Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gareth J. Williams is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gareth J. Williams.


DNA Repair | 2010

Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 conformations and the control of sensing, signaling, and effector responses at DNA double-strand breaks

Gareth J. Williams; Susan P. Lees-Miller; John A. Tainer

Repair and integrity of DNA ends at breaks, replication forks and telomeres are essential for life; yet, paradoxically, these responses are, in many cases, controlled by a single protein complex, Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN). The MRN complex consists of dimers of each subunit and this heterohexamer controls key sensing, signaling, regulation, and effector responses to DNA double-strand breaks including ATM activation, homologous recombinational repair, microhomology-mediated end joining and, in some organisms, non-homologous end joining. We propose that this is possible because each MRN subunit can exist in three or more distinct states; thus, the trimer of MRN dimers can exist in a stunning 6(3) or 216 states, a number that can be expanded further when post-translational modifications are taken into account. MRN can therefore be considered as a molecular computer that effectively assesses optimal responses and pathway choice based upon its states as set by cell status and the nature of the DNA damage. This extreme multi-state concept demands a paradigm shift from striving to understand DNA damage responses in separate terms of signaling, checkpoint, and effector proteins: we must now endeavor to characterize conformational and assembly states of MRN and other DNA repair machines that couple, coordinate, and control biological outcomes. Addressing the emerging challenge of gaining a detailed molecular understanding of MRN and other multi-state dynamic DNA repair machines promises to provide opportunities to develop master keys for controlling cell biology with probable impacts on therapeutic interventions.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 2011

ABC ATPase signature helices in Rad50 link nucleotide state to Mre11 interface for DNA repair

Gareth J. Williams; R. Scott Williams; Jessica S. Williams; Gabriel Moncalian; Andrew S. Arvai; Oliver Limbo; Grant Guenther; Soumita SilDas; Michal Hammel; Paul Russell; John A. Tainer

The Rad50 ABC–ATPase complex with Mre11 nuclease is essential for dsDNA break repair, telomere maintenance and ataxia telangiectasia–mutated kinase checkpoint signaling. How Rad50 affects Mre11 functions and how ABC–ATPases communicate nucleotide binding and ligand states across long distances and among protein partners are questions that have remained obscure. Here, structures of Mre11–Rad50 complexes define the Mre11 2-helix Rad50 binding domain (RBD) that forms a four-helix interface with Rad50 coiled coils adjoining the ATPase core. Newly identified effector and basic-switch helix motifs extend the ABC–ATPase signature motif to link ATP-driven Rad50 movements to coiled coils binding Mre11, implying an ~30-Å pull on the linker to the nuclease domain. Both RBD and basic-switch mutations cause clastogen sensitivity. Our new results characterize flexible ATP-dependent Mre11 regulation, defects in cancer-linked RBD mutations, conserved superfamily basic switches and motifs effecting ATP-driven conformational change, and they provide a unified comprehension of ABC–ATPase activities.


DNA Repair | 2014

Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time.

Gareth J. Williams; Michal Hammel; Sarvan Kumar Radhakrishnan; Dale A. Ramsden; Susan P. Lees-Miller; John A. Tainer

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the major pathway for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in human cells. NHEJ is also needed for V(D)J recombination and the development of T and B cells in vertebrate immune systems, and acts in both the generation and prevention of non-homologous chromosomal translocations, a hallmark of genomic instability and many human cancers. X-ray crystal structures, cryo-electron microscopy envelopes, and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) solution conformations and assemblies are defining most of the core protein components for NHEJ: Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer; the DNA dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs); the structure-specific endonuclease Artemis along with polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase (PNKP), aprataxin and PNKP related protein (APLF); the scaffolding proteins XRCC4 and XLF (XRCC4-like factor); DNA polymerases, and DNA ligase IV (Lig IV). The dynamic assembly of multi-protein NHEJ complexes at DSBs is regulated in part by protein phosphorylation. The basic steps of NHEJ have been biochemically defined to require: (1) DSB detection by the Ku heterodimer with subsequent DNA-PKcs tethering to form the DNA-PKcs-Ku-DNA complex (termed DNA-PK), (2) lesion processing, and (3) DNA end ligation by Lig IV, which functions in complex with XRCC4 and XLF. The current integration of structures by combined methods is resolving puzzles regarding the mechanisms, coordination and regulation of these three basic steps. Overall, structural results suggest the NHEJ system forms a flexing scaffold with the DNA-PKcs HEAT repeats acting as compressible macromolecular springs suitable to store and release conformational energy to apply forces to regulate NHEJ complexes and the DNA substrate for DNA end protection, processing, and ligation.


