Gabriel S. Aldea
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gabriel S. Aldea.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1999
Gabriel S. Aldea; Jennifer M. Gaudiani; Oz M. Shapira; Alice K. Jacobs; Janice Weinberg; Adrienne Cupples; Harold L. Lazar; Richard J. Shemin
BACKGROUND Compared to men, women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting appear to have a higher morbidity and mortality, particularly in the perioperative period. This study was designed to answer the questions of whether such differences in clinical outcomes between men and women still exist with improvements in surgical techniques and determine whether it is gender or associated comorbid conditions in women that lead to higher morbidity. METHODS An analysis of a single centers contemporary experience (1994 to 1997) of 1,743 consecutive patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed. Only reoperations were excluded. Data were collected prospectively and presented as mean +/- standard deviation (p<0.05). RESULTS Women represented 30.0% of patients. Compared with men, women were older (68.4 versus 63.8 years; p<0.05), and had more urgent surgical interventions (70.0% versus 56.7%; p<0.05), a higher incidence of diabetes (42.1% versus 26.7%; p<0.05), hypertension (82.0% versus 73.9%; p<0.05), lower body surface area (1.73+/-0.18 m2 versus 2.03+/-0.19 m2; p<0.05), and hematocrit (31.7%+/-3.9% versus 36.2%+/-3.9%; p<0.05). Ejection fraction, incidence of previous myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left main (LM) disease, renal insufficiency, extent of coronary disease, and preoperative intraaortic balloon pump were similar. Women received fewer arterial grafts (91.0% versus 95.5%; p<0.05) and distal anastomoses (3.31+/-0.88 versus 3.49+/-0.94 p<0.05). Despite these differences, there were no statistical differences in the incidence of postoperative death (1.5% versus 1.0%), myocardial infarction (0.6% versus 0.6%), or cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (1.1% versus 0.4%) between men and women. Women had a higher inotropic support (10.2% versus 4.4%; p<0.05) and longer hospital stays (7.3+/-5.7 days versus 6.3+/-4.2 days; p<0.05). Using multivariate analysis, female gender was not an independent predictor of death or postoperative complications but was a predictor of length of hospital stay, use of arterial grafts, and extent of coronary revascularization. CONCLUSIONS After accounting for differences in their risk variables, the incidences of death, perioperative myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident/ transient ischemic attack after coronary artery bypass grafting in women and men were not statistically significant. Perioperative complications are related to comorbid risk factors but not to female gender itself. Further studies are warranted.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1999
Richard A Howard; Gabriel S. Aldea; Oz M. Shapira; John Kasznica; Ravin Davidoff
Papillary fibroelastomas are uncommon benign tumors usually involving the heart valves, which historically have been diagnosed at autopsy. With the advent of echocardiography, however, the number of patients diagnosed in life has increased. Papillary fibroelastomas represent a surgically treatable cause of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular ischemia and infarction making their identification clinically important. We report three unusual cases of papillary fibroelastoma; two patients presenting with symptoms of cerebrovascular ischemia and one presenting with myocardial infarction. We also present a comprehensive review of the literature and provide a compilation of all case reports to date.
