G. Champault

Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscopes

BACKGROUND The Airtraq laryngoscope is designed to allow visualization of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes. We hypothesized that this new airway device would facilitate tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients. We compared tracheal intubation performance of standard Macintosh laryngoscope with the Airtraq laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients. METHODS One hundred and six consecutive ASA I-III morbidly obese patients undergoing surgery were randomized to intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope or the Airtraq laryngoscope. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized. If tracheal intubation failed within 120 s with the Macintosh or Airtraq , laryngoscopes were switched. Success rate, SpO2, duration of tracheal intubation, and quality of airway management were evaluated and compared between the groups. RESULTS Preoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. In the Airtraq group, tracheal intubation was successfully carried out in all patients within 120 s. In the Macintosh laryngoscope group, six patients required intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope. The mean (SD) time taken for tracheal intubation was 24 (16) and 56 (23) s, respectively, with the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes, (P<0.001). SpO2 was better maintained in the Airtraq group than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group with one and nine patients, respectively, demonstrating drops of SpO2 to 92% or less (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this study, the Airtraq laryngoscope shortened the duration of tracheal intubation and prevented reductions in arterial oxygen saturation in morbidly obese patients.

EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair

BackgroundAlthough the repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias is one of the most commonly performed operations, many aspects of their treatment are still under debate or poorly studied. In addition, there is a lack of good definitions and classifications that make the evaluation of studies and meta-analyses in this field of surgery difficult.Materials and methodsUnder the auspices of the board of the European Hernia Society and following the previously published classifications on inguinal and on ventral hernias, a working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of operations for ventral abdominal wall hernias. Development of such a registry involved reaching agreement about clear definitions and classifications on patient variables, surgical procedures and mesh materials used, as well as outcome parameters. The EuraHS working group (European registry for abdominal wall hernias) comprised of a multinational European expert panel with specific interest in abdominal wall hernias. Over five working group meetings, consensus was reached on definitions for the data to be recorded in the registry.ResultsA set of well-described definitions was made. The previously reported EHS classifications of hernias will be used. Risk factors for recurrences and co-morbidities of patients were listed. A new severity of comorbidity score was defined. Post-operative complications were classified according to existing classifications as described for other fields of surgery. A new 3-dimensional numerical quality-of-life score, EuraHS-QoL score, was defined. An online platform is created based on the definitions and classifications, which can be used by individual surgeons, surgical teams or for multicentre studies. A EuraHS website is constructed with easy access to all the definitions, classifications and results from the database.ConclusionAn online platform for registration and outcome measurement of abdominal wall hernia repairs with clear definitions and classifications is offered to the surgical community. It is hoped that this registry could lead to better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of abdominal wall hernias based on hernia variables, patient variables, available hernia repair materials and techniques.

Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage or Primary Anastomosis With Defunctioning Stoma for Hinchey 3 Complicated Diverticulitis : Results of a Comparative Study

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and open primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma in the management of Hinchey 3 diverticulitis. METHODS: From 1994 to 2006, 35 patients underwent laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey 3 diverticulitis in three institutions. Data prospectively collected were compared with those of a retrospective series of 24 patients matched for Hincheys classification and who underwent primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma. RESULTS: There was no postoperative death. Postoperative morbidity was not different between the two groups. One patient in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group required a Hartmanns procedure because of a colonic fistula. One patient in the primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma group underwent a reoperation for incisional dehiscence. The median hospital stay was lower in patients treated by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.0001). Twenty-five patients in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group underwent elective laparoscopic resection. One of them required conversion to laparotomy. All patients in the primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma group have had their ileostomy closed. Cumulative surgical morbidity (16 vs. 37.5 percent, P = 0.0507) and hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, P < 0.0001) were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group. CONCLUSION: In the management of Hinchey 3 diverticulitis, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage does not result in excess morbidity or mortality, it reduces the length of hospital stay and avoids a stoma in most patients, and it is, therefore, a reasonable alternative to primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma.

Two-stage laparoscopic management of generalized peritonitis due to perforated sigmoid diverticula: eighteen cases.

