Gaetano Prosperini

Sputum eosinophilia is more closely associated with airway responsiveness to bradykinin than methacholine in asthma.

Hyperresponsiveness of the airways to various spasmogenic stimuli is a characteristic feature of bronchial asthma. However, the association between the different stimuli to which asthmatic airways are hyperresponsive and airways inflammation is not completely understood. We have investigated the relationship between airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma, as assessed by bronchoprovocation tests to methacholine and bradykinin, two well defined bronchoconstrictor agonists. Sputum induction by hypertonic saline and methacholine and bradykinin challenges were performed in 14 nonsmoking subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma. Airway responsiveness to either agonist did not correlate with sputum neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages. Whilst the absolute number of eosinophilia failed to be significantly related to methacholine responsiveness (r=-0.47; p=0.09), it correlated markedly and significantly with provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (r=0.72; p<0.01). When expressed as % of total cell counts, sputum eosinophils correlated with both types of responsiveness (r=-056; p=0.04 and r=-0.76, p<0.001, respectively). Although the concentration of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the sputum correlated with the absolute numbers of eosinophils (r=0.62; p<0.02), no correlation was found between ECP levels and the airway responsiveness to any of the agonists tested. In subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma, airway responsiveness to bradykinin is more strongly associated with the magnitude of eosinophilic inflammation in the airways than methacholine. This finding underlines the selectivity of diverse agonists in assessing airway hyperresponsiveness and cellular inflammation in asthma.

Anaphylaxis after prednisone

A reactions to corticosteroids are relatively uncommon (1, 2). These reactions may be immunologic or nonimmunologic in nature, and the clinical signs of anaphylaxis may be seen with both types of reaction. It is somewhat paradoxical that on rare occasions steroids themselves can induce systemic adverse reactions. We describe here the case of a girl with asthma and aspirin intolerance who developed severe systemic symptoms and loss of consciousness after a single dose of 25 mg prednisone.

Effect of salbutamol on nasal symptoms and mast cell degranulation induced by adenosine 5′ monophosphate nasal challenge

Background In addition to its well‐known functional agonism at the level of β2 adrenergic receptors on airways smooth muscle cells, salbutamol appears to have additional protective effects, possibly through an inhibition of mast cell activation.

Endothelial-coagulative activation during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prone to clinical exacerbations of their disease and this is known to be associated with increased airway inflammation.[1][1] A prothrombotic condition resulting from the inflammatory activation of the endothelium may well occur during

Bronchodilator response to salbutamol after spontaneous recovery from nonspecific bronchial provocation tests in asthma

Assessment of airway responsiveness by bronchoprovocation and bronchodilatation tests is important in the diagnostic work-up protocol of bronchial asthma and it would be convenient to undertake both tests on the same occasion. However, it is not known whether this can be done accurately. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of a prior bronchial provocation test on the bronchodilator response to salbutamol after spontaneous recovery of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in a group of asthmatic subjects. On two separate occasions at the same time of day, concentration-response studies with inhaled histamine or methacholine, or a sham challenge with normal saline were carried out in a blinded, randomized manner. Changes in airway calibre were followed as FEV1 and agonist responsiveness expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). After either spontaneous recovery or a fixed-duration wait of 45 min (when appropriate), the subjects received 2x100 microg of salbutamol from a metered dose inhaler with a spacer. The bronchodilator response to salbutamol was expressed as a percentage of initial FEV1 (deltaFEV1% init). Bronchial challenge with both agonists failed to alter significantly the airway response to salbutamol, with the deltaFEV1% init mean value (range) being 16.9% (9.0-31.9) and 17.5% (11.6-31.2) on the sham and histamine/methacholine challenge day respectively. It was shown that the degree of bronchodilatation achieved after salbutamol 200 microg is not affected by prior bronchoprovocation testing when enough time is allowed for the airways to recover spontaneously to baseline forced expiratory volume in one second. Thus evaluation of airway responsiveness by both bronchial provocation tests and bronchodilator testing can be assessed reliably within a few hours in asthmatic patients.

A case of acute deterioration in asthma symptoms induced by isoniazid prophylaxis

The present case report describes a 10-year-old boy with clinical history of steroid-dependent asthma who developed severe exacerbation of his respiratory symptoms upon isoniazid administration. Subsequent control of his asthma symptoms was re-established and maintained only after isoniazid withdrawal. This case is the first to emphasize the dangers of isoniazid administration in patients who have asthma.

Changes in neurokinin A airway responsiveness with inhaled lysine-acetylsalicylate in asthma

Endogenously released cyclooxygenase products modulate the bronchoconstrictor response to various stimuli in asthma. Little is known of the change in airway responsiveness to neurokinin A (NKA) after cyclooxygenase blockade. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we have investigated the effect of the potent cyclooxygenase inhibitor, lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) administered by inhalation, on the bronchoconstrictor response both to neurokinin A (NKA) and methacholine in nine asthmatic subjects. Subjects attended the laboratory on four separate occasions to receive nebulized L-ASA (solution of 90 mg.mL-1) or matched placebo (glycine, solution of 30 mg.mL-1) 15 min prior to bronchial challenge with NKA or methacholine, in a randomized, double-blind order. Changes in airway calibre were followed as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and agonist responsiveness, expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline (PC20). L-ASA elicited a significant fall in FEV1 from baseline. When compared with placebo, inhaled L-ASA reduced the airway responsiveness to NKA in 8 of the 9 subjects studied, the geometric mean (range) values for PC20 NKA increasing significantly from 153.2 (52.0-258.9) to 303.1 (83.4-668.5) micrograms.mL-1 after placebo and L-ASA, respectively. However, no significant change in airway responsiveness to methacholine was recorded after L-ASA, their geometric mean (range) PC20 values being 1.60 (0.17-9.59) and 1.53 (0.09-14.01) mg.mL-1 after placebo and L-ASA, respectively. The small decrease in airway responsiveness to neurokinin A after administration of lysine acetylsalicylate by inhalation suggests that endogenous prostaglandins may play a contributory protective role in the airway response to neurokinin A in human asthma.

Inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) attenuates histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

When administered by inhalation, histamine provokes dose‐related bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects mainly by a direct activation of histamine H1‐receptors on airway smooth muscle. However, little is known of the change in airway responsiveness to histamine after cyclooxygenase blockade. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the potent cyclooxygenase inhibitor, lysine acetylsalicylate (L‐ASA), administered by inhalation on histamine‐induced bronchoconstriction in a group of 16 asthmatic subjects. The subjects studied attended the laboratory on four separate occasions to receive nebulized L‐ASA (solution of 90mg/ml) or matched placebo (glycine solution of 30 mg/ml) 15 min before bronchoprovocation tests with histamine and methacholine in a randomized, double‐blind order. Changes in airway caliber were followed as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and agonist responsiveness was expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline (PC20).

Effect of inhaled bradykinin on indices of airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects

Asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, a physiopathological abnormality which may result from the complex interplay between inflammatory cells and proinflammatory mediators. Although kinins are thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, it is not known whether bradykinin is able to induce airway hyperresponsiveness. We have, therefore, investigated the effect of inhaled bradykinin on the changes in airway calibre and in airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine, in a double-blind, randomized study of nine asthmatic subjects. Subjects were studied on two study periods, separated by at least 15 days. On the first day of each study period, subjects inhaled either a single dose of bradykinin or methacholine (placebo) with changes in airway calibre being followed as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and as the maximum expiratory flow rate measured at 70% of the vital capacity below total lung capacity (TLC) from a partial forced expiratory manoeuvre (Vp30) at 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min, and then every hour for 7 h. Airway responsiveness to histamine, expressed as the provocative concentrations producing a 20% fall in FEV1 and 40% fall in Vp30 (PC20FEV1 and PC40Vp30), was measured at 3 and 7 h after inhaling the agonists, then on days 1, 3, 7 and 14. Inhalation of bradykinin caused rapid bronchoconstriction that peaked at 3-5 min. When compared to placebo, no significant difference in histamine responsiveness was seen after bradykinin in terms of changes in PC20FEV1 values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)