disorders. Results revealed an age-related deterioration in both cognitive and social adaptation skills, the extent of this decline depending on the dimension under scrutiny, and interindividual variability in aging profiles.

A Novel Analog Reasoning Paradigm: New Insights in Intellectually Disabled Patients

Background Intellectual Disability (ID) is characterized by deficits in intellectual functions such as reasoning, problem-solving, planning, abstract thinking, judgment, and learning. As new avenues are emerging for treatment of genetically determined ID (such as Down’s syndrome or Fragile X syndrome), it is necessary to identify objective reliable and sensitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Objective We developed a novel visual analogical reasoning paradigm, inspired by the Progressive Raven’s Matrices, but appropriate for Intellectually Disabled patients. This new paradigm assesses reasoning and inhibition abilities in ID patients. Methods We performed behavioural analyses for this task (with a reaction time and error rate analysis, Study 1) in 96 healthy controls (adults and typically developed children older than 4) and 41 genetically determined ID patients (Fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome and ARX mutated patients). In order to establish and quantify the cognitive strategies used to solve the task, we also performed an eye-tracking analysis (Study 2). Results Down syndrome, ARX and Fragile X patients were significantly slower and made significantly more errors than chronological age-matched healthy controls. The effect of inhibition on error rate was greater than the matrix complexity effect in ID patients, opposite to findings in adult healthy controls. Interestingly, ID patients were more impaired by inhibition than mental age-matched healthy controls, but not by the matrix complexity. Eye-tracking analysis made it possible to identify the strategy used by the participants to solve the task. Adult healthy controls used a matrix-based strategy, whereas ID patients used a response-based strategy. Furthermore, etiologic-specific reasoning differences were evidenced between ID patients groups. Conclusion We suggest that this paradigm, appropriate for ID patients and developmental populations as well as adult healthy controls, provides an objective and quantitative assessment of visual analogical reasoning and cognitive inhibition, enabling testing for the effect of pharmacological or behavioural intervention in these specific populations.

The c.429_452 duplication of the ARX gene: a unique developmental-model of limb kinetic apraxia

BackgroundThe c.429_452dup24 of the ARX gene is a rare genetic anomaly, leading to X-Linked Intellectual Disability without brain malformation. While in certain cases c.429_452dup24 has been associated with specific clinical patterns such as Partington syndrome, the consequence of this mutation has been also often classified as “non-specific Intellectual Disability”. The present work aims at a more precise description of the clinical features linked to the c.429_452dup24 mutation.MethodsWe clinically reviewed all affected patients identified in France over a five-year period, i.e. 27 patients from 12 different families. Detailed cognitive, behavioural, and motor evaluation, as well as standardized videotaped assessments of oro-lingual and gestural praxis, were performed. In a sub-group of 13 ARX patients, kinematic and MRI studies were further accomplished to better characterize the motor impairment prevalent in the ARX patients group. To ensure that data were specific to the ARX gene mutation and did not result from low-cognitive functioning per se, a group of 27 age- and IQ-matched Down syndrome patients served as control.ResultsNeuropsychological and motor assessment indicated that the c.429_452dup24 mutation constitutes a recognizable clinical syndrome: ARX patients exhibiting Intellectual Disability, without primary motor impairment, but with a very specific upper limb distal motor apraxia associated with a pathognomonic hand-grip. Patients affected with the so-called Partington syndrome, which involves major hand dystonia and orolingual apraxia, exhibit the most severe symptoms of the disorder. The particular “reach and grip” impairment which was observed in all ARX patients, but not in Down syndrome patients, was further characterized by the kinematic data: (i) loss of preference for the index finger when gripping an object, (ii) major impairment of fourth finger deftness, and (iii) a lack of pronation movements. This lack of distal movement coordination exhibited by ARX patients is associated with the loss of independent digital dexterity and is similar to the distortion of individual finger movements and posture observed in Limb Kinetic Apraxia.ConclusionThese findings suggest that the ARX c.429_452dup24 mutation may be a developmental model for Limb Kinetic Apraxia.

Asperger syndrome and early-onset schizophrenia associated with a novel MECP2 deleterious missense variant

Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) deleterious variants, which are responsible for Rett syndrome in girls, are involved in a wide spectrum of developmental disabilities in males. A neuropsychiatric phenotype without intellectual disability is uncommon in patients with MECP2 deleterious variants. We report on two dizygotic twins with an MECP2-related psychiatric disorder without intellectual disability. Neuropsychological and psychiatric phenotype assessments were performed, and a genetic analysis was carried out. Both patients fulfilled the Pervasive Developmental Disorder criteria on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Asperger syndrome criteria on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV). One patient developed early-onset schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria) with two acute psychotic episodes, the latest one following corticosteroids and sodium valproate intake, with major hyperammonemia. A novel MECP2 gene transversion c.491 G>T [p.(Ser164Ile)] was found in both twins. Pathogenicity of this variant was considered on the basis of strong clinical and molecular data. The underlying molecular basis of neuropsychiatric disorders may have important consequences on genetic counseling and therapeutic strategies.

Basal ganglia involvement in ARX patients: The reason for ARX patients very specific grasping?

The ARX (Aristaless Related homeoboX) gene was identified in 2002 as responsible for XLAG syndrome, a lissencephaly characterized by an almost complete absence of cortical GABAergic interneurons, and for milder forms of X-linked Intellectual Disability (ID) without apparent brain abnormalities. The most frequent mutation found in the ARX gene, a duplication of 24 base pairs (c.429_452dup24) in exon 2, results in a recognizable syndrome in which patients present ID without primary motor impairment, but with a very specific upper limb distal motor apraxia associated with a pathognomonic hand-grip, described as developmental Limb Kinetic Apraxia (LKA). In this study, we first present ARX expression during human fetal brain development showing that it is strongly expressed in GABAergic neuronal progenitors during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. We show that although ARX expression strongly decreases towards the end of gestation, it is still present after birth in some neurons of the basal ganglia, thalamus and cerebral cortex, suggesting that ARX also plays a role in more mature neuron functioning. Then, using morphometric brain MRI in 13 ARX patients carrying c.429_452dup24 mutation and in 13 sex- and age-matched healthy controls, we show that ARX patients have a significantly decreased volume of several brain structures including the striatum (and more specifically the caudate nucleus), hippocampus and thalamus as well as decreased precentral gyrus cortical thickness. We observe a significant correlation between caudate nucleus volume reduction and motor impairment severity quantified by kinematic parameter of precision grip. As basal ganglia are known to regulate sensorimotor processing and are involved in the control of precision gripping, the combined decrease in cortical thickness of primary motor cortex and basal ganglia volume in ARX dup24 patients is very likely the anatomical substrate of this developmental form of LKA.