Breast Cancer Research | 2014

Rare Key Functional Domain Missense Substitutions in MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN Contribute to Breast Cancer Susceptibility: Results From a Breast Cancer Family Registry Case-Control Mutation-Screening Study

Francesca Damiola; Maroulio Pertesi; Javier Oliver; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Catherine Voegele; Erin L. Young; Nivonirina Robinot; Nathalie Forey; Geoffroy Durand; Maxime P. Vallée; Kayoko Tao; Terrell C Roane; Gareth J. Williams; John L. Hopper; Melissa C. Southey; Irene L. Andrulis; Esther M. John; David E. Goldgar; Fabienne Lesueur; Sean V. Tavtigian

IntroductionThe MRE11A-RAD50-Nibrin (MRN) complex plays several critical roles related to repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Inherited mutations in the three components predispose to genetic instability disorders and the MRN genes have been implicated in breast cancer susceptibility, but the underlying data are not entirely convincing. Here, we address two related questions: (1) are some rare MRN variants intermediate-risk breast cancer susceptibility alleles, and if so (2) do the MRN genes follow a BRCA1/BRCA2 pattern wherein most susceptibility alleles are protein-truncating variants, or do they follow an ATM/CHEK2 pattern wherein half or more of the susceptibility alleles are missense substitutions?MethodsUsing high-resolution melt curve analysis followed by Sanger sequencing, we mutation screened the coding exons and proximal splice junction regions of the MRN genes in 1,313 early-onset breast cancer cases and 1,123 population controls. Rare variants in the three genes were pooled using bioinformatics methods similar to those previously applied to ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2, and then assessed by logistic regression.ResultsRe-analysis of our ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2 mutation screening data revealed that these genes do not harbor pathogenic alleles (other than modest-risk SNPs) with minor allele frequencies >0.1% in Caucasian Americans, African Americans, or East Asians. Limiting our MRN analyses to variants with allele frequencies of <0.1% and combining protein-truncating variants, likely spliceogenic variants, and key functional domain rare missense substitutions, we found significant evidence that the MRN genes are indeed intermediate-risk breast cancer susceptibility genes (odds ratio (OR) = 2.88, P = 0.0090). Key domain missense substitutions were more frequent than the truncating variants (24 versus 12 observations) and conferred a slightly higher OR (3.07 versus 2.61) with a lower P value (0.029 versus 0.14).ConclusionsThese data establish that MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN are intermediate-risk breast cancer susceptibility genes. Like ATM and CHEK2, their spectrum of pathogenic variants includes a relatively high proportion of missense substitutions. However, the data neither establish whether variants in each of the three genes are best evaluated under the same analysis model nor achieve clinically actionable classification of individual variants observed in this study.


Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology | 2015

Envisioning the dynamics and flexibility of Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex to decipher its roles in DNA replication and repair

Julien Lafrance-Vanasse; Gareth J. Williams; John A. Tainer

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex is a dynamic macromolecular machine that acts in the first steps of DNA double strand break repair, and each of its components has intrinsic dynamics and flexibility properties that are directly linked with their functions. As a result, deciphering the functional structural biology of the MRN complex is driving novel and integrated technologies to define the dynamic structural biology of protein machinery interacting with DNA. Rad50 promotes dramatic long-range allostery through its coiled-coil and zinc-hook domains. Its ATPase activity drives dynamic transitions between monomeric and dimeric forms that can be modulated with mutants modifying the ATPase rate to control end joining versus resection activities. The biological functions of Mre11s dual endo- and exonuclease activities in repair pathway choice were enigmatic until recently, when they were unveiled by the development of specific nuclease inhibitors. Mre11 dimer flexibility, which may be regulated in cells to control MRN function, suggests new inhibitor design strategies for cancer intervention. Nbs1 has FHA and BRCT domains to bind multiple interaction partners that further regulate MRN. One of them, CtIP, modulates the Mre11 excision activity for homologous recombination repair. Overall, these combined properties suggest novel therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, they collectively help to explain how MRN regulates DNA repair pathway choice with implications for improving the design and analysis of cancer clinical trials that employ DNA damaging agents or target the DNA damage response.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

DNA conformations in mismatch repair probed in solution by X-ray scattering from gold nanocrystals

Greg L. Hura; Chi Lin Tsai; Shelley A. Claridge; Marc L. Mendillo; Jessica M. Smith; Gareth J. Williams; Alexander Mastroianni; A. Paul Alivisatos; Christopher D. Putnam; Richard D. Kolodner; John A. Tainer

Significance We developed and applied nanogold labels for DNA complexes with proteins examined by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to follow DNA conformations acting in error detection by the mismatch repair (MMR) system in solution. This technique can examine short or long pieces of DNA and in most solution conditions, including those closest to cellular environments. Thus, we expect the technique to be useful for many biologically important systems involving DNA complexes and conformations. Specifically, we reveal DNA bending followed by straightening by the repair protein MutS at the site of a mismatch as a suitable mechanism for error detection and signaling needed to avoid mutations and cancers and to control microbial stability and evolution in response to environmental stress. DNA metabolism and processing frequently require transient or metastable DNA conformations that are biologically important but challenging to characterize. We use gold nanocrystal labels combined with small angle X-ray scattering to develop, test, and apply a method to follow DNA conformations acting in the Escherichia coli mismatch repair (MMR) system in solution. We developed a neutral PEG linker that allowed gold-labeled DNAs to be flash-cooled and stored without degradation in sample quality. The 1,000-fold increased gold nanocrystal scattering vs. DNA enabled investigations at much lower concentrations than otherwise possible to avoid concentration-dependent tetramerization of the MMR initiation enzyme MutS. We analyzed the correlation scattering functions for the nanocrystals to provide higher resolution interparticle distributions not convoluted by the intraparticle distribution. We determined that mispair-containing DNAs were bent more by MutS than complementary sequence DNA (csDNA), did not promote tetramer formation, and allowed MutS conversion to a sliding clamp conformation that eliminated the DNA bends. Addition of second protein responder MutL did not stabilize the MutS-bent forms of DNA. Thus, DNA distortion is only involved at the earliest mispair recognition steps of MMR: MutL does not trap bent DNA conformations, suggesting migrating MutL or MutS/MutL complexes as a conserved feature of MMR. The results promote a mechanism of mismatch DNA bending followed by straightening in initial MutS and MutL responses in MMR. We demonstrate that small angle X-ray scattering with gold labels is an enabling method to examine protein-induced DNA distortions key to the DNA repair, replication, transcription, and packaging.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2014

Mechanistic insights into the role of Hop2–Mnd1 in meiotic homologous DNA pairing

Weixing Zhao; Dorina Saro; Michal Hammel; Youngho Kwon; Yuanyuan Xu; Robert P. Rambo; Gareth J. Williams; Peter Chi; Lucy Lu; Roberto J. Pezza; R. Daniel Camerini-Otero; John A. Tainer; Hong-Wei Wang; Patrick Sung

