Gabrielle Kingsley

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis

Objective. MTX is widely used to treat synovitis in PsA without supporting trial evidence. The aim of our study was to test the value of MTX in the first large randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) in PsA. Methods. A 6-month double-blind RCT compared MTX (15 mg/week) with placebo in active PsA. The primary outcome was PsA response criteria (PsARC). Other outcomes included ACR20, DAS-28 and their individual components. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation methods. Treatments were compared using logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, sex, disease duration and, where appropriate, individual baseline scores). Results. Four hundred and sixty-two patients were screened and 221 recruited. One hundred and nine patients received MTX and 112 received placebo. Forty-four patients were lost to follow-up (21 MTX, 23 placebo). Twenty-six patients discontinued treatment (14 MTX, 12 placebo). Comparing MTX with placebo in all randomized patients at 6 months showed no significant effect on PsARC [odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% CI 0.97, 3.23], ACR20 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.65, 6.22) or DAS-28 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.90, 3.17). There were also no significant treatment effects on tender and swollen joint counts, ESR, CRP, HAQ and pain. The only benefits of MTX were reductions in patient and assessor global scores and skin scores at 6 months (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). There were no unexpected adverse events. Conclusions. This trial of active PsA found no evidence for MTX improving synovitis and consequently raises questions about its classification as a disease-modifying drug in PsA. Trial registration. Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN:54376151.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of MTX in PsA

Objective. MTX is widely used to treat synovitis in PsA without supporting trial evidence. The aim of our study was to test the value of MTX in the first large randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) in PsA. Methods. A 6-month double-blind RCT compared MTX (15 mg/week) with placebo in active PsA. The primary outcome was PsA response criteria (PsARC). Other outcomes included ACR20, DAS-28 and their individual components. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation methods. Treatments were compared using logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, sex, disease duration and, where appropriate, individual baseline scores). Results. Four hundred and sixty-two patients were screened and 221 recruited. One hundred and nine patients received MTX and 112 received placebo. Forty-four patients were lost to follow-up (21 MTX, 23 placebo). Twenty-six patients discontinued treatment (14 MTX, 12 placebo). Comparing MTX with placebo in all randomized patients at 6 months showed no significant effect on PsARC [odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% CI 0.97, 3.23], ACR20 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.65, 6.22) or DAS-28 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.90, 3.17). There were also no significant treatment effects on tender and swollen joint counts, ESR, CRP, HAQ and pain. The only benefits of MTX were reductions in patient and assessor global scores and skin scores at 6 months (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). There were no unexpected adverse events. Conclusions. This trial of active PsA found no evidence for MTX improving synovitis and consequently raises questions about its classification as a disease-modifying drug in PsA. Trial registration. Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN:54376151.

Management of septic arthritis: a systematic review

Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence on the diagnosis and management of septic arthritis in native joints. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, National Electronic Library for Health, reference lists, national experts. Review methods: Systematic review of the literature with evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected papers using defined criteria set out by the Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. Results: 3291 citations were initially identified. Of these, 189 full text articles were identified for potential selection. Following review of these full text articles, 80 articles were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria and were included in the final list. Conclusions were drawn on the diagnosis, investigation and management of septic arthritis. Discussion: Little good quality evidence exists to guide the diagnosis and management of septic arthritis. Overall, no investigation is more reliable in the diagnosis of septic arthritis than the opinion of an experienced doctor. Aspiration and culture of synovial fluid is crucial to the diagnosis, but measurement of cell count is unhelpful. Antibiotics are clearly required for a prolonged period, but there are no data to indicate by which route or for how long. Key unanswered questions remain surrounding the medical and surgical management of the infected joint.

The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on quality-of-life assessed using the SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE The assessment of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is becoming increasingly common in both research and clinical practice. One of the most widely used tools for measuring HRQoL is the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). We conducted a systematic review examining the impact of RA on HRQoL, measured through the SF-36. METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies reporting mean and standard deviation scores for each domain of the SF-36 in adult RA patients. Studies were reviewed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS In total, 31 studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, including 22,335 patients. Meta-analyses found that pooled mean HRQoL score for the SF-36 physical component summary was 34.1 (95% CI: 22.0-46.1) and mental component summary was 45.6 (95% CI: 30.3-60.8). Increased age was associated with reduced physical function and physical component summary (PCS) scores but improved mental health and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Female gender was associated with improved scores on role physical, bodily pain and PCS but reduced mental health and MCS scores. Longer disease duration was associated with improved MCS. Patients with RA have a substantially reduced HRQoL in comparison to both other physical illnesses and in comparison to normative datasets from UK and USA populations. CONCLUSIONS RA has a substantial impact on HRQoL. This supports recent NICE guidelines stipulating that RA patients should be regularly assessed for the impact their disease has on HRQoL and appropriate management provided.

Control of rheumatoid arthritis by oral tolerance.

OBJECTIVE Previous randomized controlled trials for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with acid-soluble chicken and bovine type II collagen (CII) have produced conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial examined the therapeutic effect of bovine CII tablets in RA. METHODS CII tablets were prepared by adsorption onto a lactose base. Patients with a duration of RA of > or = 2 years and who had failed treatment with at least 1 slow-acting drug were recruited, provided that they had active arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.05 mg, 0.5 mg, or 5 mg of CII or placebo daily for 6 months. All slow-acting drugs were stopped at least 4 weeks before starting CII, although prednisolone was permitted at dosages < 10 mg/day. Clinical assessments were performed at screening and at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were recruited. Initially, there were no significant differences in mean Disease Activity Scores between groups. At 24 weeks, there was a significant difference (P = 0.041, by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance); the major components of this difference were attributable to relatively large decreases in the 0.5 mg CII group (19% of initial values) and to minimal decreases in patients receiving placebo (3% of initial values). Twenty patients had American College of Rheumatology 20% responses; 11 of these were in the 0.5 mg CII group and 3 were in each of the other groups, a significant difference (chi2 = 14.6, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in any clinical measure between the placebo, 0.05 mg CII, and 5 mg CII groups. There were no side effects associated with CII treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with 0.5 mg/day of bovine CII is well tolerated and produces small, but significant, disease improvement in RA. However, the therapeutic window is narrow. The difference between our results and those of other trials may relate to the dose, species, and formulation of the CII.

Report on the fourth International workshop on reactive arthritis

There are large differences in the antigenicity and biology of the ReA-associated bacteria. For induction of arthritis, the relevance seems to be only that antigenic material reaches the joint, alive or dead. If there is a common antigen, it has to be a highly conserved one. Bacterial hsp60 seems to be an immunodominant T cell antigen in ReA, but there must be other relevant antigens shared by these different bacteria. An ineffective immune response (for example, low production of TNFalpha) seems to contribute to the manifestations and course of ReA. Although arthritis can also occur in its absence, HLA-B27 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ReA and the other SpA. Current data suggest that B27 probably acts as an antigen-presenting molecule for a still-unknown arthritogenic molecule. Comparison of ReA with IBD-associated arthritis suggests that there might indeed be a common antigen shared by ReA-associated bacteria and bacteria of the gut flora. CD8+ T cells seem to be important in ReA and other SpA. In some parts of the world, such as in Mexico, ReA could be a major predisposing cause of the development of AS. Antibiotic treatment is not effective, probably because the triggering bacteria are already dead or in a partly latent state at the time arthritis occurs. Based on this knowledge and on new technologies, it should be possible in future years to derive answers to the questions about ReA and the other SpA and, as a consequence, to find a cure.

Remission in early rheumatoid arthritis

Objective. We systematically reviewed remission as an outcome measure in observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objectives were to identify its frequency using different criteria, to determine the influence of different treatment strategies on remission, and to review the effects of remission on radiological outcomes. Methods. Pubmed, Medline and Embase were searched using the following terms: Early Rheumatoid Arthritis or Early RA combined with Remission, Treatment, anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) or Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARD). Remissions were reported using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and Disease Activity Score (DAS) criteria. Results. Seventeen observational studies (4762 patients) reported remission in 27% of patients, 17% by ACR criteria and 33% by DAS criteria. Twenty RCT (4 comparing DMARD monotherapies, 13 comparing monotherapy with combination therapies, 3 comparing combination therapies) enrolled 4290 patients. ACR remissions occurred in 16% receiving DMARD monotherapy and 24% combination therapies (random effects OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12–2.36). DAS remissions occurred in 26% and 42%, respectively (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.46–2.78). Observational studies showed continuing radiological progression despite remission. RCT showed less radiological progression in remission when treated with combination therapy compared to monotherapies. Conclusion. Remission is a realistic treatment goal in early RA. Combination therapies using DMARD with or without TNF inhibitors increase remissions. Radiological progression occurred in remission but is reduced by combination therapies. ACR and DAS remission criteria are not directly comparable and standardization is needed.

A systematic comparison of combination DMARD therapy and tumour necrosis inhibitor therapy with methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE We examined how combination DMARD therapies and TNF inhibitors therapies plus MTX (TNF/MTX) affect clinical and radiological outcomes compared with MTX monotherapy in early RA. METHODS We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed and Ovid Medline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combination therapy in early RA. We evaluated ACR responses, withdrawals for inefficacy and toxicity, HAQ and radiographic progression. Meta-analysis using Review Manager evaluated random effects odds ratios (ORs) and random effects weighted mean differences (WMDs) between treatments. RESULTS A preliminary search identified 2029 citations; 15 were relevant RCTs (4200 randomized patients). Patients with active disease were enrolled. Compared with MTX monotherapy, both combination DMARDs and TNF/MTX increased ACR20-70 responses (OR 1.64-2.02 and 2.03-2.30, respectively), reduced withdrawals for inefficacy (OR 0.52 and 0.29), reduced HAQ (WMD -0.17 and -0.16) and reduced annual X-ray progression (WMD -1.20 and -0.84%). DMARD combinations increased withdrawals for toxicity (OR 2.69; there was no difference with TNF/MTX). The only head-to-head RCT showed comparable efficacy for combination DMARDs and TNF/MTX combinations. CONCLUSIONS In early active RA, both combination DMARDs and TNF/MTX are more effective than MTX monotherapy. DMARD and TNF/MTX combinations had equal efficacy on ACR response, withdrawals for inefficacy, disability and erosive progression. There is an apparent advantage for TNF/MTX combinations in the effect on toxicity with fewer consequent patients. We conclude that there is strong evidence in favour of combination treatment for RA but there is still uncertainty about which regimen is preferable.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiac failure: meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials

To determine the risks of cardiac failure with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the specific risks with Cox‐2 specific NSAIDs (COXIBs).

Use of imaging to assess patients with muscle disease

Purpose of reviewDefined autoantibodies are found in about half of the patients with myositis. Traditionally, these autoantibodies have been divided into myositis specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis associated autoantibodies. Several studies have shown that MSAs are associated with specific clinical characteristics and can aid our understanding of the pathophysiology of myositis. Recent findingsRecent studies suggest that some MSAs are markers of specific inflammatory muscle diseases (e.g., anti-SRP for an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy) and not just of myositis in general. Furthermore, new insights are emerging about the pathophysiology of MSAs, in particular anti-Jo-1. Based on these new insights, an alternative hypothesis of the formation of anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies is presented in which the immune system itself rather than muscle is the site of antigen presentation. SummaryThe recognition that some MSAs are markers of specific disease entities that were once commonly referred to as (poly)myositis, aids the development of better disease definitions. The changing insights in the function of the Jo-1 antigen and the emergence of new hypotheses on the formation of the Jo-1 antibody, open new avenues for future research aimed at unraveling the mystery of myositis.