Gábor Szőcs
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gábor Szőcs.
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2009
Béla Molnár; Zsolt Kárpáti; Gábor Szőcs; David Hall
The honey locust gall midge, Dasineura gleditchiae Osten Sacken 1866 (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) is the main pest of ornamental varieties of the honey locust tree, Gleditsia triacanthos L., in North America, and is now becoming a pest of concern in Europe. Female midges were observed to emerge in the early morning with their ovipositor extended until they mated. Volatiles were collected from virgin females in a closed-loop stripping apparatus and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to electroantennographic (EAG) recording from the antenna of a male midge. A single EAG response was observed, which was assumed to be to the major component of the female sex pheromone. This was identified as (Z)-2-acetoxy-8-heptadecene by comparison of its mass spectrum and GC retention times on different columns with those of synthetic standards and by micro-analytical reactions. This compound was synthesized, and the individual enantiomers were produced by kinetic resolution with lipase from Candida antarctica. Analysis of the naturally-produced compound on a cyclodextrin GC column indicated it was the (R)-enantiomer. In EAG dose-response measurements, the (R)-enantiomer alone or in the racemic mixture evoked significant responses from the antennae of male D. gleditchiae, whereas the (S)-enantiomer did not. In field trapping tests, the (R)-enantiomer attracted male D. gleditchiae. The racemic compound was equally attractive, but the (S)-enantiomer was not attractive. Both the pure (R)-enantiomer or racemic (Z)-2-acetoxy-8-heptadecene, applied to red rubber septa in a dose range of 3–30 μg, constitute a strongly attractive bait in sticky traps for monitoring the flight of D. gleditchiae.
Journal of Applied Entomology | 2016
Gábor Bozsik; Armin Tröger; Wittko Francke; Gábor Szőcs
Recently, the distribution of the Mediterranean cedar bark beetle, Phloeosinus aubei Perris (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), has expanded to Central Europe. Reported mostly on cypress in the Mediterranean area, potential host plants in the invaded range include other scale‐leafed conifers, such as cultivars of arborvitae, Thuja occidentalis L. To reveal potential kairomonal cues for P. aubei, volatiles of T. occidentalis were collected and analysed by gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection (GC‐EAD). Assignments of chemical structures of antennally active components were carried out by gas chromatography linked to mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) using authentic reference samples. Antennal responses to synthetic samples of the identified compounds were studied by electroantennography (EAG), with antennae of female and male P. aubei. GC‐EAD analysis of head space volatiles of T. occidentalis revealed 22 antennally active compounds, of which 21 were identified. The most abundant components were α‐ and β‐thujone, fenchone, camphor, terpinen‐4‐ol, bornyl acetate and α‐terpinyl acetate, all of which are oxygenated monoterpenes. When EAG activities of synthetic samples were compared, the most intensive responses from female antennae were elicited by a mixture of α‐ and β‐thujone, followed by (–)‐terpinen‐4‐ol, (+)‐camphor, cis‐4‐thujanol, (+)‐sabina ketone, (+)‐terpinen‐4‐ol, isopulegone, (–)‐fenchone, borneol, (3Z)‐hexen‐1‐ol, (–)‐1‐octen‐3‐ol and (+)‐sulcatol. Male antennae responded the most to (–)‐terpinen‐4‐ol and cis‐4‐thujanol followed by the mixture of α‐ and β‐thujone. The next highest responses were elicited by (+)‐camphor, borneol, (+)‐terpinen‐4‐ol, (+)‐sulcatol and (+)‐sabina ketone. Striking differences were found between responses to the enantiomers of fenchone, sulcatol and 1‐octen‐3‐ol, whereas responses to the enantiomers of terpinen‐4‐ol did not differ significantly from each other. Several antennally active volatiles of T. occidentalis have also been reported from cypress and various other members of the Cupressaceae, suggesting that the sensory apparatus of P. aubei may recognize the shared components, which may enable rapid adaptation to new hosts in the invaded areas.
Phytoparasitica | 2017
Gábor Bozsik; Gábor Szőcs
The invasive small cypress bark beetle, Phloeosinus aubei (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) has two flights in Central-Europe, however, it was unclear, whether this corresponds to two reproductive periods, when nuptial chambers are formed and galleries initiated. The aim of this study was to clarify the life-cycle of P. aubei in Hungary, representing populations in the range of invasion, and to compare preferences towards some popular cultivars of Thuja and Juniper ornamental trees. In order to reveal which is the pioneering gender, and to confirm females’ preferences between healthy and broken trunks behavioral tests were conducted. Results showed that adults prepare hibernation tunnels from August until October. Sex ratio of overwintering adults was nearly equal. The significantly highest number of hibernation tunnels was found on Thuja plicata Atrovirens (mean±S.E.: 6.0±0.7/tree), followed by T. occidentalis Smaragd (2.2±0.8), Juniperus chinensis Spartan (1.6±0.6), and J. scopulorum Blue Arrow (0.2±0.2). Nuptial chambers were made from April until June, by singly females, never by males. Females chose broken, drying trunks over healthy ones. Adults of the next generation emerged from the galleries from August until October. By October adults emerged from 94% of the galleries, and larvae were found only in 6% of the galleries. These results showed that the autumn flight of P. aubei is linked to making hibernation tunnels, while the spring flight to producing nuptial chambers. The latter corresponds to a single reproductive period per year. Control measures against adults should be timed to these two specific periods of the season.
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2012
Béla Molnár; Armin Tröger; Theodora B. Toshova; Mitko Subchev; Erik J. van Nieukerken; J.C. Koster; Gábor Szőcs; Miklós Tóth; Wittko Francke
Archive | 2016
Gábor Bozsik; Gábor Szőcs
Archive | 2015
Jenő Kontschán; István Tóbiás; Ágnes Szénási; Gábor Bozsik; Gábor Szőcs
Archive | 2015
Jenő Kontschán; István Tóbiás; Gábor Bozsik; Gábor Szőcs
Archive | 2014
Gábor Bozsik; Andrea Nyiri; András Lakatos; Gábor Szőcs
Archive | 2014
Alexandra Fejes-Tóth; Béla Molnár; Gábor Szőcs; Gábor Bozsik; Zsolt Kárpáti
Archive | 2014
Gábor Bozsik; Balázs Zsolnai; Gyula Both; Gábor Szőcs; Wittko Francke