G. Jiang

Maintenance of Sorafenib following combined therapy of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy/intensity-modulated radiation therapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase I/II study

BackgroundThree-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT)/intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has shown favorable outcomes in local control and survival of locally advanced HCC. However, intra-hepatic spreading and metastasis are still the predominant treatment failure patterns. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with effects against tumor proliferation and angiogenesis. Maintenance Sorafenib would probably prevent or delay the intrahepatic and extrahepatic spread of HCC after radiotherapy, which provides the rationale for the combination of these treatment modalities.Methods and designPatients with solitary lesion (bigger than 5 cm in diameter) histologically or cytologically confirmed HCC receive TACE (1-3 cycles) plus 3DCRT/IMRT 4-6 weeks later. Maintenance Sorafenib will be administered only for the patients with non-progression disease 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. The dose will be 400 mg, p.o., twice a day. Sorafenib will be continuously given for 12 months unless intolerable toxicities and/or tumor progression. If no more than 3 patients discontinue Sorafenib treatment who experience dose-limiting toxicity after necessary dose modification and delay and/or radiation-induced liver disease in the first 15 enrolled patients, the study will recruit second fifteen patients for further evaluating safety and efficacy of treatment. Hypothesis of the current study is that Sorafenib as a maintenance therapy after combined therapy of 3DCRT/IMRT and TACE is safe and superior to radiotherapy combined with TACE alone in terms of time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to historical data.DiscussionA recent meta-analysis showed TACE in combination with radiotherapy, improved the survival and the tumor response of patients, and was thus more therapeutically beneficial. In this study, local therapy for HCC is the combination of TACE and radiotherapy. Radiation exposure as a kind of stress might induce the compensatory activations of multiple intracellular signaling pathway mediators, such as PI3K, MAPK, JNK and NF-kB. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was identified as one factor that was increased in a time- and dose-dependent manner after sublethal irradiation of HCC cells in vitro, translating to enhanced intratumor angiogenesis in vivo. Therefore, Sorafenib-mediated blockade of the Raf/MAPK and VEGFR pathways might enhance the efficacy of radiation, when Sorafenib is followed sequentially as a maintenance modality. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00999843.)

Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Irradiation Dose Escalation Study

PURPOSE To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT)/intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were assigned to two subgroups based on tumor diameter: Group 1 had tumors <10 cm; Group II had tumors ≥10 cm. Escalation was achieved by increments of 4.0 Gy for each cohort in both groups. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a grade of ≥3 acute liver or gastrointestinal toxicity or any grade 5 acute toxicity in other organs at risk or radiation-induced liver disease. The dose escalation would be terminated when ≥2 of 8 patients in a cohort experienced DLT. RESULTS From April 2005 to May 2008, 40 patients were enrolled. In Group I, 11 patients had grade ≤2 acute treatment-related toxicities, and no patient experienced DLT; and in Group II, 10 patients had grade ≤2 acute toxicity, and 1 patient in the group receiving 52 Gy developed radiation-induced liver disease. MTD was 62 Gy for Group I and 52 Gy for Group II. In-field progression-free and local progression-free rates were 100% and 69% at 1 year, and 93% and 44% at 2 years, respectively. Distant metastasis rates were 6% at 1 year and 15% at 2 years. Overall survival rates for 1-year and 2-years were 72% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The irradiation dose was safely escalated in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by using 3DCRT/IMRT with an active breathing coordinator. MTD was 62 Gy and 52 Gy for patients with tumor diameters of <10 cm and ≥10 cm, respectively.

Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation

BackgroundThe cone beam CT (CBCT) guided radiation can reduce the systematic and random setup errors as compared to the skin-mark setup. However, the residual and intrafractional (RAIF) errors are still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the magnitude of RAIF errors and correction action levels needed in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).MethodsTen patients were enrolled in the prospective study of CBCT guided APBI. The postoperative tumor bed was irradiated with 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Two cone-beam CT data sets were obtained with one before and one after the treatment delivery. The CBCT images were registered online to the planning CT images using the automatic algorithm followed by a fine manual adjustment. An action level of 3 mm, meaning that corrections were performed for translations exceeding 3 mm, was implemented in clinical treatments. Based on the acquired data, different correction action levels were simulated, and random RAIF errors, systematic RAIF errors and related margins before and after the treatments were determined for varying correction action levels.ResultsA total of 75 pairs of CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic and random setup errors based on skin-mark setup prior to treatment delivery were 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm in the lateral (LR), 3.1 mm and 2.3 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 2.3 mm and 2.0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. With the 3 mm correction action level, the systematic and random RAIF errors were 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm in the LR direction, 2.3 mm and 2.3 mm in the SI direction, and 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm in the AP direction after treatments delivery. Accordingly, the margins for correction action levels of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and no correction were 7.9 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 7.9 mm and 8.0 mm in the LR direction; 6.4 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.2 mm and 10.5 mm in the SI direction; 7.6 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.4 mm, 10.1 mm and 12.7 mm in the AP direction, respectively.ConclusionsResidual and intrafractional errors can significantly affect the accuracy of image-guided APBI with nonplanar 3DCRT techniques. If a 10-mm CTV-PTV margin is applied, a correction action level of 5 mm or less is necessary so as to maintain the RAIF errors within 10 mm for more than 95% of fractions. Pre-treatment CBCT guidance is not a guarantee for safe delivery of the treatment despite its known benefits of reducing the initial setup errors. A patient position verification and correction during the treatment may be a method for the safe delivery.

Reduced toxicity with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a secondary analysis of data from four prospective clinical trials.

We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the toxicity and long-term survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT). All data in the present study were based on four prospective clinical trials conducted at our institution from 1996 to 2004 and included 308 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with 2DRT or 3DCRT/IMRT. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 254 patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 158 were treated with 2DRT, whereas 96 were treated with 3DCRT/IMRT. The rates of ≥Grade3 acute toxicity of the esophagus and lung were 11.5% versus 28.5% (P = 0.002) and 5.2% versus 10.8% (P = 0.127) in the 3DCRT/IMRT and 2DRT groups, respectively. The incidences of ≥Grade 3 late toxicity of the esophagus and lungs were 3.1% versus 10.7% (P = 0.028) and 3.1% versus 5.7% (P = 0.127) in the 3DCRT/IMRT and 2DRT groups, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year estimated overall survival rates were 81%, 38% and 34% in the 3DCRT/IMRT group and 79%, 44% and 31% in the 2DRT group, respectively (P = 0.628). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year local control rates were 88%, 71% and 66% in the 3DCRT/IMRT group and 84%, 66% and 60% in the 2DRT group, respectively (P = 0.412). Fewer incidences of acute and late toxicities were observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with 3DCRT/IMRT compared with those treated with 2DRT. No significant survival benefit was observed with the use of 3DCRT/IMRT.

Radiotherapeutic management of isolated local-regional recurrence following mastectomy.

Abstract #5135 Background : Postmastectomy isolated local-regional recurrence(ILRR) remains a therapeutic challenge. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the role of radiotherapy(RT) in these patients and to analyze factors that influence local-regional control and survival.
 Methods: 255 pts with chest-wall(CW) and/or regional nodes recurrence(supraclavicular SC, axillary AXI and internal mammary nodes IMN) as first failure and received RT during 1990 and 2005 were analyzed, included 109 CW recurrence only, 114 regional nodes only and 32 pts with both, resulted in 304 recurrent sites. The median dose was 60Gy(47-74). Systemic treatment was give to 190 pts, including chemotherapy in 171, endocrine therapy(ET) in 69, and both in 41 pts.
 Results: The median disease-free interval(DFI) was 22 mo(2-260 mo), which were 37 and 17 mo in pts with positive hormonal receptor (HR) and negative HR respectively. Median follow-up was 45 mo (9 mo -15.5 yrs). The 2, 5 and 8-yr overall survival rate was 86.4%, 56.5% and 35% respectively. Median survival time after recurrence was 79 mo. The 2, 5 and 8-yr local control rate was 56.1%, 36.3% and 27.6% respectively. 79 second recurrence in the initial recurrent region and 83 subsequent recurrence in other local-regional sites were found.
 CW is the most common site of second recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that no CW involvement, non-diffuse recurrence and radiation to the entire recurrent region were independent prognostic factors on local control of initial recurrent sites. ET proved to be the only independent prognostic factors on subsequent recurrence in other sites. In pts with CW recurrence, small field(67 pts) resulted in significantly lower 5-yrs local control compared to entire CW irradiation(74 pts) (33.6% vs 55.6%, p=0.023). Cox regression model found that DFI≥1yr, positive HR, solitary CW or non-supraclavicular nodal recurrence were independent favorable prognostic factors on overall survival .
 Conclusions: RT is an effective approach for ILRR after mastectomy. Radiation fields should cover the entire recurrent region. Elective irradiation to the CW in pts with nodal recurrence is recommended. Prognostic Index based on the positive multivariate analysis could be established as to stratify different prognostic sub-groups. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5135.