Anesthesiology | 2005
Michael S. Avidan; Jerrold H. Levy; Jens Scholz; Elise Delphin; Peter Rosseel; Michael B. Howie; Irwin Gratz; Charles R. Bush; Nikolaos J. Skubas; Gabriel S. Aldea; Michael G. Licina; Laura J. Bonfiglio; Daniel K. Kajdasz; Elizabeth Ott; George J. Despotis
Background:The study evaluated the efficacy of recombinant human antithrombin (rhAT) for restoring heparin responsiveness in heparin resistant patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods:This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in heparin-resistant patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Heparin resistance was diagnosed when the activated clotting time was less than 480 s after 400 U/kg heparin. Fifty-four heparin-resistant patients were randomized. One cohort received 75 U/kg rhAT, and the other received normal saline. If the activated clotting time remained less than 480 s, this was considered treatment failure, and 2 units fresh frozen plasma was transfused. Patients were monitored for adverse events. Results:Only 19% of patients in the rhAT group received fresh frozen plasma, compared with 81% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). During their hospitalization, 48% of patients in the rhAT group received fresh frozen plasma, compared with 85% of patients in the placebo group (P = 0.009). Patients in the placebo group required higher heparin doses (P < 0.005) for anticoagulation. There was no increase in serious adverse events associated with rhAT. There was increased blood loss 12 h postoperatively (P = 0.05) with a trend toward increased 24-h bleeding in the rhAT group (P = 0.06). There was no difference between the groups in blood and platelet transfusions. Conclusion:Treatment with 75 U/kg rhAT is effective in restoring heparin responsiveness and promoting therapeutic anticoagulation in the majority of heparin-resistant patients. Treating heparin-resistant patients with rhAT may decrease the requirement for heparin and fresh frozen plasma.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1998
Gabriel S. Aldea; Paul O’Gara; Oz M. Shapira; Patrick Treanor; Ashraf Osman; Eva Patalis; Charles Arkin; Rhea Diamond; Viken L. Babikian; Harold L. Lazar; Richard J. Shemin
BACKGROUND We have demonstrated that the use of heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits (HBCs) combined with a lower anticoagulation protocol as an adjunct to an integrated blood conservation strategy decreases the incidence and magnitude of homologous transfusion and improves clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting. It is not known whether it is the lower anticoagulation protocol that influences outcome in patients treated with HBCs. Furthermore, the thrombogenic risk of using lower anticoagulation with HBCs still is debated. METHODS To answer these questions, a prospective randomized study was conducted in which 244 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting were treated with HBCs and randomized to undergo either a full (activated clotting time, > 450 seconds) or a lower (activated clotting time, > 250 seconds) anticoagulation protocol. In addition to clinical outcome, levels of thrombin generation markers during and after cardiopulmonary bypass were assessed in a consecutive subset of 58 patients (full anticoagulation profile = 28, lower anticoagulation profile = 30) by measuring thrombin-antithrombin complexes and prothrombin fragment 1.2. Levels of these markers also were correlated with the activated clotting time during cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS Preoperative and intraoperative risk profiles and other characteristics were similar in both groups, with more than 60% of patients undergoing nonelective operation. Compared with the full anticoagulation protocol group, patients in the lower anticoagulation protocol group were less likely to require blood products (24.2% versus 35.8%, respectively; p = 0.047) and received substantially fewer homologous donor units (0.50 +/- 0.92 versus 1.08 +/- 2.10 U, respectively; p = 0.005). Clinical outcomes were uniformly outstanding (but similar) in both treatment groups, with a modest reduction in the length of the hospital stay in the lower anticoagulation protocol group (5.26 +/- 1.23 versus 5.63 +/- 1.73 days, respectively; p = 0.05). The use of HBCs with a lower anticoagulation protocol was not associated with any adverse clinical events. Thrombin generation increased during cardiopulmonary bypass in both treatment groups, but was unrelated to the anticoagulation protocol or the activated clotting time (r2 = 0.03). No differences between the full and lower anticoagulation protocol groups were noted in the number of microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler analyses during cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 40) or in the postoperative neurologic and neuropsychologic outcomes (n = 30). CONCLUSIONS This study definitively demonstrates that, when used appropriately, patients who are treated with HBCs and a lower anticoagulation protocol have a lower incidence and magnitude of homologous transfusion and are not at any added risk for clinical, hematologic (thrombin-antithrombin complex and fragment 1.2 measurements), or microscopic (transcranial Doppler analyses) thromboembolic complications or for neurologic or neuropsychologic deficits.
Circulation | 1995
Harold L. Lazar; Carmel Fitzgerald; Stacy Gross; Timothy Heeren; Gabriel S. Aldea; Richard J. Shemin
BACKGROUND Rising healthcare costs have prompted limitations in the length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Because not all patients are candidates for early discharge, in the present study our aim was to determine factors that prolong LOS. METHODS AND RESULTS In 194 consecutive patients undergoing CABG procedures, LOS was > 7 days in 37%. Stepwise multiple regression procedures and chi 2 testing were used to determine what factors prolonged LOS for > 7 days. Preoperative factors that significantly (P < .05) prolonged LOS included repeat CABG, CABG plus valve surgery, congestive heart failure, preoperative coronary care unit stay, renal failure, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patients with at least one risk factor had a significantly higher incidence of LOS of > 7 days (47% versus 17%; P < .001). Significant (P < .05) postoperative factors prolonging LOS included arrhythmias, respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and wound infection. Of patients with at least one risk factor, 83% had LOS of > 7 days (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The presence of certain preoperative and post-operative risk factors can be predicted to prolong LOS after CABG surgery. This should be taken into consideration when defining reimbursement policies.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2016
Gabriel S. Aldea; Faisal G. Bakaeen; Jay Pal; Stephen E. Fremes; Stuart J. Head; Joseph F. Sabik; Todd Rosengart; A. Pieter Kappetein; Vinod H. Thourani; Scott Firestone; John D. Mitchell
Internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) should be used to bypass the left anterior descending (LAD) artery when bypass of the LAD is indicated (class of recommendation [COR] I, level of evidence [LOE] B). As an adjunct to left internal thoracic artery (LITA), a second arterial graft (right ITA or radial artery [RA]) should be considered in appropriate patients (COR IIa, LOE B). Use of bilateral ITAs (BITAs) should be considered in patients who do not have an excessive risk of sternal complications (COR IIa, LOE B). To reduce the risk of sternal infection with BITA, skeletonized grafts should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), smoking cessation is recommended (COR I, LOE C), glycemic control should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), and enhanced sternal stabilization may be considered (COR IIb, LOE C). As an adjunct to LITA to LAD (or in patients with inadequate LITA grafts), use of a RA graft is reasonable when grafting coronary targets with severe stenoses (COR IIa, LOE: B). When RA grafts are used, it is reasonable to use pharmacologic agents to reduce acute intraoperative and perioperative spasm (COR IIa, LOE C). The right gastroepiploic artery may be considered in patients with poor conduit options or as an adjunct to more complete arterial revascularization (COR IIb, LOE B). Use of arterial grafts (specific targets, number, and type) should be a part of the discussion of the heart team in determining the optimal approach for each patient (COR I, LOE C).
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1998
Oz M. Shapira; Gabriel S. Aldea; Patrick Treanor; Robin M. Chartrand; Kolleen DeAndrade; Harold L. Lazar; Richard J. Shemin
BACKGROUND Despite recent advances in blood conservation techniques, up to 30% to 80% of patients undergoing open heart operations require allogeneic blood transfusions. A prospective, randomized study was performed to test the effect of lowering cardiopulmonary bypass prime volume (as an additional component of an integrated blood conservation strategy) on clinical outcome and allogeneic blood transfusion. METHODS One hundred fourteen patients undergoing open heart operations were randomized to either full prime (FP) volume (1,400 mL of Plasmalyte solution) or reduced prime (RP) volume (600 to 800 mL). The reduction of prime volume was achieved by slowly draining the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit into a cell-saving device before the initiation of bypass. Firm transfusion thresholds were observed. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to baseline characteristics, body surface area, type and urgency of the procedures, perfusion technique, and hematologic profile. Mortality (FP, 1.7%; RP, 0%; p approximately 1.0) and overall morbidity (FP, 28.1%; RP, 22.8%; p = 0.53) were similar. However, transfusion requirements were significantly lower in the RP group: total donor exposure, 3.8 +/- 10.1 versus 1.0 +/- 2.4 units (p = 0.044); percentage of patients transfused, 54% (n = 31) versus 35% (n = 20) (p = 0.036). Twenty-four-hour chest tube drainage was similar: 455 +/- 223 mL for FP versus 472 +/- 173 mL for RP (p = 0.66). The lowest hematocrit on bypass was significantly higher in the RP group: 29.3% +/- 4% versus 26.3% +/- 5.3% (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Lowering cardiopulmonary bypass prime volume resulted in a significant decrease in allogeneic blood product use. Because postoperative 24-hour chest tube drainage was similar in both groups, and hematocrit during bypass was higher in the RP group, the reduction in allogeneic blood transfusions appears to be related to a decrease in prime-induced hemodilution. This technique is effective, simple, and safe. It therefore should be strongly considered for patients undergoing operations using normothermic or near-normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass who are at high risk for allogeneic blood transfusion.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1999
Oz M. Shapira; Aiming Xu; Joseph A. Vita; Gabriel S. Aldea; Nirav P. Shah; Richard J. Shemin; John F. Keaney
BACKGROUND Recent reports of improved radial artery patency have been attributed, in part, to routine use of diltiazem to prevent vasospasm. However, diltiazem is costly, and its use may be associated with negative inotropic and chronotropic side effects. This study compares the vasodilatory properties of diltiazem to those of nitroglycerin. METHODS In vitro, with the use of organ chambers, the vasodilatory properties of diltiazem and nitroglycerin were compared in matched segments of radial artery, internal thoracic artery, and saphenous vein that were harvested from the same patients (n = 11). The vasodilatory response of the radial artery to intravenous diltiazem or nitroglycerin was compared in vivo (n = 10) with the use of ultrasonographic measurements of radial artery diameter. RESULTS The maximum relaxation of radial artery (100% +/- 4%), internal thoracic artery (96% +/- 4%), and saphenous vein (100% +/- 3%) to nitroglycerin were significantly greater than the response to diltiazem (33% +/- 6%, 22% +/- 7%, and 34% +/- 5%, respectively; P <.001). The thromboxane mimetic, U46619, induced radial artery spasm with a median effective concentration of 3.7 +/- 0.8 nmol/L. Physiologic concentrations of nitroglycerin (0.1+/- micromol/L) significantly inhibited the radial artery response to U46619 (median effective concentration, 6.2 +/- 1.1 nmol/L; P =.046), whereas diltiazem (1 micromol/L) did not (median effective concentration, 3.7 +/- 0.8 nmol/L; P =.64). In vivo, nitroglycerin increased radial artery diameter 22% +/- 3%, which was significantly greater than diltiazem (3% +/- 0.5%; P =.001). CONCLUSION Nitroglycerin is a superior conduit vasodilator and is more effective in preventing graft spasm than diltiazem. Nitroglycerin should be strongly considered as the drug of choice to prevent conduit spasm after coronary bypass grafting.
Cardiovascular Surgery | 1995
Harold L. Lazar; H. Hudson; James C. McCann; J. D. Fonger; D. BirKett; Gabriel S. Aldea; Richard J. Shemin
This study sought to determine which factors influence the mortality rate in patients developing gastrointestinal complications following cardiac surgery. Between July 1988 and January 1992, 2054 patients underwent cardiac surgical procedures at the Boston University Medical Center. Of these, 29 (1.4%) developed postoperative gastrointestinal complications. The overall mortality rate among these patients was 27% (8/29). Those who died following such complications had a higher incidence of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV and unstable symptoms (8/8, 100% versus 3/21, 14%; P < 0.0001), and an increased need for preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support (4/8, 50% versus 1/21, 5%; P < 0.004). The need for gastrointestinal surgical intervention increased the mortality rate significantly compared with patients managed medically (8/18, 44% versus 0/11, 0%; P < 0.01). Patients with ischemic bowel also had a significantly higher mortality (5/5, 100% versus 3/24, 12%; P < 0.001). It is concluded that most patients with gastrointestinal complications following cardiac surgery can be treated, and with acceptable mortality rates. The presence of unstable symptoms, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support, ischemic bowel and the need for gastrointestinal surgical intervention adversely affect mortality.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Carl L. Tommaso; R. Morton Bolman; Ted Feldman; Joseph E. Bavaria; Michael A. Acker; Gabriel S. Aldea; Duke E. Cameron; Larry S. Dean; Dave Fullerton; Ziyad M. Hijazi; Eric Horlick; D. Craig Miller; Marc R. Moon; Richard Ringel; Carlos E. Ruiz; Alfredo Trento; Bonnie H. Weiner; Evan M. Zahn
The granting of staff privileges to physicians is an important mechanism to ensure quality care. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations requires that medical staff privileges be based on professional criteria specified in medical staff bylaws. Physicians are charged with