G. T. McDonald
University of Queensland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by G. T. McDonald.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 2005
Marcus B. Lane; G. T. McDonald
The operational dilemmas and challenges associated with the practice of community-based environmental planning (CBEP) are examined. The paper examines the frequently invoked ‘bottom-up’ versus ‘top-down’ dichotomy and argues that environmental governance is more complex, dynamic and multi-scalar than this simple dichotomy implies. The paper identifies six key problems with the CBEP approach: (i) the conceptualization of ‘community’ which poorly accounts for difference; (ii) problems of inequality; (iii) the organizational capacity and efficacy of community groups; (iv) the scale of CBEP; (v) the types of knowledge utilized by communities in environmental management; and (vi) the potential for parochial concerns to dominate the priorities and agenda of community organizations. The paper analyses each of these issues, identifies planning principles that may aid resolution, and suggests possible remedies.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 2000
Stefan Hajkowicz; G. T. McDonald; Phil Smith
Multiple objective decision support (MODS) is a structured framework for evaluating decision alternatives against multiple, and often conflicting, criteria. Its ability to handle complex trade-offs in a variety of quantitative and qualitative units gives it much potential in the field of natural resource management (NRM). A key component of MODS is the process used to obtain information from decision makers on the relative importance of evaluative criteria. Ranking algorithms then use this information to determine the relative value of each decision alternative. This paper explores how practising community based NRM decision makers respond to five generic methods for weighting the criteria. It presents a study in which 55 decision makers throughout five regions in Queensland, Australia, applied MODS to evaluate environmental projects seeking funding under the Australian Natural Heritage Trust. Weighting methods applied include fixed point scoring, rating, ordinal ranking, a graphical method and paired comparisons. Decision makers evaluated each weighting method in terms of ease of use and of how much it helped clarify the decision problem. Results show that decision makers felt uncomfortable applying fixed point scoring and generally preferred to express their preferences through ordinal ranking. This has implications for the types of ranking algorithms that can be applied to evaluate the decision alternatives.
Land Use Policy | 2002
Marcus B. Lane; G. T. McDonald
Abstract This paper proposes and tests a hypothesis that there is a general model of forest management through time that applies to varying extents in several countries. It does so by analyzing at a synoptic level, evidence from the histories of United States, Canadian and Australian forest histories and to a lesser extent global forest management histories. The hypothesized stages are (i) traditional hunter-gatherer society, (ii) exploitive colonization, settlement and commercialization, (iii) wood resource protection, (iv) multiple use management, and finally, (v) sustainable forest management or ecosystem management. The developmentalist model of change presented here reveals a striking similarity in the stages or eras that these countries experienced in the struggle to manage public forest estates. Changing community values and economic circumstances produced similar stages in several countries. The details of policies and legislation may differ, the terminology may be different, even some stages may be missing, but the trajectory of change remains similar.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 2002
G. T. McDonald; Marcus B. Lane
Sustainable forest management (SFM) or ecosystem management is now the stated goal of forest managers in most countries. SFM takes a longer-term, broader perspective on forest values than timber production or the narrow multiple use regimes of the past. As a result of international activities including the International Tropical Timber Organization, the Ministerial Council on Protection of Forests in Europe and the Montreal Process for temperate and boreal forests outside Europe, there are now sufficiently specific and agreed principles, criteria and indicators (C&I) to guide policy makers towards SFM. To achieve SFM requires holistic assessments of forest management systems in terms of these C&I to ensure the delivery of sustainable outcomes across forest regions. This paper focuses on the implementation of SFM as defined by the C&I, and, in particular, how to identify needed reforms in forest management systems. The paper explains and evaluates the International Standards Organizations (ISOs) environmental management systems (EMS) ISO14000/EMS approach adopted for this purpose in Australia to assess the adequacy of forest management systems. The approach was applied as a key element in the regional forest agreements prepared to meet the Australian National Forest Policy Statement. The ISO14000/EMS, in conjunction with the SFM criteria, provides a systematic approach to assessing forest management systems to reveal the adequacy of the legislative, planning, implementation, monitoring and review of all-tenure forest management as required by SFM.
Journal of Rural Studies | 2002
Marcus B. Lane; G. T. McDonald
This paper tests the four-phase heuristic model of change in resource management regimes developed by Gunderson et al. (1995. In: Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 489-533) by applying it to a case analysis of rainforest management in northeastern Australia. The model suggests that resource management regimes change in four phases: (i) crisis caused by external factors, (ii) a search for alternative management solutions, (iii) creation of a new management regime, and (iv) bureaucratic implementation of the new arrangements. The history of human use arid management of the tropical forests of this region is described and applied to this model. The ensuing analysis demonstrates that: (i) resource management tends to be characterized by a series of distinct eras; (ii) changes to management regimes are precipitated by crisis; and (iii) change is externally generated. The paper concludes by arguing that this theoretical perspective oil institutional change in resource management systems has wider utility
Cartography | 1998
David Pullar; P Sharma; G. T. McDonald
Education in spatial information technology has been strongly influenced by three disciplines in Australia; these are Surveying, Geography, and Information Technology. The curriculum at The University of Queensland has developed very much in line with this pattern. As a result of both historical reasons and strategic directions, the program in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) has included aspects of each of these disciplines. This paper presents an overview of the graduate and postgraduate offerings in GIS/RS, and describes how the program has been influenced by the need to define performance criteria for graduates based upon anticipated industry requirements.
Journal of Environmental Management | 1998
Carl Smith; G. T. McDonald
Archive | 2000
G. T. McDonald; Marcus B. Lane
Journal of Environmental Management | 2000
Carl Smith; G. T. McDonald; R. Thwaites
Australia, state of the environment 2006 : Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage | 2006
T. Smith; Csiro Sustainable Ecosystems; Peter Murphy; Daniel Walker; Gail Kelly; Steven Cork; Jenny Bellamy; G. T. McDonald; Lionel V. Pero; Robyn Mills; Kaye Guidetti; Christy Matthes; Patrick Ledwith; Angela Shepherd; Bruce Thom
Collaboration
Dive into the G. T. McDonald's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs