Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where G.P. Adams is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by G.P. Adams.


Theriogenology | 1995

Exogenous control of follicular wave emergence in cattle

G.A. Bo; G.P. Adams; Roger Pierson; R.J. Mapletoft

Variability in ovarian response to superstimulatory treatments and in the interval from PGF20 treatment to es&us in cattle is largely attributable to the status of follicular wave development at the time of treatment. To date, most treatments designed to control follicular wave development have been based on removal of the suppressive effect of the dominant follicle, either physically (by electrocauterization or ultrasound-guided follicle ablation) or hormonally (by GnRH or estradiol and progestogen treatment), and thereby induce the emergence of a new follicular wave at a specific time after treatment. Treatment of progestogen-implanted cattle with estradiol-17P (E-17P) resulted in suppression of the dominant follicle and emergence of a new follicular wave 4.3 d9.1 d later. Superstimulatory treatments initiated 4 d after E-17P treatment in progestogen-implanted cattle resulted in a superovulatory response comparable to that of cattle in which superstimulatory treatments were initiated on the second follicular wave. In another study, induced follicular wave emergence, regardless of the stage of the estrous cycle, resulted in similar superovulatory response and higher fertilization rates in heifers than when superstimulatory treatments were initiated 8 to 12 d after estrus (traditional approach). Finally, es&us synchronization treatments with E-17P plus progesterone and PGF2, have resulted in synchronous estms and ovulation. Overall, it appears that treatment with E- 17s and progestogen in combination may be used to effectively control and synchronize follicular wave development and may have important implications in artificial control of ovarian cyclicity and superovulation.


Biology of Reproduction | 2003

Characterization of Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics in Women

Angela Baerwald; G.P. Adams; Roger Pierson

Abstract A wave phenomenon of ovarian follicular development in women has recently been documented in our laboratory. The objective of the present study was to characterize follicular waves to determine whether women exhibit major and minor wave patterns of follicle development during the interovulatory interval (IOI). The ovaries of 50 women with clinically normal menstrual cycles were examined daily using transvaginal ultrasonography for one IOI. Profiles of the diameters of all follicles ≥4 mm and the numbers of follicles ≥5 mm were graphed during the IOI. Major waves were defined as those in which one follicle grew to ≥10 mm and exceeded all other follicles by ≥2 mm. Minor waves were defined as those in which follicles developed to a diameter of <10 mm and follicle dominance was not manifest. Blood samples were drawn to measure serum concentrations of estradiol-17β, LH, and FSH. Women exhibited major and minor patterns of follicular wave dynamics during the IOI. Of the 50 women evaluated, 29/34 women with two follicle waves (85.3%) exhibited a minor-major wave pattern of follicle development and 5 women (14.7%) exhibited a major-major wave pattern. Ten of the 16 women with three follicle waves (62.5%) exhibited a minor-minor-major wave pattern, 3 women (18.8%) exhibited a minor-major-major wave pattern, and 3 women (18.8%) exhibited a major-major-major wave pattern. Documentation of major and minor follicular waves during the menstrual cycle challenges the traditional theory that a single cohort of antral follicles grows only during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.


Fertility and Sterility | 2003

A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle

Angela Baerwald; G.P. Adams; Roger Pierson

OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in ovarian follicle dynamics during the human menstrual cycle to test the hypothesis that folliculogenesis occurs in a wave-like fashion. DESIGN Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment. PATIENT(S) Fifty healthy women of reproductive age (range 19-43 years) with a history of regular menstrual cycles not taking medications known to interfere with reproductive function were evaluated. INTERVENTION(S) Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed daily for one interovulatory interval (IOI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Changes in the diameter and number of follicles > or =5 mm were evaluated. RESULT(S) Sixty-eight percent of women exhibited two waves of follicle development during the IOI and 32% exhibited three waves. Waves were characterized by an increase and subsequent decrease in the number of follicles > or =5 mm occurring in association with the growth of > or =2 follicles to > or =6 mm. A day effect and day by wave interaction were detected in the mean diameter of the largest three follicles and the number of follicles > or =5 mm. CONCLUSION(S) The follicular wave phenomenon in women provides a new model for ovarian function during the menstrual cycle and will improve our understanding of the ovarian response to fertility and hormonal contraceptive regimens.


Theriogenology | 1994

Ovarian synchronization following ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle ablation in heifers

D.R. Berfelt; K.C. Lightfoot; G.P. Adams

In Experiments 1 and 2, ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle aspiration was used as a method of follicle ablation to induce and synchronize subsequent follicular wave emergence and enhance ovulation synchrony following PGF2alpha administration. Heifers were at unknown stages of the estrous cycle at the start of both experiments in which all follicles>or=5 mm in diameter were ablated; luteolysis was induced 4 d later with cloprostenol (500 ug/dose, im). In Experiment 1, heifers were randomly assigned to either an ablation (n=17) or a procedural control (no follicle ablation, n=17) group. Ablation-induced wave emergence was indicated by a significant increase in the total number of follicles>or=5 mm within 2 d of ablation (mean, 1.5 d), which was preceded by a significant surge in circulating FSH. Although the mean (+/-SEM) interval from PGF2alpha administration to ovulation did not differ between follicle-ablated heifers (5.1+/-0.5 d range, 3 to 9 d) and control heifers (5.1+/-1.0 d; range, 1 to 5 d), the variability of the interval was different (P<0.05). Inequality of variance between the 2 groups was attributed to a greater (P<0.08) degree of ovulation synchrony in the ablation group than in the control group; 13/16 (81%) versus 9/17 (53%), respectively, ovulated within 5 d of cloprostenol administration. Relative asynchrony of ovulations in control heifers was associated with the status of the follicular wave at the time of PGF2alpha administration and, in part, to incomplete luteolysis following a single dose of PGF2alpha. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the efficacy of 2 doses of cloprostenol 12 h apart (n=7) versus a single dose (n=8) to induce complete luteolysis subsequent to follicle ablation-induced wave emergence. Two doses of cloprostenol potentiated ovulation synchrony; more (P<0.05) 2-dose heifers (7/7, 100%) than single-dose heifers (4/8, 50%) ovulated within 5 d after PGF2alpha administration. In summary, ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle ablation, done at random during the estrous cycle, induced and synchronized subsequent follicular wave emergence, and resulted in a high degree of ovulation synchrony among heifers after PGF2alpha induced luteolysis, especially when 2 doses of PGF2alpha were administered 12 h apart.


Theriogenology | 1993

Ovarian superstimulatory response relative to follicular wave emergence in heifers

L.F. Nasser; G.P. Adams; G.A. Bo; R.J. Mapletoft

Two experiments were designed to evaluate the responsiveness of beef heifers to superstimulatory treatments administered during the first follicular wave. Heifers were examined daily (Experiment 1) or twice daily (Experiment 2) by ultrasonography to determine the status of follicular wave development and the day of initiation of superstimulatory treatment. Heifers in both experiments were superstimulated with a total dose of 10 ml Folltropin (equivalent to 200 mg of NIH-FSH-P1), divided into 10 equal intramuscular injections over 5 days. On the last day of treatment, heifers received 500 mug of cloprostenol after each injection of Folltropin to induce luteolysis. In the respective groups, superstimulatory treatments were initiated on Day -1, Day 0 (day of ovulation) or Day +1 for Experiment 1, and on Day -1, Day 0, Day +1 or Day +2 for Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the number of ovulations in each ovary was assessed by ultrasonography and by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL) in each ovary at slaughter. The correlation between both techniques for assessing ovulatory response was high (r= 0.98; P< 0.0001), and there was no significant difference in the mean number of ovulations detected by ultrasound (5.7+/-1.1) versus the mean number of CL counted at slaughter (6.2+/-1.2). In Experiment 1, the mean (+/- SEM) number of CL counted at slaughter in heifers treated on Day -1 (9.4+/-3.8) and Day 0 (7.3+/-1.6) was higher (P< 0.05) than that of heifers treated on Day +1 (0.7+/-0.3). The mean number of follicles >/=7 mm in diameter on the last day of treatment was also higher (P<0.05) in the Day -1 group compared with the Day +1 group; the Day 0 group was intermediate. In Experiment 2, the mean number of ovulations was higher (P< 0.05) in the Day 0 group (18.4+/-3.4) than the Day -1 (9.5+/-2.3), Day +1 (6.7+/-2.2) or Day +2 (6.5+/-2.3) groups. Heifers in the Day -1, and Day 0 groups had more (P< 0.05) follicles >/=7 mm at the end of treatment compared with heifers in the Day +1 or the Day +2 group. The stated hypothesis was supported: exogenous FSH treatment initiated at the time of wave emergence, near the expected time of the endogenous wave-eliciting FSH surge, has a positive effect on the superstimulatory response. A higher superstimulatory response was elicited when treatments were initiated on the day of, or the day before, wave emergence compared with that of later treatments.


Animal Reproduction Science | 1995

Ovarian follicular wave emergence after treatment with progestogen and estradiol in cattle

G.A. Bo; G.P. Adams; M. Caccia; M.F. Martínez; Roger Pierson; R.J. Mapletoft

Abstract An experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of treatment with progestogen and estradiol-17β (E-17β), in combination, at different stages of development of the dominant follicle, on follicular development and subsequent wave emergence. Cross-bred beef cows (n = 12) and heifers (n = 25) were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups on Day 0 (ovulation). Treatment groups were untreated control animals and those that were given progestogen ear implants on Day 2, 5 or 8 and injected intramuscularly with 5 mg E-17β in sesame oil on Day 3, 6 or 9, respectively. Ovarian ultrasonography was performed daily from Day 0 until progestogen implant removal, 4 days after the emergence of the post-treatment follicular wave. The mean (± SEM) time (days) to cessation of growth and onset of regression of the dominant follicle of the first wave were earlier (P


Theriogenology | 1994

Follicular wave dynamics after estradiol-17β treatment of heifers with or without a progestogen implant

G.A. Bo; G.P. Adams; Roger Pierson; H.E. Tribulo; M. Caccia; R.J. Mapletoft

Abstract Two experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of estradiol-17β (E-17β) on follicular wave dynamics and gonadotropin in cattle. The first experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of 5 mg E-17β administered on Day 1 (ovulation=Day 0) in heifers with or without a progestogen (SMB) ear implant. The dominant follicle in heifers treated with E-17β+SMB ceased to grow 1 d after E-17β treatment and subsequently regressed resulting in early emergence of the next follicular wave. Conversely, E-17β treatment of non-implanted heifers resulted in transient or incomplete suppression of the dominant follicle, and delayed emergence of the next follicular wave (P


Animal Reproduction Science | 1999

Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers

M.F. Martínez; G.P. Adams; D.R. Bergfelt; J.P. Kastelic; R.J. Mapletoft

A study was designed to characterise ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on days 3, 6 or 9 (ovulation = day 0), corresponding to the growing, early-static, and late-static phases of the first follicular wave. Following ovulation, 65 beef heifers were assigned, by replicate, to the following seven treatment groups: 25 mg im of pLH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); 100 microg im of GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); or controls (no treatment; n = 11). Ovulation occurred within 36 h in 67%, 100% and 67% of heifers treated with pLH and in 89%, 56% and 22% of heifers treated with GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9, respectively (treatment-by-day interaction, P < 0.09). Combined for all treatment days, ovulation rates were 78% and 56% in pLH- and GnRH-treated groups, respectively (P < 0.09). Overall, mean day (+/- SD) of emergence of the second follicular wave in heifers that ovulated was different from that in controls or in heifers that did not ovulate (P < 0.05). Mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the second wave occurred earlier (day 5.6+/-1.2; P < 0.05) in heifers that ovulated after treatment on day 3 (n = 14) than in controls (day 8.7+/-1.6; n = 11); however, wave emergence in all heifers treated on day 6 (day 8.1+/-0.5; n = 18) did not differ from controls, regardless of whether or not ovulation occurred. In the heifers that ovulated in response to treatment on day 9 (n = 8), the emergence of the second follicular wave was delayed (day 10.9+/-0.4; P < 0.05). The day of emergence of the second wave in the 14 treated heifers that failed to ovulate, irrespective of the day of treatment (day 8.9+/-1.4) did not differ from control heifers. The emergence of the second wave was more synchronous in day 6 heifers (regardless of whether they ovulated) and in day 9 heifers that ovulated compared to control heifers (P < 0.05). Results did not support the hypothesis that the administration of pLH or GnRH at known stages of the follicular wave in cycling heifers would consistently induce ovulation or atresia and, thereby, induce emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval. New wave emergence was induced consistently (1.3 days post-treatment) only in those animals that ovulated in response to treatment. However, 22% of LH-treated heifers and 44% of GnRH-treated heifers failed to ovulate. Treatments did not induce atresia of the dominant follicle or alter the interval to new wave emergence in animals that did not ovulate in response to treatment.


Biology of Reproduction | 2005

Bovine Model for the Study of Reproductive Aging in Women: Follicular, Luteal, and Endocrine Characteristics

Pritpal S. Malhi; G.P. Adams; J. Singh

Abstract At present, there is no well-characterized animal model to study the effects of aging on fertility in women. The objectives of the study were to characterize age-related changes in ovarian and endocrine functions in old cows and to investigate the validity of a bovine model for the study of human reproductive aging. We tested the hypotheses that aging in cattle is associated with 1) elevated concentrations of gonadotropins and reduced concentrations of steroid hormones in systemic circulation and 2) increased recruitment of ovarian follicles during wave emergence. Daily ultrasonography was performed in 13- to 14-yr-old cows (n = 10) and their 1- to 4-yr-old daughters (n = 9) for one interovulatory interval to study ovarian function. Plasma samples were obtained every 12 h for determination of FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol concentrations. Circulating FSH concentrations were higher (P = 0.009) during follicular waves in old cows than in their daughters, but the number of 4- to 5-mm follicles recruited into a wave was lower (P = 0.04) in old cows. Plasma LH concentrations did not differ between groups (P = 0.4), but the ovulatory follicle in two-wave cycles was smaller in old cows (P = 0.04). Plasma estradiol concentrations were higher (P = 0.01) in old cows, and luteal phase progesterone tended to be lower (P = 0.1). We conclude that these changes are consistent with those reported for women approaching menopause transition. Therefore, our results validate the use of the bovine model to study reproductive aging in women.


Theriogenology | 2000

Induction of follicular wave emergence for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in heifers

M.F. Martínez; G.P. Adams; J.P. Kastelic; D.R. Bergfelt; R.J. Mapletoft

The objective was to synchronize follicular wave emergence among cattle for synchronization of estrus and ovulation, and to determine pregnancy rate after AI at observed estrus. At random stages of the estrous cycle, a controlled internal drug release device (CIDR-B) was inserted intravaginally (Day 0) in 67 cross-bred beef heifers, and they were randomly allocated to receive either no further treatment (Control; n = 18); 5 mg of estradiol-17beta and 100 mg of progesterone im (E/P; n = 16); 100 microg im of GnRH (GnRH; n = 16); or transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular ablation of all follicles > or = 5 mm (FA; n = 17). All heifers received a luteolytic dose of PGF (repeated 12 h later), and CIDR-B were removed on Days 9, 8, 6 or 5, in Control, E/P, GnRH or FA groups, respectively, so the dominant follicle of the induced wave was exposed to exogenous progesterone for a similar period of time in each group. Mean (+/- SEM) intervals (and range, in days) from treatment to follicular wave emergence in these groups were 3.5 +/- 0.6 (-2 to 8), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3 to 4), 1.5 +/- 0.3 (-1 to 4), and 1.0 +/- 0.1 (0 to 2), respectively. Although the interval was longest (P<0.01) in the E/P and Control groups, it was least variable (P<0.01) in the E/P and FA groups. Intervals (and range, in days) from CIDR-B removal (and first PGF treatment) to estrus were 2.3 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 4.5), 2.2 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 3.0), 2.1 +/- 0.1,(1.5 to 3.5), and 2.5 +/- 0.1 (2.0 to 3.5), and to ovulation were 3.5 +/- 0.2 (2.5 to 5.5), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), 3.5 +/- 0.1 (2.5 to 4.5), and 3.8 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (ns). The proportion of heifers displaying estrus was higher in the Control than in the FA group (94% versus 65%, P<0.05) and intermediate in EP and GnRH groups (87% and 75%). Heifers were inseminated approximately 12 h prior to ovulation (based on estrous behavior and ultrasound examinations). Pregnancy rates were 78%, 80%, 69% and 65% for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (P=0.73). Results support the hypothesis that synchronous follicular wave emergence results in synchronous follicle development and, following progesterone removal, synchronous estrus and ovulation with high pregnancy rates to AI. The synchrony of estrus and ovulation in the E/P, GnRH and FA groups suggest that these treatments, in combination with CIDR-B, could be adapted to fixed-time insemination programs.

Collaboration


Dive into the G.P. Adams's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R.J. Mapletoft

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger Pierson

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.H. Ratto

Austral University of Chile

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. P. Cervantes

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.P. Kastelic

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. M. Palomino

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela Baerwald

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Huanca

National University of San Marcos

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mauricio Silva

Oregon National Primate Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge