Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gad Rennert is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gad Rennert.


Nature Genetics | 2008

Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

Albert Tenesa; Susan M. Farrington; James Prendergast; Mary Porteous; Marion Walker; Naila Haq; Rebecca A. Barnetson; Evropi Theodoratou; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Nicola Cartwright; Colin A. Semple; Andy Clark; Fiona Reid; Lorna Smith; Thibaud Koessler; Paul Pharoah; Stephan Buch; Clemens Schafmayer; Jürgen Tepel; Stefan Schreiber; Henry Völzke; Carsten Schmidt; Jochen Hampe; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Stefan Wilkening; Federico Canzian; Gabriel Capellá; Victor Moreno

In a genome-wide association study to identify loci associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, we genotyped 555,510 SNPs in 1,012 early-onset Scottish CRC cases and 1,012 controls (phase 1). In phase 2, we genotyped the 15,008 highest-ranked SNPs in 2,057 Scottish cases and 2,111 controls. We then genotyped the five highest-ranked SNPs from the joint phase 1 and 2 analysis in 14,500 cases and 13,294 controls from seven populations, and identified a previously unreported association, rs3802842 on 11q23 (OR = 1.1; P = 5.8 × 10−10), showing population differences in risk. We also replicated and fine-mapped associations at 8q24 (rs7014346; OR = 1.19; P = 8.6 × 10−26) and 18q21 (rs4939827; OR = 1.2; P = 7.8 × 10−28). Risk was greater for rectal than for colon cancer for rs3802842 (P < 0.008) and rs4939827 (P < 0.009). Carrying all six possible risk alleles yielded OR = 2.6 (95% CI = 1.75–3.89) for CRC. These findings extend our understanding of the role of common genetic variation in CRC etiology.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2008

Common Breast Cancer-Predisposition Alleles Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Antonis C. Antoniou; Amanda B. Spurdle; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Sue Healey; Karen A. Pooley; Rita K. Schmutzler; Beatrix Versmold; Christoph Engel; Alfons Meindl; Norbert Arnold; Wera Hofmann; Christian Sutter; Dieter Niederacher; Helmut Deissler; Trinidad Caldés; Kati Kämpjärvi; Heli Nevanlinna; Jacques Simard; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Susan L. Neuhausen; Timothy R. Rebbeck; Theresa Wagner; Henry T. Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Jeffrey N. Weitzel; Patricia A. Ganz; Mary B. Daly; Gail E. Tomlinson; Olufunmilayo I. Olopade

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.


American Journal of Pathology | 2001

Organ-Specific Molecular Classification of Primary Lung, Colon, and Ovarian Adenocarcinomas Using Gene Expression Profiles

Thomas J. Giordano; Kerby Shedden; Donald R. Schwartz; Rork Kuick; Jeremy M. G. Taylor; Nana Lee; David E. Misek; Joel K. Greenson; Sharon L.R. Kardia; David G. Beer; Gad Rennert; Kathleen R. Cho; Stephen B. Gruber; Eric R. Fearon; Samir M. Hanash

Molecular classification of tumors based on their gene expression profiles promises to significantly refine diagnosis and management of cancer patients. The establishment of organ-specific gene expression patterns represents a crucial first step in the clinical application of the molecular approach. Here, we report on the gene expression profiles of 154 primary adenocarcinomas of the lung, colon, and ovary. Using high-density oligonucleotide arrays with 7129 gene probe sets, comprehensive gene expression profiles of 57 lung, 51 colon, and 46 ovary adenocarcinomas were generated and subjected to principle component analysis and to a cross-validated prediction analysis using nearest neighbor classification. These statistical analyses resulted in the classification of 152 of 154 of the adenocarcinomas in an organ-specific manner and identified genes expressed in a putative tissue-specific manner for each tumor type. Furthermore, two tumors were identified, one in the colon group and another in the ovarian group, that did not conform to their respective organ-specific cohorts. Investigation of these outlier tumors by immunohistochemical profiling revealed the ovarian tumor was consistent with a metastatic adenocarcinoma of colonic origin and the colonic tumor was a pleomorphic mesenchymal tumor, probably a leiomyosarcoma, rather than an epithelial tumor. Our results demonstrate the ability of gene expression profiles to classify tumors and suggest that determination of organ-specific gene expression profiles will play a significant role in a wide variety of clinical settings, including molecular diagnosis and classification.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2003

Phenotype of microsatellite unstable colorectal carcinomas: Well-differentiated and focally mucinous tumors and the absence of dirty necrosis correlate with microsatellite instability.

Joel K. Greenson; Joseph D. Bonner; Ofer Ben-Yzhak; Hector I. Cohen; Ines Miselevich; Murray B. Resnick; Philippe Trougouboff; Lynn D. Tomsho; Evelyn Kim; Marcelo Low; Ronit Almog; Gad Rennert; Stephen B. Gruber

&NA; The phenotypic markers of colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability have been widely studied and include mucinous or poor differentiation, prominent host response, a circumscribed growth pattern, histologic heterogeneity, and right‐sided location. As part of a population‐based case–control study of colorectal cancer in northern Israel, we reviewed the pathology and microsatellite status of 528 consecutively diagnosed colorectal cancers. Phenotypic analysis was performed by one pathologist (J.K.G.) and included assessment of grade, mucinous histology (>50%, or focal), histologic heterogeneity, growth pattern, necrosis, and host response. Microsatellite status was determined on microdissected portions of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue using a panel of 5 NCI consensus primers. Fifty‐two of 528 colorectal carcinomas were microsatellite unstable (9.85%). Multivariate analysis found that >2 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes per high power field (p <0.0001), the lack of dirty necrosis (p = 0.0054), a Crohns‐like host response (p = 0.0064), right‐sided location (p = 0.032), well or poor differentiation (p = 0.037), and any mucinous differentiation (p = 0.039) were independent predictors of microsatellite instability. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were the single best histologic predictor of microsatellite instability. The absence of dirty necrosis and the presence of well‐differentiated tumors and tumors with only focal mucinous differentiation were also important markers for microsatellite instability that have not been emphasized previously. The combination of >2 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes per high power field and/or any mucinous differentiation and/or the absence of dirty necrosis identified all MSI‐H tumors in this study.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010

Replication of Lung Cancer Susceptibility Loci at Chromosomes 15q25, 5p15, and 6p21: A Pooled Analysis From the International Lung Cancer Consortium

Thérèse Truong; Rayjean J. Hung; Christopher I. Amos; Xifeng Wu; Heike Bickeböller; Albert Rosenberger; Wiebke Sauter; Thomas Illig; H.-Erich Wichmann; Angela Risch; Hendrik Dienemann; Rudolph Kaaks; Ping Yang; Ruoxiang Jiang; John K. Wiencke; Margaret Wrensch; Helen M. Hansen; Karl T. Kelsey; Keitaro Matsuo; Kazuo Tajima; Ann G. Schwartz; Angie S. Wenzlaff; Adeline Seow; Chen Ying; Andrea Staratschek-Jox; Peter Nürnberg; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Philip Lazarus; Joshua E. Muscat

BACKGROUND Genome-wide association studies have identified three chromosomal regions at 15q25, 5p15, and 6p21 as being associated with the risk of lung cancer. To confirm these associations in independent studies and investigate heterogeneity of these associations within specific subgroups, we conducted a coordinated genotyping study within the International Lung Cancer Consortium based on independent studies that were not included in previous genome-wide association studies. METHODS Genotype data for single-nucleotide polymorphisms at chromosomes 15q25 (rs16969968, rs8034191), 5p15 (rs2736100, rs402710), and 6p21 (rs2256543, rs4324798) from 21 case-control studies for 11 645 lung cancer case patients and 14 954 control subjects, of whom 85% were white and 15% were Asian, were pooled. Associations between the variants and the risk of lung cancer were estimated by logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Associations between 15q25 and the risk of lung cancer were replicated in white ever-smokers (rs16969968: odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21 to 1.32, P(trend) = 2 x 10(-26)), and this association was stronger for those diagnosed at younger ages. There was no association in never-smokers or in Asians between either of the 15q25 variants and the risk of lung cancer. For the chromosome 5p15 region, we confirmed statistically significant associations in whites for both rs2736100 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.20, P(trend) = 1 x 10(-10)) and rs402710 (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.19, P(trend) = 5 x 10(-8)) and identified similar associations in Asians (rs2736100: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.35, P(trend) = 2 x 10(-5); rs402710: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.27, P(trend) = .007). The associations between the 5p15 variants and lung cancer differed by histology; odds ratios for rs2736100 were highest in adenocarcinoma and for rs402710 were highest in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas. This pattern was observed in both ethnic groups. Neither of the two variants on chromosome 6p21 was associated with the risk of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS In this international genetic association study of lung cancer, previous associations found in white populations were replicated and new associations were identified in Asian populations. Future genetic studies of lung cancer should include detailed stratification by histology.


International Journal of Cancer | 2005

Effect of pregnancy as a risk factor for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

Carey A. Cullinane; Jan Lubinski; Susan L. Neuhausen; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry T. Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Barbara L. Weber; Pål Møller; Kenneth Offit; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Eitan Friedman; Susan Randall; Barbara Pasini; Peter Ainsworth; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; William D. Foulkes; J.G.M. Klijn; Nadine Tung; Gad Rennert; Olufunmilayo I. Olopade; Fergus J. Couch; Teresa Wagner; Håkan Olsson; Ping Sun; Jeffrey N. Weitzel; Steven A. Narod

Early age at first birth and multiparity have been associated with a decrease in the risk of breast cancer in women in the general population. We examined whether this relationship is also present in women at high risk of breast cancer due to the presence of a mutation in either of the 2 breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. We performed a matched case‐control study of 1,260 pairs of women with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, recruited from North America, Europe and Israel. Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were matched with unaffected control subjects for year of birth, country of residence, and mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2). Study subjects completed a questionnaire detailing their reproductive histories. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by conditional logistic regression. Among BRCA1 carriers, parity per se was not associated with the risk of breast cancer (OR for parous vs. nulliparous = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.75–1.19; p = 0.62). However, women with a BRCA1 mutation and 4 or more children had a 38% decrease in breast cancer risk compared to nulliparous women (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.41–0.94). In contrast, among BRCA2 carriers, increasing parity was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; women with 2 or more children were at approximately 1.5 times the risk of breast cancer as nulliparous women (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.01–2.32; p = 0.05). Among women with BRCA2 mutations and who were younger than age 50, the (adjusted) risk of breast cancer increased by 17% with each additional birth (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.01–1.36; p = 0.03). There was no significant increase in the risk of breast cancer among BRCA2 carriers older than 50 (OR for each additional birth = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.58–1.53; p = 0.92). In the 2‐year period following a birth, the risk of breast cancer in a BRCA2 carrier was increased by 70% compared to nulliparous controls (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 0.97–3.0). There was a much smaller increase in breast cancer risk among BRCA2 carriers whose last birth was 5 or more years in the past (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 0.79–1.95). A modest reduction in risk of breast cancer was observed among BRCA1 carriers with 4 or more births. Among BRCA2 carriers, increasing parity was associated with a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer before age 50 and this increase was greatest in the 2‐year period following a pregnancy.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Use of Bisphosphonates and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

Gad Rennert; Mila Pinchev; Hedy S. Rennert

PURPOSE Bisphosphonates are commonly used for the treatment of osteoporosis and for prevention and treatment of skeletal lesions due to malignancy. However, the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the risk of developing breast cancer has not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Breast Cancer in Northern Israel Study is a population-based case-control study in northern Israel of patients with breast cancer and age-, clinic-, and ethnic-group matched controls. Use of bisphosphonates was assessed in 4,039 postmenopausal patients and controls, members of Clalit Health Services, using pharmacy records. RESULTS The use of bisphosphonates for longer than 1 year before diagnosis, but not for shorter than 1 year, was associated with a significantly reduced relative risk of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76). This association remained significant after adjustment for age, fruit, and vegetable consumption, sports activity, family history of breast cancer, ethnic group, body mass index, use of calcium supplements, hormone replacement therapy use, number of pregnancies, months of breast feeding, and age at first pregnancy (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.90). Breast cancer risk did not change further if bisphosphonates were used for more years. Breast tumors identified in bisphosphonates users were more often estrogen receptor positive and less often poorly differentiated. CONCLUSION The use of bisphosphonates for longer than 1 year was associated with a 28% relative reduction in the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Tumors developing under bisphosphonates treatment tended to have a favorable prognostic factors profile.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2004

Clinical phenotype of families with longevity.

