Gal Haimovich
Weizmann Institute of Science
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gal Haimovich.
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology | 2015
Adina R. Buxbaum; Gal Haimovich; Robert H. Singer
The spatial regulation of protein translation is an efficient way to create functional and structural asymmetries in cells. Recent research has furthered our understanding of how individual cells spatially organize protein synthesis, by applying innovative technology to characterize the relationship between mRNAs and their regulatory proteins, single-mRNA trafficking dynamics, physiological effects of abrogating mRNA localization in vivo and for endogenous mRNA labelling. The implementation of new imaging technologies has yielded valuable information on mRNA localization, for example, by observing single molecules in tissues. The emerging movements and localization patterns of mRNAs in morphologically distinct unicellular organisms and in neurons have illuminated shared and specialized mechanisms of mRNA localization, and this information is complemented by transgenic and biochemical techniques that reveal the biological consequences of mRNA mislocalization.
Genes & Development | 2008
Vicky Goler-Baron; Michael Selitrennik; Oren Barkai; Gal Haimovich; Rona Lotan; Mordechai Choder
Maintaining appropriate mRNAs levels is vital for any living cell. mRNA synthesis in the nucleus by RNA polymerase II core enzyme (Pol II) and mRNA decay by cytoplasmic machineries determine these levels. Yet, little is known about possible cross-talk between these processes. The yeast Rpb4/7 is a nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling heterodimer that interacts with Pol II and with mRNAs and is required for mRNA decay in the cytoplasm. Here we show that interaction of Rpb4/7 with mRNAs and eventual decay of these mRNAs in the cytoplasm depends on association of Rpb4/7 with Pol II in the nucleus. We propose that, following its interaction with Pol II, Rpb4/7 functions in transcription, interacts with the transcript cotranscriptionally and travels with it to the cytoplasm to stimulate mRNA decay. Hence, by recruiting Rpb4/7, Pol II governs not only transcription but also mRNA decay.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2013
Gal Haimovich; Mordechai Choder; Robert H. Singer; Tatjana Trcek
Recent years have seen a rise in publications demonstrating coupling between transcription and mRNA decay. This coupling most often accompanies cellular processes that involve transitions in gene expression patterns, for example during mitotic division and cellular differentiation and in response to cellular stress. Transcription can affect the mRNA fate by multiple mechanisms. The most novel finding is the process of co-transcriptional imprinting of mRNAs with proteins, which in turn regulate cytoplasmic mRNA stability. Transcription therefore is not only a catalyst of mRNA synthesis but also provides a platform that enables imprinting, which coordinates between transcription and mRNA decay. Here we present an overview of the literature, which provides the evidence of coupling between transcription and decay, review the mechanisms and regulators by which the two processes are coupled, discuss why such coupling is beneficial and present a new model for regulation of gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA Decay mechanisms.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Judith Somekh; Gal Haimovich; Adi Guterman; Dov Dori; Mordechai Choder
Biologists are required to integrate large amounts of data to construct a working model of the system under investigation. This model is often informal and stored mentally or textually, making it prone to contain undetected inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or even contradictions, not much less than a representation in free natural language. Using Object-Process Methodology (OPM), a formal yet visual and humanly accessible conceptual modeling language, we have created an executable working model of the mRNA decay process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as the import of its components to the nucleus following mRNA decay. We show how our model, which incorporates knowledge from 43 articles, can reproduce outcomes that match the experimental findings, evaluate hypotheses, and predict new possible outcomes. Moreover, we were able to analyze the effects of the mRNA decay model perturbations related to gene and interaction deletions, and predict the nuclear import of certain decay factors, which we then verified experimentally. In particular, we verified experimentally the hypothesis that Rpb4p, Lsm1p, and Pan2p remain bound to the RNA 3′-untralslated region during the entire process of the 5′ to 3′ degradation of the RNA open reading frame. The model has also highlighted erroneous hypotheses that indeed were not in line with the experimental outcomes. Beyond the scientific value of these specific findings, this work demonstrates the value of the conceptual model as an in silico vehicle for hypotheses generation and testing, which can reinforce, and often even replace, risky, costlier wet lab experiments.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2016
Gal Haimovich; Osnat Cohen-Zontag; Jeffrey E. Gerst
Peroxisomes are distinct membrane-enclosed organelles involved in the β-oxidation of fatty acids and synthesis of ether phospholipids (e.g. plasmalogens), as well as cholesterol and its derivatives (e.g. bile acids). Peroxisomes comprise a distinct and highly segregated subset of cellular proteins, including those of the peroxisome membrane and the interior matrix, and while the mechanisms of protein import into peroxisomes have been extensively studied, they are not fully understood. Here we will examine the potential role of RNA trafficking and localized translation on protein import into peroxisomes and its role in peroxisome biogenesis and function. Given that RNAs encoding peroxisome biogenesis (PEX) and matrix proteins have been found in association with the endoplasmic reticulum and peroxisomes, it suggests that localized translation may play a significant role in the import pathways of these different peroxisomal constituents.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017
Gal Haimovich; Christopher Ecker; Margaret Dunagin; Elliott Eggan; Arjun Raj; Jeffrey E. Gerst; Robert H. Singer
Significance mRNA molecules convey genetic information within cells, beginning from genes in the nucleus to ribosomes in the cell body, where they are translated into proteins. Here we show a mode of transferring genetic information from one cell to another. Contrary to previous publications suggesting that mRNAs transfer via extracellular vesicles, we provide visual and quantitative data showing that mRNAs transfer via membrane nanotubes and direct cell-to-cell contact. We predict that this process has a major role in regulating local cellular environments with respect to tissue development and maintenance and cellular responses to stress, interactions with parasites, tissue transplants, and the tumor microenvironment. RNAs have been shown to undergo transfer between mammalian cells, although the mechanism behind this phenomenon and its overall importance to cell physiology is not well understood. Numerous publications have suggested that RNAs (microRNAs and incomplete mRNAs) undergo transfer via extracellular vesicles (e.g., exosomes). However, in contrast to a diffusion-based transfer mechanism, we find that full-length mRNAs undergo direct cell–cell transfer via cytoplasmic extensions characteristic of membrane nanotubes (mNTs), which connect donor and acceptor cells. By employing a simple coculture experimental model and using single-molecule imaging, we provide quantitative data showing that mRNAs are transferred between cells in contact. Examples of mRNAs that undergo transfer include those encoding GFP, mouse β-actin, and human Cyclin D1, BRCA1, MT2A, and HER2. We show that intercellular mRNA transfer occurs in all coculture models tested (e.g., between primary cells, immortalized cells, and in cocultures of immortalized human and murine cells). Rapid mRNA transfer is dependent upon actin but is independent of de novo protein synthesis and is modulated by stress conditions and gene-expression levels. Hence, this work supports the hypothesis that full-length mRNAs undergo transfer between cells through a refined structural connection. Importantly, unlike the transfer of miRNA or RNA fragments, this process of communication transfers genetic information that could potentially alter the acceptor cell proteome. This phenomenon may prove important for the proper development and functioning of tissues as well as for host–parasite or symbiotic interactions.
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology | 2015
Adina R. Buxbaum; Gal Haimovich; Robert H. Singer
In the right place at the right time: visualizing and understanding mRNA localization Adina R. Buxbaum, Gal Haimovich and Robert H. Singer Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 16, 95–109 (2015) In the original article, the two reference citations in the following sentence were incorrect: “... conversely, only 600–800 mammalian RBPs have been recognized so far (REFS 88, 89; see the RBP database) ...”. The correct references have now been added to the online version of this articleas as references 177 and 178.
bioRxiv | 2017
Gal Haimovich; Christopher Ecker; Margaret Dunagin; Elliot Eggan; Arjun Raj; Jeffrey E. Gerst; Robert H. Singer
RNAs have been shown to undergo transfer between mammalian cells, though the mechanism behind this phenomenon and its overall importance to cell physiology is not well understood. Numerous publications have suggested that RNAs (microRNAs and incomplete mRNAs) undergo transfer via extracellular vesicles (e.g. exosomes). However, in contrast to a diffusion-based transfer mechanism, we find that full-length mRNAs undergo direct cell-cell transfer via cytoplasmic extensions, called membrane nanotubes (mNTs), which connect donor and acceptor cells. By employing a simple co-culture experimental model and using single-molecule imaging, we provide quantitative data showing that mRNAs are transferred between cells in contact. Examples of mRNAs that undergo transfer include those encoding GFP, mouse β-actin, and human Cyclin D1, BRCA1, MT2A, and HER2. We show that intercellular mRNA transfer occurs in all co-culture models tested (e.g. between primary cells, immortalized cells, and in co-cultures of immortalized human and murine cells). Rapid mRNA transfer is dependent upon actin, but independent of de novo protein synthesis, and is modulated by stress conditions and gene expression levels. Hence, this work supports the hypothesis that full-length mRNAs undergo transfer between cells through a refined structural connection. Importantly, unlike the transfer of miRNA or RNA fragments, this process of communication transfers genetic information that could potentially alter the acceptor cell proteome. This phenomenon may prove important for the proper development and functioning of tissues, as well as host-parasite or symbiotic interactions. Significance Messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules convey genetic information within cells, beginning from genes in the nucleus to ribosomes in the cell body, where they are translated into proteins. Here, we show a novel mode of transferring genetic information from one cell to another. Contrary to previous publications suggesting that mRNAs transfer via extracellular vesicles, we provide visual and quantitative data showing that mRNAs transfer via membrane nanotubes and direct cell-to-cell contact. We predict that this process has a major role in regulating local cellular environments with respect to tissue development and maintenance, cellular responses to stress, interactions with parasites, tissue transplants, and the tumor microenvironment. Author contributions G.H., A.R. and R.H.S. conceived the research and designed the experiments; C.M.E. performed and analyzed the experiments with WM983b+/-GFP, including transwell and exosomes; M.C.D. and E.E. performed and analyzed the WM983b/NIH393 co-culture experiments; G.H. performed and analyzed all other experiments; and G.H., J.E.G, A.R. and R.H.S. wrote the paper.
Cell | 2005
Iris Kamer; Rachel Sarig; Yehudit Zaltsman; Hagit Niv; Galia Oberkovitz; Limor Regev; Gal Haimovich; Yaniv Lerenthal; Richard C. Marcellus; Atan Gross
Cell | 2013
Gal Haimovich; Daniel A. Medina; Sebastien Z. Causse; Manuel Garber; Gonzalo Millán-Zambrano; Oren Barkai; Sebastián Chávez; José E. Pérez-Ortín; Xavier Darzacq; Mordechai Choder