G. Tagliaferri

Evidence for a canonical GRB afterglow light curve in the Swift/XRT data

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments. These power law segments are separated by two corresponding break times. On top of this canonical behavior of the early X-ray light curve, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long lasting sporadx activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission: from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve. This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f greater than or approx. equal to 4, and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission.

Evidence for a canonical gamma-ray burst afterglow light curve in the Swift XRT data

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) well observed by the Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power-law segments: (1) an initial very steep decay (/t � � with 3P � 1 P5), followed by (2) a very shallow decay (0:5P � 2 P1:0), and finally (3) a somewhat steeper decay (1P � 3 P1:5). These power-law segments are separated by two corresponding break times, tbreak;1 P500 s and 10 3 sPtbreak;2P 10 4 s. On top of this canonical behavior, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long-lasting sporadic activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission, from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve (tbreak;1) takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay (� 2) likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve (tbreak;2). This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f k4 and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission. Subject headingg gamma rays: bursts — radiation mechanisms: nonthermal

Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole

Supermassive black holes have powerful gravitational fields with strong gradients that can destroy stars that get too close, producing a bright flare in ultraviolet and X-ray spectral regions from stellar debris that forms an accretion disk around the black hole. The aftermath of this process may have been seen several times over the past two decades in the form of sparsely sampled, slowly fading emission from distant galaxies, but the onset of the stellar disruption event has not hitherto been observed. Here we report observations of a bright X-ray flare from the extragalactic transient Swift J164449.3+573451. This source increased in brightness in the X-ray band by a factor of at least 10,000 since 1990 and by a factor of at least 100 since early 2010. We conclude that we have captured the onset of relativistic jet activity from a supermassive black hole. A companion paper comes to similar conclusions on the basis of radio observations. This event is probably due to the tidal disruption of a star falling into a supermassive black hole, but the detailed behaviour differs from current theoretical models of such events.D. N. Burrows , J. A. Kennea , G. Ghisellini , V. Mangano , B. Zhang , K. L. Page , M. Eracleous , P. Romano , T. Sakamoto , A. D. Falcone , J. P. Osborne , S. Campana , A. P. Beardmore , A. A. Breeveld , M. M. Chester , R. Corbet , S. Covino , J. R. Cummings , P. D’Avanzo , V. D’Elia , P. Esposito , P. A. Evans , D. Fugazza, J. M. Gelbord , K. Hiroi , S. T. Holland , K. Y. Huang , M. Im, G. Israel , Y. Jeon , Y.-B. Jeon , N. Kawai , H. A. Krimm , P. Mészáros , H. Negoro , N. Omodei , W.K. Park , J. S. Perkins , M. Sugizaki , H.-I. Sung , G. Tagliaferri , E. Troja , Y. Ueda, Y. Urata, R. Usui , L. A. Antonelli , S. D. Barthelmy , G. Cusumano , P. Giommi , F. E. Marshall , A. Melandri , M. Perri , J. L. Racusin , B. Sbarufatti , M. H. Siegel , & N. Gehrels 21

Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole [Discovery of the onset of rapid accretion by a dormant massive black hole]

Supermassive black holes have powerful gravitational fields with strong gradients that can destroy stars that get too close, producing a bright flare in ultraviolet and X-ray spectral regions from stellar debris that forms an accretion disk around the black hole. The aftermath of this process may have been seen several times over the past two decades in the form of sparsely sampled, slowly fading emission from distant galaxies, but the onset of the stellar disruption event has not hitherto been observed. Here we report observations of a bright X-ray flare from the extragalactic transient Swift J164449.3+573451. This source increased in brightness in the X-ray band by a factor of at least 10,000 since 1990 and by a factor of at least 100 since early 2010. We conclude that we have captured the onset of relativistic jet activity from a supermassive black hole. A companion paper comes to similar conclusions on the basis of radio observations. This event is probably due to the tidal disruption of a star falling into a supermassive black hole, but the detailed behaviour differs from current theoretical models of such events.D. N. Burrows , J. A. Kennea , G. Ghisellini , V. Mangano , B. Zhang , K. L. Page , M. Eracleous , P. Romano , T. Sakamoto , A. D. Falcone , J. P. Osborne , S. Campana , A. P. Beardmore , A. A. Breeveld , M. M. Chester , R. Corbet , S. Covino , J. R. Cummings , P. D’Avanzo , V. D’Elia , P. Esposito , P. A. Evans , D. Fugazza, J. M. Gelbord , K. Hiroi , S. T. Holland , K. Y. Huang , M. Im, G. Israel , Y. Jeon , Y.-B. Jeon , N. Kawai , H. A. Krimm , P. Mészáros , H. Negoro , N. Omodei , W.K. Park , J. S. Perkins , M. Sugizaki , H.-I. Sung , G. Tagliaferri , E. Troja , Y. Ueda, Y. Urata, R. Usui , L. A. Antonelli , S. D. Barthelmy , G. Cusumano , P. Giommi , F. E. Marshall , A. Melandri , M. Perri , J. L. Racusin , B. Sbarufatti , M. H. Siegel , & N. Gehrels 21

The Resolved Fraction of the Cosmic X-Ray Background

We present the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: we combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide-field and deep pencil-beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton). The sample covers with good statistics the largest possible flux range so far: 2.4 × 10-17 to 10-11 ergs s-1 cm-2 in the soft band and 2.1 × 10-16 to 8 × 10-12 ergs s-1 cm-2 in the hard band. Integrating the flux distributions over this range and taking into account the (small) contribution of the brightest sources, we derive the flux density generated by discrete sources in both bands. After a critical review of the literature values of the total cosmic X-ray background (CXB) we conclude that, with the present data, 94.3 % and 88.8 % of the soft and hard CXB can be ascribed to discrete source emission. If we extrapolate the analytical form of the log N-log S distribution beyond the flux limit of our catalog in the soft band we find that the flux from discrete sources at ~3 × 10-18 ergs s-1 cm-2 is consistent with the entire CXB, whereas in the hard band it accounts for only 93% of the total CXB at most, hinting at a faint and obscured population to arise at even fainter fluxes.

An enigmatic long-lasting γ-ray burst not accompanied by a bright supernova

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are short, intense flashes of soft γ-rays coming from the distant Universe. Long-duration GRBs (those lasting more than ∼2 s) are believed to originate from the deaths of massive stars, mainly on the basis of a handful of solid associations between GRBs and supernovae. GRB 060614, one of the closest GRBs discovered, consisted of a 5-s hard spike followed by softer, brighter emission that lasted for ∼100 s (refs 8, 9). Here we report deep optical observations of GRB 060614 showing no emerging supernova with absolute visual magnitude brighter than MV = -13.7. Any supernova associated with GRB 060614 was therefore at least 100 times fainter, at optical wavelengths, than the other supernovae associated with GRBs. This demonstrates that some long-lasting GRBs can either be associated with a very faint supernova or produced by different phenomena.

THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. I. COMPARING PRE-SWIFT AND SWIFT-ERA LONG/SOFT (TYPE II) GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS

We have gathered optical photometry data from the literature on a large sample of Swift-era gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows including GRBs up to 2009 September, for a total of 76 GRBs, and present an additional three pre-Swift GRBs not included in an earlier sample. Furthermore, we publish 840 additional new photometry data points on a total of 42 GRB afterglows, including large data sets for GRBs 050319, 050408, 050802, 050820A, 050922C, 060418, 080413A, and 080810. We analyzed the light curves of all GRBs in the sample and derived spectral energy distributions for the sample with the best data quality, allowing us to estimate the host-galaxy extinction. We transformed the afterglow light curves into an extinction-corrected z = 1 system and compared their luminosities with a sample of pre-Swift afterglows. The results of a former study, which showed that GRB afterglows clustered and exhibited a bimodal distribution in luminosity space, are weakened by the larger sample. We found that the luminosity distribution of the two afterglow samples (Swift-era and pre-Swift) is very similar, and that a subsample for which we were not able to estimate the extinction, which is fainter than the main sample, can be explained by assuming a moderate amount of line-of-sight host extinction. We derived bolometric isotropic energies for all GRBs in our sample, and found only a tentative correlation between the prompt energy release and the optical afterglow luminosity at 1 day after the GRB in the z = 1 system. A comparative study of the optical luminosities of GRB afterglows with echelle spectra (which show a high number of foreground absorbing systems) and those without, reveals no indication that the former are statistically significantly more luminous. Furthermore, we propose the existence of an upper ceiling on afterglow luminosities and study the luminosity distribution at early times, which was not accessible before the advent of the Swift satellite. Most GRBs feature afterglows that are dominated by the forward shock from early times on. Finally, we present the first indications of a class of long GRBs, which form a bridge between the typical high-luminosity, high-redshift events and nearby low-luminosity events (which are also associated with spectroscopic supernovae) in terms of energetics and observed redshift distribution, indicating a continuous distribution overall.

The First Survey of X-Ray Flares from Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Temporal Properties and Morphology

We present the first systematic investigation of the morphological and timing properties of flares in GRBs observed by Swift XRT. We consider a large sample drawn from all GRBs detected by Swift, INTEGRAL, and HETE-2 prior to 2006 January 31, which had an XRT follow-up and which showed significant flaring. Our sample of 33 GRBs includes long and short, at low and high redshift, and a total of 69 flares. The strongest flares occur in the early phases, with a clear anticorrelation between the flare peak intensity and the flare time of occurrence. Fitting each X-ray flare with a Gaussian model, we find that the mean ratio of the width and peak time is --> ? t/t = 0.13 ? 0.10, albeit with a large scatter. Late flares at times >2000 s have long durations, -->? t > 300 s, and can be very energetic compared to the underlying continuum. We further investigated whether there is a clear link between the number of pulses detected in the prompt phase by BAT and the number of X-ray flares detected by XRT, finding no correlation. However, we find that the distribution of intensity ratios between successive BAT prompt pulses and that between successive XRT flares is the same, an indication of a common origin for gamma-ray pulses and X-ray flares. All evidence indicates that flares are indeed related to the workings of the central engine and, in the standard fireball scenario, originate from internal shocks rather than external shocks. While all flares can be explained by long-lasting engine activity, 29/69 flares may also be explained by refreshed shocks. However, 10 can only be explained by prolonged activity of the central engine.

GRB 090423 at a redshift of z ≈ 8.1

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced by rare types of massive stellar explosion. Their rapidly fading afterglows are often bright enough at optical wavelengths that they are detectable at cosmological distances. Hitherto, the highest known redshift for a GRB was z = 6.7 (ref. 1), for GRB 080913, and for a galaxy was z = 6.96 (ref. 2). Here we report observations of GRB 090423 and the near-infrared spectroscopic measurement of its redshift, z = . This burst happened when the Universe was only about 4 per cent of its current age. Its properties are similar to those of GRBs observed at low/intermediate redshifts, suggesting that the mechanisms and progenitors that gave rise to this burst about 600,000,000 years after the Big Bang are not markedly different from those producing GRBs about 10,000,000,000 years later.

REM observations of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A: the onset of the afterglow and the initial fireball Lorentz factor determination

Context. Gamma-ray burst (GRB) emission is believed to originate in highly relativistic fireballs. Aims. Currently, only lower limits were securely set to the initia l fireball Lorentz factor 0. We aim to provide a direct measure of 0. Methods. The early-time afterglow light curve carries information about 0, which determines the time of the afterglow peak. We have obtained early observations of the near-infrared afte rglows of GRB 060418 and GRB 060607A with the REM robotic telescope. Results. For both events, the afterglow peak could be clearly singled out, allowing a firm determination of the fireball Lorentz of 0∼ 400, fully confirming the highly relativistic nature of GRB fi reballs. The deceleration radius was inferred to be Rdec≈ 10 17 cm. This is much larger than the internal shocks radius (believed to power the prompt emission), thus providing further evidence for a different origin of the prompt and afterglow stages of the GRB.E. Molinari, S.D. Vergani , D. Malesani , S. Covino, P. D’Avanzo, G. Chincarini , F.M. Zerbi, L.A. Antonelli, P. Conconi , V. Testa, G. Tosti , F. Vitali, F. D’Alessio, G. Malaspina, L. Nicastro, E. Palazzi , D. Guetta, S. Campana , P. Goldoni , N. Masetti , E.J.A. Meurs, A. Monfardini, L. Norci, E. Pian, S. Piranomonte , D. Rizzuto, M. Stefanon, L. Stella, G. Tagliaferri , P.A. Ward, G. Ihle, L. Gonzalez, A. Pizarro, P. Sinclair, J. Valenzuela 15