G. Kornek

Phase II trial of two-weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma face a dismal prognosis as no effective palliative therapy has been defined. The aim of the present phase II investigation was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerance of a two-weekly high-dose gemcitabine regimen in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two consecutive patients with locally unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer were enrolled in this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 2200 mg/m2 given as a 30-min intravenous infusion every two weeks for a duration of six months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS After a median number of 12 treatment courses, 7 of 32 (22%) patients had a partial response that lasted for a median duration of 6.0 months (range 3.5-10.0). Fourteen additional patients (44%) had stable disease, whereas eleven patients (34%) progressed despite therapy. The median time to progression was 5.6 months (range 1.8-13.0); median survival time was 11.5 months (range 3.0-24.0), and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 44%. The tolerance of treatment was remarkable with only two patients each experiencing grade 3 leukocytopenia, granulocytopenia and/or thrombocytopenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Similarly, nonhaematologic side effects were infrequent, and generally mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS Two-weekly high-dose gemcitabine seems to represent a potentially effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Importance of extensive staging in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type lymphoma.

Lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type usually arises in MALT acquired through chronic antigenic stimulation triggered by persistent infection and/or autoimmune processes. Due to specific ligand–receptor interactions between lymphoid cells and high-endothelial venules of MALT, both normal and neoplastic lymphoid cells display a pronounced homing tendency to MALT throughout the body. In the case of neoplastic disease these homing properties may be responsible for lymphoma dissemination among various MALT-sites. According to this concept, we have standardized staging procedures in all patients diagnosed with MALT-type lymphoma. All patients with MALT-type lymphoma underwent standardized staging procedures before treatment. Staging included ophthalmologic examination, otolaryngologic investigation, gastroscopy with multiple biopsies, endosonography of the upper gastrointestinal tract, enteroclysis, colonoscopy, computed tomography of thorax and abdomen and bone marrow biopsy. Biopsy was performed in all lesions suggestive for lymphomatous involvement, and evaluation of all biopsy specimens was performed by a reference pathologist. 35 consecutive patients with histologically verified MALT-type lymphoma were admitted to our department. Twenty-four patients (68%) had primary involvement of the stomach, five (15%) had lymphoma of the ocular adnexa, three (8.5%) had lymphoma of the parotid, and three (8,5%) of the lung. Lymph-node involvement corresponding to stage EII disease was found in 13 patients (37%), only one patient with primary gastric lymphoma had local and supradiaphragmatic lymph-node involvement (stage EIII). Bone marrow biopsies were negative in all patients. Overall, eight of 35 patients (23%) had simultaneous biopsy-proven involvement of two MALT-sites: one patient each had lymphoma of parotid and lacrimal gland, conjunctiva and hypopharynx, conjunctiva and skin, lacrimal gland and lung, stomach and colon, and stomach and lung. The remaining two patients had bilateral parotideal lymphoma. Staging work-up was negative for lymph-node involvement in all of these eight patients. The importance of extensive staging in MALT-type lymphoma is emphasized by the demonstration of multiorgan involvement in almost a quarter of patients. In addition, our data suggest that extra-gastrointestinal MALT-type lymphoma more frequently occurs simultaneously at different anatomic sites than MALT-type lymphoma involving the GI-tract.

Two consecutive phase II studies of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/mitomycin C and of gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer.

Introduction: Carcinoma of the biliary system is a rare tumor entity, and patients with advanced disease face a dismal prognosis. Because of the absence of standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary carcinoma, we have performed two consecutive studies to evaluate the clinical potential of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and mitomycin C as well as the novel antimetabolite gemcitabine in this disease. Patients and Methods: A total of 39 consecutive patients suffering from locally inoperable or metastatic biliary cancer were enrolled in the study between March 1994 and October 1997. Twenty patients were treated with leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2, both given as intravenous bolus on days 1–4, and mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 on day 1 (group A). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. The second cohort included 19 patients, who received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 with a 2-week interval before the next treatment cycle (group B). Treatment was continued for a maximum of 6 cycles in the absence of progressive disease in both groups, and endpoints of the study were responses rates, survival and toxicity. Results: In group A, 5 patients (25%) had a partial response (PR), 6 additional patients (30%) had stable disease (SD) and 9 patients (45%) progressed during treatment. The median survival was 9.5 months (range, 3–14.5) with the median time to progression being 4 months (range, 3–9). In group B, 3 patients achieved a PR (16%), 4 showed SD (21%), while the remaining 12 patients had progressive disease. A median survival of 6.5 months (range, 2–11.5) was obtained, and the median time to progression was 2.5 months (range, 1–6+). Toxicity was generally mild in both treatment arms, 6 patients in group A required dose reductions, while no dose adaptation had to be performed for gemcitabine. Conclusion: Our data suggest that treatment of advanced biliary cancer is feasible and can be safely performed with both regimens applied in our study. While administration of gemcitabine has resulted in only mild toxicities, its exact impact on the management of advanced biliary cancer should be evaluated in a controlled trial.

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with combined radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined treatment modality including systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin, cisplatin and external beam radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Systemic chemotherapy consisted of FU 400 mg m–2and leucovorin 20 mgm–2both given as intravenous bolus injection on days 1–4, plus cisplatin 20 mgm–2administered as 90-min infusion on days 1–4. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks × 6 unless prior evidence of progressive disease. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation of ≥ 6 MV photons with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered during the second and third chemotherapy course, that was reduced in dose by 25%. Between October 1994 and July 1996, a total of 38 patients were entered onto this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity and survival. Eighteen of these (47%) had objective remissions to combined radiochemotherapy, including four CR (11%), 13 (34%) had stable disease and seven patients (18%) showed tumour progression during treatment. The median progression-free interval of the entire study population was 10 months (range 3–32), and median overall survival was 14.0 months (range 3–45+ months); 53% of all patients were alive at 12 months, and 18% of patients were alive at 24 months respectively. Severe haematological side-effects comprised neutropenia in 18%, thrombocytopenia in 8% and anaemia in 11%. The most frequent non-haematological side-effects were nausea/vomiting (WHO grade 3: 18%), and diarrhoea (grade 3: 13%). This combined radiochemotherapy regimen was tolerable and effective in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Since therapeutic results, in fact, compare favourably with other series, including surgical treatment of potentially resectable tumours, further evaluation of combined treatment modalities in the neoadjuvant setting seems warranted.

Subcutaneous administration of amifostine: a promising therapeutic option in patients with oxaliplatin-related peripheral sensitive neuropathy.

Subcutaneous administration of amifostine: A promising therapeutic option in patients with oxaliplatin-related peripheral sensitive neuropathy. Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum compound with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, is a recently developed agent with a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activities [1]. Hallmarks of this novel agent include its lack of cross-resistance with cisplatin and carboplatin, synergistic activity with various other cytotoxic agents such as 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin, and an excellent safety profile with a specific and manageable set of toxicities. When given alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs at its recommended dose of 85 mg/m 2 every two weeks or 130 mg/m 2 every three weeks, haematological side effects are commonly seen, but are generally mild. The most frequently encountered nonhaematological adverse events include gastrointestinal symptoms and a peripheral neurosensory toxicity (PNP), characterised by pares-thesia and/or dysesthesia triggered or exacerbated by exposure to cold. This side effect, which is cumulative but reversible in most patients a few months after stopping treatment, does represent the principal dose-limiting toxicity in patients receiving oxaliplatin [1]. Amifostine (WR-2721; ethyol) is a thiophosphate cytoprotec-tant agent with the potential to abrogate many chemotherapy-induced toxicities [2], In preclinical studies, amifostine protected against the cytotoxic side effects of alkylating agents, platinum analogues, and radiation therapy in normal tissues, but preserved antineoplastic activity of these therapeutic modalities in tumour tissue. Most normal tissues were protected, including bone marrow, kidney, lung, and peripheral nerves. Usually amifostine is administered as a short intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 15 minutes. Recent pharmacokinetic studies, however, have shown acceptable plasma levels of its active metabolite (WR-1605) after subcutaneous (s.c.) injection [3], and Koukourakis et al. have subsequently established feasibility, efficacy as well as a superior tolerance of this simplified administration schedule in a randomised phase II trial involving 140 patients with head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic cancers undergoing radical radiotherapy [4]. In the present pilot study, we have investigated the therapeutic potential of an identical s.c. administration schedule of the cytoprotective agent amifostine to counteract oxaliplatin-related PNP. Nine patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy with raltitrexed 3 mg/m 2 plus oxali-platin 130 mg/m 2 every three weeks and six patients receiving irinotecan 175 mg/m 2 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 both given i.v. on days 1 and 14 every four weeks were enrolled onto this study until today. All patients gave written informed consent according to institutional regulations. Their pretreatment characteristics are summarised in Table …

Effective combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and/or erythropoietin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumour efficacy and tolerance of combined paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoetic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty-five patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 2-weekly courses of paclitaxel 160 mg per m2 and cisplatin 60 mg per m2 both given on day 1. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration (1000–2000 per μl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 μg kg−1 per day was given subcutaneously; in addition, if haemoglobin was <12.0 mg dl−1, erythropoietin 10 000 IU was administered subcutaneously three times per week. The confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 44%, including five complete (11%) and 15 partial remissions (33%). Twelve patients had stable disease (27%), 11 (24%) progressed while on chemotherapy, and two patients were not evaluable. The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression 7.0 months, and the median survival time was 11.2 months with 12 patients currently alive. Haematologic toxicity was common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only five patients (11%). Apart from total alopecia in 16 patients (36%), severe non-haematologic adverse reactions included grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in six (13%) and anaphylaxis in two patients. In addition, there was one patient each who experienced grade 3 emesis, diarrhea, and infection, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

SummaryAlthough the novel cytidin analogue gemcitabine has shown superior anti-tumour activity than 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, further improvements of therapeutic results are warranted. This goal might be achieved by combining gemcitabine with other active drugs. This trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of such a combination regimen with epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic disease. Seventy patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this multicentre trial. Patients received 4-weekly courses of a combination regimen consisting of epirubicin 60 mg m–2 given as intravenous bolus injection on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg m–2 infused over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and G-CSF administered at 5 μg kg–1 day–1 subcutaneously from days 2–6 during each cycle. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by conventional measures, i.e. objective response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in pain intensity, ≥ 50% reduction in daily analgesic consumption, and/or ≥ 20-point improvement in Karnofsky performance status that was sustained for ≥ 4 consecutive weeks). Of 66 patients evaluable for objective response, one achieved complete and 13 partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI), 12–33%); 27 additional patients (41%) had stable and 25 (38%) increasing disease. The median time to progression was 3.8 months. Median survival was 7.8 months, and the probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 21.2%. Out of 60 patients with tumour-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 26 (43%) experienced significant palliation. The median time to achieve a clinical benefit response was 7 weeks, and its median duration was 22 weeks. Chemotherapy was well-tolerated with leukopenia/granulocytopenia representing the most common and dose-limiting side-effect. Gastrointestinal and other subjective toxicities were infrequent and generally rated minor. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and G-CSF seems to be an effective palliative treatment with only moderate toxic effects in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our results in terms of objective and clinical benefit response, as well as survival seem to suggest an advantage over gemcitabine-monotherapy, though this remains to be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Phase II Study with Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Purpose: Since the combination of cisplatin and docetaxel have demonstrated activity in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung and oesophagus before, promising results in recurrent metastatic head and neck cancer were expected. Patients and Methods: Between September 1998 and October 2000, 40 patients entered this trial, 38 of whom were evaluable. Six patients were previously untreated, 24 had surgery and/or radiotherapy and 13 had received chemoradiation and/or surgery. Therapy consisted of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (1-hour infusion) and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin (90-min infusion) on day 1, repeated every three weeks for a maximum of 6 courses. All patients received corticosteroids routinely, 5-HT3-antagonists, and hydration. Results: The overall response rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval, 36.1 to 68.5%) including 7 complete (17.5% complete response; CR) and 14 partial remissions (35% partial response; PR). The overall response rate in patients who had no prior treatment (n = 6) was 100%, including 3 CR and 3 PR. In patients who had prior surgery and/or radiotherapy (n = 21) an overall response rate of 42.8% was observed, including 2 CR and 7 PR; 8 patients (38.1%) had stable disease, while disease progressed in 3 (14.3%). Six of 13 patients (46.2%) who had prior chemoradiation ± surgery responded, including 2 CR (15.4%) and 4 PR (30.8%), no change was seen in 4 patients (30.8%) and tumour progressed in 2 (15.4%). The median response duration for all patients was 10 months (range, 3–20), the median overall survival was 11 months (range, 1–30). Myelosuppression was commonly observed; WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 12 patients (30%) each, and was complicated by septicaemia in 5 cases. WHO grade 3 anaemia was observed in only 3 patients (7.5%). Severe non-hematologic toxicity except for alopecia was rarely observed, and included diarrhea in 2 (5%), nausea/vomiting in 2 patients (5%) and stomatitis in 1 patient (2.5%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that docetaxel and cisplatin in combination is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of head and neck cancer with an excellent response rate in previously untreated patients.

Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with fluoropyrimidine leucovorin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within six months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines leucovorin +/- irinotecan, participated in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every three weeks for a total of eight courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS The overall objective response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.6%-51%). Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only seven (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range 1.2-14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8 of 36 patients (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 non-haematological adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in three, asthenia in one, diarrhea in two, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in two patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has substantial antitumour activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine leucovorin + irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and convenient three-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Combined intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy after curative resection for colonic adenocarcinoma

Patients who underwent potential curative surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospectively randomised, controlled clinical trial of combined intraperitoneal (i.p.) plus systemic intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). We investigated whether this adjuvant treatment approach, specifically addressing the risk of peritoneal and hepatic recurrence, could improve disease-free and overall survival. Between May 1988 and December 1990, 121 patients with resected stage III or high-risk stage II (T4N0M0) colon cancer were randomly assigned for observation (which was considered standard care until the NIH consensus conference) or adjuvant chemotherapy with LV (200 mg/m2) plus 5-FU (350 mg/m2), both given i.v. (days 1-4) and i.p. (days 1 and 3) every 4 weeks for a total of six courses. After a median follow-up time of 4.6 years, a comparative analysis between the two groups of patients suggested both an improvement in disease-free survival (75% versus 58%; P = 0.06) and a survival advantage (78% versus 63%; P = 0.05) in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy. The sites of recurrence were also different, i.e. local regional and intrahepatic tumour recurrences were observed in only 6/58 (10%) and 5/58 (9%) adjuvant treated patients as compared to 11/60 (18%) and 10/60 (17%) observed patients. The overall benefit of adjuvant therapy appeared to be greatest in patients with stage III colon cancer. Treatment-associated toxicity was infrequent and generally mild with only 5% experiencing severe (WHO grade 3) adverse reactions. Interim results of this adjuvant trial suggest that combined i.p. plus systemic i.v. chemotherapy with 5-FU and LV represents a potentially effective adjuvant regimen in stage II/III colon cancer.