The classic treatment of generalized peritonitis due to perforation of sigmoid diverticula is based on the principle of a two-stage surgery with a temporary derivation of the colonic transit. This procedure is associated with a prohibitively high immediate and delayed morbidity, especially associated with the abdominal wound. The laparoscopic approach to this complication is less aggressive and allows a second-stage elective laparoscopic resection. Eighteen consecutive patients (ten women and eight men; average age, 53.7 years) underwent emergency laparoscopic treatment for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticula. Eight of these patients had previously had diverticulitis attacks. By peritoneal cavity exploration and full peritoneal lavage (average, 15 L), the infected sigmoid lesion was stuck with biologic glue. A drain was inserted at the site of the lesion and in some cases also in other abdominal zones. No colostomy was necessary. Antibiotic treatment was started at diagnosis and continued for a minimum of 7 days. There was no mortality. Morbidity was limited to three patients (two cases of lymphangitis and one of pulmonary disease). No patient had a wound abscess or residual deep collections. The mean hospitalization was 8 days. Fourteen patients underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection with a delay of 3.5 months. One conversion to laparotomy was necessary. The laparoscopic treatment of generalized peritonitis due to perforated sigmoid diverticula is an interesting alternative to the traditional treatment. It is associated with a lower morbidity, a shorter postoperative hospital stay, and an improvement in the patients quality of life, because colostomy is avoided. It is also associated with economic savings.

Routine surgical pathology in general surgery

Although pathological analysis provides the definitive diagnosis for most resection specimens, recent evidence suggests that such analysis may be omitted for certain routine samples. This was a retrospective analysis of the value of routine histopathological examination performed in daily general surgical practice.

Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease

BackgroundWe undertook a retrospective multicenter study of elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the safety and the results of the procedure performed by a large number of surgeons.Materials and methodsBetween January 1998 and April 1999, the French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery recruited retrospectively 179 patients from 10 surgical units, operated on for elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. There were 94 men and 85 women with a mean age of 58 years (range, 30–82). The indications for surgery were acute attacks in 123 cases, complicated diverticulitis in 47 cases, and miscellaneous in 9 cases.ResultsThe performed procedure was a successful laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomy in 154 cases (with totally intracorporeal anastomosis in 136 cases and hand-sewn anastomosis via small incision in 18 cases). The mean operation time was 223 min ±79 (range, 100–480). There was no mortality and 23 complications occurred in 23 patients (14.9%). Postoperative ileus lasted 2.5±0.9 days (range, 1–6), and oral intake started after 3.3±1.3 days (range, 1–12). The mean postoperative stay was 9.3 days (range, 4–50). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 25 cases (13.9%). The essential causes of conversion were obesity, severe adhesions, and colonic inflammation. The mean postoperative stay for the 25 converted patients was 13±8.5 days (range, 7–42).ConclusionElective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis is feasible and is safe. The complication and mortality rates are similar to those observed after open procedures. For experienced surgical teams, laparoscopic colonic resection is a good approach for selected patients suffering from symptomatic diverticulitis.

The use of diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography in the assessment of pancreatic cancer

AbstractBackground: Pancreatic resection with curative intent is possible in a select minority of patients with carcinomas of the pancreatic head. Diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography combines the proven benefits of staging laparoscopy with high-resolution intraoperative ultrasound, thus allowing the surgeon to perform a detailed assessment of the pancreatic cancer. Methods: In a prospective study of 26 patients with obstructive jaundice from a carcinoma of the head of the pancreas, the curative resectability of tumors was assessed by ultrasound (26 cases), computerized tomography (26 cases), endoscopic ultrasound (16 cases), and a combination of diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound (26 cases). Results: The findings of ultrasound and computerized tomography were comparable: 50% of patients were excluded from curative resection. Endoscopic ultrasound provided precise information on the primary tumors. The accuracy of the combined diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound, when compared with ultrasound, computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound, was better with respect to minute peritoneal or hepatic metastasis: 80.7% (or a further 30.7%) of patients did not qualify for curative resection. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography enables detection of previously unsuspected metastases; thus, needless laparotomy can be avoided. It should therefore be considered the first step in any potentially curative surgical procedure.

Video-Assisted Versus Conventional Tracheal Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients

BackgroundWe compared tracheal intubation characteristics and arterial oxygenation quality during airway management of morbidly obese patients whose trachea was intubated under video assistance with the LMA CTrach™ (SEBAC, Pantin, France) or the Airtraq™ laryngoscope (VYGON, Écouen, France) with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.MethodsAfter standardized induction of anesthesia, 318 morbidly obese patients scheduled for elective morbid obesity surgery received tracheal intubation with the LMA CTrach™, the Airtraq™ laryngoscope, or the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. Duration of apnea, time to tracheal intubation, and oxygenation quality during airway management were compared between the LMA CTrach™ and the laryngoscope groups.ResultsPatients’ characteristics were similar in the three groups. The success rate for tracheal intubation was 100% with the LMA CTrach™ and the Airtraq™ laryngoscope. One patient of the Macintosh laryngoscope group received LMA CTrach™ intubation because of early arterial oxygen desaturation associated with unstable facemask ventilation. The duration of apnea was shorter with the LMA CTrach™ than that of the Airtraq™ laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. The duration tracheal intubation was shorter with the Airtraq™ laryngoscope than with the Macintosh laryngoscopes and the LMA CTrach™. During airway management, arterial oxygenation was of better quality with the LMA CTrach™ and the Airtraq™ laryngoscope than that of the Macintosh laryngoscope.ConclusionBecause LMA CTrach™ promoted short apnea time and the Airtraq™ laryngoscope allowed early definitive airway, both video-assisted tracheal intubation devices prevented most serious arterial oxygenation desaturation evidenced during tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients with the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.

Splénectomie laparoscopique pour maladies hématologiques.Étude de 275 cas

AIM OF THE STUDY To evaluate the results of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases by a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1991 and 1998, 275 patients (mean age: 40.4 years [18-93]) underwent splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n = 209, 76%), for hemolytic anemia (HA) (n = 37) including hereditary spherocytosis (n = 13) and auto-immune anemia (n = 24), lymphoma (n = 12), tumor (n = 6) and uncommon hematologic syndromes (n = 11). Laparoscopic splenectomy was attempted in every patient. The lateral approach was most commonly used with an anterior approach to the splenic hilar vessels, which were cut after hemostasis using a stapling gun; other techniques were also employed. RESULTS The mean operating time was 165 minutes (45-360); it was shorter in the case of conversion (144 minutes) and became shorter with the operators experience. Conversion was necessary in 55 patients (20%), due to hemorrhage in 2/3 of cases, related to splenic vessels (20 cases), short gastric vessels (9 cases), or injury of the spleen (8 cases). In ten cases (2%), conversion was necessary for extraction of the spleen. Conversion rate varied from 5.3 to 46.7%, depending on the surgical team. Univariate analysis of factors predisposing to conversion identified four causes: obesity; technique used to achieve hemostasis of the splenic hilar vessels; operators experience; and presence of splenomegaly. An accessory spleen was found in 44 patients (16%). The weight of the spleen was more than 350 g in 43 patients (15.6%). There were no deaths. There were no significant complications in 236 patients (85.8%) and the mean hospital stay was 6.4 days. In comparison with patients who had a conversion, bowel function returned significantly earlier, use of analgesia was reduced and hospital stay was shorter. The overall morbidity rate was 13.8% (n = 38); morbidity rate was only 10.4% (n = 22) for laparoscopic splenectomy. In these 22 patients, the complications were: subphrenic collections (n = 5, 2.2%), abdominal wall infections (n = 5), thromboembolic events (n = 2), anemia (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 1), peptic ulcer (n = 1), bowel obstruction (n = 1), splenic vein thrombosis (n = 1). Re-operations were required in 4 patients (1.8%) because of hemorrhage, pancreatitis and bowel obstruction. Morbidity rate was significantly increased in the case of conversion (27%), obesity (20%), malignant disease (30%) and splenomegaly (21.8%). Forty-four patients (16%) received perioperative or postoperative blood transfusion and 23 (8.3%) received platelet transfusion. Mean time to return to normal activity was 21 days and was shorter in the absence of conversion (18.5 days versus 35 days). In patients with ITP, the mean platelet count was 240,000 after 3 months, and the failure rate was 8.3%. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic splenectomy is a real alternative to conventional splenectomy for some hematologic diseases, particularly ITP and HA. The advantages are an uneventful postoperative course, a lower morbidity rate, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to normal activity. The limits of this technique are related to the operators experience, the size of the spleen, the nature of the underlying disorders and patient characteristics, mainly obesity.

Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair

BackgroundThe literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology.Materials and methodsThe EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction.ResultsA list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of “time-to-event analysis” to report data on “freedom-of-recurrence” rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods.ConclusionA set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.