G. D. Nielsen

Investigation of the adjuvant and immuno-suppressive effects of benzyl butyl phthalate, phthalic acid and benzyl alcohol in a murine injection model

In a recent study, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and its metabolite, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, were shown to possess adjuvant effect [Toxicology 169 (2001) 37; Toxicology Letters 125 (2001) 11]. The present study investigates the adjuvant effect of another important commercial phthalate plasticizer, benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) as well as its degradation products, phthalic acid and benzyl alcohol (BA) in a murine model. The model antigen, ovalbumin (OA), was injected either alone (OA control group), together with one of the test substances (test group) or together with aluminium hydroxide, which served as the positive adjuvant control. The mice were boosted either once or twice with OA before blood was collected and assayed for the content of OA-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies by ELISA methods. Adjuvant effect was defined as a statistically significant increased antibody level in the test groups compared with the OA control group. Conversely, if the antibody production in a test group was significantly lower than the OA control group, it was deemed to be immunosuppression. This study demonstrated that BBP, in contrast to DEHP, did not possess adjuvant effect. Furthermore, immunosuppression was apparent in the case of BA. The study also demonstrated that if the injections give rise to formation of wounds, it may cause false positive results.

Effects of R-(+)-and S-(-)-limonene on the respiratory tract in mice

The effects of airborne R-(+)- and S-(-)-limonene were studied in conscious BALB/c mice by continuous monitoring respiratory rate (f), tidal volume (VT) and mid-expiratory flow rate (VD) during an exposure period of 30 min. Both enantiomers decreasedffrom a trigeminal reflex, i.e., due to sensory irritation. The exposure concentration decreasingf by 50% (RD50) in the first 10 min of the exposure period was estimated to be 1076 ppm for R-(+)-limonene and 1467 ppmforS-(-)-limonene. Resultsforsensoryirritation ofR –(+)-limonene in BALB/c mice and humans are in close agreement. The reported sensory irritation threshold is above 80 ppm in humans while the no – observed – effect level was estimated to be 100 ppm in mice. The enantiomers were devoid of pulmonary irritation or general anesthetic effects with R-(+)-limonene <1599 ppm and S-(-)-limonene <2421 ppm. R-(+)-limonene did not influence VT below 629 ppm. S-(-)-limonene increased VT above 1900 ppm. Both enantiomers induced a mild bronchoconstrictive effect above 1000 ppm.

Study of adjuvant effect of model surfactants from the groups of alkyl sulfates, alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol ethoxylates and soaps.

The sodium salts of representatives of anionic surfactants, dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and coconut oil fatty acids, and a nonionic surfactant, dodecyl alcohol ethoxylate, were studied for adjuvant effect on the production of specific IgE antibodies in mice. The surfactants were injected subcutaneously (sc) in concentrations of 1000, 100, 10 or 1 mg/l, respectively, together with 1 microg of ovalbumin (OVA). In addition, groups of mice received OVA in saline (control group) or in Al(OH)(3) (positive adjuvant control group). After the primary immunization the mice were boosted up to three times with OVA (0.1 microg sc) in saline. OVA-specific IgE antibodies were determined by the heterologous mouse rat passive cutaneous anaphylaxis test. The results were confirmed by a specific ELISA method. After the first booster, the Al(OH)(3) group and the 10 mg/l SDS group showed a statistically significant increase in OVA specific IgE levels. After two boosters, a statistically significant suppression in OVA-specific IgE production occurred with SDS (1000 mg/l), SDBS (1000 and 100 mg/l), coconut soap (1000 mg/l) and the alcohol ethoxylate (10 mg/l). This study suggests that a limited number of surfactants possess an adjuvant effect whereas all surfactants at certain levels can suppress specific IgE production.

DETERGENTS IN THE INDOOR ENVIRONMENT – WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR AN ALLERGY PROMOTING EFFECT? KNOWN AND POSTULATED MECHANISMS

IgE-mediated allergic diseases, such as asthma and rhinitis seem to be increasing in industrialised societies. One possible explanation for this could be the increased use of more effective and aggressive detergents. The surfactants from these could interfere with the sensitisation process in which specific IgE is formed to ubiquitously occurring environmental allergens. Only sparse data exist in relation to surfactants and allergic sensitization. However, it can be speculated that the strong surfactant properties of some of ingredients used in modem detergents may interfere with some of the intricate cellular interactions taking place along the immunological pathways. These include formation of IL-4 and IL-5 producing T helper lymphocytes type 2 and the B-lymphocyte isotype switch, which leads to production of specific IgE. Candidates for experimental studies of such phenomena on the cellular level are proposed.

Pulmonary toxicity following exposure to a tile coating product containing alkylsiloxanes. A clinical and toxicological evaluation.

Abstract Context. Coating products are widely used for making surfaces water and dirt repellent. However, on several occasions the use of these products has been associated with lung toxicity. Objective. In the present study, we evaluated the toxic effects of an aerosolized tile-coating product. Methods. Thirty-nine persons, who reported respiratory and systemic symptoms following exposure to the tile-coating product, were clinically examined. The product was analysed chemically and furthermore, the exposure scenario was reconstructed using a climate chamber and the toxicological properties of the product were studied using in vivo and by in vitro surfactometry. Results. The symptoms developed within few hours and included coughing, tachypnoea, chest pain, general malaise and fever. The physical examination revealed perihilar lung infiltrates on chest radiograph and reduced blood oxygen saturation. The acute symptoms resolved gradually within 1–3 days and no delayed symptoms were observed. By means of mass spectrometry and X-ray spectroscopy, it was shown that the product contained non-fluorinated alkylsiloxanes. The exposure conditions in the supermarket were reconstructed under controlled conditions in a climate chamber and particle and gas exposure levels were monitored over time allowing estimation of human exposure levels. Mice exposed to the product developed symptoms of acute pulmonary toxicity in a concentration-and time-dependent manner. The symptoms of acute pulmonary toxicity likely resulted from inhibition of the pulmonary surfactant function as demonstrated by in vitro surfactometry. Among these patients only a partial association between the level of exposure and the degree of respiratory symptoms was observed, which could be because of a high inter-individual difference in sensitivity and time-dependent changes in the chemical composition of the aerosol. Conclusion. Workers need to cautiously apply surface coating products because the contents can be highly toxic through inhalation, and the aerosols can disperse to locations remote from the worksite and affect bystanders.