Gailen L. Hite
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gailen L. Hite.
Journal of Financial Economics | 1983
Gailen L. Hite; James E. Owers
Abstract We examine security price reactions around the announcements of 123 voluntary spin-offs by 116 firms between 1963 and 1981 involving a pro-rata distribution of the common stock of a subsidiary to the stockholders of the parent firm. The median spin-off in the sample is 6.6% of the original equity value and is associated with an abnormal return of 7.0% from 50 days prior to the announcement through completion of the spin-off. No evidence is found to indicate the gains to stockholders represent wealth transfers from senior securityholders. Over the entire event period we find positive gains for firms engaging in spin-offs to facilitate mergers or to separate diverse operating units but negative returns to firms responding to legal and/or regulatory difficulties. In the two-day interval surrounding the first press announcement we find positive average excess returns for all groups.
Journal of Financial Economics | 1987
Gailen L. Hite; James E. Owers; Ronald C. Rogers
Abstract We investigate the valuation consequences of voluntary proposals to sell part or all of a corporations assets. For partial sell-offs, successful sellers and buyers reap statistically significant abnormal returns of 1.66% and 0.83%, respectively. Unsuccessful sellers realize gains at the bid announcement of 1.41% that are lost at the offer termination. In contrast, proposals to liquidate the firm are associated with significant average abnormal returns of 12.24%. We interpret these findings as evidence that asset sales are associated with the movement of resources to higher-valued uses rather than as evidence of market mispricing before the divestiture announcements.
Journal of Financial Economics | 1998
Rakesh Bali; Gailen L. Hite
Abstract Since prices are constrained to discrete tick multiples while dividends are essentially continuous, ex day price changes will not equal dividends. We argue that the expected price drop is strictly less than the dividend but within one tick of the dividend. The price-drop-to-dividend ratio will (i) be less than one, (ii) increase with dividends generally, and (iii) decline between tick multiples, giving a sawtooth pattern in the data. Since dividends and dividend yields are highly correlated, discreteness will give the impression of tax-induced dividend clienteles even if there are none. Taxable cash dividends and nontaxable stock dividends exhibit similar ex day behavior.
Journal of Accounting and Economics | 1982
Gailen L. Hite; Michael S. Long
Abstract In the Sixties, the qualified stock option was the predominant form of long-term incentive compensation contract for major industrial firms in the U.S. In the early Seventies these same firms replaced their tax-qualified stock option plans with non-qualified sttock options and later modified these plans to include a variety of new contingent compensation arrangements, some of which were based on accounting numbers instead of stock prices. This paper develops the hypothesis that tax considerations play an important role in explaining the form of compensation contracts. The pattern and timing of changes in the compensation plans of the top 100 industrial firms provides evidence consistent with the tax hypothesis.
Journal of Financial Economics | 1977
Gailen L. Hite
Abstract This paper uses the Capital Asset Pricing Model to link the financial policy of the firm with the firms real decisions including output, input mix, and investment. Whereas the M-M leverage theorems were derived for a given set of real decisions, this paper considers the impact of leverage on firm optimization when interest is tax-deductible. In general, leverage impacts upon factor proportions, capital stock, and output decisions. In the final proposition, the author demonstrates that the ‘cost of capital’ need not decline with leverage even in perfect capital markets and with default-free debt.
Real Estate Economics | 1984
Gailen L. Hite; James E. Owers; Ronald C. Rogers
In this paper, we consider spin-offs as a vehicle to separate real estate operations from other real estate and/or non-real estate operations. For a sample of 33 such spin-offs announced and completed between 1962 and 1982, we document significantly positive abnormal returns around spin-off announcements. Using the standard event-time methodology, we find average excess returns of 5.7% in the two-day interval surrounding the first Wall Street Journal report of a pending spin-off. While the gains associated with spin-offs by real estate firms are positive on average, they are small in comparison to the 9.1% two-day announcement period abnormal returns surrounding proposals by non-real estate firms to divest real estate operations. Copyright American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.
Real Estate Economics | 1981
Gailen L. Hite; Anthony B. Sanders
The advantages of using an accelerated form of depreciation are significantly reduced for investors with substantial wage incomes. Excess depreciation is treated as a tax preference item under current tax rules which has the effect of imposing significant tax penalties on the high wage income individual who invests in rental property and who qualifies for the maximum tax on personal service income. Under certain circumstances accelerated depreciation methods may be inferior to the straight-line method. The explanation for this phenomenon lies in the interaction between tax preference income and the maximum tax. Copyright American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.
Real Estate Economics | 1982
Gailen L. Hite; Raymond J. Krasniewski
This paper examines changes in cost recovery (i.e., depreciation) patterns for realty resulting from the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. While the Act provides for much shorter write-offs than were previously available, it also imposes more severe recapture penalties for commercial property that has been depreciated according to the new Accelerated Cost Recovery System. An analysis of discounted cash flows is used to predict investor selection of the most advantageous cost recovery method. Although the accelerated system is generally preferable for residential realty, there are many situations where a taxpayer owning commercial property will elect the optional fifteen-year straight-line method. Copyright American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.
Journal of Finance | 1989
Gailen L. Hite; Michael R. Vetsuypens
Archive | 1985
K.C. Chen; David C. Cheng; Gailen L. Hite