Gabriele Dell'Era

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and electrical storm: Results of the OBSERVational registry On long-term outcome of ICD patients (OBSERVO-ICD).

BACKGROUND Electrical storm (ES) is defined as 3 or more episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) within 24 hours and is associated with increased cardiac and all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test whether aggressive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming can be associated with ES. METHODS The OBSERVational registry On long-term outcome of ICD patients (OBSERVO-ICD) is a multicenter, retrospective registry enrolling all consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation from 2010 to 2012 in 5 Italian high-volume arrhythmia centers. Clinical history and risk factors were collected for all patients, as were ICD therapy-related variables such as detection zones and delays. The total number of arrhythmic episodes and therapies delivered by the ICD were collected through out-of-hospital visits and remote monitoring. RESULTS The registry enrolled 1319 consecutive patients, of whom 62 (4.7%) experienced at least 1 ES during follow-up (median 39 months). Patients who experienced ES had a significantly lower VF detection zone (P = .002), more frequently had antitachycardia pacing therapies programmed off during capacitor charge (P = .001), and less frequently had an ICD set with delayed therapies for VT zones (P = .042) and VF zone (P = .036). Patients who experienced ES had a significantly higher incidence of death and heart failure-related death compared to patients with no ventricular arrhythmias and patients with unclustered VTs/VFs (P = .025 and P <.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Patients with ES had a more aggressive ICD programming setup, including lower VF detection rates, shorter detection times, and no antitachycardia pacing therapies during capacitor charge. This kind of ICD programming potentially could increase the likelihood of ES and the related risk of death.

External implantable defibrillator as a bridge to reimplant after explant for infection: Experience from two centers

The management of patients explanted for implantable converter defibrillator (ICD) infections may be complex when anti‐bradycardia pacing and tachyarrhythmia protection are needed. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual‐coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplantation.

Occurrence of simultaneous cathodal–anodal capture with left ventricular quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: an electrocardiogram evaluation

Aims The occurrence of left ventricular (LV) anodal activation during pacing with modern multipolar cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems has never been reported. The aim of our study was to demonstrate, by means of electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, the occurrence of simultaneous cathodal-anodal LV capture with quadripolar LV leads. Methods and Results We studied 10 first-time recipients of a CRT device equipped with a quadripolar LV lead. During follow-up, standard supine 12-lead ECGs were obtained in available cathode-to-anode LV pacing configurations with a pulse amplitude equal to twice the pacing threshold. The occurrence of simultaneous cathodal-anodal LV capture was defined as the presence of variations in electrocardiographic ventricular activation (EVA) when the distal tip (cathode)-to-device can (anode) pacing configuration was compared with the distal tip (cathode)-to-proximal ring (anode) configuration. In eight patients, we found differences in EVA when different LV sites were paced through the unipolar LV tip and unipolar LV ring configurations. In these patients, a difference in EVA was detected in 61.5% (59 of 96) of the ECG leads (marked difference in 31.3%, slight difference in 30.2%). Changes in EVA between unipolar tip-to-can and bipolar tip-to-ring pacing that were suggestive of cathodal-anodal LV capture were found in six patients. In these patients, a total of 30 (41.7%) ECG leads showed a difference in EVA (marked difference in 20.8%, slight difference in 20.8%). Conclusion In our experience, additional anodal capture by the proximal LV ring during LV pacing is provable in most recipients of a resynchronization device equipped with a multipolar LV lead.

External implantable defibrillator as a bridge to reimplant after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator explant

When an infection induces the complete removal of an implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the subsequent reimplant may be safely bridged by an external ICD, connected to a transvenous defibrillating lead inserted through the site of extraction. We present …

Feasibility of cathodic-anodal left ventricular stimulation for alternative multisite pacing: DELL'ERA et al.

Simultaneous cathodic‐anodal capture by a bipole of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) left‐ventricular (LV) catheter may depolarize a larger LV area than conventional multipoint pacing. We evaluated the feasibility of cathodic‐anodal LV stimulation.

Effect of fixed-rate vs. rate-RESPONSIve pacing on exercise capacity in patients with permanent, refractory atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction treated with atrioventricular junction aBLation and bivEntricular pacing (RESPONSIBLE): a prospective, multicentre, randomized, single-blind study

Aims Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation followed by biventricular pacing is an established strategy for improving symptoms and morbidity in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and uncontrolled ventricular rate. There is no clear evidence that such patients benefit from rate-responsive (RR) pacing. Methods and results This prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicentre study was designed as an intra-patient comparison and enrolled 60 patients (age 69.5 ± 11.8 years, males 63.3%, NYHA 3.0 ± 0.6) with refractory AF and reduced LVEF (mean 32.4 ± 8.3%) treated with AVJ ablation and biventricular pacing. Two 6-minute walking tests (6MWT) were performed 1 week apart: one during VVI 70/min biventricular pacing and the other during VVIR 70-130/min biventricular pacing; patients were randomly and blindly assigned to Group A (n = 29, first 6MWT in VVIR mode) or B (n = 31, first 6MWT in VVI mode). Rate-responsive activation determined an increase of 18.8 ± 24.4 m in the distance walked during the 6MWT (P < 0.001). The increase was similar in both groups (P = 0.571). A >5% increase in the distance walked was observed in 76.7% of patients. The increase in the distance walked was linearly correlated with the increase in heart rate recorded during the 6MWT in the VVIR mode (r = 0.54; P < 0.001). Conclusion In permanent AF patients with uncontrolled rate and reduced LVEF who had undergone AVJ ablation and biventricular pacing, RR pacing yields a significant gain in exercise capacity, which seems to be related to the RR-induced frequency during effort.