The Hop2–Mnd1 complex functions with the DMC1 recombinase in meiotic recombination. Hop2–Mnd1 stabilizes the DMC1-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) filament and promotes the capture of the double-stranded DNA partner by the recombinase filament to assemble the synaptic complex. Herein, we define the action mechanism of Hop2–Mnd1 in DMC1-mediated recombination. Small angle X-ray scattering analysis and electron microscopy reveal that the heterodimeric Hop2–Mnd1 is a V-shaped molecule. We show that the protein complex harbors three distinct DNA binding sites, and determine their functional relevance. Specifically, the N-terminal double-stranded DNA binding functions of Hop2 and Mnd1 co-operate to mediate synaptic complex assembly, whereas ssDNA binding by the Hop2 C-terminus helps stabilize the DMC1-ssDNA filament. A model of the Hop2-Mnd1-DMC1-ssDNA ensemble is proposed to explain how it mediates homologous DNA pairing in meiotic recombination.


Biochemistry | 2014

Interfacial residues promote an optimal alignment of the catalytic center in human soluble guanylate cyclase: heterodimerization is required but not sufficient for activity.

Franziska Seeger; Royston Quintyn; Akiko Tanimoto; Gareth J. Williams; John A. Tainer; Vicki H. Wysocki; Elsa D. Garcin

Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) plays a central role in the cardiovascular system and is a drug target for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. While the three-dimensional structure of sGC is unknown, studies suggest that binding of the regulatory domain to the catalytic domain maintains sGC in an autoinhibited basal state. The activation signal, binding of NO to heme, is thought to be transmitted via the regulatory and dimerization domains to the cyclase domain and unleashes the full catalytic potential of sGC. Consequently, isolated catalytic domains should show catalytic turnover comparable to that of activated sGC. Using X-ray crystallography, activity measurements, and native mass spectrometry, we show unambiguously that human isolated catalytic domains are much less active than basal sGC, while still forming heterodimers. We identified key structural elements regulating the dimer interface and propose a novel role for residues located in an interfacial flap and a hydrogen bond network as key modulators of the orientation of the catalytic subunits. We demonstrate that even in the absence of the regulatory domain, additional sGC domains are required to guide the appropriate conformation of the catalytic subunits associated with high activity. Our data support a novel regulatory mechanism whereby sGC activity is tuned by distinct domain interactions that either promote or inhibit catalytic activity. These results further our understanding of heterodimerization and activation of sGC and open additional drug discovery routes for targeting the NO–sGC–cGMP pathway via the design of small molecules that promote a productive conformation of the catalytic subunits or disrupt inhibitory domain interactions.


DNA Repair | 2013

Functional attributes of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic recombinase Dmc1.

Valeria Busygina; William A. Gaines; Yuanyuan Xu; Youngho Kwon; Gareth J. Williams; Sheng-Wei Lin; Hao-Yen Chang; Peter Chi; Hong-Wei Wang; Patrick Sung

The role of Dmc1 as a meiosis-specific general recombinase was first demonstrated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Progress in understanding the biochemical mechanism of ScDmc1 has been hampered by its tendency to form inactive aggregates. We have found that the inclusion of ATP during protein purification prevents Dmc1 aggregation. ScDmc1 so prepared is capable of forming D-loops and responsive to its accessory factors Rad54 and Rdh54. Negative staining electron microscopy and iterative helical real-space reconstruction revealed that the ScDmc1-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament harbors 6.5 protomers per turn with a pitch of ∼106Å. The ScDmc1 purification procedure and companion molecular analyses should facilitate future studies on this recombinase.


Cell | 2008

A Charged Performance by gp17 in Viral Packaging

R. Scott Williams; Gareth J. Williams; John A. Tainer

Packaging of viral genomes into virus capsids requires powerful motors to overcome the repulsive force that builds as the nucleic acids are compressed. Through structural analyses of the T4 bacteriophage packaging motor gp17, Sun et al. (2008) now propose a packaging mechanism in which electrostatic forces cause the motor to alternate between tensed and relaxed conformational states.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gareth J. Williams's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Tainer

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michal Hammel

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Schild

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Scott Williams

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claudia Wiese

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grant Guenther

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miaw-Sheue Tsai

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oliver Limbo

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge