G. D. Aulich
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by G. D. Aulich.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2001
C. B. Moore; K. B. Eack; G. D. Aulich; W. Rison
With the use of a NaI scintillation detector, bursts of radiation with energies in excess of 1 MeV were recorded at a mountain-top observatory immediately before three, nearby cloud-to-ground, negative lightning strikes. Coincident recordings of the electric field changes due to the discharges showed that, in each case, the bursts began between 1 and 2 milliseconds before and continued until the onset of the first return stroke. This radiation was associated with approaching stepped-leaders and may have influenced their development.
Journal of Applied Meteorology | 2000
C. B. Moore; W Illiam Rison; J Ames Mathis; G. D. Aulich
Although lightning rods have long been used to limit damage from lightning, there are currently no American standards for the shape and form of these devices. Following tradition, however, sharp-tipped Franklin rods are widely installed despite evidence that, on occasion, lightning strikes objects in their vicinity. In recent tests of various tip configurations to determine which were preferentially struck by lightning, several hemispherically tipped, blunt rods were struck but none of the nearby, sharper rods were ‘‘hit’’ by lightning. Measurements of the currents from the tips of lightning rods exposed to strong electric fields under negatively charged cloud bases show that the emissions consist of periodic ion charge bursts that act to reduce the strength of the local fields. After a burst of charge, no further emissions occur until that charge has moved away from the tip. Laboratory measurements of the emissions from a wide range of electrodes exposed to strong, normalpolarity thunderstorm electric fields show that positive ions are formed and move more readily over sharp-tipped electrodes than over blunter ones. From these findings, it appears that the electric field rates of intensification over sharp rods must be much greater than those over similarly exposed blunt rods for the initiation of upwardgoing leaders. Calculations of the relative strengths of the electric fields above similarly exposed sharp and blunt rods show that although the fields, prior to any emissions, are much stronger at the tip of a sharp rod, they decrease more rapidly with distance. As a result, at a few centimeters above the tip of a 20-mm-diameter blunt rod, the strength of the field is greater than that over an otherwise similar, sharper rod at the same height. Since the field strength at the tip of a sharpened rod tends to be limited by the easy formation of ions in the surrounding air, the field strengths over blunt rods can be much stronger than those at distances greater than 1 cm over sharper ones. The results of this study suggest that moderately blunt metal rods (with tip height‐to‐tip radius of curvature ratios of about 680:1) are better lightning strike receptors than are sharper rods or very blunt ones.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1999
W. P. Winn; S. J. Hunyady; G. D. Aulich
A number of instruments were placed on the ground across the path of a large tornado that passed west of the town of Allison, Texas, on June 8, 1995. The center of the tornado came within 660 m of the closest instrument, which recorded a pressure drop of 55 mbar and a subsequent pressure rise of 60 mbar. During the lowest recorded pressures (near r = 660 m), there were large and rapid pressure fluctuations; the largest fluctuation was a 10-mbar spike lasting 2 s. A second instrument on the opposite side of the tornado recorded a pressure drop of 26 mbar. From the pressure variations with time P(t) at the two instruments, the variation of pressure with distance p(r) from the center of the tornado has been deduced for r>660 m. As r decreases, the measured pressure function p(r) drops more abruptly than would be expected from conservation of angular momentum of air spiraling inward near the ground level.
Journal of Applied Meteorology | 2003
C. B. Moore; G. D. Aulich; William Rison
Conventional lightning rods used in the United States have sharp tips, a practice derived from Benjamin Franklin’s discovery of a means to obtain protection from lightning. However, the virtue of sharp tips for strike reception has never been established. An examination of the relevant physics shows that very strong electric fields are required above the tips of rods in order that they function as strike receptors but that the gradients of the field strength over sharp-tipped rods are so great that, at distances of a few millimeters, the local fields are often too weak for the development of upward-going streamers. In field tests, rods with rounded tips have been found to be better strike receptors than were nearby sharp-tipped rods.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2000
W. P. Winn; S. J. Hunyady; G. D. Aulich
A number of observers have reported lightning, diffuse luminosity, or other manifestations of electrical activity in tornadoes. To try to quantify these observations, eight instruments with sensors for electric field and other parameters were placed in front of a large tornado that passed by Allison, Texas, on June 8, 1995. The edge of the tornado vortex passed over two of the instruments and near other instruments. When the two instruments were in the low-pressure region near the edge of the vortex, they indicated electric field amplitudes less than about 3 kV/m, which is low compared with amplitudes of 10 kV/m or greater that are often present below thunderclouds. The thunderstorm produced frequent lightning, but there is no evidence from the measurements or from visual observations of lightning in the vortex. However, there was one interesting electrical effect associated with the tornado: the electric field at the two instruments in the vortex relaxed to zero quickly after lightning flashes, whereas the electric field at nearby instruments outside the vortex did not relax quickly after the same lightning flashes. The most likely cause of the rapid relaxation is shielding of the electric field at the ground by charge induced on soil, leaves, grass, and other debris lofted by the strong winds.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
W. P. Winn; G. D. Aulich; S. J. Hunyady; K. B. Eack; H. E. Edens; Paul Krehbiel; W. Rison; Richard Sonnenfeld
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
H. E. Edens; K. B. Eack; E. M. Eastvedt; J. J. Trueblood; W. P. Winn; Paul Krehbiel; G. D. Aulich; S. J. Hunyady; W. C. Murray; W. Rison; S. A. Behnke; Robert J. Thomas
Geophysical Research Letters | 2000
C. B. Moore; G. D. Aulich; W. Rison
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
W. P. Winn; E. M. Eastvedt; J. J. Trueblood; K. B. Eack; H. E. Edens; G. D. Aulich; S. J. Hunyady; W. C. Murray
Archive | 2006
Paul Krehbiel; W. Rison; H. E. Edens; Nicholas OConnor; G. D. Aulich; Ronald Thomas; Sandra Kieft; Steven J. Goodman; Richard J. Blakeslee; John Hall; Jeffrey C. Bailey