G. De Marco

Breast Cancer Local Recurrence: Risk Factors and Prognostic Relevance of Early Time to Recurrence

BackgroundLocal recurrence occurs in 10%–20% of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for stage I–II breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate breast cancer local recurrence, potential risk factors, and prognostic impact.MethodsA total of 503 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were included in the study. All patients underwent axillary dissection and postoperative radiotherapy, and all patients had negative margins at pathological examination. Median follow-up was 82 months. Local recurrence was classified as early when it occurred within 2 years from surgery. The risk factors for local recurrence and overall survival were estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsForty-six cases (9.1%) of local recurrence were observed, 11 of which occurred within 24 months of surgery; the other 35, sometime later. Statistically significant risk factors for local recurrence were premenopausal status, peritumoral vascular invasion, multifocality, and absence of estrogen receptors. Independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival at 5 and 10 years were N stage, absence of estrogen receptors, and early time to recurrence. Overall survival at 10 years was 10.0% for patients with early recurrence, 87.5% for patients with late recurrence, and 87.9% for patients without recurrence.ConclusionsNone of the studied clinicopathological characteristics alone is a determinant for the choice of surgical treatment. Younger patients treated with breast-conserving surgery should receive aggressive postsurgical treatment and should be followed with an intensive follow-up program when metastatic axillary lymph nodes, negative estrogen receptors, or peritumoral vascular invasion are present.

Prognostic relevance of proliferative activity evaluated by Mib-1 immunostaining in node negative breast cancer.

AIM The purpose of this prospective observational study was to analyze the role of Mib-1 immunostaining as a proliferation index in breast cancer. Correlations between Mib-1 expression and clinico-pathological characteristics as well as its prognostic value have been studied in a series of 432 node negative breast cancers. METHODS Mib-1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Tumor sections from highly cellular invasive areas of cancer were stained by monoclonal antibody Mib-1 (Dako) and cells whose nuclei stained positive were counted in 10 randomly chosen HPFs and expressed as percentages of all epithelial cells. A minimum of 400 cells were counted. Correlation between Mib-1 staining and clinico-pathological factors was investigated by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. The prognostic impact on actuarial disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by univariate analysis using the log-rank test and by multivariate analysis using Cox regression model. RESULTS Tumors were considered as positive for Mib-1 expression when more than 15% of cells counted were stained. Mib-1 positivity was found in 190/432 cases and resulted in being significantly related to tumor grade, tumor size and absence of estrogen receptors at multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 66 months, Mib-1 positivity resulted in being the only independent predictor of OS (RR 2.92), and an independent predictor of DFS (RR 2.01) together with absence of estrogen receptors (RR 2.15). CONCLUSIONS Mib-1 index of proliferative activity correlates well to other established prognostic factors of breast cancer. Mib-1 index may improve the tailoring of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer, and our experience adds evidence to its effectiveness as prognostic factor. Efforts to reach uniformity in the methodology and in the scoring system should be done to warrant a standardized procedure and make Mib-1 determination definitively reliable in the current clinical practice.