Gareth J. Harrison

Surveillance after EVAR based on duplex ultrasound and abdominal radiography.

INTRODUCTION Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is considered the gold standard imaging technique for surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Limitations of CTA include cost, risk of contrast nephropathy and radiation exposure. A modified surveillance protocol involving annual duplex ultrasound (DUS) and abdominal radiography (AXR) was introduced, with CTA performed only if abnormalities were identified or DUS was undiagnostic. METHODS Prospective records were maintained on patients undergoing infra-renal EVAR at a UK, tertiary referral centre. All patients enrolled with at least one-year follow-up were reviewed. Primary outcomes identified were aneurysm rupture and aneurysm-related complications. Secondary outcomes included number of CTAs avoided and cost. RESULTS Median follow-up was 36 months (range 12-57) for 194 patients. The total number of sets of surveillance imaging was 412 of which 70 (17%) required CTA. Abnormalities were found in 30 patients, 18 confirmed by CTA. Eleven patients required secondary intervention, three initially identified by AXR, three by DUS, three by both DUS and AXR, and two by CTA following undiagnostic DUS. No patient presented with rupture or aneurysm-related complications not identified by modified surveillance. Mean annual savings were €223. CONCLUSION EVAR surveillance based on DUS and AXR is feasible and safe. The complimentary nature of AXR and DUS is demonstrated.

Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance

OBJECTIVE Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance includes duplex ultrasound, abdominal radiography, and computed tomography angiography. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as an additional modality whose role remains undefined. We evaluated whether a potential role for CEUS was the elucidation of unresolved issues following standard surveillance modalities. METHODS All patients undergoing EVAR at a tertiary referral center had surveillance based on plain abdominal radiograph and duplex ultrasound, with single arterial phase computed tomography angiography reserved for abnormalities or nondiagnostic imaging. In this prospective evaluation, from April 2010 to July 2011, discordance between imaging modalities or unresolved surveillance issues prompted CEUS. Cases and imaging were discussed in a multidisciplinary setting and outcomes recorded. RESULTS During the study period, 539 patients underwent EVAR surveillance, of whom 33 (6%) had CEUS for unresolved issues (median age, 79; range, 66-90; 28 male). Median follow-up after EVAR was 23 months (range, 0-132). In all cases, CEUS was able to resolve the clinical issue, resulting in secondary intervention in 10 patients (30%). The remaining patients were returned to surveillance. Within the cohort of 33 patients, the clinical issues were categorized into three groups. Group 1: Endoleak of uncertain classification (n = 27: 21 type II, four type I, two had endoleak excluded). Group 2: Significant aneurysm expansion (≥ 5 mm) without apparent endoleak (n = 4: one type II, three had endoleak excluded). Group 3: Target vessel patency following fenestrated EVAR (n = 2: patency confirmed in both). CONCLUSIONS CEUS can enhance EVAR surveillance through clarification of endoleak and target vessel patency when standard imaging modalities are not diagnostic.

Guidewire stiffness: what's in a name?

Purpose To measure the stiffness of commonly used “stiff” guidewires in terms of their flexural modulus, an engineering parameter related to bending stiffness. Methods Eleven different intact stiff guidewires were selected to undergo a 3-point bending test performed using a tensile testing machine. Testing was performed on 3 new and intact specimens of each guidewire at 10 locations along the wires length, excluding the floppy tip. The flexural modulus (in gigapascals, GPa) was calculated from the results of the bending test. Results The flexural modulus of the plain Amplatz wire was 9.5 GPa compared to 11.4 to 14.5 GPa for the “heavy duty” wires. Within the Amplatz family of guidewires, the flexural modulus was 17 GPa for the “stiff,” 29.2 GPa for the “extra stiff,” 60.3 GPa for the “super stiff,” and 65.4 GPa for the “ultra stiff.” The Backup Meier measured 139.6 GPa and the Lunderquist Extra Stiff 158.4 GPa. Conclusion The Instructions for Use of some endovascular devices specify a wire type selected from a range of undefined “stiffness” descriptors. These descriptors have little correlation with the measured flexural modulus. Two guidewires with the description “extra stiff” can have a 5-fold difference in flexural modulus. We recommend that guidewire catalogues and packaging include the flexural modulus and that device manufacturers amend their Instructions for Use accordingly.

Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics

BACKGROUND Meta-analysis supports patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy (CEA); however, studies indicate considerable variation in practice. The hemodynamic effect of a patch is unclear and this study attempted to elucidate this and guide patch width selection. METHODS Four groups were selected: healthy volunteers and patients undergoing CEA with primary closure, trimmed patch (5 mm), or 8-mm patch angioplasty. Computer-generated three-dimensional models of carotid bifurcations were produced from transverse ultrasound images recorded at 1-mm intervals. Rapid prototyping generated models for flow visualization studies. Computational fluid dynamic studies were performed for each model and validated by flow visualization. Mean wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) maps were created for each model using pulsatile inflow at 300 mL/min. WSS of <0.4 Pa and OSI >0.3 were considered pathological, predisposing to accretion of intimal hyperplasia. The resultant WSS and OSI maps were compared. RESULTS The four groups comprised 8 normal carotid arteries, 6 primary closures, 6 trimmed patches, and seven 8-mm patches. Flow visualization identified flow separation and recirculation at the bifurcation increased with a patch and was related to the patch width. Computational fluid dynamic identified that primary closure had the fewest areas of low WSS or elevated OSI but did have mild common carotid artery stenoses at the proximal arteriotomy that caused turbulence. Trimmed patches had more regions of abnormal WSS and OSI at the bifurcation, but 8-mm patches had the largest areas of deleteriously low WSS and high OSI. Qualitative comparison among the four groups confirmed that incorporation of a patch increased areas of low WSS and high OSI at the bifurcation and that this was related to patch width. CONCLUSIONS Closure technique after CEA influences the hemodynamic profile. Patching does not appear to generate favorable flow dynamics. However, a trimmed 5-mm patch may offer hemodynamic benefits over an 8-mm patch and may be the preferred option.

Fascial Closure Following Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

INTRODUCTION There are potential benefits of percutaneous over open femoral access for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Subsequent arterial closure using percutaneous devices is costly, whilst open repair risks potential wound complications and delayed discharge. The technique of fascial closure has perceived advantages but its efficacy is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and durability of fascial closure after EVAR. METHODS Patients undergoing EVAR using devices up to 24 French were considered. Exclusion criteria included morbid obesity, high bifurcation, previous surgery, inadvertent high puncture, arteries < 5 mm and surgeon preference. The primary outcome measure was immediate technical success. All patients were followed-up clinically and with duplex at one and twelve months to determine secondary complications. RESULTS Over a one-year period fascial closure of 69 common femoral arteries was attempted in 38 patients undergoing EVAR. Nine primary failures were due to haemorrhage in eight arteries and thrombosis in one artery; all had immediate, uncomplicated open revision. Of the 60 (87%) successful procedures, all had duplex surveillance at one month. Four pseudoaneurysms were identified, all treated conservatively. At one year, 61 fascial closures (88%) were imaged, four patients had died and two were lost to follow-up. Three of the pseudoaneurysms had resolved, the fourth patient had died (unrelated). No other complication attributable to fascial closure was found at either one or twelve months. CONCLUSION Fascial closure is a safe, durable and cost-effective method of arterial closure following EVAR. Success and complication rates are comparable to other techniques.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Sealing (EVARS): A Useful Adjunct in Treating Challenging Morphology

An 81-year-old male with previous open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair presented with asymptomatic large pseudoaneurysms at both ends of an open surgical tube graft. Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) in combination with the iliac limbs of a standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) successfully excluded both pseudoaneurysms from circulation. We describe the combination of elements of EVAS and EVAR and have termed this endovascular aneurysm repair and sealing (EVARS). EVARS has the advantage of harnessing the benefits of endobag sealing in aortic necks unsuitable for standard EVAR whilst providing the security of accurate stent placement within short common iliac arteries. In conclusion, EVAS may be combined with standard endovascular iliac limbs and is a possible treatment option for pseudoaneurysm following open aneurysm repair.

Aortic Dehiscence During Endovascular Sealing for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Purpose: To present a case of aneurysm disruption during endovascular sealing of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Case Report: A 91-year-old woman presented with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Her aneurysm morphology was unsuitable for standard or fenestrated endovascular repair, whereas open repair was considered to have an increased perioperative risk owing to multiple comorbidities. The Nellix endovascular sealing system was used. The balloon-expandable stent-grafts were deployed, but in the presence of aneurysm rupture, it was decided not to prefill the endobags with saline. The patient developed hypotension during endobag filling, which resolved once target pressure was reached. The procedure was completed uneventfully, and the completion angiogram revealed no endoleak. The time from guidewire insertion to completion angiogram was 24 minutes. Over the following days, she developed a gradual drop in hemoglobin, and computed tomographic angiography revealed an increased retroperitoneal hematoma and pronounced disruption of the calcified rim of the aortic sac compared to the preoperative imaging. She was managed with supportive treatment, demonstrating remarkable progress. She remains in good health 4 months later. Conclusion: Endovascular sealing can be used in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Intraoperative endobag saline prefill should be avoided to minimize the risk of aortic wall disruption.

Anchoring Barbs and Balloon Expandable Stents: What is the Risk of Perforation and Failed Stent Deployment?

PURPOSE Balloon expandable stents may on occasion be deployed in close proximity to the anchoring barbs of endovascular grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the risk and effect of balloon perforation by anchoring barbs and to assess whether these risks are different if the balloon is protected by a covered stent mounted upon it. METHODS A bench-top model was developed to mimic the penetration of anchoring barbs into the lumen of medium sized blood vessels. The model allowed variation of angle and depth of vessel penetration. Both bare balloons and those with covered stents mounted upon them were tested in the model to determine whether there was a risk of perforation and which factors increased or decreased this risk. RESULTS All combinations of barb angle and depth caused balloon perforation but this was most marked when the barb was placed perpendicular to the long axis of the balloon. When the deployment of covered stents was attempted balloon perforation occurred in some cases but full stent deployment was achieved in all cases where the perforation was in the portion of the balloon covered by the stent. The only situation in which stent deployment failed was where the barb was intentionally placed in the uncovered portion of the balloon. This resulted in only partial deployment of the stent. CONCLUSIONS Balloon rupture is a distinct possibility when deploying balloon-expandable stents in close proximity to anchoring barbs. Care should be taken in this circumstance to ensure that the barb is well away from the uncovered portion of the balloon.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Sealing (EVARS): A Useful Adjunct in Treating Challenging Morphology: Response to Comments

To the Editor, We would like to thank the commentators for their interest in our paper [1]. EVARS as described in our report uses the standard 2 stent EVAS system as the basis for repair of a complex aneurysm with additional support of standard EVAR iliac limbs. This is a practical combination based on the conventional use of existing technologies; EVARS described by us, currently, is only an option to treat difficult anatomy rather than a further endovascular revolution. Bi et al. propose the development of a system using a single endobag around a bifurcated stent termed EVARS [2, 3]. There are potential attractions to such a proposal in the avoidance of type 2 endoleaks and possibly in conformability to difficult-shaped aortic necks. However, there would be difficulties deploying such a bifurcated device, which would have to be in one piece for filling of the single endobag, in contrast to all commercially available EVARdevices. In addition, in our experience with EVAS, the second endobag has avoided difficulties when one endobag fails to fill properly due to constraints within calcified iliac vessels. We wish Bi et al. well in their development of this new device and would be keen to look at it on completion. Compliance with Ethical Standards