Gil Atzmon; Clyde B. Schechter; William Greiner; Deborah Davidson; Gad Rennert; Nir Barzilai

Objectives: To determine whether offspring of centenarians acquired protection from age‐related diseases.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2002

A Novel Founder Mutation in the RNASEL Gene, 471delAAAG, Is Associated with Prostate Cancer in Ashkenazi Jews

Hanna Rennert; Dani Bercovich; Ayala Hubert; Dvora Abeliovich; Uri Rozovsky; Anat Bar-Shira; Sonya Soloviov; Letizia Schreiber; Haim Matzkin; Gad Rennert; Luna Kadouri; Tamar Peretz; Yuval Yaron; Avi Orr-Urtreger

HPC1/RNASEL was recently identified as a candidate gene for hereditary prostate cancer. We identified a novel founder frameshift mutation in RNASEL, 471delAAAG, in Ashkenazi Jews. The mutation frequency in the Ashkenazi population, estimated on the basis of the frequency in 150 healthy young women, was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9%-8.4%). Among Ashkenazi Jews, the mutation frequency was higher in patients with prostate cancer (PRCA) than in elderly male control individuals (6.9% vs. 2.4%; odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI 0.6-15.3; P=.17). 471delAAAG was not detected in the 134 non-Ashkenazi patients with PRCA and control individuals tested. The median age at PRCA diagnosis did not differ significantly between the Ashkenazi carriers and noncarriers included in our study. However, carriers received diagnoses at a significantly earlier age, compared with patients with PRCA who were registered in the Israeli National Cancer Registry (65 vs. 74.4 years, respectively; P<.001). When we examined two brothers with PRCA, we found a heterozygous 471delAAAG mutation in one and a homozygous mutation in the other. Loss of heterozygosity was demonstrated in the tumor of the heterozygous sib. Taken together, these data suggest that the 471delAAAG null mutation is associated with PRCA in Ashkenazi men. However, additional studies are required to determine whether this mutation confers increased risk for PRCA in this population.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2008

Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers

Andrea Eisen; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Pål Møller; Henry T. Lynch; J.G.M. Klijn; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Susan L. Neuhausen; Lucy Gilbert; Parviz Ghadirian; Siranoush Manoukian; Gad Rennert; Eitan Friedman; Claudine Isaacs; Eliot M. Rosen; Barry Rosen; Mary B. Daly; Ping Sun; Steven A. Narod

Background Hormone therapy (HT) is commonly given to women to alleviate the climacteric symptoms associated with menopause. There is concern that this treatment may increase the risk of breast cancer. The potential association of HT and breast cancer risk is of particular interest to women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 because they face a high lifetime risk of breast cancer and because many of these women take HT after undergoing prophylactic surgical oophorectomy at a young age. Methods We conducted a matched case–control study of 472 postmenopausal women with a BRCA1 mutation to examine whether or not the use of HT is associated with subsequent risk of breast cancer. Breast cancer case patients and control subjects were matched with respect to age, age at menopause, and type of menopause (surgical or natural). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with conditional logistic regression. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results In this group of BRCA1 mutation carriers, the adjusted OR for breast cancer associated with ever use of HT compared with never use was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.35 to 0.96; P = .03). In analyses by type of HT, an inverse association with breast cancer risk was observed with use of estrogen only (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.98; P = .04); the association with use of estrogen plus progesterone was not statistically significant (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.34 to 1.27; P = .21). Conclusion Among postmenopausal women with a BRCA1 mutation, HT use was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer; indeed, in this population, it was associated with a decreased risk.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gad Rennert's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen B. Gruber

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hedy S. Rennert

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Flavio Lejbkowicz

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mila Pinchev

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ofra Barnett-Griness

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walid Saliba

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lea Hagoel

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leon Raskin

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge