Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gail Darling is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gail Darling.


The Lancet | 2009

Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial

Kathy S. Albain; R. Suzanne Swann; Valerie W. Rusch; Andrew T. Turrisi; Frances A. Shepherd; Colum Smith; Yuhchyau Chen; Robert B. Livingston; Richard H. Feins; David R. Gandara; Willard Fry; Gail Darling; David H. Johnson; Mark R. Green; Robert C. Miller; Joanne Ley; Willliam T Sause; James D. Cox

BACKGROUND Results from phase II studies in patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer with ipsilateral mediastinal nodal metastases (N2) have shown the feasibility of resection after concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with promising rates of survival. We therefore did this phase III trial to compare concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by resection with standard concurrent chemotherapy and definitive radiotherapy without resection. METHODS Patients with stage T1-3pN2M0 non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to concurrent induction chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin [50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36] and etoposide [50 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33]) plus radiotherapy (45 Gy) in multiple academic and community hospitals. If no progression, patients in group 1 underwent resection and those in group 2 continued radiotherapy uninterrupted up to 61 Gy. Two additional cycles of cisplatin and etoposide were given in both groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002550. FINDINGS 202 patients (median age 59 years, range 31-77) were assigned to group 1 and 194 (61 years, 32-78) to group 2. Median OS was 23.6 months (IQR 9.0-not reached) in group 1 versus 22.2 months (9.4-52.7) in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87 [0.70-1.10]; p=0.24). Number of patients alive at 5 years was 37 (point estimate 27%) in group 1 and 24 (point estimate 20%) in group 2 (odds ratio 0.63 [0.36-1.10]; p=0.10). With N0 status at thoracotomy, the median OS was 34.4 months (IQR 15.7-not reached; 19 [point estimate 41%] patients alive at 5 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) was better in group 1 than in group 2, median 12.8 months (5.3-42.2) vs 10.5 months (4.8-20.6), HR 0.77 [0.62-0.96]; p=0.017); the number of patients without disease progression at 5 years was 32 (point estimate 22%) versus 13 (point estimate 11%), respectively. Neutropenia and oesophagitis were the main grade 3 or 4 toxicities associated with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in group 1 (77 [38%] and 20 [10%], respectively) and group 2 (80 [41%] and 44 [23%], respectively). In group 1, 16 (8%) deaths were treatment related versus four (2%) in group 2. In an exploratory analysis, OS was improved for patients who underwent lobectomy, but not pneumonectomy, versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without resection (preferably lobectomy) are options for patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer. FUNDING National Cancer Institute, Canadian Cancer Society, and National Cancer Institute of Canada.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2011

Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma: Results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

Gail Darling; Mark S. Allen; Paul A. Decker; Karla V. Ballman; Richard A. Malthaner; Richard Inculet; David R. Jones; Robert J. McKenna; Rodney J. Landreneau; Valerie W. Rusch; Joe B. Putnam

OBJECTIVE To determine whether mediastinal lymph node dissection improves survival compared with mediastinal lymph node sampling in patients undergoing resection for N0 or nonhilar N1, T1, or T2 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS Patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent sampling of 2R, 4R, 7, and 10R for right-sided tumors and 5, 6, 7, and 10L for left-sided tumors. If all tumors were negative for malignancy, patients were randomized to no further lymph node sampling (mediastinal lymph node sampling) or complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. RESULTS Of 1111 patients randomized, 1023 (mediastinal lymph node sampling in 498, mediastinal lymph node dissection in 525) were eligible and evaluable. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, histology, cancer location, type or extent of resection, and pathologic stage. Occult N2 disease was found in 21 patients in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 435 patients (43%) have died: mediastinal lymph node sampling in 217 (44%) and mediastinal lymph node dissection in 218 (42%). The median survival is 8.1 years for mediastinal lymph node sampling and 8.5 years for mediastinal lymph node dissection (P = .25). The 5-year disease-free survival was 69% (95% confidence interval, 64-74) in the mediastinal lymph node sampling group and 68% (95% confidence interval, 64-73) years in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group (P = .92). There was no difference in local (P = .52), regional (P = .10), or distant (P = .76) recurrence between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS If systematic and thorough presection sampling of the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is negative, mediastinal lymph node dissection does not improve survival in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, but these results are not generalizable to patients staged radiographically or those with higher stage tumors.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007

Three-gene prognostic classifier for early-stage non small-cell lung cancer.

Suzanne K. Lau; Paul C. Boutros; Melania Pintilie; Fiona Blackhall; Chang Qi Zhu; Dan Strumpf; Michael R. Johnston; Gail Darling; Shaf Keshavjee; Thomas K. Waddell; Ni Liu; Davina Lau; Linda Z. Penn; Frances A. Shepherd; Igor Jurisica; Sandy D. Der; Ming-Sound Tsao

PURPOSE Several microarray studies have reported gene expression signatures that classify non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients into different prognostic groups. However, the prognostic gene lists reported to date overlap poorly across studies, and few have been validated independently using more quantitative assay methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS The expression of 158 putative prognostic genes identified in previous microarray studies was analyzed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the tumors of 147 NSCLC patients. Concordance indices and risk scores were used to identify a stage-independent set of genes that could classify patients with significantly different prognoses. RESULTS We have identified a three-gene classifier (STX1A, HIF1A, and CCR7) for overall survival (hazard ratio = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.2; P < .001). The classifier was also able to stratify stage I and II patients and further improved the predictive ability of clinical factors such as histology and tumor stage. The predictive value of this three-gene classifier was validated in two large independent microarray data sets from Harvard and Duke Universities. CONCLUSION We have identified a new three-gene classifier that is independent of and improves on stage to stratify early-stage NSCLC patients with significantly different prognoses. This classifier may be tested further for its potential value to improve the selection of resected NSCLC patients in adjuvant therapy.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2010

Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial.

Walter J. Scott; Mark S. Allen; Gail Darling; Bryan F. Meyers; Paul A. Decker; Joe B. Putnam; Robert W. Mckenna; Rodney J. Landrenau; David R. Jones; Richard Inculet; Richard A. Malthaner

OBJECTIVE Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy remains controversial. We compared outcomes from participants in a randomized study comparing lymph node sampling versus dissection for early-stage lung cancer who underwent either video-assisted thoracoscopic or open lobectomy. METHODS Data from 964 participants in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 trial were used to construct propensity scores for video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy (based on age, gender, histology, performance status, tumor location, and T1 vs T2). Propensity scores were used to estimate the adjusted risks of short-term outcomes of surgery. Patients were classified into 5 equal-sized groups and compared using conditional logistic regression or repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS A total of 752 patients (66 video-assisted and 686 open procedures) were analyzed on the basis of propensity score stratification. Median operative time was shorter for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopy 117.5 minutes vs open 171.5 minutes; P < .001). Median total number of lymph nodes retrieved (dissection group only) was similar (video-assisted thoracoscopy 15 nodes vs open 19 nodes; P = .147), as were instances of R1/R2 resection (video-assisted thoracoscopy 0% vs open 2.3%; P = .368). Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy had less atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy (0% vs 6.3%, P = .035), fewer chest tubes draining greater than 7 days (1.5% vs 10.8%; P = .029), and shorter median length of stay (5 days vs 7 days; P < .001). Operative mortality was similar (video-assisted thoracoscopy 0% vs open 1.6%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing video-assisted lobectomy had fewer respiratory complications and shorter length of stay. These data suggest video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe in patients with resectable lung cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the oncologic equivalency of video-assisted versus open lobectomy.


Annals of Surgery | 2015

International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)

Donald E. Low; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C. Chang; Gail Darling; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; S Michael Griffin; Arnulf H. Hölscher; Wayne L. Hofstetter; Blair A. Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; John C. Kucharczuk; Simon Law; Toni Lerut; Nick Maynard; Manuel Pera; Jeffrey H. Peters; C. S. Pramesh; John V. Reynolds; B. Mark Smithers; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

INTRODUCTION Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes. METHODS The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group comprised 21 high-volume esophageal surgeons from 14 countries, supported by all the major thoracic and upper gastrointestinal professional societies. Delphi surveys and group meetings were used to achieve a consensus on standardized methods for defining complications and quality measures that could be collected in institutional databases and national audits. RESULTS A standardized list of complications was created to provide a template for recording individual complications associated with esophagectomy. Where possible, these were linked to preexisting international definitions. A Delphi survey facilitated production of specific definitions for anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leak, and recurrent nerve palsy. An additional Delphi survey documented consensus regarding critical quality parameters recommended for routine inclusion in databases. These quality parameters were documentation on mortality, comorbidities, completeness of data collection, blood transfusion, grading of complication severity, changes in level of care, discharge location, and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS The proposed system for defining and recording perioperative complications associated with esophagectomy provides an infrastructure to standardize international data collection and facilitate future comparative studies and quality improvement projects.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2006

The Effect of Reflux and Bile Acid Aspiration on the Lung Allograft and Its Surfactant and Innate Immunity Molecules SP-A and SP-D

F. D'Ovidio; Marco Mura; R. Ridsdale; Hiroki Takahashi; Thomas K. Waddell; Michael Hutcheon; Denis Hadjiliadis; Lianne G. Singer; A. Pierre; C. Chaparro; Carlos Gutierrez; L. Miller; Gail Darling; Mingyao Liu; M. Post; Shaf Keshavjee

Gastro‐esophageal reflux and related pulmonary bile acid aspiration were prospectively investigated as possible contributors to postlung transplant bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). We also studied the impact of aspiration on pulmonary surfactant collectin proteins SP‐A and SP‐D and on surfactant phospholipids—all important components of innate immunity in the lung. Proximal and distal esophageal 24‐h pH testing and broncho‐alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) bile acid assays were performed prospectively at 3‐month posttransplant in 50 patients. BALF was also assayed for SP‐A, SP‐D and phospholipids expressed as ratio to total lipids: phosphatidylcholine; dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine; phosphatidylglycerol (PG); phosphatidylinositol; sphingomyelin (SM) and lysophosphatidylcholine. Actuarial freedom from BOS was assessed.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2009

The Management of Thymoma: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline

Conrad Falkson; Andrea Bezjak; Gail Darling; Richard Gregg; Richard A. Malthaner; Donna E. Maziak; Edward Yu; Christopher A. Smith; Sheila McNair; Yee C. Ung; William K. Evans

Introduction: Thymoma is a rare tumor for which there is little randomized evidence to guide treatment. Because of the lack of high-quality evidence, a formal consensus-based approach was used to develop recommendations on treatment. Methods: A systematic refview of the literature was performed. Recommendations were formed from available evidence and developed through a two-round modified Delphi consensus approach. Results: The treatment recommendations are summarized as follows: Stage I—complete resection of the entire thymus without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Stage II—complete resection of the entire thymus with consideration of adjuvant radiation for high-risk tumors. Stage IIIA—surgery either initially or after neoadjuvant therapy, or surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Stage IIIB—treatment may include a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and/or surgery, or if technically possible, surgery in combination with chemoradiotherapy (concurrent cisplatin based). For bulky tumors, consideration should be given to sequential chemotherapy followed by radiation. Stage IVA—as per stage III, with surgery only if metastases can be resected. Stage IVB—treatment on an individual case basis (no generic recommendations). Recurrent disease—consider surgery, radiation, and/or chemoradiation. Chemoradiation should be considered in all medically inoperable and technically inoperable patients. Conclusion: Consensus was achieved on these recommendations, which serve to provide practical guidance to the physician treating this rare disease.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2011

Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Compared with Invasive Mediastinal Staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of Mediastinal Staging in the Early Lung Positron Emission Tomography Trial

Gail Darling; Donna E. Maziak; Richard Inculet; Karen Y. Gulenchyn; Albert Driedger; Yee C. Ung; Chu-Shu Gu; M. Sara Kuruvilla; Kathryn J. Cline; Jim A. Julian; William K. Evans; Mark N. Levine

Introduction: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require careful preoperative staging to define resectability for potential cure. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18FDG PET-CT) is widely used to stage NSCLC. If the mediastinum is positive on PET-CT examination, some practitioners conclude that the patient is inoperable and refer the patient for nonsurgical treatment. Methods: In this analysis of a previously reported trial comparing PET-CT with conventional imaging in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinical stage I, II, or IIIA NSCLC, we determined the accuracy of PET-CT in mediastinal staging compared with invasive mediastinal staging either by mediastinoscopy alone or by mediastinoscopy combined with thoracotomy. Results: All 149 patients had mediastinal nodal staging at mediastinoscopy alone (14), thoracotomy alone (64), or both (71). The sensitivity of PET-CT was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48–85%), and specificity was 94% (95% CI, 88–97%). Of 22 patients with a PET-CT interpreted as positive for mediastinal nodes, 8 did not have tumor. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 64% (95% CI, 43–80%) and 95% (95% CI, 90–98%), respectively. Based on PET-CT alone, eight patients would have been denied potentially curative surgery if the mediastinal abnormalities detected by PET-CT had not been evaluated with an invasive mediastinal procedure. Conclusions: PET-CT assessment of the mediastinum is associated with a clinically relevant false-positive result. Our study confirms the need for pathologic confirmation of mediastinal lymph node abnormalities detected by PET-CT.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada

Sinead Cuffe; Christopher M. Booth; Yingwei Peng; Gail Darling; Gavin Li; Weidong Kong; William J. Mackillop; Frances A. Shepherd

PURPOSE Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is predominantly a disease of the elderly. Retrospective analyses of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 trial and the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE) meta-analysis suggest that the elderly benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the elderly were under-represented in these studies, raising concerns regarding the reproducibility of the study results in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS By using the Ontario Cancer Registry, we identified 6,304 patients with NSCLC who were treated with surgical resection from 2001 to 2006. Registry data were linked to electronic treatment records. Uptake of chemotherapy was compared across age groups: younger than 70, 70 to 74, 75 to 79, and ≥ 80 years. As a proxy of survival benefit from chemotherapy, we compared survival of patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 with survival of those diagnosed from 2001 to 2003. Hospitalization rates within 6 to 24 weeks of surgery served as a proxy of severe chemotherapy-related toxicity. RESULTS In all, 2,763 (43.8%) of 6,304 surgical patients were elderly (age ≥ 70 years). Uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly increased from 3.3% (2001 to 2003) to 16.2% (2004 to 2006). Among evaluable elderly patients, 70% received cisplatin and 28% received carboplatin-based regimens. Requirements for dose adjustments or drug substitutions were similar across age groups. Hospitalization rates within 6 to 24 weeks of surgery were similar across age groups (28.0% for patients age < 70 years; 27.8% for patients age ≥ 70 years; P = .54). Four-year survival of elderly patients increased significantly (47.1% for patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2003; 49.9% for patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006; P = .01). Survival improved in all subgroups except patients age ≥ 80 years. CONCLUSION Uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC increased in patients age 70 years or older following reporting of pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials, but it remained below that for patients younger than age 70 years. Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with significant survival benefit in the elderly (age ≥ 70 years), with tolerability apparently similar to that of patients who are younger than age 70 years.


Chest | 2011

Number of Lymph Nodes Harvested From a Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy: Results of the Randomized, Prospective American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

Gail Darling; Mark S. Allen; Paul A. Decker; Karla V. Ballman; Richard A. Malthaner; Richard Inculet; David R. Jones; Robert J. McKenna; Rodney J. Landreneau; Joe B. Putnam

BACKGROUND Lymph node status is a major determinant of stage and survival in patients with lung cancer; however, little information is available about the expected yield of a mediastinal lymphadenectomy. METHODS The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 prospective, randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling vs complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection enrolled 1,111 patients from July 1999 to February 2004. Data from 524 patients who underwent complete mediastinal lymph node dissection were analyzed to determine the number of lymph nodes obtained. RESULTS The median number of additional lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy following systematic sampling was 18 with a range of one to 72 for right-sided tumors, and 18 with a range of four to 69 for left-sided tumors. The median number of N2 nodes harvested was 11 on the right and 12 on the left. A median of at least six nodes was harvested from at least three stations in 99% of patients, and 90% of patients had at least 10 nodes harvested from three stations. Overall, 21 patients (4%) were found to have occult N2 disease. CONCLUSIONS Although high variability exists in the actual number of lymph nodes obtained from various nodal stations, complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy removes one or more lymph nodes from all mediastinal stations. Adequate mediastinal lymphadenectomy should include stations 2R, 4R, 7, 8, and 9 for right-sided cancers and stations 4L, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 for left-sided cancers. Six or more nodes were resected in 99% of patients in this study. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00003831; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gail Darling's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shaf Keshavjee

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Pierre

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Geoffrey Liu

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rebecca Wong

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer J. Knox

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frances A. Shepherd

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc de Perrot

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcelo Cypel

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge