Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where G. Grätzer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by G. Grätzer.


Archive | 2011

Lattice theory : foundation

G. Grätzer

Preface.- Introduction.- Glossary of Notation.- I First Concepts.- 1 Two Definitions of Lattices.- 2 How to Describe Lattices.- 3 Some Basic Concepts.- 4 Terms, Identities, and Inequalities.- 5 Free Lattices.- 6 Special Elements.- II Distributive Lattices.- 1 Characterization and Representation Theorems.- 2 Terms and Freeness.- 3 Congruence Relations.- 4 Boolean Algebras.- 5 Topological Representation.- 6 Pseudocomplementation.- III Congruences.- 1 Congruence Spreading.- 2 Distributive, Standard, and Neutral Elements.- 3 Distributive, Standard, and Neutral Ideals.- 4 Structure Theorems.- IV Lattice Constructions.- 1 Adding an Element.- 2 Gluing.- 3 Chopped Lattices.- 4 Constructing Lattices with Given Congruence Lattices.- 5 Boolean Triples.- V Modular and Semimodular Lattices.- 1 Modular Lattices.- 2 Semimodular Lattices.- 3 Geometric Lattices.- 4 Partition Lattices.- 5 Complemented Modular Lattices.- VI Varieties of Lattices.- 1 Characterizations of Varieties 397.- 2 The Lattice of Varieties of Lattices.- 3 Finding Equational Bases.- 4 The Amalgamation Property.- VII Free Products.- 1 Free Products of Lattices.- 2 The Structure of Free Lattices.- 3 Reduced Free Products.- 4 Hopfian Lattices.- Afterword.- Bibliography.


Acta Mathematica Hungarica | 1962

On congruence lattices of lattices

G. Grätzer; E. T. Schmidt

If K is a lattice, then let | denote the lattice of all congruence relations of K. It is known (see [1]) that O(K) is a distributive lattice satisfying some continuity properties (see below). It is natural to ask about the lattice-theoretical characterization of O(K). I f K is finite, then | is also finite, and conversely, every finite distributive lattice L is isomorphic to a O(K) where Kis finite too. This theorem is due to R. P. DILWORTH and is mentioned in [I] without proof. No proof of this theorem has been published as yet. In this note we give a proof of this theorem; some generalizations are also mentioned. Before stating the results some notions are needed. A lattice K is called section complemented if K has a least element 0, and if every x with x_-< y has a complement z in [0, y], i. e. xP, z=O, x U z = y . The length of a chain C o f n + l elements is n, and the length of a finite lattice K is n if K contains a subchain of length n but no subchain of length n + 1.


Canadian Mathematical Bulletin | 1998

Congruence lattices of finite semimodular lattices

G. Grätzer; H. Lakser; E. T. Schmidt

We prove that every finite distributive lattice can be represented as the congruence lattice of a finite (planar) semimodular lattice.


Canadian Journal of Mathematics | 1969

Stone lattices. II. Structure theorems

C. C. Chen; G. Grätzer

Using the triple associated with a Stone algebra L , as introduced in the first part of this paper ( 1 ), we will investigate certain problems concerning the structure of a Stone lattice. The following topics will be discussed: prime ideals, topological representation, completeness, relative Stone lattices, and the reduced triple. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with §§ 2–4 of ( 1 ). For the sake of convenience, we will write L = 〈 C, D, ϕ 〉 to indicate that 〈 C, D, ϕ 〉 is the triple associated with L , and whenever convenient we will write the elements of L as ordered pairs 〈 x, a 〉, as it is given in ( 1 , § 4, the Construction Theorem).


Transactions of the American Mathematical Society | 1981

The structure of tensor products of semilattices with zero

G. Grätzer; H. Lakser; Robert W. Quackenbush

If A and B are finite lattices, then the tensor product C of A and B in the category of join semilattices with zero is a lattice again. The main result of this paper is the description of the congruence lattice of C as the free product (in the category of bounded distributive lattices) of the congruence lattice of A and the congruence lattice of B. This provides us with a method of constructing finite subdirectly irreducible (resp., simple) lattices: if A and B are finite subdirectly irreducible (resp., simple) lattices then so is their tensor product. Another application is a result of E. T. Schmidt describing the congruence lattice of a bounded distributive extension of M3.


Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society | 1995

Congruence lattices of small planar lattices

G. Grätzer; H. Lakser; E. T. Schmidt

For a finite distributive lattice D with n join-irreducible elements, we construct a finite (planar) lattice L with 0(n2) elements such that the congruence lattice of L is isomorphic to D. This improves on an early result of R. P. Dilworth (around 1940) and G. Gratzer and E. T. Schmidt (1962) constructing such a (nonplanar) lattice L with 0(22n) elements, and on a recent construction of G. Gratzer and H. Lakser which yields a finite (planar) lattice L with 0(n3) elements.


Mathematische Zeitschrift | 1967

Boolean extensions and normal subdirect powers of finite universal algebras

Matthew Gould; G. Grätzer

(i) ~B is subdirectly representable in {91o . . . . ,91,_2}c_K if and only if satisfies the identities of 91o x ... x 91n2. (ii) I f I f3 ] > 1 and ~ is subdirectly representable in K, then ~ has a unique set of factors in K. We shall generalize the concept of normal subdirect power in a way that will enable us to prove Theorems 1 * and 2* for arbi t rary (rather than binary or f-) algebras; Theorem 3 will be proved without recourse to the theory of f algebras.


Duke Mathematical Journal | 1966

Equational classes of lattices

G. Grätzer

In this section we shall discuss the basic properties of equational classes of lattices. Of the four characterizations and descriptions given, three apply to arbitrary equational classes of universal algebras; the fourth is valid only for those equational classes of universal algebras that are congruence distributive (that is, the congruence lattice of any algebra in the class is distributive). For the sake of simplicity, all these results are stated and proved only for lattices.


Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society | 1999

CONGRUENCE-PRESERVING EXTENSIONS OF FINITE LATTICES TO SECTIONALLY COMPLEMENTED LATTICES

G. Grätzer; E. T. Schmidt

In 1962, the authors proved that every finite distributive lattice can be represented as the congruence lattice of a finite sectionally complemented lattice. In 1992, M. Tischendorf verified that every finite lattice has a congruence-preserving extension to an atomistic lattice. In this paper, we bring these two results together. We prove that every finite lattice has a congruence-preserving extension to a finite sectionally complemented lattice.


Acta Mathematica Hungarica | 1999

PROPER CONGRUENCE-PRESERVING EXTENSIONS OF LATTICES

G. Grätzer; Friedrich Wehrung

We prove that every lattice with more than one element has a proper congruence-preserving extension.

Collaboration


Dive into the G. Grätzer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. T. Schmidt

Hungarian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Lakser

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Kelly

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Fried

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Sichler

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. C. Chen

Nanyang Technological University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Knapp

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge