Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Galia Rahav is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Galia Rahav.


The Lancet | 2016

Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): A phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial

Johan Maertens; Issam Raad; Kieren A. Marr; Thomas F. Patterson; Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis; Oliver A. Cornely; Eric J. Bow; Galia Rahav; Dionysios Neofytos; Mickael Aoun; John W. Baddley; Michael Giladi; Werner J. Heinz; Raoul Herbrecht; William W. Hope; Meinolf Karthaus; Dong-Gun Lee; Olivier Lortholary; Vicki A. Morrison; Ilana Oren; Dominik Selleslag; Shmuel Shoham; George R. Thompson; Misun Lee; Rochelle Maher; Anne Hortense Schmitt-Hoffmann; Bernhardt Zeiher; Andrew J. Ullmann

BACKGROUND Isavuconazole is a novel triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. The SECURE trial assessed efficacy and safety of isavuconazole versus voriconazole in patients with invasive mould disease. METHODS This was a phase 3, double-blind, global multicentre, comparative-group study. Patients with suspected invasive mould disease were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using an interactive voice-web response system, stratified by geographical region, allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, and active malignant disease at baseline, to receive isavuconazonium sulfate 372 mg (prodrug; equivalent to 200 mg isavuconazole; intravenously three times a day on days 1 and 2, then either intravenously or orally once daily) or voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 1, 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 2, then intravenously 4 mg/kg twice daily or orally 200 mg twice daily from day 3 onwards). We tested non-inferiority of the primary efficacy endpoint of all-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) using a 10% non-inferiority margin. Safety was assessed in patients who received the first dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00412893. FINDINGS 527 adult patients were randomly assigned (258 received study medication per group) between March 7, 2007, and March 28, 2013. All-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 for the ITT population was 19% with isavuconazole (48 patients) and 20% with voriconazole (52 patients), with an adjusted treatment difference of -1·0% (95% CI -7·8 to 5·7). Because the upper bound of the 95% CI (5·7%) did not exceed 10%, non-inferiority was shown. Most patients (247 [96%] receiving isavuconazole and 255 [98%] receiving voriconazole) had treatment-emergent adverse events (p=0·122); the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (174 [68%] vs 180 [69%]) and infections and infestations (152 [59%] vs 158 [61%]). Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events by system organ class were similar overall. However, isavuconazole-treated patients had a lower frequency of hepatobiliary disorders (23 [9%] vs 42 [16%]; p=0·016), eye disorders (39 [15%] vs 69 [27%]; p=0·002), and skin or subcutaneous tissue disorders (86 [33%] vs 110 [42%]; p=0·037). Drug-related adverse events were reported in 109 (42%) patients receiving isavuconazole and 155 (60%) receiving voriconazole (p<0·001). INTERPRETATION Isavuconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for the primary treatment of suspected invasive mould disease. Isavuconazole was well tolerated compared with voriconazole, with fewer study-drug-related adverse events. Our results support the use of isavuconazole for the primary treatment of patients with invasive mould disease. FUNDING Astellas Pharma Global Development, Basilea Pharmaceutica International.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2011

Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens

Ethan Rubinstein; Tahaniyat Lalani; G. Ralph Corey; Zeina A. Kanafani; Esteban C. Nannini; Marcelo G. Rocha; Galia Rahav; Michael S. Niederman; Marin H. Kollef; Andrew F. Shorr; Patrick Lee; Arnold Lentnek; Carlos M. Luna; Jean-Yves Fagon; Antoni Torres; Michael M. Kitt; Fredric C. Genter; Steven L. Barriere; H. David Friedland; Martin E. Stryjewski

The results from two methodologically identical double-blind studies indicate that telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin based on clinical response in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-positive pathogens.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2002

Listeria monocytogenes infection in Israel and review of cases worldwide.

Yardena Siegman-Igra; Rotem Levin; Miriam Weinberger; Yoav Golan; David Schwartz; Zmira Samra; Hana Konigsberger; Amos M. Yinnon; Galia Rahav; Nathan Keller; Nail Bisharat; Jehuda Karpuch; Renato Finkelstein; Michael Alkan; Zvi Landau; Julia Novikov; David Hassin; Carlos Rudnicki; Ruth Kitzes; Shmouel Ovadia; Zvi Shimoni; Ruth Lang; Tamar Shohat

Listeria monocytogenes, an uncommon foodborne pathogen, is increasingly recognized as a cause of life-threatening disease. A marked increase in reported cases of listeriosis during 1998 motivated a retrospective nationwide survey of the infection in Israel. From 1995 to 1999, 161 cases were identified; 70 (43%) were perinatal infections, with a fetal mortality rate of 45%. Most (74%) of the 91 nonperinatal infections involved immunocompromised patients with malignancies, chronic liver disease, chronic renal failure, or diabetes mellitus. The common clinical syndromes in these patients were primary bacteremia (47%) and meningitis (28%). The crude case-fatality rate in this group was 38%, with a higher death rate in immunocompromised patients.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2009

Clinical Features of Heteroresistant Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia versus Those of Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia

Yasmin Maor; Michal Hagin; Natasha Belausov; Nathan Keller; Debbi Ben-David; Galia Rahav

BACKGROUND Heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) infections are emerging, but their clinical significance remains unclear. Our objective was to compare patients who had hVISA bacteremia with patients who had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. METHODS A total of 27 case patients with hVISA bacteremia were compared with 223 control patients with MRSA bacteremia. Medical records of all patients were reviewed, and factors independently associated with infection-related mortality were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS Patients with hVISA bacteremia were not significantly different from those with MRSA bacteremia with respect to age, comorbidities, duration of hospital stay, and infection-attributable mortality. However, the median duration of bacteremia among patients with hVISA was significantly longer than that among patients with MRSA (12 vs. 2 days; P = .005), and patients with hVISA had a greater prevalence of complications, such as endocarditis (18.5% vs. 3.6%; P = .007) and osteomyelitis (25.9% vs. 7.2%, respectively; P = .006). Rifampin resistance emerged more frequently among hVISA isolates than among MRSA isolates (44% vs. 5.9%; P < .001). Factors independently associated with infection-related mortality in all patients were age, Charlson comorbidity index, female sex, and being bedridden. CONCLUSIONS hVISA bacteremia was significantly associated with prolonged bacteremia duration, greater rates of complications, and emergence of rifampin resistance, compared with MRSA bacteremia. However, no significant difference in mortality existed between patients with hVISA bacteremia and those with MRSA bacteremia.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2017

Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

Mark H. Wilcox; Dale N. Gerding; Ian R. Poxton; Ciaran P. Kelly; Richard P. Nathan; Thomas Birch; Oliver A. Cornely; Galia Rahav; Emilio Bouza; Christine G. Lee; Grant Jenkin; Werner Jensen; You-Sun Kim; Junichi Yoshida; Lori J. Gabryelski; Alison Pedley; Karen Eves; Robert W. Tipping; Dalya Guris; Nicholas A. Kartsonis; Mary-Beth Dorr

Background Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Recurrences are common after antibiotic therapy. Actoxumab and bezlotoxumab are human monoclonal antibodies against C. difficile toxins A and B, respectively. Methods We conducted two double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials, MODIFY I and MODIFY II, involving 2655 adults receiving oral standard‐of‐care antibiotics for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection. Participants received an infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight), actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram each), or placebo; actoxumab alone (10 mg per kilogram) was given in MODIFY I but discontinued after a planned interim analysis. The primary end point was recurrent infection (new episode after initial clinical cure) within 12 weeks after infusion in the modified intention‐to‐treat population. Results In both trials, the rate of recurrent C. difficile infection was significantly lower with bezlotoxumab alone than with placebo (MODIFY I: 17% [67 of 386] vs. 28% [109 of 395]; adjusted difference, ‐10.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], ‐15.9 to ‐4.3; P<0.001; MODIFY II: 16% [62 of 395] vs. 26% [97 of 378]; adjusted difference, ‐9.9 percentage points; 95% CI, ‐15.5 to ‐4.3; P<0.001) and was significantly lower with actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab than with placebo (MODIFY I: 16% [61 of 383] vs. 28% [109 of 395]; adjusted difference, ‐11.6 percentage points; 95% CI, ‐17.4 to ‐5.9; P<0.001; MODIFY II: 15% [58 of 390] vs. 26% [97 of 378]; adjusted difference, ‐10.7 percentage points; 95% CI, ‐16.4 to ‐5.1; P<0.001). In prespecified subgroup analyses (combined data set), rates of recurrent infection were lower in both groups that received bezlotoxumab than in the placebo group in subpopulations at high risk for recurrent infection or for an adverse outcome. The rates of initial clinical cure were 80% with bezlotoxumab alone, 73% with actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab, and 80% with placebo; the rates of sustained cure (initial clinical cure without recurrent infection in 12 weeks) were 64%, 58%, and 54%, respectively. The rates of adverse events were similar among these groups; the most common events were diarrhea and nausea. Conclusions Among participants receiving antibiotic treatment for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection, bezlotoxumab was associated with a substantially lower rate of recurrent infection than placebo and had a safety profile similar to that of placebo. The addition of actoxumab did not improve efficacy. (Funded by Merck; MODIFY I and MODIFY II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01241552 and NCT01513239.)


Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2012

Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections

Debby Ben-David; R. Kordevani; Nathan Keller; Ilana Tal; A. Marzel; Ohad Gal-Mor; Y. Maor; Galia Rahav

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections on mortality. During the study period 42, 68 and 120 patients were identified with carbapenem-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers (ESBL) and susceptible K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections, respectively. Patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae had higher rates of prior antimicrobial exposure, other nosocomial infections, and use of invasive devices. Infection-related mortality was 48% for carbapenem-resistant, 22% for ESBL producers and 17% for susceptible K. pneumoniae. Independent risk factors for infection-related mortality were Pitt bacteraemia score, Charlson score and carbapenem resistance.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2010

Potential role of active surveillance in the control of a hospital-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection.

Debby Ben-David; Yasmin Maor; Nathan Keller; Gili Regev-Yochay; Ilana Tal; Rn Dalit Shachar; Amir Zlotkin; Gill Smollan; Galia Rahav

BACKGROUND The recent emergence of carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae is a major threat for hospitalized patients, and effective strategies are needed. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of an intensified intervention, which included active surveillance, on the incidence of infection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. SETTING Sheba Medical Center, a 1,600-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Tel Hashomer, Israel. DESIGN Quasi-experimental study. METHODS The medical records of all the patients who acquired a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection during 2006 were reviewed. An intensified intervention was initiated in May 2007. In addition to contact precautions, active surveillance was initiated in high-risk units. The incidence of clinical carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection over time was measured, and interrupted time-series analysis was performed. RESULTS The incidence of clinical carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection increased 6.42-fold from the first quarter of 2006 up to the initiation of the intervention. In 2006, of the 120 patients whose clinical microbiologic culture results were positive for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, 67 (56%) developed a nosocomial infection. During the intervention period, the rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae rectal colonization was 9%. Of the 390 patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae colonization or infection, 204 (52%) were identified by screening cultures. There were a total of 12,391 days of contact precautions, and of these, 4,713 (38%) were added as a result of active surveillance. After initiation of infection control measures, we observed a significant decrease in the incidence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection. CONCLUSIONS The use of active surveillance and contact precautions, as part of a multifactorial intervention, may be an effective strategy to decrease rates of nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae colonization or infection.


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2016

Isavuconazole treatment for mucormycosis: a single-arm open-label trial and case-control analysis

Francisco M. Marty; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Oliver A. Cornely; Kathleen M. Mullane; John R. Perfect; George R. Thompson; George Alangaden; Janice M. Brown; David N. Fredricks; Werner J. Heinz; Raoul Herbrecht; Nikolai Klimko; Galina Klyasova; Johan Maertens; Sameer R. Melinkeri; Ilana Oren; Peter G. Pappas; Zdeněk Ráčil; Galia Rahav; Rodrigo Ribeiro dos Santos; Stefan Schwartz; J. Janne Vehreschild; Jo Anne H. Young; Ploenchan Chetchotisakd; Sutep Jaruratanasirikul; Souha S. Kanj; Marc Engelhardt; Achim Kaufhold; Masanori Ito; Misun Lee

BACKGROUND Mucormycosis is an uncommon invasive fungal disease with high mortality and few treatment options. Isavuconazole is a triazole active in vitro and in animal models against moulds of the order Mucorales. We assessed the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for treatment of mucormycosis and compared its efficacy with amphotericin B in a matched case-control analysis. METHODS In a single-arm open-label trial (VITAL study), adult patients (≥18 years) with invasive fungal disease caused by rare fungi, including mucormycosis, were recruited from 34 centres worldwide. Patients were given isavuconazole 200 mg (as its intravenous or oral water-soluble prodrug, isavuconazonium sulfate) three times daily for six doses, followed by 200 mg/day until invasive fungal disease resolution, failure, or for 180 days or more. The primary endpoint was independent data review committee-determined overall response-ie, complete or partial response (treatment success) or stable or progressive disease (treatment failure)-according to prespecified criteria. Mucormycosis cases treated with isavuconazole as primary treatment were matched with controls from the FungiScope Registry, recruited from 17 centres worldwide, who received primary amphotericin B-based treatment, and were analysed for day-42 all-cause mortality. VITAL is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00634049. FungiScope is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01731353. FINDINGS Within the VITAL study, from April 22, 2008, to June 21, 2013, 37 patients with mucormycosis received isavuconazole for a median of 84 days (IQR 19-179, range 2-882). By day 42, four patients (11%) had a partial response, 16 (43%) had stable invasive fungal disease, one (3%) had invasive fungal disease progression, three (8%) had missing assessments, and 13 (35%) had died. 35 patients (95%) had adverse events (28 [76%] serious). Day-42 crude all-cause mortality in seven (33%) of 21 primary-treatment isavuconazole cases was similar to 13 (39%) of 33 amphotericin B-treated matched controls (weighted all-cause mortality: 33% vs 41%; p=0·595). INTERPRETATION Isavuconazole showed activity against mucormycosis with efficacy similar to amphotericin B. Isavuconazole can be used for treatment of mucormycosis and is well tolerated. FUNDING Astellas Pharma Global Development, Basilea Pharmaceutica International.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2008

Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections among Cystic Fibrosis Patients, Israel

Isaac Levy; Galia Grisaru-Soen; Liat Lerner-Geva; Eitan Kerem; Hana Blau; Lea Bentur; Micha Aviram; Joseph Rivlin; Elie Picard; Anita Lavy; Yakov Yahav; Galia Rahav

A multicenter cross-sectional study showed prevalence appears to be increasing.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2005

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Gili Regev-Yochay; Ethan Rubinstein; Asher Barzilai; Yehuda Carmeli; Jacob Kuint; Jerome Etienne; Mira Blech; Gill Smollen; Ayala Maayan-Metzger; Azita Leavitt; Galia Rahav; Nathan Keller

A neonatal intensive care unit outbreak was caused by a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus previously found in the community (ST45-MRSA-IV). Fifteen infected neonates were identified, 2 of whom died. This outbreak illustrates how a rare community pathogen can rapidly spread through nosocomial transmission.

Collaboration


Dive into the Galia Rahav's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ohad Gal-Mor

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meir Raz

Maccabi Health Care Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Giladi

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ilana Oren

Rambam Health Care Campus

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge