Gabrielle Silver

Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: A Valid, Rapid, Observational Tool for Screening Delirium in the PICU*

Objective:To determine validity and reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, a rapid observational screening tool. Design:Double-blinded assessments were performed with the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium completed by nursing staff in the PICU. These ratings were compared with an assessment by consultation liaison child psychiatrist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV criteria as the “gold standard” for diagnosis of delirium. An initial series of duplicate Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium assessments were performed in blinded fashion to assess interrater reliability. Nurses recorded the time required to complete the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium screen. Setting:Twenty-bed general PICU in a major urban academic medical center over a 10-week period, March–May 2012. Patients:One hundred eleven patients stratified over ages ranging from 0 to 21 years and across developmental levels. Intervention:Two hundred forty-eight paired assessments completed. Measurements and Main Results:The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium had an overall sensitivity of 94.1% (95% CI, 83.8–98.8%) and specificity of 79.2% (95% CI, 73.5–84.9%). Overall Cronbach’s &agr; of 0.90 was observed, with a range of 0.87–0.90 for each of the eight items, indicating good internal consistency. A scoring cut point of 9 demonstrated good interrater reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium when comparing results of the screen between nurses (overall &kgr; = 0.94; item range &kgr; = 0.68–0.78). In patients without significant developmental delay, sensitivity was 92.0% (95% CI, 85.7–98.3%) and specificity was 86.5% (95% CI, 75.4–97.6%). In developmentally delayed children, the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium showed decreased specificity of 51.2% (95% CI, 24.7–77.8%) but sensitivity remained high at 96.2% (95% CI, 86.5–100%). The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium takes less than 2 minutes to complete. Conclusions:With an overall prevalence rate of 20.6% in our study population, delirium is a common problem in pediatric critical care. The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium is a valid, rapid, observational nursing screen that is urgently needed for the detection of delirium in PICU settings.

Pediatric delirium and associated risk factors: a single-center prospective observational study.

Objective: To describe a single-institution pilot study regarding prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill children. Design: A prospective observational study, with secondary analysis of data collected during the validation of a pediatric delirium screening tool, the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium. Setting: This study took place in the PICU at an urban academic medical center. Patients: Ninety-nine consecutive patients, ages newborn to 21 years. Intervention: Subjects underwent a psychiatric evaluation for delirium based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV criteria. Measurements and Main Results: Prevalence of delirium in this sample was 21%. In multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with the diagnosis of delirium were presence of developmental delay, need for mechanical ventilation, and age 2–5 years. Conclusions: In our institution, pediatric delirium is a prevalent problem, with identifiable risk factors. Further large-scale prospective studies are required to explore multi-institutional prevalence, modifiable risk factors, therapeutic interventions, and effect on long-term outcomes.

Infant Delirium in Pediatric Critical Care Settings

Pediatric delirium is a common though underrecognized and understudied phenomenon in pediatric critical care. The unique combination of the vulnerability and resiliency of children’s developing brains makes it imperative that research on prevention, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of this complication of pediatric medical illness and treatment be vigorously pursued. Although antipsychotics are rarely used for treatment, a small but growing body of research supports the effi cacy and short-term safety of using both conventional and atypical antipsychotics. Further understanding of the complex neurophysiology of delirium may lead to more refi ned treatments. Developmentally valid screening tools will make the assessment and treatment of pediatric delirium more feasible when expert consultation is not available.

Delirium in Critically Ill Children: An International Point Prevalence Study*

Objectives: To determine prevalence of delirium in critically ill children and explore associated risk factors. Design: Multi-institutional point prevalence study. Setting: Twenty-five pediatric critical care units in the United States, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and Saudi Arabia. Patients: All children admitted to the pediatric critical care units on designated study days (n = 994). Intervention: Children were screened for delirium using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium by the bedside nurse. Demographic and treatment-related variables were collected. Measurements and Main Results: Primary study outcome measure was prevalence of delirium. In 159 children, a final determination of mental status could not be ascertained. Of the 835 remaining subjects, 25% screened positive for delirium, 13% were classified as comatose, and 62% were delirium-free and coma-free. Delirium prevalence rates varied significantly with reason for ICU admission, with highest delirium rates found in children admitted with an infectious or inflammatory disorder. For children who were in the PICU for 6 or more days, delirium prevalence rate was 38%. In a multivariate model, risk factors independently associated with development of delirium included age less than 2 years, mechanical ventilation, benzodiazepines, narcotics, use of physical restraints, and exposure to vasopressors and antiepileptics. Conclusions: Delirium is a prevalent complication of critical illness in children, with identifiable risk factors. Further multi-institutional, longitudinal studies are required to investigate effect of delirium on long-term outcomes and possible preventive and treatment measures. Universal delirium screening is practical and can be implemented in pediatric critical care units.

Delirium and Mortality in Critically Ill Children: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Pediatric Delirium*

Objectives: Delirium occurs frequently in adults and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, the epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium are not well-characterized. The primary objectives of this study were to describe the frequency of delirium in critically ill children, its duration, associated risk factors, and effect on in-hospital outcomes, including mortality. Secondary objectives included determination of delirium subtype, and effect of delirium on duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay. Design: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Urban academic tertiary care PICU. Patients: All consecutive admissions from September 2014 through August 2015. Interventions: Children were screened for delirium twice daily throughout their ICU stay. Measurements and Main Results: Of 1,547 consecutive patients, delirium was diagnosed in 267 (17%) and lasted a median of 2 days (interquartile range, 1–5). Seventy-eight percent of children with delirium developed it within the first 3 PICU days. Most cases of delirium were of the hypoactive (46%) and mixed (45%) subtypes; only 8% of delirium episodes were characterized as hyperactive delirium. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of delirium included age less than or equal to 2 years old, developmental delay, severity of illness, prior coma, mechanical ventilation, and receipt of benzodiazepines and anticholinergics. PICU length of stay was increased in children with delirium (adjusted relative length of stay, 2.3; CI = 2.1–2.5; p < 0.001), as was duration of mechanical ventilation (median, 4 vs 1 d; p < 0.001). Delirium was a strong and independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 4.39; CI = 1.96–9.99; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Delirium occurs frequently in critically ill children and is independently associated with mortality. Some in-hospital risk factors for delirium development are modifiable. Interventional studies are needed to determine best practices to limit delirium exposure in at-risk children.

Cost Associated With Pediatric Delirium in the ICU.

Objective:To determine the costs associated with delirium in critically ill children. Design:Prospective observational study. Setting:An urban, academic, tertiary-care PICU in New York city. Patients:Four-hundred and sixty-four consecutive PICU admissions between September 2, 2014, and December 12, 2014. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:All children were assessed for delirium daily throughout their PICU stay. Hospital costs were analyzed using cost-to-charge ratios, in 2014 dollars. Median total PICU costs were higher in patients with delirium than in patients who were never delirious (

Evaluation of the Safety of Quetiapine in Treating Delirium in Critically Ill Children: A Retrospective Review

18,832 vs

Neuroblastoma and pediatric delirium: A case series

4,803; p < 0.0001). Costs increased incrementally with number of days spent delirious (median cost of

Delirium in Children After Cardiac Bypass Surgery.

9,173 for 1 d with delirium,

Detection and Management of Delirium in the Neonatal Unit: A Case Series.

19,682 for 2–3 d with delirium, and